key issues
jurisdiction of arbitral tribunal
| all issuesAll documents for the issue: 250
Case law: 38 | Bibliography: 207 | Publications ADR. Arbitraż i Mediacja: 5Judgment of the Court of Justice of 25 January 2022, C-638/19 P
[A]rticles 267 and 344 TFEU must be interpreted as precluding a provision contained in an international agreement concluded between two Member States under which an investor from one of those Member States may, in the event of a dispute concerning investments in the other Member State, bring proceedings against the latter Member State before an arbitral tribunal whose jurisdiction that Member State has undertaken to accept… .
Data wydania: 25-01-2022 | Sygnatura: C-638/19 P
Key issues: investment arbitration, arbitration agreement, jurisdiction of arbitral tribunalid: 20623
Polish Supreme Court judgment dated 10 May 2021 Case No. I CSKP 64/21
1. [I]n case of an arbitral tribunal dismissed by a separate order, a plea raised by a party that the arbitral tribunal did not have jurisdiction in a dispute or a demand of the opposing party asserted during the course of the proceeding exceeds the scope of the arbitration agreement (Art. 1180 § 2 of the PCPC), a state court’s review of the legitimacy of this position can take place only in the manner provided for in the Art. 1180 § 3 of the PCPC… .
2. A valid state court’s order confirming jurisdiction of an arbitral tribunal, delivered in accordance with Art. 1180 § 3 of the PCPC, is binding in the proceedings regarding a petition to set aside an arbitration award… and excludes the possibility of re-examination of the issue of the arbitration agreement… .
3. If, pursuant to Art. 1180 § 3 of the PCPC, a state court has validly dismissed a motion for declaration that the arbitral tribunal does not have jurisdiction to settle the dispute, such a ruling binds the state court in the case of setting aside of the arbitration award in such a way that if there are no new facts which may justify the expiration of the effect of the arbitration agreement after the state court has delivered its ruling pursuant to Art. 1180 § 3 of the PCPC, a party cannot effectively rely on non-existence of the arbitration agreement (Art. 1206 § 1 point 1 of the PCPC).
4. Submitting an arbitration award on lack of jurisdiction of the arbitral tribunal to review by a two-instance state court also fully satisfies the parties’ right to court and the right to have the case heard in two-instance proceedings… .
Data wydania: 10-05-2021 | Sygnatura: I CSKP 64/21
Key issues: jurisdiction of arbitral tribunal, petition to set aside arbitration awardid: 20584
Warsaw Court of Appeal judgment dated 12 December 2019 Case No. VII AGa 1503/18
1. The essence of the petition to set aside an arbitration award is to create a review mechanism respecting, on the one hand, the separateness and autonomy of arbitration, and on the other hand, preventing non-state court rulings violating the rule of law from functioning in the legal circulation. Proceedings initiated by a petition to set aside an arbitration award do not result in reconsideration of the merits of the dispute between the parties, but are intended only at verification of the petitioner’s allegations as to the existence of the grounds raised in the petition, as provided for in Art. 1206 § 1 of the PCPC. The aim of the petition is to prevent an arbitration award that is non-compliant the elementary formal requirements of dispute resolution from remaining in the legal circulation… .
2. [The legal doctrine – insertion added] raises that the possibility of conducting arbitration proceedings [before the Internet Domains Arbitration Court at the Polish Chamber of Information Technology and Telecommunications – insertion added] is not excluded by the fact that after filing of the lawsuit, in order to avoid liability for infringements, the content of the website in the disputed domain has been changed in a way which does not allow to determine whether there is an infringement of a third party’s rights at the time.
3. Purposive, functional and comparative interpretation confirms that Art. 2 of the Arbitration Rules of the Internet Domains Arbitration Court at the Polish Chamber of Information Technology and Telecommunications should be interpreted in such a way that the jurisdiction of the Arbitration Court includes examining of legal effects connected with the fact of registration, as well as the effects of registration occurring after the conclusion of the domain maintenance contract, with the proviso that the way in which the domain is used, not the mere fact of registration, usually allows for the assessment whether there has been such an infringement… .
4. The public policy clause covers both the procedural and substantive fundamental principles of the legal order. Procedural public policy may be a ground for assessing an arbitration award in two aspects. First, the procedure which led to rendering of an arbitration award is assessed for its compliance with the fundamental principles of the legal order, second, the effects of the arbitration award are assessed from the perspective of their consistency with the procedural public policy, i.e. whether they are reconcilable with the system of procedural law.
5. [A]rbitration awards after their recognition or enforcement enjoy also the substantive legal finality within the meaning of Art. 365 and 366 of the PCPC… .
6. Submission of a dispute existing between the parties to arbitration does not justify the conclusion that the parties have resigned from the right to reliable and insightful procedure ensuring the possibility of satisfaction of the legal interest of the parties that deserves to be protected.
Data wydania: 12-12-2019 | Sygnatura: VII AGa 1503/18
Key issues: arbitration procedure, jurisdiction of arbitral tribunal, arbitration awardid: 20597
Polish Supreme Court order dated 4 April 2019 Case No. III CSK 81/17
1. [T]he concept of an ‘agreement in writing’, whereunder parties undertake to refer a dispute to arbitration, has been explained as meaning both an arbitration clause contained in a contract (i.e. relating to disputes which may arise in the future) as well as a compromise, i.e. an agreement to refer a dispute to arbitration concluded after a dispute has arisen.
2. [D]evelopment of means of distance communication results in acceptance of the viewpoint that the intent of Art. II (2) sentence 2 of the New York Convention is fulfilled also if a declaration of will is made by new technical methods, including an exchange of e-mails or faxes. In any of these situations, however, two requirements need to be fulfilled. Firstly, since we are dealing with a contract, it is necessary for each of the parties to clearly express its will to refer the dispute to arbitration, which is tantamount to acceptance of exclusion of a case from jurisdiction of a state court. Secondly, mutual acceptance of the idea to refer a dispute to arbitration is not sufficient. It is necessary for the parties to make a declaration of will in a way that fulfils the requirement of written form within the meaning of Art. II (2) sentence 2 of the New York Convention.
3. To conclude an ‘agreement in writing’ within the meaning of Art. II of the New York Convention it would be also necessary in the situation at hand to make another declaration, whose content would express the will of the contractor agreeing to having a case recognized by an arbitration court. Only then it could be possible to say that was ‘an exchange of letters or telegrams’ (also faxes, e-mails, etc.) within the meaning of Art. II (2) sentence 2 of the New York Convention, understood as documents referring or corresponding to each other and containing consistent declarations of will of the parties to refer a dispute to arbitration. This criterion is not fulfilled, if the parties correspond with each other about matters related to the contract, but from the content of this correspondence it does not follow that an ‘exchange’ took place within the meaning of Art. II (2) sentence 2 of the New York Convention, so an ‘exchange’ of declarations concerning establishment of jurisdiction of an arbitration court.
4. [C]onclusion of an ‘agreement in writing’ or making an arbitration agreement is always a subject to assessment by an arbitration tribunal or a state court which decides on its jurisdiction or lack of jurisdiction to hear the case.
5. Effective reliance on the grounds for application of Art. 1162 § 2 sentence 2 of the Polish Civil Procedure Code is (…) possible only if a contract is concluded with respect to which a dispute may arise, i.e. the so-called main contract (…).
6. [T]o effectively rely on existence of an arbitration clause, it is not sufficient for the contractor to challenge the conclusion of the main contract (for example, a sales contract) in which reference is made to the arbitration agreement contained in another document. The issue of existence of the arbitration agreement always requires a separate assessment and a decision on the validity and effectiveness of the arbitration clause.
7. Competence of an arbitration tribunal to settle a dispute results from the will of the parties. This will should be (in legal categories, i.e. terms of assignability of the declaration) unquestionable (…).
Data wydania: 04-04-2019 | Sygnatura: III CSK 81/17
Key issues: New York Convention, arbitrability of dispute, arbitration agreement, jurisdiction of arbitral tribunalid: 20533
Kraków Court of Appeal judgment dated 15 March 2018 Case No. I AGa 90/18
1. Relying on objective illegality of actions of the other party to an agreement and possible concurrent grounds of liability does not override the competence of an arbitral tribunal.
2. [A]n arbitration award may be assessed in the context of procedural public order. Subject to assessment is the compliance with the fundamental procedural principles of legal order of procedure that have led to the delivery of the arbitration award (…).
3. An allegation of infringement of Art. 1183 of the Polish Civil Procedure Code may be justified, if an arbitral tribunal conducts proceedings in omission of evidence offered by a party, but only if this evidence was necessary to resolve the case (…).
4. The control of elements comprising an arbitration award cannot be of the same scope as substantive control (of validity) of such an award.
5. When hearing a case, an arbitral tribunal may be guided by legal intuition, and it does not need to – unlike a state court – strictly apply the provisions of substantive law, but may base its ruling also on the principles of equity or good faith. According to the public policy clause expressed in Art. 1206 § 2 point 2 of the Polish Civil Procedure Code, an arbitration award shall be set aside when effects determined by the award are incompatible with a specific norm which is one of the fundamental principles of this public policy (…).
6. The arbitration award that protects one of the partners encumbered with the contractual risk of failure of the business venture does not infringe upon trading certainty and the principle of trading security, in the situation when the investor (the Fund) could limit its own economic risk resulting from engagement of funds by correct, consistent with the agreement, and, above all, loyal conduct.
7. Application of the public policy clause is not aimed at verification whether the assessed arbitration award id compliant with all applicable absolutely binding provisions of law, but whether effects of such an award are contrary to the fundamental principles of national legal order.
Data wydania: 15-03-2018 | Sygnatura: I AGa 90/18
Key issues: arbitration procedure, jurisdiction of arbitral tribunal, arbitration award, petition to set aside arbitration awardid: 20559
Judgment of the Court of Justice of 6 March 2018, C-284/16, Slovak Republic v. Achmea BV
Articles 267 and 344 TFEU must be interpreted as precluding a provision in an international agreement concluded between Member States, such as Article 8 of the Agreement on encouragement and reciprocal protection of investments between the Kingdom of the Netherlands and the Czech and Slovak Federative Republic, under which an investor from one of those Member States may, in the event of a dispute concerning investments in the other Member State, bring proceedings against the latter Member State before an arbitral tribunal whose jurisdiction that Member State has undertaken to accept.
Data wydania: 06-03-2018 | Sygnatura: C-284/16
Key issues: arbitrability of dispute, investment arbitration, arbitration agreement, jurisdiction of arbitral tribunalid: 20532
Kraków Court of Appeal order dated 24 January 2018 Case No. I AGz 48/18
1. According to Art. 1161 § 1 of the Polish Civil Procedure Code, submission of a dispute to arbitration requires an agreement between the parties defining the subject of the dispute or the legal relationship under which the dispute has arisen or may arise. An obligatory element of such an agreement is indication that resolution of the dispute has been referred to an arbitral tribunal. It should be stressed that an agreement which does not contain the aforementioned statement is not an arbitration agreement … .
2. In the case, both mandate contracts contained a provision stating “all disputes arising out of a mandate contract shall be resolved amicably”. Such a provision does not contain at all any submission of disputes arising between the parties to resolution by an arbitral tribunal, irrespective of whether it would be a permanent arbitral tribunal or an ad hoc arbitral tribunal, that is established in the event of a specific dispute.
3. [A]micable dispute resolution is not equivalent to the institution of arbitration to which the parties submit the resolution of a dispute from a particular legal relationship. Art. 1161 of the Polish Civil Procedure Code stipulates a requirement of indicating jurisdiction of an arbitral tribunal directly, in a separate contract or in a so-called arbitration clause, which is one of the provisions of the main contract.
Data wydania: 24-01-2018 | Sygnatura: I AGz 48/18
Key issues: arbitration agreement, jurisdiction of arbitral tribunalid: 20558
Polish Supreme Court order dated 1 December 2017 Case No. I CSK 170/17
1. If an assigned claim was covered by an arbitration clause, the clause also exerts effects with respect to the assignee, which means that the assignee is bound inter alia by the negative effect of the clause in the form of exclusion of the jurisdiction of the state courts over disputes concerning the claim.
2. Declaration of the bankruptcy of the assignor of a claim after the assignment is made does not affect the effectiveness of the arbitration clause covering the assigned claim in relations between the current holder—the legal successor of the bankrupt (the assignee)—and the defendant. In that situation, at the time of declaration of bankruptcy the bankrupt is no longer a party to the clause, the effects of which passed to the assignee as properties of the assigned claim. Art. 142 and 147 of the Bankruptcy Law [prior to the 2015 overhaul introducing the Reorganization Law] referred to disputes to which the bankrupt is a party.
3. Although Art. 142 and 147 of the Bankruptcy Law used the broad phrase “arbitration clause made by the debtor,” this provision cannot be understood to mean that it provides for the loss of force of an arbitration clause to which the bankrupt was originally a party, regardless of whether this entity is still a party to the legal relationship covered by the clause.
4. Under Art. 1161 §1 of the Civil Procedure Code, an arbitration clause must indicate the subject of the dispute or the legal relationship under which the dispute has arisen or may arise. This necessity is intended to eliminate clauses covering the totality of existing or future disputes between the parties. However, the assessment of whether the clause meets this requirement must consider not only the wording of the clause, but also, in interpreting it, the other relevant circumstances in which the parties’ declarations were made, in this context linguistic and situational circumstances, as well as the parties’ intent.
5. The legal relationship to which the arbitration clause applies need not be expressly stated in the clause, but may also be determined through interpretation of the clause. As an arbitration clause is an expression of the autonomy of will of rationally acting parties, its interpretation should also comply with the principle of favor validatis, seeking, within the limits of permissible interpretation, to uphold the effectiveness of the parties’ declarations.
6. The recent legal literature and case law stress the trend toward broad interpretation of an arbitration clause, based on avoiding a split of competencies between the arbitral tribunal and the state court within the same legal relationship. The demand of this interpretation of an arbitration clause (in favorem jurisdictionis arbitrii) is apt, particularly in international trade, in disputes between businesses.
7. Submission to an arbitral tribunal of disputes arising out of a contractual relationship means that the competence of the tribunal extends to all claims for performance of the contract, claims arising in the event of non-performance or improper performance of the contract, claims for disgorgement of unjust enrichment arising in the event of invalidity or repudiation of the contract, as well as tort claims if they arise out of an event that also constitutes non-performance or improper performance of the contract.
Data wydania: 01-12-2017 | Sygnatura: I CSK 170/17
Key issues: arbitration agreement, jurisdiction of arbitral tribunalid: 20520
Polish Supreme Court order dated 13 October 2017 Case No. I CSK 33/17
1. The provisions of the Civil Code may be applied to an arbitration agreement only on issues not covered by a separate procedural regulation, and taking into account the specific nature of an arbitration agreement as an institution of procedural law. In other words, reference to substantive law in the event of a gap in the procedural regulation must be preceded in each instance by a consideration of whether the provisions of substantive law are appropriate in this case, given the procedural nature of an arbitration agreement, and if so, in what shape they should be applied.
2. [Art. 1161 §2 of the Civil Procedure Code] excludes framing an arbitration clause so that it violates the principle of equality, in particular by entitling only one of the parties to elect between commencing a case before the state court or the arbitral tribunal. This therefore applies to the wording of the clause and does not bar a situation in which one of the parties to the arbitration agreement, as a consequence of making of the clause by a falsus procurator, obtains the power to ratify it, and in consequence to be bound by the clause. If ratification occurs, both parties will be bound by the clause, and the assessment of its content will be governed inter alia by Civil Procedure Code Art. 1161 §2. This situation does not differ from instances in which ratification under Civil Code Art. 103 would involve an agreement of substantive law.
3. Civil Procedure Code Art. 1167 establishes the rule that a power of attorney to make a legal act granted by a business, regardless of the nature of the act, also empowers the holder to enter into an arbitration agreement. The legislature thus accepted that empowerment to make a transaction also implies empowerment to select arbitration as the procedure for resolving disputes arising out of the transaction, unless otherwise provided in the power of attorney. This provision erases the distinction between authority to enter into a legal act and authority to enter into an arbitration clause with respect to disputes involving that act. The type of power of attorney necessary to make the legal act is determined by statute (Civil Code Art. 98), and if the power of attorney is effectively granted, empowerment to make an arbitration clause is a derivative of that power of attorney.
4. Civil Procedure Code Art. 1167 should be regarded as the legislature’s response to the interpretation adopted in the case law, regarded as rigorous, with respect to the requirements for empowerment to conclude an arbitration clause. Considering that the scope of application of this solution is limited to businesses, this argues for giving it broader meaning than being limited to a power of attorney of a specific nature.
5. Civil Procedure Code Art. 1167 detaches the effectiveness of authority to conclude an arbitration agreement from its autonomous classification as an act that is or is not within the ordinary course of business, making it dependent only on the existence of effective authorization to make a legal act.
Data wydania: 13-09-2017 | Sygnatura: I CSK 33/17
Key issues: jurisdiction of arbitral tribunal, settlement before arbitral tribunalid: 20519
Polish Supreme Court judgment of 14 June 2017 Case No. IV CSK 482/16
The Supreme Court is authorized to interpret the content of the arbitration clause, as the scope of its application is subject to examination by the court on its own initiative because it may result in dismissal of the claim (Art. 1165 §1 of the Civil Procedure Code). In making such interpretation, it must be assumed that the principal route for pursuing claims is through the courts. The interpretation of the arbitration clause thus may not extend so far that the competence of the arbitral tribunal is accepted contrary to the express intention of the parties as set forth in the agreement.
Data wydania: 14-06-2017 | Sygnatura: IV CSK 482/16
Key issues: jurisdiction of arbitral tribunal, settlement before arbitral tribunalid: 20518
Białystok Court of Appeal judgment dated 29 December 2016 Case No. I ACa 592/16
1. The scope of review of an arbitration award is limited only to the prerequisites indicated in Art. 1206 of the Polish Civil Procedure Code and the defectiveness of such an award in terms of facts or law is not generally examined in the proceedings initiated by a petition to set aside an arbitration award. Limitation of the cognition of the state court in such proceedings has its source in the voluntary resignation from the constitutional right to court by the parties to the arbitration agreement… . … the state court is not bound by the grounds for setting aside of an arbitration award invoked in the petition, so ex officio it shall examine only … the prerequisites enumerated in Art. 1206 § 2 of the PCPC … .
2. [A]rt. 365 § 1 of the PCPC is one of the fundamental systemic principles of the Polish law and the violation of this provision shall be assessed as a violation of the fundamental procedural principles of the legal order … .
3. Submission to an arbitral tribunal of disputes under a contractual relationship means in other words that the jurisdiction of the arbitral tribunal includes any and all claims for performance of the contract, claims arising in the event of non-performance or improper performance of the contract, claims to restore undue consideration arising in the event of invalidity of the contract or rescission of the contract, as well as tort claims if they arise out of an event that also constitutes non-performance or improper performance of the contract … .
4. A violation of the provisions of substantive law by an arbitral tribunal only exceptionally may be a basis for setting aside of an arbitration award, namely, when the infringed norm is of ius cogens character and a special role in the domestic legal system is attributed to it, usually in the context of certain constitutional principles. The assessment whether there are grounds for applying the public policy clause shall, however, be formulated ad casum and thus in a restrictive manner … .
5. [T]he arbitration court’s erroneous interpretation or incorrect application of the provisions regarding the limitation periods or preclusion shall not be regarded as violation of fundamental principles of the legal order … .
6. [T]he requirements in terms of the reasons for the arbitration award feature, with reference to the reasoning of the state court’s judgment, some minimalism and to find them fulfilled it is sufficient if it is possible to deduce from them what grounds the arbitral tribunal has based on.
Data wydania: 29-12-2016 | Sygnatura: I ACa 592/16
Key issues: arbitration agreement, jurisdiction of arbitral tribunal, arbitration award, petition to set aside arbitration awardid: 20561
Kraków Court of Appeal order dated 22 November 2016 Case No. I ACz 1997/16
1. Under Art. 1194 §2 of the Civil Procedure Code, in every instance, and thus also when ruling under general principles of law and equity, the arbitral tribunal shall take into consideration the provisions of the contract and the established customs applicable to the given legal relation. Such established customs include lex mercatoria (autonomous commercial law). Under either field, the basis for the resolution of the validity of the claim by the arbitral tribunal, depending on the procedural stance of the respondent, may be the relevant institution connected with the defence of setoff.
2. The legal construction of setoff may be relevant also for the dispute before the arbitral tribunal. In particular, once the dispute is pending before the tribunal, assertion by the opposing party of an effective defence (under substantive and procedural law) of setoff, depending on the substance of the overall procedural defence by the respondent in that proceeding, may exert the effect of acknowledgement of the debt by the party asserting that defence in the proceeding, and in further consequence lead to a kind of modification of the dispute in the proceeding (depending on the position of the party initiating the proceeding), which becomes an evaluation of the existence of the claim covered by that defence.
3. In a situation in which the existence of the claim determined exclusively by the defence of setoff constitutes the subject of the dispute in another proceeding, there are no grounds for finding that the plaintiff has a legal interest in obtaining a declaration that it was effectively set off. … Given such arrangement of the procedural relations between the parties, the arbitration agreement made by the parties applies to issues covered by the agreement within the meaning of Civil Procedure Code Art. 1161 (as it is connected with the issue of effective performance by the respondent of the obligation covered by the agreement), and it cannot be found that the agreement has ceased to be in force (Art. 1165 §2).
4. The construction of the institution of setoff in the specific conditions of the proceeding before the arbitral tribunal may speak in favour of considering it in that proceeding (if it was connected with acknowledgement of the claim covered by the arbitration agreement), unless the permissibility of asserting such defence (e.g. in a proceeding for an order for payment) is expressly excluded. Analogous reasons may constitute a basis for refusing enforcement of the arbitration award by the state court under Civil Procedure Code Art. 1214 §3(2).
5. After an arbitration award is enforced by issuance of an enforcement clause for the award pursuant to Civil Procedure Code Art. 1214 §2 (also considering the repealed portion of Art. 777 §1(2)) of the code), the award constitutes a writ of enforcement coming from a court, and consequently Art. 840 of the code may be applicable.
6. Leaving to the court the discretion to select the method of security does not mean that the choice can be arbitrary. The court is bound by the demand stated by the party applying for the security as to the method of security, the nature of which may relate only to the purpose of the proceeding, and in consequence may not affect the realm of procedural actions the other party is entitled to by law in terms of its freedom to exercise the legal means afforded to it in another proceeding. There is no justification in the civil procedure regulations in question for obstructing the course of proceedings before an arbitral tribunal.
Data wydania: 22-11-2016 | Sygnatura: I ACz 1997/16
Key issues: interim measures, jurisdiction of arbitral tribunalid: 20435
Judgment of the Court of Justice of 13 May 2015, C-536/13, Gazprom
Council Regulation (EC) No 44/2001 of 22 December 2000 on jurisdiction and the recognition and enforcement of judgments in civil and commercial matters must be interpreted as not precluding a court of a Member State from recognising and enforcing, or from refusing to recognise and enforce, an arbitral award prohibiting a party from bringing certain claims before a court of that Member State, since that regulation does not govern the recognition and enforcement, in a Member State, of an arbitral award issued by an arbitral tribunal in another Member State.
Data wydania: 13-05-2015 | Sygnatura: C-536/13
Key issues: New York Convention, jurisdiction of arbitral tribunal, recognition and enforcement of foreign arbitration awardid: 20392
Kraków Court of Appeal judgment dated 8 May 2015 Case No. I ACa 255/15
1. The obligation to exhaust the route of negotiations before seeking arbitration is not a provision that invalidates the arbitration clause.
2. Submission to arbitration of disputes under a contractual relationship means submission to arbitration of all claims, including tort claims.
Data wydania: 08-05-2015 | Sygnatura: I ACa 255/15
Key issues: arbitration agreement, jurisdiction of arbitral tribunalid: 20402
Polish Supreme Court judgment dated 19 March 2015 Case No. IV CSK 443/14
1. The FIDIC conditions are a set of procedures and conditions describing the course of construction projects. Among other things, they describe the rights and obligations of the participants in the construction process, including in clause 20 the procedure for disputes and arbitration. … Interpretation of the provisions included in the FIDIC conditions included in the contract in force between the parties is made in accordance with the principles of interpretation of declarations of will (contracts) set forth in Art. 56 and Art. 65 §§ 1 and 2 of the Civil Code.
2. Pursuant to FIDIC clause 20.4, “If a dispute (of any kind whatsoever) arises between the Parties in connection with, or arising out of, the Contract or the execution of the Works, … either Party may refer the dispute in writing to the DAB [dispute adjudication board]”. The use of the word “may” in this clause should be understood only to mean that pursuit of claims is a right and not an obligation of a party. But if the party does decide to pursue the claim, according to FIDIC clause 20 it must submit the claim to a dispute adjudication board.
3. Pursuant to FIDIC clause 20.8, “If a dispute arises between the Parties in connection with, or arising out of, the Contract or the execution of the Works and there is no DAB [dispute adjudication board] in place, whether by reason of the expiry of the DAB’s appointment or otherwise: Sub-Clause 20.4 [Obtaining Dispute Adjudication Board’s Decision] and Sub-Clause 20.5 [Amicable Settlement] shall not apply, and the dispute may be referred directly to arbitration under Sub-Clause 20.6 [Arbitration].” Under the circumstances of this case, the possibility of referring the dispute directly to arbitration arose “otherwise,” i.e. by the parties’ failure to agree on the composition of the dispute adjudication board and failure by either of them to apply to the appointing authority to appoint the DAB.
4. The fundamental principles of the legal order are fundamental constitutional principles and the leading principles governing specific fields of substantive and procedural law.
Data wydania: 19-03-2015 | Sygnatura: IV CSK 443/14
Key issues: jurisdiction of arbitral tribunal, arbitration award, petition to set aside arbitration awardid: 20395
Katowice Appellate Court order dated 8 May 2014 Case No. V ACz 343/14
1. Clause 20.8 of the [FIDIC Conditions of Contract for Plant and Design-Build] could apply in all instances where the parties did not decide for whatever reason to submit a dispute to the Dispute Adjudication Board. This conclusion is also justified by the placement of this provision. After detailed provisions concerning dispute resolution, at the end of the conditions of contract the parties decided to include a kind of savings clause maintaining the arbitration clause
in force regardless of whether the procedures provided for earlier were followed or not.
2. The argument that the arbitration clause gave the party initiating the proceeding the exclusive choice of which court the dispute should be resolved by should not be upheld.
3. The court of appeal did not share the view that the defence [of the arbitration clause] could be asserted at the latest at the stage of the dispute adjudication procedure conducted between the parties.
Data wydania: 08-05-2014 | Sygnatura: V ACz 343/14
Key issues: arbitration agreement, jurisdiction of arbitral tribunalid: 20148
Kraków Court of Appeal order dated 17 December 2013 Case No. I ACz 2321/13
1. Arbitrability of a dispute means that the character of the case makes it possible to be referred to arbitration by the parties, i.e. to be referred to the jurisdiction of an arbitral tribunal as a result of conclusion of an arbitration agreement.
2. Arbitration may… include a demand for awarding a claim, a demand for establishment of a legal relationship or a right, as well as a demand for shaping of a legal relationship indicated in the content of an arbitration agreement (for example, a demand to dissolve of a company).
3. In the current legal state, an allegation of lack of jurisdiction of an arbitral tribunal is a matter of preclusion, if it is not raised within a deadline referred to in Art. 1180 § 2 of the PCPC. In such a situation, a petition to set aside an arbitration award cannot be effectively based on the grounds indicated in Art. 1206 § 1 point 1 of the PCPC. All the more so if, on the basis of this allegation, it is impossible to refuse to rule on recognition or enforcement of an arbitration award or a settlement reached before the arbitration tribunal… .
4. An arbitration award may be said to be contrary to the fundamental principles of the legal order only with respect to constitutional principles of the socioeconomic system or the fundamental principles governing specific fields of substantive law… . [T]he phrase “fundamental principles of the legal order” used in Art. 1206 § 2 of the PCPC refers to such a violation of provisions of substantive law that results in violation of the principles of the rule of law, and the award infringes the overriding principles in force in the Republic of Poland and is in conflict with the legal order, i.e. it violates the principles of the political and socioeconomic system. The non-compliance of an arbitration award with a public policy clause does not consist in its non-compliance with the provisions of law, even the imperative ones, but in the inconsistency of the effects of recognition and enforcement of the arbitration award with the fundamental principles of the legal order.
5. [V]iolation of a [public policy – insertion added] clause is not… justified by an allegation that a performance, awarded in the arbitration award, results from a contract which was effectively terminated. Termination of a contract does not result in annulment of the legal effects which had arose earlier, at the time when the terminated contract was in force, and, furthermore, is not equivalent to the loss of the binding force by the arbitration agreement.
6. In the proceedings for enforcement of an arbitration award, a state court neither re-examines the case resolved by an arbitration award ex novo, nor examines the legitimacy of a substantive law claim raised by the claimant in the arbitration proceedings. The activity of the court is limited to examination whether there are prerequisites to refuse recognition of the arbitration award, which are a condition for the arbitration award to obtain, after its recognition or declaration of enforceability by the court, the same legal force as is enjoyed by state court judgements… .
7. Filing of a petition (Art. 1206 § 1 of the PCPC) is not a obstacle for issuing of a clause under Art. 1214 of the PCPC. If the parties have not established an appealing instance, an arbitration award is final. It becomes formally final – in a situation when there is no right to appeal against it – as soon as it is issued, and if the appeal is allowed – as soon as a tribunal of second instance renders its award.
8. [T]he fact that a state court grants an enforcement clause to an arbitration award does not affect by any means the possibility of filing a petition to set aside the arbitration award… .
Data wydania: 17-12-2013 | Sygnatura: I ACz 2321/13
Key issues: arbitrability of dispute, arbitration agreement, arbitration procedure, jurisdiction of arbitral tribunal, petition to set aside arbitration award, recognition and enforcement of domestic arbitration awardid: 20638
Gdańsk Court of Appeal judgment dated 28 November 2013 Case No. I ACa 550/13
1. The view cannot be shared that in connection with the dispute that had arisen the contractor should have brought about the appointment of a dispute adjudication board and presented the dispute to it, and the consequence of failure to take such actions is the loss of the possibility of effectively pursuing the claim. The section [of the FIDIC contract conditions] on Claims, Disputes and Arbitration does not provide for such sanctions.
2. In proceedings before the arbitration court the arbitrators are not bound by decisions of the [FIDIC] dispute adjudication board, whose decisions should be treated as evidence in the case. The decision by the dispute adjudication board cannot be treated analogously to an arbitration award, nor is the proceeding before the board a part of the proceeding before the arbitration court.
3. The contracting entity was properly informed of the need to perform additional works and did not dispute the need to perform them. It thus may not effectively allege that payment for such works violates fundamental principles of the legal order because public monies were involved in financing the works.
Data wydania: 28-11-2013 | Sygnatura: I ACa 550/13
Key issues: arbitration procedure, jurisdiction of arbitral tribunal, petition to set aside arbitration awardid: 20396
Polish Supreme Court order dated 7 November 2013 Case No. V CSK 545/12
1. Under the circumstances of the specific case, it is essential that the parties making an arbitration clause fulfilled the requirements set forth in Civil Procedure Code Art. 1161 § 1 to adequately identify the subject matter of the arbitration clause. Precise determination of this must adequately identify the legal relationship which is subject to submission to the arbitration court for consideration.
2. Submission to an arbitration court of disputes arising out of a contractual relationship demarcates its authority to determine the existence, effectiveness and validity of the contract, any claims for performance of the contract, claims arising in the event of non-performance or improper performance of the contract, claims for restoration of consideration provided without foundation which arise in the event of the ineffectiveness of the contract or renunciation of the contract, tort claims if they arise out of an event which constitutes non-performance or improper performance of the contract, and, depending on the parties’ agreement, disputes arising against the background of a settlement concluded with respect to a claim arising out of the contract which contained an arbitration clause.
3. An arbitration clause concerns the broadly understood jurisdiction of the court to consider a case, and its fundamental effect is exclusion of the jurisdiction of the state courts in favour of the authority of the arbitration court. It therefore falls within the broadly understood functional definition of a procedural act, highlighting its subject matter and effects and the assumption that procedural acts should not be limited to unilateral acts.
4. There are exceptions to the rule that an arbitration clause is binding on the parties that made it, including exceptions concerning expansion of the bounds of the arbitration clause to include persons who are legal successors of the parties, under general as well as specific grounds, within the legal relationship submitted to consideration by the arbitration court.
5. The scope of examination of a court considering the defence of an arbitration clause which if granted would result in dismissal of the statement of claim (Civil Procedure Code Art. 1165 § 1) includes not only determination of the fact of existence of the agreement submitting the dispute to consideration by the arbitration court, but also whether the plaintiff’s claim, as expressed in the relief sought and the factual allegations in support of the claim, falls within the subjective and objective scope of the agreement. The necessity to consider this defence at the stage before joining issue on the merits of the case cannot be regarded as meaning that it is impermissible to address any substantive legal issues at all. If therefore the allegation that the claim asserted in the statement of claim falls within the scope of an arbitration clause requires examination of the content of the contract and the mutual intent of the parties that concluded it, the court may not decline to make such findings and resolve these issues.
Data wydania: 07-11-2013 | Sygnatura: V CSK 545/12
Key issues: arbitration agreement, jurisdiction of arbitral tribunalid: 20226
Polish Supreme Court judgment dated 28 January 2011 Case No. I CSK 231/10
1. An arbitration court may rule on its own jurisdiction in a proceeding in which a claim has been filed (Civil Procedure Code Art. 1180 §1), including also in a separate order. In the regulations concerning procedure before the arbitration court, the Parliament did not provide a basis for issuance of an award dismissing a statement of claim commencing a proceeding before the arbitration court, including in a situation where the arbitration court finds that it has no jurisdiction to decide the dispute. It follows from these provisions that in instances indicated in Civil Procedure Code Art. 1190 §1, 1196 §1 and 1198, the arbitration court shall issue an order discontinuing the proceeding. It should thus be accepted that the arbitration court shall issue such an order also when, after beginning to receive evidence in the matter, it finds that the proceeding cannot continue because of the lack of an arbitration clause or the invalidity of such agreement. Conducting the proceeding and issuing an award then becomes impossible for a reason other than that stated in Civil Procedure Code Art. 1198 (1) and the beginning of (2).
2. The nature of a ruling issued by a court, including by an arbitration court, is decided by the substance of the ruling, and not the name or external form which the court gave to the ruling .... The ruling challenged by the claimant in the petition to set aside the arbitration award ... was not—contrary to the name used—an arbitration award, but in light of the nature of the determination made therein, an order.
3. An order discontinuing the proceedings before the arbitration court because of the lack of a valid arbitration clause, or an order dismissing the statement of claim for this reason, is a ruling ending the proceeding before the arbitration court, in which the court rules on its own lack of jurisdiction in the matter. While an order by the arbitration court in which the arbitration court denies a defence of the lack of the arbitration court’s jurisdiction may be challenged before the common court by either of the parties within two weeks (Civil Procedure Code Art. 1180 §3), the Parliament did not provide for the opportunity to challenge before the common court an order by the arbitration court in which the arbitration court rules that it lacks jurisdiction in the matter. Upon issuance of such ruling, a proceeding before the common courts is open to the parties interested in resolution of the dispute, and they may exercise their right of access to the courts in such proceeding.
4. A negative determination by the arbitration court as to its own jurisdiction in a matter is a final ruling and is not subject to review by the common court. A ruling by the arbitration court finding that it lacks jurisdiction in the matter may thus not be challenged by a petition to set aside an arbitration award as provided by Civil Procedure Code Art. 1205 ff.
Data wydania: 28-01-2011 | Sygnatura: I CSK 231/10
Key issues: arbitration agreement, arbitration procedure, jurisdiction of arbitral tribunal, petition to set aside arbitration awardid: 20362
Warsaw Appellate Court order dated 24 September 2009 Case No. I ACa 995/08
1. The New York Convention does not contain provisions indicating the form in which the parties should make a choice of law governing the arbitration clause. Art. V(1)[(a)] of the New York Convention does not require that the choice of law governing the arbitration clause be made in writing. The term “indication” should be interpreted to mean behaviour by a person in the form of writing, or any other behaviour that sufficiently reveals the person’s intent. Art. VI(2) of the European Convention on International Commercial Arbitration made at Geneva on 21 April 1961 uses the term “indication” without specifying the form, and thus “indication” should be interpreted as any behaviour by the parties indicating their joint intent.
2. It is not possible to conclude a settlement where, based on the nature of the disputed legal relations, the parties cannot freely dispose of the rights. Thus the appellate court holds that a dispute over the effectiveness of an agreement on sale of shares in a limited-liability company is not arbitrable.
3. The plaintiff determines who is a party when it initiates a dispute. The attribute of being a party is purely formal in nature and is not tied to the existence of a substantive legal claim, nor does it determine the jurisdiction of the arbitration court to decide the merits of the case. In a case where the arbitration court finds that it lacks jurisdiction over a “party,” it cannot be inferred that the ruling on the merits of the dispute is binding on that party. The party was not a party to the dispute on the merits because the arbitration court did not have jurisdiction over it.
4. Assessment of procedural acts of the parties in an arbitration proceeding lies within the power of the arbitration court, and a court ruling on recognition of an award may not make assessments contrary to that of the arbitration court, or assessments under the Polish Civil Procedure Code, which was not applicable in the proceeding before the arbitration court.
5. The state court is bound by the ruling of the arbitration court concerning its lack of jurisdiction to resolve specific disputes, regardless of whether the arbitration court’s interpretation of the scope of the arbitration clause was correct or not. It is clear that the arbitration court is authorized to rule on its own jurisdiction.
6. In order to decide on its jurisdiction, the arbitration court must consider the grounds for or against its jurisdiction. This cannot mean, however, that in cases in which the same issues are decisive of both the jurisdiction of the arbitration and the resolution on the merits the authority to resolve the issue of jurisdiction is also authority to decide the merits of the dispute. Otherwise the party would de facto be deprived of the ability to effectively assert the defence of lack of jurisdiction on the part of the arbitration court.
7. None of the provisions of law providing the arbitration court the authority to decide on its jurisdiction and analyze all factual and legal issues necessary to perform this task provides it a priori authority to decide the merits of the case. If the jurisdictional determination is negative, the arbitration court must refrain from deciding the merits of case. Review of the merits in such instance serves only as a basis for the jurisdictional ruling.
8. It is impermissible that res judicata effect of a ruling by the arbitration court would exert effects in Poland with respect to persons not covered by the legal finality of such ruling in the country of origin.
Data wydania: 24-09-2009 | Sygnatura: I ACa 995/08
Key issues: arbitrability of dispute, arbitration agreement, jurisdiction of arbitral tribunal, recognition and enforcement of foreign arbitration awardid: 20294
Szczecin Court of Appeal order dated 7 August 2009 Case No. I ACz 397/09
1. Submission to an arbitral tribunal of disputes arising out of a contractual relationship means that the jurisdiction of the tribunal extends to any and all claims for performance of the contract, claims arising in the event of non-performance or improper performance of the contract, claims for unjust enrichment in the event of the invalidity or repudiation of the contract, as well as tort claims arising out of an event that also constitutes breach of contract.
2. The court cannot uphold the existence of an arbitration agreement on its own initiative, but only as a defence asserted before joining issue on the merits of the case. Joining issue on the merits of the case occurs when the defendant disputes the justice of the plaintiff’s demands by asserting that it does not acknowledge the claim or applies for denial of the claim.
3. Pursuant to Civil Procedure Code Art. 1165 §2, the defence of an arbitration clause will be denied if the state court finds that the clause is invalid, ineffective, unenforceable or no longer in force, or if the arbitral tribunal has already ruled that it lacks jurisdiction. The clause is invalid if it violates mandatorily applicable provisions of the law governing the clause; ineffective, if it ceases to exert the intended effects in consequence of events arising after it is made but these are not events that cause the clause to cease to be in force. An arbitration clause may be said to be unenforceable when it is not possible to commence a proceeding before the arbitral tribunal. The statement of claim also cannot be dismissed as a result of assertion of the defence of an arbitration clause if the arbitral tribunal has previously ruled that it lacks jurisdiction.
4. It is irrelevant for whether the parties are bound by an arbitration clause that the wording of the parties’ contractual arbitration clause is identical to the wording of the arbitration clause drafted by a permanent arbitration court. The validity of an arbitration clause examined by the state court depends on fulfilment of the conditions set forth in the Civil Procedure Code.
Data wydania: 07-08-2009 | Sygnatura: I ACz 397/09
Key issues: arbitration agreement, jurisdiction of arbitral tribunalid: 20444
Polish Supreme Court order dated 5 February 2009 Case No. I CSK 311/08
Submission to an arbitration court of disputes under a contractual relationship means that the jurisdiction of the arbitration court extends to any and all claims for performance of the contract, claims arising in the event of non-performance or improper performance of the contract, claims to restore undue consideration arising in the event of invalidity of the contract or rescission of the contract, as well as tort claims if they arise out of an event that also constitutes non-performance or improper performance of the contract.
Data wydania: 05-02-2009 | Sygnatura: I CSK 311/08
Key issues: arbitration agreement, jurisdiction of arbitral tribunalid: 20260
Supreme Court order dated 17 May 2006 Case No. I CSK 16/06
1. Mere assertion of the defence of the existence of an arbitration clause is not grounds in any event for dismissal of a statement of claim. In order to have that effect, the defence must be justified, which is subject to the assessment of the court.
2. The task of the court is to clarify whether the resolution of the case rests with the arbitration court, which also includes assessment of the validity of the arbitration clause.
Data wydania: 17-05-2006 | Sygnatura: I CSK 16/06
Key issues: arbitration agreement, jurisdiction of arbitral tribunalid: 20224
Supreme Court resolution dated 24 February 2005 Case No. III CZP 86/04
1. The defence of an arbitration clause concerning the legal relationship between the issuer of a promissory note and the payee is also effective with respect to the issuer of the promissory note when, alongside the issuer of the note, the guarantor of the promissory note, who was not a party to the agreement submitting the dispute for resolution by the arbitration court, is also a defendant.
2. A promissory note obligation may be subject to an arbitration clause.
3. The effect of shifting the dispute onto the general ground of civil law, meaning that the resolution of the dispute requires assessment of the justification of the claim in light of the “underlying relationship” in connection with which the promissory note was issued, does not occur by the mere fact of filing defences to the order for payment. This effect depends on whether the interested party takes the relevant actions, and the court has no duty to act in this respect on its own initiative. The actions taken by the party may consist of the defendant’s assertion of defences to an order for payment with respect to the lack of grounds for the claim pursued based on the underlying relationship, or the plaintiff’s assertion, in the statement of claim or in the proceeding conducted as a result of assertion of defences to the order for payment, of allegations justifying the claim asserted also on the basis of the underlying relationship.
4. In the event of lack of actions by the parties causing the dispute to be shifted to the general ground of civil law, the dispute in the proceeding conducted pursuant to the defences against the order for payment is subject to consideration under the promissory note relationship.
5. A promissory note guarantor may defend against the holder of the note with all defences available to the person for whom he issued the guarantee, but this applies only to substantive defences (Art. 32 of the Promissory Note Law dated 28 April 1936, Journal of Laws Dz.U. 1936 No. 37 item 282), but the defence of an arbitration clause is a procedural defence. Without being a party to the agreement ... containing the arbitration clause, the defendant cannot assert the arbitration clause.
6. Civil Procedure Code Art. 72 §3 cannot be interpreted as a provision that changes the consequences of the lack of procedural grounds, and specifically as eliminating the effectiveness of an arbitration clause. If the clause is effective with respect to one substantive co-party, of any type, but is not effective with respect to the other co-party, the case with respect to the first co-party cannot be considered at all by the state court, and the statement of claim in this respect is subject to dismissal; however, with respect to the other co-party, the case is subject by consideration by the state court.
Data wydania: 24-02-2005 | Sygnatura: III CZP 86/04
Key issues: arbitrability of dispute, arbitration agreement, jurisdiction of arbitral tribunalid: 20213
Polish Supreme Court order dated 8 August 2003 Case No. V CK 486/02
1. The condition for the effectiveness of an arbitration clause under [Civil Procedure Code Art. 1105 §2] of the “foreign status” of at least one of the parties refers to the stage of conclusion of the forum selection agreement, and thus has to do with the parties to that agreement and not the parties to the dispute covered by the arbitration clause. The purpose of the forum selection clause is to submit future property disputes to an arbitration court (Civil Procedure Code Art. 697 in connection with Art. 1105 §2), and thus the effectiveness of the clause referring to an arbitration court operating abroad is determined by the forum selection agreement establishing such clause, so long as the limiting conditions listed in Civil Procedure Code Art. 1105 §2 are met at the time of conclusion of the agreement.
2. The necessity to examine the legal force and effectiveness of an arbitration clause, but according to the state of facts as of the date of conclusion of the forum selection agreement, may lead to a situation in which a foreign arbitration court will be proper to decide the dispute even though as of the date of commencement of the dispute the parties to the dispute no longer meet any of the characteristics of “foreignness” listed in Civil Procedure Code Art. 1105 §2, i.e. having a registered office abroad or operating an enterprise abroad which is connected with the dispute....
Data wydania: 08-08-2003 | Sygnatura: V CK 486/02
Key issues: arbitration agreement, jurisdiction of arbitral tribunalid: 20197
Polish Supreme Court order dated 15 December 2000 Case No. I CKN 1131/00
1. The ability for the dispute to be heard by the state court is excluded so long as the parties are bound by an arbitration clause. The Civil Procedure Code expressly mentions only two situations in which an arbitration clause loses force (Art. 702 §1 and 707 §2). There is no doubt, however, that this may occur also in other instances, specifically if a written agreement is concluded dissolving the clause.
2. If the parties were bound by a cooperation agreement which contains an arbitration clause, the original arbitration clause remains valid following lapse of a settlement agreement submitting enforcement of a specific claim to the state courts.
Data wydania: 15-12-2000 | Sygnatura: I CKN 1131/00
Key issues: arbitration agreement, jurisdiction of arbitral tribunalid: 20182
Polish Supreme Court order dated 16 March 2000 Case No. I CKN 1507/99
1. Exclusion of the jurisdiction of the court and submission of a specific dispute to the jurisdiction of the arbitration court is determined by the agreement of the parties—concluded within the framework laid down by law. With respect to the form of such contract, under the requirements of Civil Procedure Code Art. 698 §1 and Art. 1105 §2, it must be a written agreement. While both of those regulations refer to conclusion of an agreement by the parties, ... when the agreement provides for the possibility of accession to the agreement by new entities, if they make such accession such entities are bound by the contents of the entire agreement, including the arbitration clause. ... When acceding to such agreement, the new entities need not conclude a separate agreement with respect to the arbitration clause, as the declaration of the intention of accession, made in writing, also means acceptance of the arbitration clause included in the agreement. The requirement with respect to the content and the form of such agreement is thus fulfilled.
2. A foreign arbitration court may be competent to resolve a dispute between entities that do not meet any of the characteristics of “foreignness” mentioned in Civil Procedure Code Art. 1105 §2, i.e. a registered office abroad, Or operating an enterprise there which is connected with the dispute that has been instituted. … Fulfilment of such requirements, i.e. the foreign element, by any of the parties is determined as of the time of conclusion of the jurisdictional agreement, and not as of the time of commencement of the dispute between the parties who are bound by the arbitration clause.
Data wydania: 16-03-2000 | Sygnatura: I CKN 1507/99
Key issues: arbitration agreement, jurisdiction of arbitral tribunalid: 20172
Polish Supreme Court judgment dated 16 February 1999 Case No. I CKN 1020/98
1. An agreement vesting jurisdiction in a foreign court or an arbitration court operating abroad (Civil Procedure Code Art. 1105 §§ 1 and 2) must be preceded by the existence of domestic jurisdiction. Exclusive jurisdiction of a Polish court may, however, constitute a barrier to effective conclusion of an agreement on jurisdiction. But such barrier functions only with respect to vesting jurisdiction in a foreign state court (Civil Procedure Code Art. 1105 §1, second sentence) and does not apply with respect to vesting jurisdiction in a foreign arbitration court, which is subject only to the limitations provided in Civil Procedure Code Art. 697 §1.
2. The requirement of “foreign status” of one of the parties as a condition for the permissibility of an arbitration clause as provided for in Civil Procedure Code Art. 1105 §2, refers to the phase of conclusion of the agreement on jurisdiction, and thus applies to the parties to such agreement and not the parties to the dispute covered by the arbitration clause.
3. Civil Procedure Code Art. 1105 §2 also applies to multilateral agreements. ... In the case of a multilateral agreement, it may happen that a foreign arbitration court has jurisdiction to hear a dispute between parties that are domestic entities.
Data wydania: 16-02-1999 | Sygnatura: I CKN 1020/98
Key issues: New York Convention, arbitration agreement, jurisdiction of arbitral tribunalid: 20160
Polish Supreme Court order dated 14 July 1998 Case No. III CKN 548/98
1. Submission of a dispute for resolution by an arbitration court does not definitively exclude the jurisdiction of the state court. The proceeding before the arbitration court constitutes only a fragment of the entire system of protection of the interests of the claimant.
2. The position that a proceeding before the state court, initiated by filing of a motion for interim relief to secure a claim which will be pursued before the arbitration court, becomes an independent case within the meaning of Civil Procedure Code Art. 392 §1 is indefensible. Such proceeding remains a proceeding in which only a certain incidental issue is resolved. The ruling that is issued does not end the proceeding “in the case” even though it ends the proceeding initiated by the motion for interim relief. Only the arbitration award will be a ruling ending the case as a certain entirety submitted for judgment. An interim order issued by the state court concerning security for the claim is a ruling that resolves only an incidental issue.
Data wydania: 14-07-1998 | Sygnatura: III CKN 548/98
Key issues: state court assistance, jurisdiction of arbitral tribunalid: 20153
Poznań Appellate Court judgment dated 23 May 1996 Case No. I ACr 189/96
1. Recusal of an entire court may not be demanded, but only recusal of specific judges (one or more of them), identified by name, but this does not mean that in this case the arbitration court itself could determine that the motion by the defendant should not be granted. The province court correctly stated that the arbitration court may not decide a motion to recuse an arbitrator, either on the merits or on procedural grounds, even if the motion was clearly unjustified or late.
2. The ruling issued as a result of a petition to set aside an arbitration award is in the nature of cassation, and thus the state court may only set aside the award or deny the petition, and may not rule on the merits. In consequence, when the state court sets aside an arbitration award by granting a petition under Civil Procedure Code Art. 712 §1(2)–(5), the arbitration court retains its jurisdiction to decide the dispute.
Data wydania: 23-05-1996 | Sygnatura: I ACr 189/96
Key issues: arbitrator, jurisdiction of arbitral tribunal, petition to set aside arbitration awardid: 20272
Białystok Appellate Court order dated 29 February 1996 Case No. I ACz 69/96
The parties and the arbitration court itself are given great discretion to determine the procedure before the arbitration court, although the Civil Procedure Code does establish certain minimum rules that are mandatorily applicable (juris cogentis).
Data wydania: 29-02-1996 | Sygnatura: I ACz 69/96
Key issues: arbitration agreement, jurisdiction of arbitral tribunalid: 20271
Polish Supreme Court order dated 7 March 1979 Case No. III CRN 10/79
1. Which cases that are subject to consideration by the state courts may be submitted to arbitration is determined by the regulations governing arbitration proceedings.
2. Issuance of an enforcement clause must be preceded by a legally final ruling by the state court, pursuant to Civil Procedure Code Art. 711, confirming the enforceability of the arbitration award.
3. The only cases falling under the non-adversarial procedure that may be heard by an arbitration court are those rather rare cases whose nature allows for this, that is, those that meet the grounds [for arbitrability] provided in Civil Procedure Code Art. 697 §1.
4. Under current law, adversarial and non-adversarial proceedings are parallel tracks for judicial proceedings, and the non-adversarial procedure in property matters in which the court commences the proceeding upon application is not so different from the rules applicable in an adversarial proceeding that mere submission of a given matter to resolution through the non-adversarial procedure results in exclusion of the possibility of submitting such matter to an arbitration court for resolution.
Data wydania: 07-03-1979 | Sygnatura: III CRN 10/79
Key issues: arbitrability of dispute, arbitration agreement, jurisdiction of arbitral tribunal, recognition and enforcement of domestic arbitration awardid: 20122
Polish Supreme Court order dated 22 April 1966 Case No. I CR 433/64
The wording of §14 of the Transport Protocol on Polish-Czechoslovakian Cooperation for 1961, “When entering into any agreements, ... the interested enterprises ... shall stipulate the jurisdiction of the International Court of Arbitration in Gdynia for resolution of any possible disputes,” does not justify the conclusion that this provision submits all such future disputes identified therein to resolution by the arbitration court.
Section 14, as its wording indicates, only imposes on the enterprises of both of the contracting states the duty to include arbitration clauses in the agreements they conclude, and thus the position taken in the order appealed from is correct, that because the charter party binding on the parties does not contain such clause, this dispute is subject to the jurisdiction of the common court.
Data wydania: 22-04-1966 | Sygnatura: I CR 433/64
Key issues: arbitration agreement, jurisdiction of arbitral tribunalid: 20105
Polish Supreme Court ruling dated 19 September 1934 Case No. C I 1998/33
Art. 1387 of the [former Russian] Civil Procedure Code authorizes arbitration courts to rule in disputes between the parties not on the basis of general regulations of judicial procedure and not on the basis of provisions of substantive law, but according to its own conscience—but not by any means to resolve fictitious disputes arising out of collusion between the parties in order to circumvent regulations of law.
Data wydania: 19-09-1934 | Sygnatura: C I 1998/33
Key issues: jurisdiction of arbitral tribunalid: 20045
Polish Supreme Court ruling dated 12 June 1928 Case No. C 78/28
An objection of lack of arbitrability does not have to do with non-justiciability, but refers to the jurisdiction of the court.
Data wydania: 12-06-1928 | Sygnatura: C 78/28
Key issues: jurisdiction of arbitral tribunalid: 20011
Polish Supreme Court ruling dated 18 January 1928 Case No. III Rw 253/27
The fact that the procedure under provisions concerning arbitration courts does not contain an express provision on the costs of the dispute does not justify a finding that the arbitration court is not authorized to rule on the costs of the dispute. In any event, such provisions do not contain a prohibition in this respect, and [former Austrian] Civil Procedure Code § 577, which provides that a private law claim may be submitted to an arbitration court for resolution, also includes the authority to rule on the costs of the dispute as an auxiliary element combined with the resolution itself.
Data wydania: 18-01-1928 | Sygnatura: III Rw 253/27
Key issues: arbitration procedure, jurisdiction of arbitral tribunalid: 20010
Polish Supreme Court ruling dated 5 April 1927 Case No. R 148/27
Establishment in a silent partnership agreement of the jurisdiction of the arbitration court for disputes arising out of this contractual relationship is irrelevant for disputes over the existence of such relationship.
Data wydania: 05-04-1927 | Sygnatura: R 148/27
Key issues: jurisdiction of arbitral tribunalid: 20006
Allerhand Maurycy
Commentary on the Resolution of the Third Chamber of the Supreme Court dated 8 November 1922, R 832/22 (re: issuance of an Arbitration Award by a Mentally Ill Arbitrator) [Original title: Glosa do uchwały izby trzeciej sądu najwyższego z 8 listopada 1922, R 832/22 (dot. wydania wyroku sądu polubownego przez sędziego chorego umysłowo)]
OSP 1924 (vol. 3), item 13, p. 9-10
Key issues: arbitrator, jurisdiction of arbitral tribunalid: 30587
Arkuszewska Aneta M., Świrgoń-Skok Renata
Amicable Proceedings on the Basis of Compromissum as a Roman Roots of the Contemporary Arbitration Agreement [Original title: Postępowanie polubowne na podstawie compromissum jako rzymskie korzenie współczesnego zapisu na sąd polubowny]
Olszewski Jan, Błaszczak Łukasz, Morek Rafał (eds). Arbitraż i mediacja - perspektywy prywatnoprawna i publicznoprawna. Między teorią a praktyką. Księga pamiątkowa ku czci profesora Jana Łukasiewicza, Rzeszów 2018, p. 534-551
Key issues: arbitration agreement, arbitration agreement, jurisdiction of arbitral tribunal, jurisdiction of arbitral tribunalid: 31985
Arkuszewska Aneta M., Świrgoń-Skok Renata
Amicable Proceedings on the Basis of Compromissum as a Roman Roots of the Contemporary Arbitration Agreement [Original title: Postępowanie polubowne na podstawie compromissum jako rzymskie korzenie współczesnego zapisu na sąd polubowny]
Olszewski Jan, Błaszczak Łukasz, Morek Rafał (eds). Arbitraż i mediacja - perspektywy prywatnoprawna i publicznoprawna. Między teorią a praktyką. Księga pamiątkowa ku czci profesora Jana Łukasiewicza, Rzeszów 2018, p. 534-551
Key issues: arbitration agreement, arbitration agreement, jurisdiction of arbitral tribunal, jurisdiction of arbitral tribunalid: 31985
Asłanowicz Marcin
Arbitration Court. Commentary to Articles 1154-1217 of the Civil Procedure Code [Original title: Sąd polubowny (arbitrażowy). Komentarz do art. 1154-1217 KPC]
Warsaw 2017, pp. 255
Key issues: arbitrability of dispute, arbitration agreement, arbitration award, arbitration procedure, arbitrator, costs of arbitration, general works, interim measures, jurisdiction of arbitral tribunal, New York Convention, petition to set aside arbitration award, recognition and enforcement of domestic arbitration award, recognition and enforcement of foreign arbitration award, settlement before arbitral tribunal, state court assistance, arbitrability of dispute, arbitration agreement, arbitration award, arbitration procedure, arbitrator, costs of arbitration, general works, interim measures, jurisdiction of arbitral tribunal, New York Convention, petition to set aside arbitration award, recognition and enforcement of domestic arbitration award, recognition and enforcement of foreign arbitration award, settlement before arbitral tribunal, state court assistanceid: 31909
Asłanowicz Marcin
Arbitration Court. Commentary to Articles 1154-1217 of the Civil Procedure Code [Original title: Sąd polubowny (arbitrażowy). Komentarz do art. 1154-1217 KPC]
Warsaw 2017, pp. 255
Key issues: arbitrability of dispute, arbitration agreement, arbitration award, arbitration procedure, arbitrator, costs of arbitration, general works, interim measures, jurisdiction of arbitral tribunal, New York Convention, petition to set aside arbitration award, recognition and enforcement of domestic arbitration award, recognition and enforcement of foreign arbitration award, settlement before arbitral tribunal, state court assistance, arbitrability of dispute, arbitration agreement, arbitration award, arbitration procedure, arbitrator, costs of arbitration, general works, interim measures, jurisdiction of arbitral tribunal, New York Convention, petition to set aside arbitration award, recognition and enforcement of domestic arbitration award, recognition and enforcement of foreign arbitration award, settlement before arbitral tribunal, state court assistanceid: 31909
Asłanowicz Marcin, Piotrowska Sylwia
Legal Character and Scope of the Changes in ICC Rules of Arbitration [Original title: Charakter i zakres zmian Regulaminu Arbitrażowego ICC]
[in:] M. Łaszczuk (chair), M. Furtek, S. Pieckowski, J. Poczobut, A. Szumański, M. Tomaszewski (eds.), Arbitration and Mediation. A Commemorative Volume Dedicated to Dr Andrzej Tynel [Arbitraż i mediacja. Księga jubileuszowa dedykowana doktorowi Andrzejowi Tynelowi], Warszawa 2012, p. 36-53
Key issues: arbitrator, arbitration procedure, jurisdiction of arbitral tribunalid: 31077
Barańska Anna
Effectiveness of the Arbitration Agreement and the Assignment under Polish and Italian Law [Original title: Skuteczność zapisu na sąd polubowny a umowa przelewu wierzytelności w prawie polskim i włoskim]
ADR. Arbitraż i Mediacja 2018, No. 3, p. 5-12
Key issues: arbitration agreement, arbitration agreement, jurisdiction of arbitral tribunal, jurisdiction of arbitral tribunalid: 31966
Barańska Anna
Effectiveness of the Arbitration Agreement and the Assignment under Polish and Italian Law [Original title: Skuteczność zapisu na sąd polubowny a umowa przelewu wierzytelności w prawie polskim i włoskim]
ADR. Arbitraż i Mediacja 2018, No. 3, p. 5-12
Key issues: arbitration agreement, arbitration agreement, jurisdiction of arbitral tribunal, jurisdiction of arbitral tribunalid: 31966
Barańska Anna Maria
Investment arbitration in the light of the CJEU judgment of 6 March 2018 in case C-284/16 Slowakische Republik v. Achmea BV [Original title: Arbitraż inwestycyjny w świetle wyroku TSUE z 6.3.2018 r. w sprawie C-284/16 Slowakische Republik v. Achmea BV]
ADR. Arbitraż i Mediacja 2019, No. 3, p. 5-14
Key issues: arbitrability of dispute, arbitrability of dispute, investment arbitration, investment arbitration, arbitration agreement, arbitration agreement, jurisdiction of arbitral tribunal, jurisdiction of arbitral tribunalid: 32001
Barańska Anna Maria
Investment arbitration in the light of the CJEU judgment of 6 March 2018 in case C-284/16 Slowakische Republik v. Achmea BV [Original title: Arbitraż inwestycyjny w świetle wyroku TSUE z 6.3.2018 r. w sprawie C-284/16 Slowakische Republik v. Achmea BV]
ADR. Arbitraż i Mediacja 2019, No. 3, p. 5-14
Key issues: arbitrability of dispute, arbitrability of dispute, investment arbitration, investment arbitration, arbitration agreement, arbitration agreement, jurisdiction of arbitral tribunal, jurisdiction of arbitral tribunalid: 32001
Barańska Anna Maria
Investment arbitration in the light of the CJEU judgment of 6 March 2018 in case C-284/16 Slowakische Republik v. Achmea BV [Original title: Investitionsschiedsgerichtsbarkeit im Lichte des EuGH-Urteils vom 6. März 2018 in der Rechtssache C-284/16 Slowakische Republik gegen Achmea BV]
ADR. Arbitraż i Mediacja 2019, No. 3, p. 15-24
Key issues: arbitrability of dispute, arbitrability of dispute, investment arbitration, investment arbitration, arbitration agreement, arbitration agreement, jurisdiction of arbitral tribunal, jurisdiction of arbitral tribunalid: 32002
Barańska Anna Maria
Investment arbitration in the light of the CJEU judgment of 6 March 2018 in case C-284/16 Slowakische Republik v. Achmea BV [Original title: Investitionsschiedsgerichtsbarkeit im Lichte des EuGH-Urteils vom 6. März 2018 in der Rechtssache C-284/16 Slowakische Republik gegen Achmea BV]
ADR. Arbitraż i Mediacja 2019, No. 3, p. 15-24
Key issues: arbitrability of dispute, arbitrability of dispute, investment arbitration, investment arbitration, arbitration agreement, arbitration agreement, jurisdiction of arbitral tribunal, jurisdiction of arbitral tribunalid: 32002
Bělohlávek Alexander J.
Arbitration Agreement, MDR Clauses and Relation thereof to Nature of Jurisdictional Decisions on the Break of Legal Cultures
[in:] Józef Okolski (chair), Andrzej Całus, Maksymilian Pazdan, Stanisław Sołtysiński, Tomasz Wardyński, Stanisław Włodyka (ed.) Essays in Honour of 60 years of the Court of Arbitration at the Polish Chamber of Commerce in Warsaw [Księga pamiątkowa 60-lecia Sądu Arbitrażowego przy Krajowej Izbie Gospodarczej w Warszawie], Warszawa 2010, p. 411-437
Key issues: arbitration agreement, jurisdiction of arbitral tribunalid: 30928
Błaszczak Łukasz, Gessel-Kalinowska vel Kalisz Beata, Sikorski Rafał, Zachariasiewicz Maciej, Zawiślak Karol, Żmij Grzegorz
White Book. Proposed legislative changes aimed at improving the legal framework of arbitration in Poland [Original title: Biała Księga. Propozycje zmian legislacyjnych mających na celu ulepszenie ram prawnych sądownictwa polubownego w Polsce]
Warsaw - Katowice - Kraków - Wrocław - Poznań 2014, pp. 80
Key issues: arbitrability of dispute, arbitration agreement, arbitration award, arbitration procedure, arbitrator, costs of arbitration, general works, interim measures, jurisdiction of arbitral tribunal, New York Convention, petition to set aside arbitration award, settlement before arbitral tribunal, arbitrability of dispute, arbitration agreement, arbitration award, arbitration procedure, arbitrator, costs of arbitration, general works, interim measures, jurisdiction of arbitral tribunal, New York Convention, petition to set aside arbitration award, settlement before arbitral tribunalid: 32149
Błaszczak Łukasz, Gessel-Kalinowska vel Kalisz Beata, Sikorski Rafał, Zachariasiewicz Maciej, Zawiślak Karol, Żmij Grzegorz
White Book. Proposed legislative changes aimed at improving the legal framework of arbitration in Poland [Original title: Biała Księga. Propozycje zmian legislacyjnych mających na celu ulepszenie ram prawnych sądownictwa polubownego w Polsce]
Warsaw - Katowice - Kraków - Wrocław - Poznań 2014, pp. 80
Key issues: arbitrability of dispute, arbitration agreement, arbitration award, arbitration procedure, arbitrator, costs of arbitration, general works, interim measures, jurisdiction of arbitral tribunal, New York Convention, petition to set aside arbitration award, settlement before arbitral tribunal, arbitrability of dispute, arbitration agreement, arbitration award, arbitration procedure, arbitrator, costs of arbitration, general works, interim measures, jurisdiction of arbitral tribunal, New York Convention, petition to set aside arbitration award, settlement before arbitral tribunalid: 32149
Nowaczyk Piotr, Bogucka Elżbieta
Anti-suit Injunctions in Poland - Possibilities and Perspectives [Original title: Anti-suit injunctions w Polsce - możliwości i perspektywy]
[in:] M. Łaszczuk (chair), M. Furtek, S. Pieckowski, J. Poczobut, A. Szumański, M. Tomaszewski (eds.), Arbitration and Mediation. A Commemorative Volume Dedicated to Dr Andrzej Tynel [Arbitraż i mediacja. Księga jubileuszowa dedykowana doktorowi Andrzejowi Tynelowi], Warszawa 2012, p. 346-357
Key issues: state court assistance, jurisdiction of arbitral tribunalid: 31095
Buchman Louis B., Loquin Eric
Arbitration Award in the West Tankers vs. France Case [Original title: L'arrêt West Tankers vu de France]
[in:] Józef Okolski (chair), Andrzej Całus, Maksymilian Pazdan, Stanisław Sołtysiński, Tomasz Wardyński, Stanisław Włodyka (ed.) Essays in Honour of 60 years of the Court of Arbitration at the Polish Chamber of Commerce in Warsaw [Księga pamiątkowa 60-lecia Sądu Arbitrażowego przy Krajowej Izbie Gospodarczej w Warszawie], Warszawa 2010, p. 503-512
Key issues: arbitration agreement, jurisdiction of arbitral tribunalid: 30933
Budniak-Rogala Aleksandra
Comments on Admissibility of Withdrawal of a Plea of Existence of an Arbitration Agreement [Original title: Uwagi na tle dopuszczalności cofnięcia zarzutu zapisu na sąd polubowny]
ADR. Arbitraż i Mediacja 2016, No. 4, p. 5-24
Key issues: arbitration agreement, arbitration agreement, jurisdiction of arbitral tribunal, jurisdiction of arbitral tribunalid: 31816
Budniak-Rogala Aleksandra
Comments on Admissibility of Withdrawal of a Plea of Existence of an Arbitration Agreement [Original title: Uwagi na tle dopuszczalności cofnięcia zarzutu zapisu na sąd polubowny]
ADR. Arbitraż i Mediacja 2016, No. 4, p. 5-24
Key issues: arbitration agreement, arbitration agreement, jurisdiction of arbitral tribunal, jurisdiction of arbitral tribunalid: 31816
Morek Rafał, Budniak-Rogala Aleksandra
a commentary to Art. 1154-1163, 1165-1213, 1214-1217
[in:] Marszałkowska-Krześ Elwira (ed.), The Polish Civil Procedure Code - a commentary 2021 [Original title: Kodeks postępowania cywilnego - komentarz 2021], 30th edition Legalis
Key issues: New York Convention, general works, state court assistance, arbitrability of dispute, arbitrator, arbitration agreement, arbitration procedure, interim measures, jurisdiction of arbitral tribunal, settlement before arbitral tribunal, arbitration award, petition to set aside arbitration award, recognition and enforcement of domestic arbitration award, recognition and enforcement of foreign arbitration awardid: 32481
Morek Rafał, Budniak-Rogala Aleksandra
a commentary to Art. 1154-1163, 1165-1213, 1214-1217
[in:] Marszałkowska-Krześ Elwira (ed.), The Polish Civil Procedure Code - a commentary 2020 [Original title: Kodeks postępowania cywilnego - komentarz 2020], 27th edition, Legalis
Key issues: New York Convention, general works, state court assistance, arbitrability of dispute, arbitrator, arbitration agreement, arbitration procedure, interim measures, jurisdiction of arbitral tribunal, settlement before arbitral tribunal, arbitration award, petition to set aside arbitration award, recognition and enforcement of domestic arbitration award, recognition and enforcement of foreign arbitration awardid: 32487
Morek Rafał, Budniak-Rogala Aleksandra
a commentary to Art. 1154-1163, 1165-1213, 1214-1217
[in:] Marszałkowska-Krześ Elwira (ed.), The Polish Civil Procedure Code - a commentary 2019 [Original title: Kodeks postępowania cywilnego - komentarz 2019], 24th edition, Legalis
Key issues: New York Convention, general works, state court assistance, arbitrability of dispute, arbitrator, arbitration agreement, arbitration procedure, interim measures, jurisdiction of arbitral tribunal, settlement before arbitral tribunal, arbitration award, petition to set aside arbitration award, recognition and enforcement of domestic arbitration award, recognition and enforcement of foreign arbitration awardid: 32493
Morek Rafał, Budniak-Rogala Aleksandra
a commentary to Art. 1154-1163, 1165-1213, 1214-1217
[in:] Marszałkowska-Krześ Elwira (ed.), The Polish Civil Procedure Code - a commentary 2019 [Original title: Kodeks postępowania cywilnego - komentarz 2019], 25th edition, Legalis
Key issues: New York Convention, general works, state court assistance, arbitrability of dispute, arbitrator, arbitration agreement, arbitration procedure, interim measures, jurisdiction of arbitral tribunal, settlement before arbitral tribunal, arbitration award, petition to set aside arbitration award, recognition and enforcement of domestic arbitration award, recognition and enforcement of foreign arbitration awardid: 32491
Morek Rafał, Budniak-Rogala Aleksandra
a commentary to Art. 1154-1163, 1165-1213, 1214-1217
[in:] Gil Izabella (ed.), Marszałkowska-Krześ Elwira (ed.), The Polish Civil Procedure Code. A commentary 2023 [Original title: Kodeks postępowania cywilnego. Komentarz 2023], 31st edition, Legalis
Key issues: New York Convention, general works, state court assistance, arbitrability of dispute, arbitrator, arbitration agreement, arbitration procedure, interim measures, jurisdiction of arbitral tribunal, settlement before arbitral tribunal, arbitration award, petition to set aside arbitration award, recognition and enforcement of domestic arbitration award, recognition and enforcement of foreign arbitration awardid: 32450
Morek Rafał, Budniak-Rogala Aleksandra
a commentary to Art. 1154-1163, 1165-1213, 1214-1217
[in:] Marszałkowska-Krześ Elwira (ed.), The Polish Civil Procedure Code - a commentary 2018 [Original title: Kodeks postępowania cywilnego - komentarz 2018], 23rd edition, Legalis
Key issues: New York Convention, general works, state court assistance, arbitrability of dispute, arbitrator, arbitration agreement, arbitration procedure, interim measures, jurisdiction of arbitral tribunal, settlement before arbitral tribunal, arbitration award, petition to set aside arbitration award, recognition and enforcement of domestic arbitration award, recognition and enforcement of foreign arbitration awardid: 32495
Morek Rafał, Budniak-Rogala Aleksandra
a commentary to Art. 1154-1163, 1165-1213, 1214-1217
[in:] Marszałkowska-Krześ Elwira (ed.), The Polish Civil Procedure Code - a commentary 2020 [Original title: Kodeks postępowania cywilnego - komentarz 2020], 26th edition, Legalis
Key issues: New York Convention, general works, state court assistance, arbitrability of dispute, arbitrator, arbitration agreement, arbitration procedure, interim measures, jurisdiction of arbitral tribunal, settlement before arbitral tribunal, arbitration award, petition to set aside arbitration award, recognition and enforcement of domestic arbitration award, recognition and enforcement of foreign arbitration awardid: 32489
Morek Rafał, Budniak-Rogala Aleksandra
a commentary to Art. 1154-1163, 1165-1213, 1214-1217
[in:] Marszałkowska-Krześ Elwira (ed.), The Polish Civil Procedure Code - a commentary 2021 [Original title: Kodeks postępowania cywilnego - komentarz 2021], 29th, Legalis
Key issues: New York Convention, general works, state court assistance, arbitrability of dispute, arbitrator, arbitration agreement, arbitration procedure, interim measures, jurisdiction of arbitral tribunal, settlement before arbitral tribunal, arbitration award, petition to set aside arbitration award, recognition and enforcement of domestic arbitration award, recognition and enforcement of foreign arbitration awardid: 32483
Morek Rafał, Budniak-Rogala Aleksandra
a commentary to Art. 1154-1163, 1165-1213, 1214-1217
[in:] Marszałkowska-Krześ Elwira (ed.), The Polish Civil Procedure Code - a commentary 2020 [Original title: Kodeks postępowania cywilnego - komentarz 2020], 28th edition, Legalis
Key issues: New York Convention, general works, state court assistance, arbitrability of dispute, arbitrator, arbitration agreement, arbitration procedure, interim measures, jurisdiction of arbitral tribunal, settlement before arbitral tribunal, arbitration award, petition to set aside arbitration award, recognition and enforcement of domestic arbitration award, recognition and enforcement of foreign arbitration awardid: 32485
Morek Rafał, Budniak-Rogala Aleksandra
a commentary to Art. 1154-1163, 1165-1213, 1214-1217
[in:] Marszałkowska-Krześ Elwira (ed.), The Polish Civil Procedure Code - a commentary 2018 [Original title: Kodeks postępowania cywilnego - komentarz 2018], 22nd edition, Legalis
Key issues: New York Convention, general works, state court assistance, arbitrability of dispute, arbitrator, arbitration agreement, arbitration procedure, interim measures, jurisdiction of arbitral tribunal, settlement before arbitral tribunal, arbitration award, petition to set aside arbitration award, recognition and enforcement of domestic arbitration award, recognition and enforcement of foreign arbitration awardid: 32497
Całus Andrzej, Pazdan Maksymilian, Sołtysiński Stanisław, Wardyński Tomasz, Włodyka Stanisław, Okolski Józef
A Commemorative Volume for 60 years of the Court of Arbitration at the Polish Chamber of Commerce in Warsaw [Original title: Księga pamiątkowa 60-lecia Sądu Arbitrażowego przy Krajowej Izbie Gospodarczej w Warszawie]
Warszawa 2010, pp. 887
Key issues: New York Convention, general works, state court assistance, arbitrability of dispute, investment arbitration, arbitrator, arbitration agreement, arbitration procedure, jurisdiction of arbitral tribunal, settlement before arbitral tribunal, arbitration award, petition to set aside arbitration award, recognition and enforcement of domestic arbitration award, recognition and enforcement of foreign arbitration awardid: 30952
Chyla Łukasz
Analysis of the Evolution of the Objective Arbitrability of the Intra-Corporate Disputes over the Shareholders’ Resolutions in Germany [Original title: Analiza ewolucji zdatności arbitrażowej tzw. sporów uchwałowych w świetle prawa niemieckiego]
Studia Iuridica Toruniensia 2017, Vol. XX (No. 1), p. 79-97
Key issues: arbitrability of dispute, arbitrability of dispute, arbitration agreement, arbitration agreement, arbitration procedure, arbitration procedure, jurisdiction of arbitral tribunal, jurisdiction of arbitral tribunalid: 31927
Chyla Łukasz
Analysis of the Evolution of the Objective Arbitrability of the Intra-Corporate Disputes over the Shareholders’ Resolutions in Germany [Original title: Analiza ewolucji zdatności arbitrażowej tzw. sporów uchwałowych w świetle prawa niemieckiego]
Studia Iuridica Toruniensia 2017, Vol. XX (No. 1), p. 79-97
Key issues: arbitrability of dispute, arbitrability of dispute, arbitration agreement, arbitration agreement, arbitration procedure, arbitration procedure, jurisdiction of arbitral tribunal, jurisdiction of arbitral tribunalid: 31927
Chyla Łukasz
Current Situation of Corporate Arbitration in Polish Law [Original title: Obecna sytuacja arbitrażu korporacyjnego w prawie polskim]
PPPM 2016, No. 19, p. 89-110
Key issues: general works, general works, arbitrability of dispute, arbitrability of dispute, arbitration agreement, arbitration agreement, arbitration procedure, arbitration procedure, jurisdiction of arbitral tribunal, jurisdiction of arbitral tribunalid: 31926
Chyla Łukasz
Current Situation of Corporate Arbitration in Polish Law [Original title: Obecna sytuacja arbitrażu korporacyjnego w prawie polskim]
PPPM 2016, No. 19, p. 89-110
Key issues: general works, general works, arbitrability of dispute, arbitrability of dispute, arbitration agreement, arbitration agreement, arbitration procedure, arbitration procedure, jurisdiction of arbitral tribunal, jurisdiction of arbitral tribunalid: 31926
Ciemiński Marcin
Possibility and Effects of Referring Disputes Arising in Connection with Bills of Exchange/Promissory Notes to Resolution By a Court of Arbitration [Original title: Możliwość oraz skutki poddania rozstrzygnięciu sądu polubownego sporów wynikających z weksla]
PPH 2005, No. 10, p. 37-42
Key issues: arbitrability of dispute, jurisdiction of arbitral tribunalid: 30464
Ciemiński Marcin, Prokop Adelina
Anti-suit Injunctions in Poland
Arbitration e-Review 2011, No. 4, p. 21-28
Key issues: state court assistance, arbitration procedure, jurisdiction of arbitral tribunalid: 31064
Comi Urszula
Arbitration – Comparative Look on the Polish and French Statutory Law Regulations [Original title: Arbitraż - prawnoporównawcze spojrzenie na regulacje ustawodawstwa polskiego i francuskiego]
[in:] A. Garnuszek, L. Mazur, A. Orzeł (eds.), Quo Vadis, Arbitrażu? Quo Vadis, Arbitration?, Warszawa 2013, p. 45-73
Key issues: arbitrability of dispute, arbitrator, arbitration agreement, arbitration procedure, jurisdiction of arbitral tribunal, arbitration award, petition to set aside arbitration award, recognition and enforcement of domestic arbitration awardid: 31205
Comi Urszula
Arbitration Agreement and Affiliated Companies – Basic Problems [Original title: Umowa o arbitraż a spółki powiązane – podstawowe problemy]
KPP 2017, No. 3, p. 631-648
Key issues: arbitration agreement, arbitration agreement, jurisdiction of arbitral tribunal, jurisdiction of arbitral tribunalid: 31904
Comi Urszula
Arbitration Agreement and Affiliated Companies – Basic Problems [Original title: Umowa o arbitraż a spółki powiązane – podstawowe problemy]
KPP 2017, No. 3, p. 631-648
Key issues: arbitration agreement, arbitration agreement, jurisdiction of arbitral tribunal, jurisdiction of arbitral tribunalid: 31904
Comi Urszula
The Bases for Holding Companies Being Bound by an Arbitration Agreement in International Commercial Arbitration [Original title: Podstawy związania umową o arbitraż spółek holdingowych w międzynarodowym arbitrażu handlowym]
KPP 2018, No. 1, p. 229-265
Key issues: arbitration agreement, arbitration agreement, jurisdiction of arbitral tribunal, jurisdiction of arbitral tribunalid: 31942
Comi Urszula
The Bases for Holding Companies Being Bound by an Arbitration Agreement in International Commercial Arbitration [Original title: Podstawy związania umową o arbitraż spółek holdingowych w międzynarodowym arbitrażu handlowym]
KPP 2018, No. 1, p. 229-265
Key issues: arbitration agreement, arbitration agreement, jurisdiction of arbitral tribunal, jurisdiction of arbitral tribunalid: 31942
Daniec Roman
Effects of the setting aside of an arbitration award by a national court [Original title: Skutki uchylenia przez sąd państwowy wyroku sądu polubownego]
Pal. 1969, No. 5, p. 45-47
Key issues: jurisdiction of arbitral tribunal, jurisdiction of arbitral tribunalid: 32092
Daniec Roman
Effects of the setting aside of an arbitration award by a national court [Original title: Skutki uchylenia przez sąd państwowy wyroku sądu polubownego]
Pal. 1969, No. 5, p. 45-47
Key issues: jurisdiction of arbitral tribunal, jurisdiction of arbitral tribunalid: 32092
Rozdeiczer Łukasz, Dubek Mateusz
The Yukos Case: Russia Bound by Energy Charter Treaty [Original title: Sprawa Jukosu: Rosja jest związana Traktatem Karty Energetycznej]
e-Przegląd Arbitrażowy 2010, No. 1, p. 51-52
Key issues: general works, jurisdiction of arbitral tribunalid: 30810
Durbas Maciej
Effect of failure to question the jurisdiction of the arbitral tribunal during the arbitration proceedings [Original title: Skutki niepodniesienia zarzutu braku właściwości sądu polubownego w czasie trwania postępowania arbitrażowego]
Palestra 2022, No. 11, p. 43-60
Key issues: jurisdiction of arbitral tribunalid: 32410
Durbas Maciej, Kos Rafał
Ready, set, off: Warsaw Court of Appeals confirms tribunal’s jurisdiction over set-off claims
Lexology 2020
Key issues: jurisdiction of arbitral tribunalid: 32190
Dziurda Marcin
Bankruptcy and Dispute Arbitrability. A Commentary [Original title: Upadłość a poddanie sporu pod rozstrzygnięcie. Komentarz]
Arbitration e-Review 2014, No. 3-4, p. 85-92
Key issues: arbitration agreement, jurisdiction of arbitral tribunalid: 31358
Ereciński Tadeusz
a commentary to Art. 1154, 1158-1159, 1169-1217
[in:] Ereciński Tadeusz (ed.), The Polish Civil Procedure Code. A commentary. Vol. IV. International civil procedure. Arbitration [Original title: Kodeks postępowania cywilnego. Komentarz. Tom IV. Międzynarodowe postępowanie cywilne. Sąd polubowny (arbitrażowy)], Warsaw 2017 (5th edition)
Key issues: New York Convention, general works, state court assistance, arbitrator, arbitration procedure, interim measures, jurisdiction of arbitral tribunal, settlement before arbitral tribunal, arbitration award, petition to set aside arbitration award, recognition and enforcement of domestic arbitration award, recognition and enforcement of foreign arbitration awardid: 32468
Fenichel Zygmunt
Arbitration Courts Under Civil Procedure Code [Original title: Sądy polubowne wedle kodeksu postępowania cywilnego.]
PPiA 1931, No. 3, p. 303-322
Key issues: arbitrator, arbitration agreement, jurisdiction of arbitral tribunalid: 30060
Fenichel Zygmunt
Binding Force of the Arbitration Clause After Setting Aside of the Award [Original title: Moc zapisu na sąd polubowny po uchyleniu jego wyroku.]
PPC 1938, No. 16-17-18, p. 512-516
Key issues: arbitration agreement, jurisdiction of arbitral tribunalid: 30058
Fiutowska Aleksandra
Admissibility of Application of Declaratory Action Stated in Article 189 of Polish Code of Civil Procedure Towards the Dispute Covered by the Arbitration Clause [Original Title: Dopuszczalność powództwa o ustalenie związania zapisem na sąd polubowny w trybie art. 189 k.p.c. wobec ograniczenia kognicji sądu powszechnego w sprawach poddanych rozstrzygnięciu sądu polubownego]
Internetowy Przegląd Prawniczy TBSP UJ 2017, No. 9, p. 50-56
Key issues: arbitration agreement, arbitration agreement, arbitration procedure, arbitration procedure, jurisdiction of arbitral tribunal, jurisdiction of arbitral tribunalid: 31908
Fiutowska Aleksandra
Admissibility of Application of Declaratory Action Stated in Article 189 of Polish Code of Civil Procedure Towards the Dispute Covered by the Arbitration Clause [Original Title: Dopuszczalność powództwa o ustalenie związania zapisem na sąd polubowny w trybie art. 189 k.p.c. wobec ograniczenia kognicji sądu powszechnego w sprawach poddanych rozstrzygnięciu sądu polubownego]
Internetowy Przegląd Prawniczy TBSP UJ 2017, No. 9, p. 50-56
Key issues: arbitration agreement, arbitration agreement, arbitration procedure, arbitration procedure, jurisdiction of arbitral tribunal, jurisdiction of arbitral tribunalid: 31908
Flaga-Gieruszyńska Kinga, Zieliński Andrzej
a commentary to Art. 1154-1217
[in:] Zieliński Andrzej, Flaga-Gieruszyńska Kinga, The Polish Civil Procedure Code. A commentary 2019 [Original title: Kodeks postępowania cywilnego. Komentarz 2019], 10th edition, Legalis
Key issues: New York Convention, general works, state court assistance, arbitrability of dispute, investment arbitration, arbitrator, arbitration agreement, arbitration procedure, costs of arbitration, interim measures, jurisdiction of arbitral tribunal, settlement before arbitral tribunal, arbitration award, petition to set aside arbitration award, recognition and enforcement of domestic arbitration award, recognition and enforcement of foreign arbitration awardid: 35238
Flaga-Gieruszyńska Kinga, Zieliński Andrzej
a commentary to Art. 1154-1217
[in:] Zieliński Andrzej, Flaga-Gieruszyńska Kinga, The Polish Civil Procedure Code. A commentary 2022 [Original title: Kodeks postępowania cywilnego. Komentarz 2022], 11th edition, Legalis
Key issues: New York Convention, general works, state court assistance, arbitrability of dispute, investment arbitration, arbitrator, arbitration agreement, arbitration procedure, costs of arbitration, interim measures, jurisdiction of arbitral tribunal, settlement before arbitral tribunal, arbitration award, petition to set aside arbitration award, recognition and enforcement of domestic arbitration award, recognition and enforcement of foreign arbitration awardid: 32452
Frątczak Klaudia
Swiss Federal Tribunal’s Decision of 26 October 2009 (4A_428/2009) [Original title: Orzeczenie Szwajcarskiego Trybunału Federalnego w sprawie 4A_428/2009]
e-Przegląd Arbitrażowy 2010, No. 1, p. 55-56
Key issues: arbitration agreement, jurisdiction of arbitral tribunalid: 30812
Fruchs Henryk
From the Issues of Arbitration [Original title: Z zagadnień dotyczących sądu polubownego.]
Głos Prawa 1936, No. 10-12, p. 454-462
Key issues: arbitration agreement, jurisdiction of arbitral tribunalid: 30067
Furtek Marek, Pieckowski Sylwester, Poczobut Jerzy, Szumański Andrzej, Tomaszewski Maciej, Łaszczuk Maciej
Arbitration and Mediation. A Commemorative Volume Dedicated to Dr Andrzej Tynel [Original tilte: Arbitraż i mediacja. Księga jubileuszowa dedykowana doktorowi Andrzejowi Tynelowi]
Warszawa 2012, pp. 732
Key issues: New York Convention, general works, state court assistance, arbitrability of dispute, investment arbitration, arbitrator, arbitration agreement, arbitration procedure, jurisdiction of arbitral tribunal, settlement before arbitral tribunal, arbitration award, petition to set aside arbitration award, recognition and enforcement of domestic arbitration award, recognition and enforcement of foreign arbitration awardid: 31075
Ganıyeva Salimya
International Commercial Arbitration Court of the Chamber of Commerce and Industry of the Russian Federation: Yesterday and Today [Original title: Международный Коммерческий Арбитражный Суд при Торгово-Промышленной Палате Российской Федерации: Вчера и Сегодня]
ZNURz 2017, No. 1, Prawo 20, p. 122-136
Key issues: general works, general works, arbitration procedure, arbitration procedure, jurisdiction of arbitral tribunal, jurisdiction of arbitral tribunalid: 32090
Ganıyeva Salimya
International Commercial Arbitration Court of the Chamber of Commerce and Industry of the Russian Federation: Yesterday and Today [Original title: Международный Коммерческий Арбитражный Суд при Торгово-Промышленной Палате Российской Федерации: Вчера и Сегодня]
ZNURz 2017, No. 1, Prawo 20, p. 122-136
Key issues: general works, general works, arbitration procedure, arbitration procedure, jurisdiction of arbitral tribunal, jurisdiction of arbitral tribunalid: 32090
Gapska Edyta
The Effectiveness of an Arbitration Agreement Contained in a Subcontracting Agreement against Investor Bearing Joint Liability on the Basis of Art. 6471(5) of the Civil Code [Original title: Skuteczność zapisu na sąd polubowny zawartego w umowie podwykonawczej wobec inwestora ponoszącego odpowiedzialność solidarną na podstawie art. 6471 § 5 k.c.]
PPH 2017, No. 1, p. 38-43
Key issues: arbitration agreement, arbitration agreement, jurisdiction of arbitral tribunal, jurisdiction of arbitral tribunalid: 31819
Gapska Edyta
The Effectiveness of an Arbitration Agreement Contained in a Subcontracting Agreement against Investor Bearing Joint Liability on the Basis of Art. 6471(5) of the Civil Code [Original title: Skuteczność zapisu na sąd polubowny zawartego w umowie podwykonawczej wobec inwestora ponoszącego odpowiedzialność solidarną na podstawie art. 6471 § 5 k.c.]
PPH 2017, No. 1, p. 38-43
Key issues: arbitration agreement, arbitration agreement, jurisdiction of arbitral tribunal, jurisdiction of arbitral tribunalid: 31819
Garnuszek Anita, Mazur Laura, Orzeł Aleksandra
Quo Vadis, Arbitration? [Original title: Quo Vadis, Arbitrażu? Quo Vadis, Arbitration?]
Warszawa 2013, pp. 709
Key issues: New York Convention, general works, state court assistance, arbitrability of dispute, investment arbitration, arbitrator, arbitration agreement, arbitration procedure, jurisdiction of arbitral tribunal, settlement before arbitral tribunal, arbitration award, petition to set aside arbitration award, recognition and enforcement of domestic arbitration award, recognition and enforcement of foreign arbitration awardid: 31202
Garnuszek Anita, Orzeł Aleksandra
Enforceability of Multi-tiered Dispute Resolution Clauses under Polish Law
Arbitration Bulletin - Young Arbitration 2016, No. 24, p. 166-180
Key issues: arbitration agreement, jurisdiction of arbitral tribunal, petition to set aside arbitration awardid: 31565
Gessel-Kalinowska vel Kalisz Beata
Diagnosis for Arbitration. Functioning of Arbitration Law and the Directions of Postulated Changes [Original title: Diagnoza arbitrażu. Funkcjonowanie prawa o arbitrażu i kierunki postulowanych zmian]
Wrocław 2014, pp. 593
Key issues: New York Convention, general works, arbitrability of dispute, arbitrator, arbitration agreement, arbitration procedure, jurisdiction of arbitral tribunal, settlement before arbitral tribunal, arbitration award, petition to set aside arbitration award, recognition and enforcement of domestic arbitration award, recognition and enforcement of foreign arbitration awardid: 31452
Gessel-Kalinowska vel Kalisz Beata
Legal interest in a declaratory action in arbitration proceedings – a commentary to the award of the Court of Arbitration at the Polish Chamber of Commerce SA 193/05 [Original title: Interes prawny w powództwie o ustalenie w postępowaniu przed sądem polubownym - glosa do wyroku SA KIG 193/05]
Biuletyn Arbitrażowy 2020, No. 27, p. 19-28
Key issues: arbitration agreement, arbitration procedure, jurisdiction of arbitral tribunalid: 32153
Gessel-Kalinowska vel Kalisz Beata
Legal interest in a declaratory action in arbitration proceedings – a commentary to the award of the Court of Arbitration at the Polish Chamber of Commerce SA 193/05 [Original title: Interes prawny w powództwie o ustalenie w postępowaniu przed sądem polubownym - glosa do wyroku SA KIG 193/05]
[in:] Dumkiewicz Małgorzata, Szczotka Jerzy, Kopaczyńska-Pieczniak Katarzyna (eds), 100 years of Polish commercial law. Andrzej Kidyba anniversary volume, Vol. II [Original title: Sto lat polskiego prawa handlowego. Księga jubileuszowa dedykowana profesorowi Andrzejowi Kidybie. Tom II], Warsaw 2020, p. 777-787
Key issues: arbitration agreement, arbitration procedure, jurisdiction of arbitral tribunalid: 32107
Gessel-Kalinowska vel Kalisz Beata
Polish arbitration law
Wrocław 2014, pp. 646
Key issues: New York Convention, general works, arbitrability of dispute, arbitrator, arbitration agreement, arbitration procedure, jurisdiction of arbitral tribunal, settlement before arbitral tribunal, arbitration award, petition to set aside arbitration award, recognition and enforcement of domestic arbitration award, recognition and enforcement of foreign arbitration awardid: 31445
Gessel-Kalinowska vel Kalisz Beata
The Concept of Legal Interest in Declaratory Relief and Access to Justice Problem: an Introduction to the Discussion. Analysis of the Statistical Data [Original title: Pojęcia interesu prawnego w powództwie o ustalenie a prawo do sądu – wprowadzenie do dyskusji. Analiza badań statystycznych]
PPH 2019, No. 1, p. 11-20
Key issues: general works, general works, jurisdiction of arbitral tribunal, jurisdiction of arbitral tribunalid: 31965
Gessel-Kalinowska vel Kalisz Beata
The Concept of Legal Interest in Declaratory Relief and Access to Justice Problem: an Introduction to the Discussion. Analysis of the Statistical Data [Original title: Pojęcia interesu prawnego w powództwie o ustalenie a prawo do sądu – wprowadzenie do dyskusji. Analiza badań statystycznych]
PPH 2019, No. 1, p. 11-20
Key issues: general works, general works, jurisdiction of arbitral tribunal, jurisdiction of arbitral tribunalid: 31965
Gessel-Kalinowska vel Kalisz Beata
The European Parliament Draft Resolution on Brussels I: a Return to the Pre-West Tankers Era?
Arbitration e-Review 2011, No. 4, p. 29-31
Key issues: general works, arbitration agreement, arbitration procedure, jurisdiction of arbitral tribunalid: 31065
Gębala Agnieszka
Limits of Arbitrability [Original title: Granice dopuszczalności arbitrażu]
R.Pr. 2008, No. 2, p. 68-76; Biul.Arb. 2008, No. 6, p. 59-69
Key issues: jurisdiction of arbitral tribunalid: 30230
Glinka Justyna
Binding Force of the Arbitration Agreement in Case of Expiration, Invalidity or Non-Existence of a Legal Relationship (Main Contract) [Original title: Moc obowiązująca zapisu na sąd polubowny w sytuacji wygaśnięcia, nieważności bądź nieistnienia stosunku prawnego (umowy głównej)]
ADR. Arbitraż i Mediacja 2017, No. 3, p. 35-44
Key issues: arbitration agreement, arbitration agreement, jurisdiction of arbitral tribunal, jurisdiction of arbitral tribunalid: 31921
Glinka Justyna
Binding Force of the Arbitration Agreement in Case of Expiration, Invalidity or Non-Existence of a Legal Relationship (Main Contract) [Original title: Moc obowiązująca zapisu na sąd polubowny w sytuacji wygaśnięcia, nieważności bądź nieistnienia stosunku prawnego (umowy głównej)]
ADR. Arbitraż i Mediacja 2017, No. 3, p. 35-44
Key issues: arbitration agreement, arbitration agreement, jurisdiction of arbitral tribunal, jurisdiction of arbitral tribunalid: 31921
Głodowski Włodzimierz
Arbitration Court Ruling on its Jurisdiction and Control of Such Rulings by the State Court [Original title: Orzekanie przez sąd polubowny w przedmiocie swojej właściwości i kontrola tych orzeczeń przez sąd państwowy]
[in:] Józef Okolski (chair), Andrzej Całus, Maksymilian Pazdan, Stanisław Sołtysiński, Tomasz Wardyński, Stanisław Włodyka (ed.) Essays in Honour of 60 years of the Court of Arbitration at the Polish Chamber of Commerce in Warsaw [Księga pamiątkowa 60-lecia Sądu Arbitrażowego przy Krajowej Izbie Gospodarczej w Warszawie], Warszawa 2010, p. 676-690
Key issues: jurisdiction of arbitral tribunalid: 30941
Wiśniewski Cezary, Górska Olga
The Scope of Jurisdiction of an Arbitral Tribunal under Bilateral Investment Treaties [Original title: Zakres jurysdykcji trybunału arbitrażowego w świetle dwustronnych umów o ochronie i wspieraniu inwestycji]
PPH 2012, No. 7, p. 10-17
Key issues: investment arbitration, jurisdiction of arbitral tribunalid: 31059
Grzegorczyk Paweł
Establishment of Domestic Jurisdiction under Article 24 of the Council’s Regulation (EC) no. 44/01, and the Pleading on Existence of an Arbitration Agreement in Another EU Member State [Original title: Ustanowienie jurysdykcji krajowej na podstawie art. 24 rozporządzenia Rady (WE) nr 44/01 a zarzut zapisu na sąd polubowny w innym państwie członkowskim Unii Europejskiej]
MoP 2012, No. 15, p. 828-830
Key issues: arbitration agreement, jurisdiction of arbitral tribunalid: 31124
Gudowski Jacek
The Polish Civil Procedure Code. Case law. Doctrine. Vol. V [Original title: Kodeks postępowania cywilnego. Orzecznictwo. Piśmiennictwo. Tom V]
Warsaw 2020, pp. 936
Key issues: arbitrability of dispute, arbitration agreement, arbitration award, arbitration procedure, arbitrator, costs of arbitration, general works, interim measures, investment arbitration, jurisdiction of arbitral tribunal, New York Convention, petition to set aside arbitration award, recognition and enforcement of domestic arbitration award, recognition and enforcement of foreign arbitration award, settlement before arbitral tribunal, state court assistanceid: 32459
Horodyski Dominik
a commentary to Art. 1169-1193
[in:] Piaskowska Olga Maria (ed.), The Polish Civil Procedure Code. Enforcement procedure. International civil procedure. Arbitration. An updated commentary [Original title: Kodeks postępowania cywilnego. Postępowanie egzekucyjne. Międzynarodowe postępowanie cywilne. Sąd polubowny (arbitrażowy). Komentarz aktualizowany], Lex/el. 2023
Key issues: general works, arbitrator, arbitration procedure, jurisdiction of arbitral tribunalid: 35270
Horodyski Dominik
a commentary to Art. 1169-1993
[in:] Piaskowska Olga Maria (ed.), The Polish Civil Procedure Code. Enforcement procedure. International civil procedure. Arbitration. A commentary [Original title: Kodeks postępowania cywilnego. Postępowanie egzekucyjne. Międzynarodowe postępowanie cywilne. Sąd polubowny (arbitrażowy). Komentarz], Warsaw 2022
Key issues: general works, arbitrator, arbitration procedure, jurisdiction of arbitral tribunalid: 32446
Jakubecki Andrzej
a commentary to Art. 1154-1217
[in:] Wiśniewski Tadeusz (ed.), The Polish Civil Procedure Code. A commentary. Vol. V. Art. 1096-1217 [Original title: Kodeks postępowania cywilnego. Komentarz. Tom V. Art. 1096-1217], Warsaw 2021
Key issues: New York Convention, general works, state court assistance, arbitrability of dispute, investment arbitration, arbitrator, arbitration agreement, arbitration procedure, costs of arbitration, interim measures, jurisdiction of arbitral tribunal, settlement before arbitral tribunal, arbitration award, petition to set aside arbitration award, recognition and enforcement of domestic arbitration award, recognition and enforcement of foreign arbitration awardid: 32458
Jakubecki Andrzej
a commentary to Art. 1514-1217
[in:] Wiśniewski Tadeusz (ed.), The Polish Civil Procedure Code. A commentary. Vol. V. Art. 1096-1217 [Original title: Kodeks postępowania cywilnego. Komentarz. Tom V. Art. 1096-1217], Warsaw 2013 (2nd edition)
Key issues: New York Convention, general works, state court assistance, arbitrability of dispute, investment arbitration, arbitrator, arbitration agreement, arbitration procedure, costs of arbitration, interim measures, jurisdiction of arbitral tribunal, settlement before arbitral tribunal, arbitration award, petition to set aside arbitration award, recognition and enforcement of domestic arbitration award, recognition and enforcement of foreign arbitration awardid: 32471
Kajkowska Ewelina
Incorporating ADR Into Arbitration Framework: Issues Arising From Integrated Dispute Resolution Clauses
[in:] J. Gudowski, K. Weitz (ed.), Aurea praxis, aurea theoria. Księga pamiątkowa ku czci Profesora Tadeusza Erecińskiego, tom II [Aurea praxis, aurea theoria. A Commemorative Volume in Honour of Professor Tadeusz Ereciński, Vol. II], Warszawa 2011, p. 1703-1719, [Article in English]
Key issues: arbitration agreement, jurisdiction of arbitral tribunalid: 31019
Kapica Agnieszka
The Limits of Arbitrability [Original title: Granice dopuszczalności arbitrażu]
MoP 2009, No. 1, special issue, p. 9-13
Key issues: jurisdiction of arbitral tribunalid: 30250
Kapłan I.
Arbitration (Comparative Outline of the Provisions of the Civil Court Procedure Act and the Civil Procedure Code) [Original title: Sąd polubowny (Szkic porównawczy przepisów U.P.C. i K.P.C.).]
Wil.Prz.Praw. 1932, No. 2, p. 33-36
Key issues: arbitration agreement, jurisdiction of arbitral tribunal, settlement before arbitral tribunal, arbitration awardid: 30076
Kąkolecki Andrzej, Nowaczyk Piotr
New ICC Rules of Arbitration [Original title: Nowy Regulamin Arbitrażowy Międzynarodowej Izby Handlowej]
Biul. Arb. 2012, No. 17, p. 55-70
Key issues: general works, arbitrator, arbitration procedure, jurisdiction of arbitral tribunal, arbitration awardid: 31046
Kita Ewelina
Arbitration clause in matters concerning labour law [Original title: Zapis na sąd polubowny w sprawach ze stosunku pracy]
ELSA 2015, No. 3, p. 89-100
Key issues: arbitrability of dispute, arbitrability of dispute, arbitrator, arbitrator, arbitration agreement, arbitration agreement, jurisdiction of arbitral tribunal, jurisdiction of arbitral tribunal, arbitration award, arbitration awardid: 32025
Kita Ewelina
Arbitration clause in matters concerning labour law [Original title: Zapis na sąd polubowny w sprawach ze stosunku pracy]
ELSA 2015, No. 3, p. 89-100
Key issues: arbitrability of dispute, arbitrability of dispute, arbitrator, arbitrator, arbitration agreement, arbitration agreement, jurisdiction of arbitral tribunal, jurisdiction of arbitral tribunal, arbitration award, arbitration awardid: 32025
Kocon Agnieszka
Poland
[in:] Ned Beale, Barbara Lautenschlager, Giuseppe Scotti, Leo Van den hole (eds.), Dispute Resolution Clauses in International Contracts. A Global Guide, Zurich-Basel-Geneva 2013, p. 433-458
Key issues: New York Convention, state court assistance, arbitrability of dispute, arbitration agreement, jurisdiction of arbitral tribunal, petition to set aside arbitration award, recognition and enforcement of foreign arbitration awardid: 31292
Koenner Marek
Selected Procedural Issues in Arbitral Proceedings on the Background of the Provisions of the Code of Civil Procedure [Original title: Wybrane zagadnienia proceduralne w postępowaniu przed sądem polubownym na tle przepisów kodeksu postępowania cywilnego]
Gdańskie Studia Prawnicze 2011, Vol. XXVI, p. 343-357
Key issues: arbitration procedure, jurisdiction of arbitral tribunal, petition to set aside arbitration awardid: 31118
Krzemiński Zdzisław
Commentary on the Supreme Court Ruling of 7.3.1979, III CRN 10/79 (re: Entering into Agreements for Subjecting Disputes to Arbitration) [Original title: Glosa do postanowienia SN z 7.3.1979 r., III CRN 10/79 (dot. poddania sądowi polubownemu sporu do rozstrzygnięcia)]
OSPiKA 1980, item 81 c
Key issues: arbitrability of dispute, jurisdiction of arbitral tribunalid: 30259
Kubas Andrzej, Trzaska Agnieszka
Two Examples of Interaction between State Courts and Arbitration: Rulling on the Competence of an Arbitral Tribunal to Adjudicate and Injunctive Relief in Arbitral Proceedings
[in:] Alexander J. Bělohlávek, Naděžda Rozehnalová (eds.), Czech (& Central European) Yearbook of Arbitration 2015, Vol. V, Interaction of Arbitration and Courts, New York 2015, p. 137-157
Key issues: state court assistance, jurisdiction of arbitral tribunalid: 31366
Marcisz Paweł, Lam Joanna
Permissibility of Investment Arbitration: between Achmea and CETA. Commentary on International Centre for Settlement of Investment Disputes Decision in Case ARB/12/12, Vattenfall (Achmea issue) [Original title: Dopuszczalność arbitrażu inwestycyjnego: między Achmeą a CETĄ. Glosa do orzeczenia Międzynarodowego Centrum Rozstrzygania Sporów Inwestycyjnych ARB/12/12, Vattenfall (w kwestii Achmei)]
EPS 2019, No. 11, p. 33-41
Key issues: arbitrability of dispute, arbitrability of dispute, investment arbitration, investment arbitration, jurisdiction of arbitral tribunal, jurisdiction of arbitral tribunalid: 31992
Marcisz Paweł, Lam Joanna
Permissibility of Investment Arbitration: between Achmea and CETA. Commentary on International Centre for Settlement of Investment Disputes Decision in Case ARB/12/12, Vattenfall (Achmea issue) [Original title: Dopuszczalność arbitrażu inwestycyjnego: między Achmeą a CETĄ. Glosa do orzeczenia Międzynarodowego Centrum Rozstrzygania Sporów Inwestycyjnych ARB/12/12, Vattenfall (w kwestii Achmei)]
EPS 2019, No. 11, p. 33-41
Key issues: arbitrability of dispute, arbitrability of dispute, investment arbitration, investment arbitration, jurisdiction of arbitral tribunal, jurisdiction of arbitral tribunalid: 31992
Lutwak Anzelm
On the Impact of the Arbitration Agreement And Its Expiry on State Court Proceeding [Original title: O wpływie zapisu kompromisarskiego oraz jego wygaśnięcia na proces w sądzie państwowym]
Głos Prawa 1935, No. 5-6, p. 346-354
Key issues: jurisdiction of arbitral tribunalid: 30088
Łaszczuk Maciej, Szumański Andrzej
The Arbitration Rules of the Court of Arbitration at the Polish Chamber of Commerce. Commentary [Original title: Regulamin Arbitrażowy Sądu Arbitrażowego przy KIG. Komentarz]
Warsaw 2017, pp. 604
Key issues: general works, arbitrability of dispute, arbitrator, arbitration agreement, arbitration procedure, costs of arbitration, interim measures, jurisdiction of arbitral tribunal, settlement before arbitral tribunal, arbitration awardid: 31829
Łoś Wiktor
Analysis of a Party Autonomy from the Perspective of the Exclusion of the Arbitration in the Brussels Regulation 44/2001 and the Brussels Regulation 1215/2012
[in:] A. Garnuszek, L. Mazur, A. Orzeł (eds.), Quo Vadis, Arbitrażu? Quo Vadis, Arbitration?, Warszawa 2013, p. 326-339
Key issues: jurisdiction of arbitral tribunalid: 31218
Maciąg Marek
Scope of Cognition of an Arbitration Court [Original title: Zakres kognicji sądu polubownego]
PiS 2002, No. 2, p. 127-144
Key issues: jurisdiction of arbitral tribunalid: 30272
Marciniak Andrzej
a commentary to Art. 1180-1182
[in:] Marciniak Andrzej (ed.), The Polish Civil Procedure Code. A commentary 2020. Vol. V. Art. 1096-1217 [Original title: Kodeks postępowania cywilnego. Komentarz 2020. Tom V. Art. 1096-1217], 1st edition, Legalis
Key issues: general works, interim measures, jurisdiction of arbitral tribunalid: 32476
Marciniak Andrzej
a commentary to Art. 1180-1182
[in:] Marciniak Andrzej (ed.), The Polish Civil Procedure Code. A commentary 2017. Vol. IV. Art. 1096-1217 [Original title: Kodeks postępowania cywilnego. Komentarz 2017. Tom IV. Art. 1096-1217], 1st edition, Legalis
Key issues: general works, interim measures, jurisdiction of arbitral tribunalid: 35231
Marcisz Paweł, Orzeł Aleksandra
Anti-Suit Injunctions Issued by Arbitration Tribunals in the Light of the Judgement of the Court of Justice of 13 May 2015, C-536/13, Gazprom [Original title: Anti-suit injunctions wydawane przez sądy polubowne w świetle wyroku Trybunału Sprawiedliwości z 13.05.2015 r., C-536/13, Gazprom]
PPC 2017, No. 3, p. 379-402
Key issues: New York Convention, New York Convention, arbitration agreement, arbitration agreement, interim measures, interim measures, jurisdiction of arbitral tribunal, jurisdiction of arbitral tribunal, recognition and enforcement of domestic arbitration award, recognition and enforcement of domestic arbitration award, recognition and enforcement of foreign arbitration award, recognition and enforcement of foreign arbitration awardid: 31890
Marcisz Paweł, Orzeł Aleksandra
Anti-Suit Injunctions Issued by Arbitration Tribunals in the Light of the Judgement of the Court of Justice of 13 May 2015, C-536/13, Gazprom [Original title: Anti-suit injunctions wydawane przez sądy polubowne w świetle wyroku Trybunału Sprawiedliwości z 13.05.2015 r., C-536/13, Gazprom]
PPC 2017, No. 3, p. 379-402
Key issues: New York Convention, New York Convention, arbitration agreement, arbitration agreement, interim measures, interim measures, jurisdiction of arbitral tribunal, jurisdiction of arbitral tribunal, recognition and enforcement of domestic arbitration award, recognition and enforcement of domestic arbitration award, recognition and enforcement of foreign arbitration award, recognition and enforcement of foreign arbitration awardid: 31890
Markowski Michał
The Impact of the Crime of Bribery on the Proceedings in International Commercial Arbitration [Original title: Wpływ przestępstwa przekupstwa na postępowanie arbitrażowe w międzynarodowym arbitrażu handlowym]
Arbitration e-Review 2011, No. 2, p. 26-37
Key issues: arbitrability of dispute, arbitration agreement, arbitration procedure, jurisdiction of arbitral tribunalid: 30984
Michałowska Katarzyna
Abuse of Access to Arbitration in International Investment Disputes [Original title: Nadużycie prawa dostępu do arbitrażu w międzynarodowych sporach inwestycyjnych]
e-Przegląd Arbitrażowy 2010, No. 2, p. 31-34
Key issues: investment arbitration, jurisdiction of arbitral tribunalid: 30845
Miśko Tomasz, Sagan Dominika
Arbitraż i mediacja - praktyczne aspekty stosowania przepisów (Iwonicz Zdrój 18-20.10.2007 r.) - sprawozdanie
ADR. Arbitraż i Mediacja 2008, Nr 1, s. 79 - 91
Key issues: general works, state court assistance, arbitrability of dispute, arbitrator, arbitration agreement, arbitration procedure, jurisdiction of arbitral tribunal, settlement before arbitral tribunal, arbitration award, petition to set aside arbitration award, recognition and enforcement of domestic arbitration award, recognition and enforcement of foreign arbitration awardid: 30500
Morek Rafał
a commentary to Art. 1154-1163, 1165-1173, 1175-1193, 1195-1205, 1209, 1211-1212, 1216-1217
[in:] Marszałkowska-Krześ Elwira (ed.), The Polish Civil Procedure Code - a commentary 2018 [Original title: Kodeks postępowania cywilnego - komentarz 2018], 21st edition, Legalis
Key issues: New York Convention, general works, state court assistance, arbitrability of dispute, arbitrator, arbitration agreement, arbitration procedure, interim measures, jurisdiction of arbitral tribunal, settlement before arbitral tribunal, arbitration award, petition to set aside arbitration award, recognition and enforcement of domestic arbitration award, recognition and enforcement of foreign arbitration awardid: 32501
Morek Rafał
a commentary to Art. 1154-1163, 1165-1173, 1175-1193, 1195-1205, 1209, 1211-1212, 1216-1217
[in:] Marszałkowska-Krześ Elwira (ed.), The Polish Civil Procedure Code - a commentary 2017 [Original title: Kodeks postępowania cywilnego - komentarz 2017], 20th edition, Legalis
Key issues: New York Convention, general works, state court assistance, arbitrability of dispute, arbitrator, arbitration agreement, arbitration procedure, interim measures, jurisdiction of arbitral tribunal, settlement before arbitral tribunal, arbitration award, petition to set aside arbitration award, recognition and enforcement of domestic arbitration award, recognition and enforcement of foreign arbitration awardid: 32504
Morek Rafał
a commentary to Art. 1154-1163, 1165-1173, 1175-1193, 1195-1205, 1209, 1211-1212, 1216-1217
[in:] Marszałkowska-Krześ Elwira (ed.), The Polish Civil Procedure Code - a commentary 2017 [Original title: Kodeks postępowania cywilnego - komentarz 2017], 19th edition, Legalis
Key issues: New York Convention, general works, state court assistance, arbitrability of dispute, arbitrator, arbitration agreement, arbitration procedure, interim measures, jurisdiction of arbitral tribunal, settlement before arbitral tribunal, arbitration award, petition to set aside arbitration award, recognition and enforcement of domestic arbitration award, recognition and enforcement of foreign arbitration awardid: 32507
Morek Rafał
a commentary to Art. 1154-1163, 1165-1193, 1195-1205, 1207-1213, 1215-1217
[in:] Marszałkowska-Krześ Elwira (ed.), The Polish Civil Procedure Code - a commentary 2017 [Original title: Kodeks postępowania cywilnego - komentarz 2017], 18th edition, Legalis
Key issues: New York Convention, general works, state court assistance, arbitrability of dispute, arbitrator, arbitration agreement, arbitration procedure, interim measures, jurisdiction of arbitral tribunal, settlement before arbitral tribunal, arbitration award, petition to set aside arbitration award, recognition and enforcement of domestic arbitration award, recognition and enforcement of foreign arbitration awardid: 32508
Morek Rafał
a commentary to Art. 1154-1217
[in:] Marszałkowska-Krześ Elwira (ed.), The Polish Civil Procedure Code - a commentary 2012 [Original title: Kodeks postępowania cywilnego - komentarz 2012], 5th edition, Legalis
Key issues: New York Convention, general works, state court assistance, arbitrability of dispute, investment arbitration, arbitrator, arbitration agreement, arbitration procedure, costs of arbitration, interim measures, jurisdiction of arbitral tribunal, settlement before arbitral tribunal, arbitration award, petition to set aside arbitration award, recognition and enforcement of domestic arbitration award, recognition and enforcement of foreign arbitration awardid: 32523
Morek Rafał
a commentary to Art. 1154-1217
[in:] Marszałkowska-Krześ Elwira (ed.), The Polish Civil Procedure Code - a commentary 2016 [Original title: Kodeks postępowania cywilnego - komentarz 2016], 17th edition, Legalis
Key issues: New York Convention, general works, state court assistance, arbitrability of dispute, investment arbitration, arbitrator, arbitration agreement, arbitration procedure, costs of arbitration, interim measures, jurisdiction of arbitral tribunal, settlement before arbitral tribunal, arbitration award, petition to set aside arbitration award, recognition and enforcement of domestic arbitration award, recognition and enforcement of foreign arbitration awardid: 32511
Morek Rafał
a commentary to Art. 1154-1217
[in:] Marszałkowska-Krześ Elwira (ed.), The Polish Civil Procedure Code - a commentary 2016 [Original title: Kodeks postępowania cywilnego - komentarz 2016], 16th edition, Legalis
Key issues: New York Convention, general works, state court assistance, arbitrability of dispute, investment arbitration, arbitrator, arbitration agreement, arbitration procedure, costs of arbitration, interim measures, jurisdiction of arbitral tribunal, settlement before arbitral tribunal, arbitration award, petition to set aside arbitration award, recognition and enforcement of domestic arbitration award, recognition and enforcement of foreign arbitration awardid: 32512
Morek Rafał
a commentary to Art. 1154-1217
[in:] Marszałkowska-Krześ Elwira (ed.), The Polish Civil Procedure Code - a commentary 2016 [Original title: Kodeks postępowania cywilnego - komentarz 2016], 15th edition, Legalis
Key issues: New York Convention, general works, state court assistance, arbitrability of dispute, investment arbitration, arbitrator, arbitration agreement, arbitration procedure, costs of arbitration, interim measures, jurisdiction of arbitral tribunal, settlement before arbitral tribunal, arbitration award, petition to set aside arbitration award, recognition and enforcement of domestic arbitration award, recognition and enforcement of foreign arbitration awardid: 32513
Morek Rafał
a commentary to Art. 1154-1217
[in:] Marszałkowska-Krześ Elwira (ed.), The Polish Civil Procedure Code - a commentary 2015 [Original title: Kodeks postępowania cywilnego - komentarz 2015], 14th edition, Legalis
Key issues: New York Convention, general works, state court assistance, arbitrability of dispute, investment arbitration, arbitrator, arbitration agreement, arbitration procedure, costs of arbitration, interim measures, jurisdiction of arbitral tribunal, settlement before arbitral tribunal, arbitration award, petition to set aside arbitration award, recognition and enforcement of domestic arbitration award, recognition and enforcement of foreign arbitration awardid: 32514
Morek Rafał
a commentary to Art. 1154-1217
[in:] Marszałkowska-Krześ Elwira (ed.), The Polish Civil Procedure Code - a commentary 2015 [Original title: Kodeks postępowania cywilnego - komentarz 2015], 13th edition, Legalis
Key issues: arbitrability of dispute, arbitration agreement, arbitration award, arbitration procedure, arbitrator, costs of arbitration, general works, interim measures, investment arbitration, jurisdiction of arbitral tribunal, New York Convention, petition to set aside arbitration award, recognition and enforcement of domestic arbitration award, recognition and enforcement of foreign arbitration award, settlement before arbitral tribunal, state court assistanceid: 32515
Morek Rafał
a commentary to Art. 1154-1217
[in:] Marszałkowska-Krześ Elwira (ed.), The Polish Civil Procedure Code - a commentary 2015 [Original title: Kodeks postępowania cywilnego - komentarz 2015], 12th edition, Legalis
Key issues: arbitrability of dispute, arbitration agreement, arbitration award, arbitration procedure, arbitrator, costs of arbitration, general works, interim measures, investment arbitration, jurisdiction of arbitral tribunal, New York Convention, petition to set aside arbitration award, recognition and enforcement of domestic arbitration award, recognition and enforcement of foreign arbitration award, settlement before arbitral tribunal, state court assistanceid: 32516
Morek Rafał
a commentary to Art. 1154-1217
[in:] Marszałkowska-Krześ Elwira (ed.), The Polish Civil Procedure Code - a commentary 2014 [Original title: Kodeks postępowania cywilnego - komentarz 2014], 11th edition, Legalis
Key issues: New York Convention, general works, state court assistance, arbitrability of dispute, investment arbitration, arbitrator, arbitration agreement, arbitration procedure, costs of arbitration, interim measures, jurisdiction of arbitral tribunal, settlement before arbitral tribunal, arbitration award, petition to set aside arbitration award, recognition and enforcement of domestic arbitration award, recognition and enforcement of foreign arbitration awardid: 32517
Morek Rafał
a commentary to Art. 1154-1217
[in:] Marszałkowska-Krześ Elwira (ed.), The Polish Civil Procedure Code - a commentary 2014 [Original title: Kodeks postępowania cywilnego - komentarz 2014], 10th edition, Legalis
Key issues: New York Convention, general works, state court assistance, arbitrability of dispute, investment arbitration, arbitrator, arbitration agreement, arbitration procedure, costs of arbitration, interim measures, jurisdiction of arbitral tribunal, settlement before arbitral tribunal, arbitration award, petition to set aside arbitration award, recognition and enforcement of domestic arbitration award, recognition and enforcement of foreign arbitration awardid: 32518
Morek Rafał
a commentary to Art. 1154-1217
[in:] Marszałkowska-Krześ Elwira (ed.), The Polish Civil Procedure Code - a commentary 2013 [Original title: Kodeks postępowania cywilnego - komentarz 2013], 9th edition, Legalis
Key issues: New York Convention, general works, state court assistance, arbitrability of dispute, investment arbitration, arbitrator, arbitration agreement, arbitration procedure, costs of arbitration, interim measures, jurisdiction of arbitral tribunal, settlement before arbitral tribunal, arbitration award, petition to set aside arbitration award, recognition and enforcement of domestic arbitration award, recognition and enforcement of foreign arbitration awardid: 32519
Morek Rafał
a commentary to Art. 1154-1217
[in:] Marszałkowska-Krześ Elwira (ed.), The Polish Civil Procedure Code - a commentary 2013 [Original title: Kodeks postępowania cywilnego - komentarz 2013], 8th edition, Legalis
Key issues: New York Convention, general works, state court assistance, arbitrability of dispute, investment arbitration, arbitrator, arbitration agreement, arbitration procedure, costs of arbitration, interim measures, jurisdiction of arbitral tribunal, settlement before arbitral tribunal, arbitration award, petition to set aside arbitration award, recognition and enforcement of domestic arbitration award, recognition and enforcement of foreign arbitration awardid: 32520
Morek Rafał
a commentary to Art. 1154-1217
[in:] Marszałkowska-Krześ Elwira (ed.), The Polish Civil Procedure Code - a commentary 2012 [Original title: Kodeks postępowania cywilnego - komentarz 2012], 7th edition, Legalis
Key issues: arbitrability of dispute, arbitration agreement, arbitration award, arbitration procedure, arbitrator, costs of arbitration, general works, interim measures, investment arbitration, jurisdiction of arbitral tribunal, New York Convention, petition to set aside arbitration award, recognition and enforcement of domestic arbitration award, recognition and enforcement of foreign arbitration award, settlement before arbitral tribunal, state court assistanceid: 32521
Morek Rafał
a commentary to Art. 1154-1217
[in:] Marszałkowska-Krześ Elwira (ed.), The Polish Civil Procedure Code - a commentary 2012 [Original title: Kodeks postępowania cywilnego - komentarz 2012], 6th edition, Legalis
Key issues: New York Convention, general works, state court assistance, arbitrability of dispute, investment arbitration, arbitrator, arbitration agreement, arbitration procedure, costs of arbitration, interim measures, jurisdiction of arbitral tribunal, settlement before arbitral tribunal, arbitration award, petition to set aside arbitration award, recognition and enforcement of domestic arbitration award, recognition and enforcement of foreign arbitration awardid: 32522
Morek Rafał
a commentary to Art. 1154-1217
[in:] Marszałkowska-Krześ Elwira (ed.), The Polish Civil Procedure Code - a commentary 2012 [Original title: Kodeks postępowania cywilnego - komentarz 2012], 4th edition, Legalis
Key issues: New York Convention, general works, state court assistance, arbitrability of dispute, investment arbitration, arbitrator, arbitration agreement, arbitration procedure, costs of arbitration, interim measures, jurisdiction of arbitral tribunal, settlement before arbitral tribunal, arbitration award, petition to set aside arbitration award, recognition and enforcement of domestic arbitration award, recognition and enforcement of foreign arbitration awardid: 35224
Morek Rafał
a commentary to Art. 1154-1217
[in:] Marszałkowska-Krześ Elwira (ed.), The Polish Civil Procedure Code - a commentary 2011 [Original title: Kodeks postępowania cywilnego - komentarz 2011], 3rd edition, Legalis
Key issues: New York Convention, general works, state court assistance, arbitrability of dispute, investment arbitration, arbitrator, arbitration agreement, arbitration procedure, costs of arbitration, interim measures, jurisdiction of arbitral tribunal, settlement before arbitral tribunal, arbitration award, petition to set aside arbitration award, recognition and enforcement of domestic arbitration award, recognition and enforcement of foreign arbitration awardid: 35225
Morek Rafał
a commentary to Art. 1154-1217
[in:] Marszałkowska-Krześ Elwira (ed.), The Polish Civil Procedure Code - a commentary 2011 [Original title: Kodeks postępowania cywilnego - komentarz 2011], 2nd edition, Legalis
Key issues: New York Convention, general works, state court assistance, arbitrability of dispute, investment arbitration, arbitrator, arbitration agreement, arbitration procedure, costs of arbitration, interim measures, jurisdiction of arbitral tribunal, settlement before arbitral tribunal, arbitration award, petition to set aside arbitration award, recognition and enforcement of domestic arbitration award, recognition and enforcement of foreign arbitration awardid: 35226
Morek Rafał
a commentary to Art. 1154-1217
[in:] Marszałkowska-Krześ Elwira (ed.), The Polish Civil Procedure Code - a commentary 2011 [Original title: Kodeks postępowania cywilnego - komentarz 2011], 1st edition, Legalis
Key issues: New York Convention, general works, state court assistance, arbitrability of dispute, investment arbitration, arbitrator, arbitration agreement, arbitration procedure, costs of arbitration, interim measures, jurisdiction of arbitral tribunal, settlement before arbitral tribunal, arbitration award, petition to set aside arbitration award, recognition and enforcement of domestic arbitration award, recognition and enforcement of foreign arbitration awardid: 35227
Morek Rafał
Review of the Rulings of the Supreme Court and of Appellate Courts [Original title: Przegląd orzecznictwa Sądu Najwyższego i sądów apelacyjnych]
Biul. Arb. 2013, No. 20, p. 93-95
Key issues: New York Convention, arbitration agreement, jurisdiction of arbitral tribunal, recognition and enforcement of foreign arbitration awardid: 31176
Morek Rafał
Selected Court Decisions related to Arbitral Proceedings [Original title: Przegląd orzecznictwa Sądu Najwyższego i sądów apelacyjnych]
Biul. Arb. 2010, No. 3, p. 116-119
Key issues: arbitration agreement, jurisdiction of arbitral tribunalid: 30885
Wach Małgorzata, Okolski Józef
The Kompetenz-Kompetenz Principle in the Arbitration Law with Particular Account Taken of The Regulations of the Court of Arbitration at the Polish Chamber of Commerce [Original title: Zasada Kompetenz-Kompetenz w prawie arbitrażowym, ze szczególnym uwzględnieniem regulacji Sądu Arbitrażowego przy Krajowej Izbie Gospodarczej
[in:] Józef Okolski (chair), Andrzej Całus, Maksymilian Pazdan, Stanisław Sołtysiński, Tomasz Wardyński, Stanisław Włodyka (ed.) Essays in Honour of 60 years of the Court of Arbitration at the Polish Chamber of Commerce in Warsaw [Księga pamiątkowa 60-lecia Sądu Arbitrażowego przy Krajowej Izbie Gospodarczej w Warszawie], Warszawa 2010, p. 242-255
Key issues: arbitration agreement, jurisdiction of arbitral tribunalid: 30913
Olaś Andrzej
Competence of an arbitral tribunal to hear a set-off plea based on a receivable debt resulting from a legal relationship not covered by an arbitration agreement – a commentary to the judgment of the Court of Appeal in Warsaw dated 18.11.2019, Case No. VII Aga 804/19 [Original title: Kompetencja sądu arbitrażowego do rozpoznania zarzutu potrącenia opartego na wierzytelności wynikającej ze stosunku prawnego nieobjętego zapisem na sad polubowny - glosa do wyroku Sądu Apelacyjnego w Warszawie z 18.11.2019 r., VII AGa 804/19]
ADR. Arbitraż i Mediacja 2020, No. 4, p. 83-104
Key issues: general works, general works, arbitration agreement, arbitration agreement, jurisdiction of arbitral tribunal, jurisdiction of arbitral tribunalid: 32129
Olaś Andrzej
Competence of an arbitral tribunal to hear a set-off plea based on a receivable debt resulting from a legal relationship not covered by an arbitration agreement – a commentary to the judgment of the Court of Appeal in Warsaw dated 18.11.2019, Case No. VII Aga 804/19 [Original title: Kompetencja sądu arbitrażowego do rozpoznania zarzutu potrącenia opartego na wierzytelności wynikającej ze stosunku prawnego nieobjętego zapisem na sad polubowny - glosa do wyroku Sądu Apelacyjnego w Warszawie z 18.11.2019 r., VII AGa 804/19]
ADR. Arbitraż i Mediacja 2020, No. 4, p. 83-104
Key issues: general works, general works, arbitration agreement, arbitration agreement, jurisdiction of arbitral tribunal, jurisdiction of arbitral tribunalid: 32129
Olaś Andrzej
Set-Off versus Arbitration Agreements under the Polish Law - Some Issues Examined from the Substantive and Procedural Civil Law [Original title: Potrącenie a zapis na sąd polubowny w prawie polskim - wybrane zagadnienia materialnoprawne i procesowe]
PPC 2014, No. 1, p. 61-91
Key issues: arbitration agreement, jurisdiction of arbitral tribunalid: 31238
Opaliński Łukasz
Arbitration in Domestic Trade [Original title: Arbitraż w krajowym obrocie gospodarczym]
[in:] Prace laureatów konkursu im. Prof. Jerzego Jakubowskiego, edycja druga [Works of the Winners of Prof. Jerzy Jakubowski Contest, Second Edition], Warszawa 2005, p. 195-244
Key issues: general works, state court assistance, arbitrability of dispute, arbitrator, arbitration agreement, arbitration procedure, jurisdiction of arbitral tribunal, settlement before arbitral tribunal, arbitration award, petition to set aside arbitration award, recognition and enforcement of domestic arbitration awardid: 30960
Orecki Marcin
Arbitration and state courts in the context of the principle of non-interference of state courts in the activity of arbitration courts and their composition [Original title: Sądownictwo polubowne a sądy państwowe wobec zasady nieingerencji sądu państwowego w działalność sądu polubownego I jego skład]
Warsaw 2019, pp. 432
Key issues: arbitration agreement, arbitration procedure, arbitrator, costs of arbitration, general works, interim measures, jurisdiction of arbitral tribunal, state court assistance, arbitration agreement, arbitration procedure, arbitrator, costs of arbitration, general works, interim measures, jurisdiction of arbitral tribunal, state court assistanceid: 32094
Orecki Marcin
Arbitration and state courts in the context of the principle of non-interference of state courts in the activity of arbitration courts and their composition [Original title: Sądownictwo polubowne a sądy państwowe wobec zasady nieingerencji sądu państwowego w działalność sądu polubownego I jego skład]
Warsaw 2019, pp. 432
Key issues: arbitration agreement, arbitration procedure, arbitrator, costs of arbitration, general works, interim measures, jurisdiction of arbitral tribunal, state court assistance, arbitration agreement, arbitration procedure, arbitrator, costs of arbitration, general works, interim measures, jurisdiction of arbitral tribunal, state court assistanceid: 32094
Orecki Marcin
Jurisdictional Conflicts in Investment Arbitration
ADR. Arbitraż i Mediacja 2014, No. 1, p. 27-38
Key issues: arbitrability of dispute, investment arbitration, jurisdiction of arbitral tribunalid: 31273
Orecki Marcin
Polish Provisions on Courts of Arbitration - de Lege Ferenda Remarks [Original title: Polskie przepisy o sądzie polubownym (arbitrażowym) - uwagi de lege ferenda]
PPC 2014, No. 2, p. 198-237
Key issues: general works, arbitrability of dispute, arbitrator, arbitration agreement, arbitration procedure, jurisdiction of arbitral tribunal, arbitration award, petition to set aside arbitration awardid: 31272
Orzeł-Jakubowska Aleksandra
a commentary to Art. 1161-1168, 1180
[in:] Rylski Piotr (ed.), The Polish Civil Procedure Code. A commentary 2022 [Original title: Kodeks postępowania cywilnego. Komentarz 2022], 1st edition, Legalis
Key issues: New York Convention, general works, arbitration agreement, jurisdiction of arbitral tribunalid: 32455
Osiński Marcin
Proceedings Before Polish Arbitration Courts – Selected Issues [Original title: Postępowanie przed polskimi sądami polubownymi - wybrane zagadnienia]
[in:] Prace laureatów konkursu im. Prof. Jerzego Jakubowskiego, edycja druga [Works of the Winners of Prof. Jerzy Jakubowski Contest, Second Edition], Warszawa 2005, p.121-193
Key issues: general works, state court assistance, arbitrator, arbitration agreement, arbitration procedure, jurisdiction of arbitral tribunal, settlement before arbitral tribunal, arbitration award, petition to set aside arbitration award, recognition and enforcement of domestic arbitration awardid: 30961
Paszkowski Jerzy
a commentary to Art. 1154-1182
[in:] Szanciło Tomasz (ed.), The Polish Civil Procedure Code. A commentary 2023. Vol. II. Art. 506-1217 [Original title: Kodeks postępowania cywilnego. Komentarz 2023. Tom II. Art. 506-1217], 2nd edition, Legalis
Key issues: general works, arbitrability of dispute, arbitrator, arbitration agreement, arbitration procedure, interim measures, jurisdiction of arbitral tribunalid: 35281
Paszkowski Jerzy
a commentary to Art. 1154-1182
[in:] Szanciło Tomasz (ed.), The Polish Civil Procedure Code. A commentary 2019. Vol. II. Art. 506-1217 [Original title: Kodeks postępowania cywilnego. Komentarz 2019. Tom II. Art. 506-1217], 1st edition, Legalis
Key issues: general works, arbitrability of dispute, arbitrator, arbitration agreement, arbitration procedure, interim measures, jurisdiction of arbitral tribunalid: 35236
Paśnik Jerzy
Selected aspects of the organization and activity of the Arbitration Court for Sport at the Polish Olympic Committee [Original title: Wybrane aspekty organizacji i działalności Trybunału Arbitrażowego do spraw Sportu przy Polskim Komitecie Olimpijskim]
Przegląd Prawa Publicznego 2020, No. 4, p. 23-35
Key issues: general works, arbitrator, arbitration agreement, arbitration procedure, interim measures, jurisdiction of arbitral tribunal, arbitration awardid: 32014
Pełczyński Michał
Arbitral Tribunal Decision on Its Own Competence [Original titlew: Orzekanie przez sąd polubowny o własnej kompetencji]
MoP 2015, No. 16, p. 849-857
Key issues: arbitration agreement, jurisdiction of arbitral tribunalid: 31467
Piaskowska Olga Maria
The Polish Civil Procedure Code. A selection of case law. A judicial commentary [Original title: Kodeks postępowania cywilnego. Wybór orzecznictwa. Komentarz orzeczniczy[
Warsaw 2014, pp. 1064
Key issues: New York Convention, general works, state court assistance, arbitrability of dispute, investment arbitration, arbitrator, arbitration agreement, arbitration procedure, costs of arbitration, interim measures, jurisdiction of arbitral tribunal, settlement before arbitral tribunal, arbitration award, petition to set aside arbitration award, recognition and enforcement of domestic arbitration award, recognition and enforcement of foreign arbitration awardid: 32470
Piechota Rafał
Out-of-court forms of sports disputes resolution [Original title: Pozasądowe formy rozwiązywania sporów sportowych]
PWPMEiP 2006, No. 4, p. 33-54
Key issues: general works, general works, arbitrator, arbitrator, arbitration procedure, arbitration procedure, jurisdiction of arbitral tribunal, jurisdiction of arbitral tribunalid: 32076
Piechota Rafał
Out-of-court forms of sports disputes resolution [Original title: Pozasądowe formy rozwiązywania sporów sportowych]
PWPMEiP 2006, No. 4, p. 33-54
Key issues: general works, general works, arbitrator, arbitrator, arbitration procedure, arbitration procedure, jurisdiction of arbitral tribunal, jurisdiction of arbitral tribunalid: 32076
Piechowiak Mirosław
Admissibility of Distribution of the Testator's Estate by the Arbitration Court [Original title: Dopuszczalność działu spadku przez sąd polubowny]
Pal. 2008, No. 7-8, p. 123-129
Key issues: jurisdiction of arbitral tribunalid: 30306
Zawicki Kamil, Ziarko Angelika, Poboźniak Bartłomiej
The Supreme Court Judgments
[in:] Bělohlávek Alexander J., Rozehnalová Naděžda (eds), Czech (& Central European) Yearbook of Arbitration 2022, Volume XII, The Hague 2022, p. 203-211
Key issues: arbitration agreement, jurisdiction of arbitral tribunal, petition to set aside arbitration awardid: 32298
Pobożniak Grzegorz, Sikora Paweł
The Admissibility of a European Account Preservation Order in the Event of an Arbitration Clause
[in:] Bělohlávek Alexander J., Rozehnalová Naděžda (eds), Czech (& Central European) Yearbook of Arbitration. Arbitral Awards and Remedies, The Hague 2018, vol. VIII, p. 221-233
Key issues: arbitration agreement, arbitration agreement, jurisdiction of arbitral tribunal, jurisdiction of arbitral tribunalid: 31941
Pobożniak Grzegorz, Sikora Paweł
The Admissibility of a European Account Preservation Order in the Event of an Arbitration Clause
[in:] Bělohlávek Alexander J., Rozehnalová Naděžda (eds), Czech (& Central European) Yearbook of Arbitration. Arbitral Awards and Remedies, The Hague 2018, vol. VIII, p. 221-233
Key issues: arbitration agreement, arbitration agreement, jurisdiction of arbitral tribunal, jurisdiction of arbitral tribunalid: 31941
Pruś Piotr
a commentary to Art. 1154-1217
[in:] Manowska Małgorzata (ed.), The Polish Civil Procedure Code. A commentary. Vol. II. Art. 478-1217 [Original title: Kodeks postępowania cywilnego. Komentarz. Tom II. Art. 478-1217], Warsaw 2021 (IVth edition)
Key issues: arbitrability of dispute, arbitration agreement, arbitration award, arbitration procedure, arbitrator, costs of arbitration, general works, interim measures, investment arbitration, jurisdiction of arbitral tribunal, New York Convention, petition to set aside arbitration award, recognition and enforcement of domestic arbitration award, recognition and enforcement of foreign arbitration award, settlement before arbitral tribunal, state court assistanceid: 32460
Pruś Piotr
a commentary to Art. 1154-1217
[in:] Manowska Małgorzata (ed.), The Polish Civil Procedure Code. A commentary. Vol. II {Original title: Kodeks postępowania cywilnego. Komentarz. Tom II], LEX/el. 2020
Key issues: New York Convention, general works, state court assistance, arbitrability of dispute, investment arbitration, arbitrator, arbitration agreement, arbitration procedure, costs of arbitration, interim measures, jurisdiction of arbitral tribunal, settlement before arbitral tribunal, arbitration award, petition to set aside arbitration award, recognition and enforcement of domestic arbitration award, recognition and enforcement of foreign arbitration awardid: 32461
Pruś Piotr
a commentary to Art. 1154-1217
[in:] Manowska Małgorzata (ed.), The Polish Civil Procedure Code. A commentary [Original title: Kodeks postępowania cywilnego. Komentarz], Warsaw 2013 (2nd edition)
Key issues: New York Convention, general works, state court assistance, arbitrability of dispute, investment arbitration, arbitrator, arbitration agreement, arbitration procedure, costs of arbitration, interim measures, jurisdiction of arbitral tribunal, settlement before arbitral tribunal, arbitration award, petition to set aside arbitration award, recognition and enforcement of domestic arbitration award, recognition and enforcement of foreign arbitration awardid: 32462
Pruś Piotr
a commentary to Art. 1154-1217
[in:] Manowska Małgorzata (ed.), The Polish Civil Procedure Code. A commentary. Vol. II. Art. 506-1217 [Original title: Kodeks postępowania cywilnego. Komentarz. Tom II. Art. 506-1217], Warsaw 2015 (3rd edition)
Key issues: New York Convention, general works, state court assistance, arbitrability of dispute, investment arbitration, arbitrator, arbitration agreement, arbitration procedure, costs of arbitration, interim measures, jurisdiction of arbitral tribunal, settlement before arbitral tribunal, arbitration award, petition to set aside arbitration award, recognition and enforcement of domestic arbitration award, recognition and enforcement of foreign arbitration awardid: 32463
Pruś Piotr
a commentary to Art. 1154-1217
[in:] Manowska Małgorzata (ed.), The Polish Civil Procedure Code. An updated commentary. Vol. II, Art. 478-1217 [Original title: Kodeks postępowania cywilnego. Komentarz aktualizowany. Tom II, Art. 478-1217], LEX/el. 2022
Key issues: New York Convention, general works, state court assistance, arbitrability of dispute, investment arbitration, arbitrator, arbitration agreement, arbitration procedure, costs of arbitration, interim measures, jurisdiction of arbitral tribunal, settlement before arbitral tribunal, arbitration award, petition to set aside arbitration award, recognition and enforcement of domestic arbitration award, recognition and enforcement of foreign arbitration awardid: 32449
Robenek Marcin
Dispute Board in the Dispute Resolution Model Provided for in the FIDIC Conditions of Contract – Optional or Obligatory Body? [Original title: Komisja Rozjemcza w modelu rozstrzygania sporów przewidzianym w Warunkach Kontraktowych FIDIC – organ fakultatywny czy obligatoryjny?]
e-Przegląd Arbitrażowy 2015, No. 1-2, p. 12-25
Key issues: arbitration agreement, arbitration procedure, jurisdiction of arbitral tribunalid: 31578
Sadrak Katarzyna
Arbitration Agreements and Actions for Antitrust Damages After the CDC Hydrogen Peroxide Judgment
YARS (Yearbook of Antitrust and Regulatory Studies) 2017, No. 16
Key issues: arbitration agreement, arbitration agreement, jurisdiction of arbitral tribunal, jurisdiction of arbitral tribunalid: 31961
Sadrak Katarzyna
Arbitration Agreements and Actions for Antitrust Damages After the CDC Hydrogen Peroxide Judgment
YARS (Yearbook of Antitrust and Regulatory Studies) 2017, No. 16
Key issues: arbitration agreement, arbitration agreement, jurisdiction of arbitral tribunal, jurisdiction of arbitral tribunalid: 31961
Sikorski Rafał
Jurisdiction of an Arbitral Tribunal
[in:] Gessel-Kalinowska vel Kalisz Beata (ed.), Polish arbitration law, Wrocław 2014, p. 281-312
Key issues: jurisdiction of arbitral tribunalid: 31449
Sikorski Rafał
Jurisdiction of an Arbitral Tribunal[Original title: Właściwość sądu polubownego]
[in:] Gessel-Kalinowska vel Kalisz Beata (ed.), Diagnosis for Arbitration. Functioning of Arbitration Law and the Directions of Postulated Changes [Diagnoza arbitrażu. Funkcjonowanie prawa o arbitrażu i kierunki postulowanych zmian], Wrocław 2014, p. 255-283
Key issues: jurisdiction of arbitral tribunalid: 31456
Skoczylas Józef
Arbitration in the Amendment to the Civil Procedure Code of 28 July 2005 [Original title: Sądownictwo arbitrażowe w nowelizacji kodeksu postępowania cywilnego z 28 lipca 2005 r.]
[in:] Jan Olszewski (ed.), Arbitration and Mediation. Current Theoretical and Practical Problems of Functioning of Arbitral Tribunals and Mediation Institutions. Conference Materials (Nałęczów Zdrój 8 - 10.05.2009) [Arbitraż i mediacja. Aktualne problemy teorii i praktyki funkcjonowania sądów polubownych i ośrodków mediacyjnych. Materiały konferencyjne (Nałęczów Zdrój 8 - 10.05.2009 r.)], Rzeszów 2009, p. 349-362
Key issues: general works, state court assistance, arbitrability of dispute, arbitrator, arbitration agreement, arbitration procedure, jurisdiction of arbitral tribunal, settlement before arbitral tribunal, arbitration award, petition to set aside arbitration awardid: 30675
Sołtysiński Stanisław
Binding Members of Groups of Companies, Their Shareholders and Stakeholder by the Agreements to Arbitrate and Arbitral Awards [Original title: Związanie zapisem na sąd polubowny i orzeczeniem arbitrażowym członków zgrupowania spółek, ich wspólników i interesariuszy]
PPPM 2012, No. 11, p. 9-28
Key issues: arbitrability of dispute, investment arbitration, arbitration agreement, jurisdiction of arbitral tribunal, arbitration awardid: 31198
Stefanicki Robert
Arbitration Court Exclusive Jurisdiction Clause (in the Light of Article 3 of Directive 93/13/EEC)(Original title: Klauzula przewidująca wyłączną właściwość sądu polubownego (w świetle art. 3 dyrektywy 93/13/EWG)]
Glosa 2014, No. 3, p. 26-33
Key issues: arbitration agreement, jurisdiction of arbitral tribunalid: 31293
Strumiłło Tomasz
a commentary to Art. 1180-1217
[in:] Jankowski Janusz (ed.), The Polish Civil Proceudre Code. A commentary 2019. Vol. II. Art. 730-1217 [Original title: Kodeks postępowania cywilnego. Komentarz 2019. Tom II. Art. 730-1217], 3rd edition, Legalis
Key issues: New York Convention, general works, state court assistance, arbitration procedure, interim measures, jurisdiction of arbitral tribunal, settlement before arbitral tribunal, arbitration award, petition to set aside arbitration award, recognition and enforcement of domestic arbitration award, recognition and enforcement of foreign arbitration awardid: 35248
Strumiłło Tomasz
a commentary to Art. 1180-1217
[in:] Jankowski Janusz (ed.), The Polish Civil Procedure Code. A commentary 2015. Vol. II. Art. 730-1217 [Original title: Kodeks postępowania cywilnego. Komentarz 2015. Tom II. Art.730-1217], 2nd edition, Legalis
Key issues: New York Convention, general works, state court assistance, arbitration procedure, interim measures, jurisdiction of arbitral tribunal, settlement before arbitral tribunal, arbitration award, petition to set aside arbitration award, recognition and enforcement of domestic arbitration award, recognition and enforcement of foreign arbitration awardid: 35250
Strumiłło Tomasz
Security of Claims Pursued Before Arbitration Courts - Selected Issues. The Problem of Application of Interim Reliefs in Parallel Proceedings Before a Common Court and an Arbitration Court [Original title: Zabezpieczenie roszczeń dochodzonych przed sądem polubownym - wybrane zagadnienia. Problem równoległych postępowań prowadzonych przed sądem powszechnym oraz sądem polubownym w przedmiocie stosowania tymczasowych środków zabezpieczających]
ADR. Arbitraż i Mediacja 2014, No. 3, p. 47-60
Key issues: state court assistance, jurisdiction of arbitral tribunalid: 31316
Suchecka Agnieszka
Referring cases to arbitration under the FIDIC regulations, including clauses modified by the ordering parties; consequences of the failure to establish a Dispute Adjudication Board in the light of the Polish Supreme Court judgment of 19 March 2015, Case No. IV CSK 443/14 [Original title: Kierowanie spraw do arbitrażu wedle regulacji FIDIC, w tym klauzul zmodyfikowanych przez Zamawiających; konsekwencje braku powołania Komisji Rozjemstwa w świetle orzeczenia Sądu Najwyższego z dnia 19 marca 2015 r., sygn. akt: IV CSK 443/14]
Konsultant 2016, No. 42-43, p. 11-12
Key issues: arbitration agreement, jurisdiction of arbitral tribunalid: 32173
Sujkowska Maja
Substantive-Law Grounds for Dispute Resolution in Arbitration [Original title: Materialnoprawne podstawy rozstrzygnięcia sporu w postępowaniu arbitrażowym]
Ius Novum 2008, No. 4, p. 110-133
Key issues: arbitrability of dispute, jurisdiction of arbitral tribunalid: 30339
Suliński Grzegorz
Admissibility of Referring a Dispute Arising within a Partnership/Company to a Court of Arbitration [Original title: Dopuszczalność poddania sporu ze stosunku spółki pod rozstrzygnięcie sądu polubownego]
PPH 2005, No. 12, p. 28-34
Key issues: arbitrability of dispute, jurisdiction of arbitral tribunalid: 30341
Szlęzak Andrzej, Tujakowska Anna
An arbitral tribunal being bound by an award of another arbitral tribunal – in the light of case law of the Polish Supreme Court, the doctrine and in the perspective comparative law [Original title: Związanie sądu polubownego wyrokiem innego sądu polubownego - w świetle orzecznictwa sądu najwyższego, doktryny i w perspektywie prawnoporównawczej]
Biuletyn Arbitrażowy 2020, No. 27, p. 29-57
Key issues: general works, arbitration agreement, arbitration procedure, jurisdiction of arbitral tribunal, arbitration awardid: 32154
Szlęzak Andrzej, Tujakowska Anna
An arbitral tribunal being bound by an award of another arbitral tribunal – in the light of case law of the Polish Supreme Court, the doctrine and in the perspective comparative law [Original title: Związanie sądu polubownego wyrokiem innego sądu polubownego - w świetle orzecznictwa Sądu Najwyższego, doktryny i w perspektywie prawnoporównawczej]
[in:] Dumkiewicz Małgorzata, Szczotka Jerzy, Kopaczyńska-Pieczniak Katarzyna (eds), 100 years of Polish commercial law. Andrzej Kidyba anniversary volume, Vol. II [Original title: Sto lat polskiego prawa handlowego. Księga jubileuszowa dedykowana profesorowi Andrzejowi Kidybie. Tom II], Warsaw 2020, p. 942-973
Key issues: general works, arbitration agreement, arbitration procedure, jurisdiction of arbitral tribunal, arbitration awardid: 32113
Szpara Justyna
A Few Remarks on Enforceability of a Decision on Costs of Arbitration in Case of Lack of Jurisdiction of the Arbitral Tribunal to Resolve a Dispute [Original title: Kilka uwag o wykonalności rozstrzygnięcia o kosztach postępowania arbitrażowego w przypadku braku właściwości sądu polubownego do rozstrzygnięcia sporu]
[in:] Jelonek-Jarco Barbara, Kos Rafał, Zawadzka Julita (eds), Usus magister est optimus. Legal Papers Dedicated to Professor Andrzej Kubas [Original title: Usus magister est optimus. Rozprawy prawnicze ofiarowane Profesorowi Andrzejowi Kubasowi], Warszawa 2016, p. 727-736
Key issues: costs of arbitration, jurisdiction of arbitral tribunalid: 31546
Szumański Andrzej
Admissibility of an Arbitration Court Cognition in Matters of Challenging Resolutions of Meetings in Commercial Companies [Original title: Dopuszczalność kognicji sądu polubownego w sprawach o zaskarżanie uchwał zgromadzeń spółek kapitałowych]
[in:] Leszek Ogiegło, Wojciech Popiołek, Maciej Szpunar, Legal Studies. Book in Memory of Professor Maksymilian Pazdan [Rozprawy prawnicze. Księga pamiątkowa Profesora Maksymiliana Pazdana], Kraków 2005, p. 515-535
Key issues: arbitrability of dispute, jurisdiction of arbitral tribunalid: 30166
Szumański Andrzej
The System of Commercial Law. Commercial Arbitration. Volume 8 [Original title: System Prawa Handlowego. Arbitraż handlowy. Tom 8]
Warszawa 2015, pp. 1175
Key issues: arbitrability of dispute, arbitration agreement, arbitration award, arbitration procedure, arbitrator, general works, investment arbitration, jurisdiction of arbitral tribunal, New York Convention, petition to set aside arbitration award, recognition and enforcement of domestic arbitration award, recognition and enforcement of foreign arbitration award, settlement before arbitral tribunal, state court assistanceid: 31474
Szumański Andrzej
The System of Commercial Law. Commercial Arbitration. Volume 8 [Original title: System Prawa Handlowego. Arbitraż handlowy. Tom 8]
Warszawa 2009, pp. 1200
Key issues: New York Convention, general works, state court assistance, arbitrability of dispute, investment arbitration, arbitrator, arbitration agreement, arbitration procedure, jurisdiction of arbitral tribunal, settlement before arbitral tribunal, arbitration award, petition to set aside arbitration award, recognition and enforcement of domestic arbitration award, recognition and enforcement of foreign arbitration awardid: 30683
Śledzikowski Marcin
Jurisdiction of the Arbitral Tribunal in Matters within the Jurisdiction of the Registry Court [Original title: Kognicja sądu polubownego w sprawach należących do właściwości sądu rejestrowego]
ADR. Arbitraż i Mediacja 2016, No. 1, p. 81-91
Key issues: arbitrability of dispute, arbitration agreement, jurisdiction of arbitral tribunalid: 31571
Śledziński Janusz
On the legal consequences of setting aside of an arbitration award by a national court [Original title: O skutkach prawnych uchylenia przez sąd państwowy wyroku sądu polubownego]
Pal. 1969, No. 5, p. 47-55
Key issues: arbitration agreement, arbitration agreement, jurisdiction of arbitral tribunal, jurisdiction of arbitral tribunal, petition to set aside arbitration award, petition to set aside arbitration awardid: 32093
Śledziński Janusz
On the legal consequences of setting aside of an arbitration award by a national court [Original title: O skutkach prawnych uchylenia przez sąd państwowy wyroku sądu polubownego]
Pal. 1969, No. 5, p. 47-55
Key issues: arbitration agreement, arbitration agreement, jurisdiction of arbitral tribunal, jurisdiction of arbitral tribunal, petition to set aside arbitration award, petition to set aside arbitration awardid: 32093
Świątkowski Marek
Application of MFN Clause to Dispute Resolution Provisions of Investment Treaties [Original title: Modyfikacja przepisów jurysdykcyjnych traktatu inwestycyjnego na podstawie klauzuli MFN]
PPH 2013, No. 12, p. 30-36
Key issues: New York Convention, investment arbitration, arbitration agreement, jurisdiction of arbitral tribunal, recognition and enforcement of foreign arbitration awardid: 31191
Topór Marek
The Influence of Joint Participation in Proceedings on the Arbitration Clause. Commentary on Supreme Court Resolution of 24 February 2005, III CZP 86/04 [Original title: Wpływ współuczestnictwa procesowego na zapis na sąd polubowny – glosa do uchwały Sądu Najwyższego z 24.02.2005r., III CZP 86/04]
Glosa 2019, No. 1, p. 33-40
Key issues: arbitration agreement, arbitration agreement, jurisdiction of arbitral tribunal, jurisdiction of arbitral tribunalid: 31964
Topór Marek
The Influence of Joint Participation in Proceedings on the Arbitration Clause. Commentary on Supreme Court Resolution of 24 February 2005, III CZP 86/04 [Original title: Wpływ współuczestnictwa procesowego na zapis na sąd polubowny – glosa do uchwały Sądu Najwyższego z 24.02.2005r., III CZP 86/04]
Glosa 2019, No. 1, p. 33-40
Key issues: arbitration agreement, arbitration agreement, jurisdiction of arbitral tribunal, jurisdiction of arbitral tribunalid: 31964
Topór Marek
The Issue of Legal Consequences of Failure to Execute Pre-Arbitration Stages of the FIDIC Multi-Stage Arbitration Clause [Original title: Problem skutków prawnych niezrealizowania przedarbitrażowych etapów wielostopniowej klauzuli arbitrażowej FIDIC]
PPH 2016, No. 11, p. 17-26
Key issues: arbitration agreement, arbitration agreement, jurisdiction of arbitral tribunal, jurisdiction of arbitral tribunalid: 31805
Topór Marek
The Issue of Legal Consequences of Failure to Execute Pre-Arbitration Stages of the FIDIC Multi-Stage Arbitration Clause [Original title: Problem skutków prawnych niezrealizowania przedarbitrażowych etapów wielostopniowej klauzuli arbitrażowej FIDIC]
PPH 2016, No. 11, p. 17-26
Key issues: arbitration agreement, arbitration agreement, jurisdiction of arbitral tribunal, jurisdiction of arbitral tribunalid: 31805
Trammer Henryk
Resolution of Commercial Cooperation Disputes by Courts of Arbitration [Original title: Rozstrzyganie przez sądy polubowne sporów cywilnych ze stosunków współpracy gospodarczej]
PiP 1973, No. 2, p. 32
Key issues: arbitrability of dispute, jurisdiction of arbitral tribunalid: 30547
Uliasz Marcin
a commentary to Art. 1154-1217
[in:] Uliasz Marcin, The Polish Civil Procedure Code. A commentary 2008 [Original title: Kodeks postępowania cywilnego. Komentarz 2008], 2nd edition, Legalis
Key issues: New York Convention, general works, state court assistance, arbitrability of dispute, investment arbitration, arbitrator, arbitration agreement, arbitration procedure, costs of arbitration, interim measures, jurisdiction of arbitral tribunal, settlement before arbitral tribunal, arbitration award, petition to set aside arbitration award, recognition and enforcement of domestic arbitration award, recognition and enforcement of foreign arbitration awardid: 35246
Voitovich Sergei A.
Bifurcation of Jurisdiction from the Merits in Investment Disputes: Follow-up Observations to Kiev Arbitration Days 2012 [Original title: Rozdział orzekania w przedmiocie właściwości sądu od orzekania co do istoty sporu w sporach inwestycyjnych - uwagi pokonferencyjne w nawiązaniu do Kijowskich Dni Arbitrażu 2012]
Arbitration e-Review 2013, Special Edition, p. 27-29
Key issues: investment arbitration, arbitration procedure, jurisdiction of arbitral tribunalid: 31163
Wach Andrzej
Institutional basis of deciding in the obligatory arbitration [Original title: Instytucjonalna podstawa orzekania w ramach arbitrażu przymusowego]
Studia Iuridica 2018, No. 75, p. 189-208
Key issues: general works, general works, arbitration agreement, arbitration agreement, jurisdiction of arbitral tribunal, jurisdiction of arbitral tribunalid: 32069
Wach Andrzej
Institutional basis of deciding in the obligatory arbitration [Original title: Instytucjonalna podstawa orzekania w ramach arbitrażu przymusowego]
Studia Iuridica 2018, No. 75, p. 189-208
Key issues: general works, general works, arbitration agreement, arbitration agreement, jurisdiction of arbitral tribunal, jurisdiction of arbitral tribunalid: 32069
Weitz Karol
Consideration on Admissibility of Disuputes on Bills if Subjected to Arbitration Court Resolution [Original title: Dopuszczalność poddania sporów wekslowych pod rozstrzygnięcie sądu polubownego]
Pal. 2006, No. 3-4, p. 214-220
Key issues: arbitrability of dispute, jurisdiction of arbitral tribunalid: 30375
Welser Irene
Pitfalls of Competence
[in:] Christian Klausegger, Peter Klein, Florian Kremslehner, Alexander Petsche, Nikolaus Pitkowitz, Jenny Power, Irene Welser, Gerold Zeiler (eds.), Austrian Arbitration Yearbook 2007, Vienna 2007, p. 3-28
Key issues: arbitration agreement, jurisdiction of arbitral tribunalid: 31298
Wiśniewski Andrzej W.
Consequences of Engaging in a Dispute before the Arbitration Court Abroad Despite the Lack of an Effective Arbitration Agreement. A Commentary to the Supreme Court Decision of 13 September 2012, file no. V CSK 323/11 [Original title: Skutki wdania się w spór przed arbitrażem za granicą pomimo braku skutecznej umowy o arbitraż. Glosa do postanowienia Sądu Najwyższego z dnia 13 września 2012 r., V CSK 323/11]
PPC 2013, No. 4, p. 571-582
Key issues: New York Convention, arbitration agreement, jurisdiction of arbitral tribunal, recognition and enforcement of foreign arbitration awardid: 31184
Wiśniewski Andrzej W.
International Commercial Arbitration in Poland. The Legal Status of Arbitration and Arbitrators [Original title: Międzynarodowy arbitraż handlowy w Polsce. Status prawny arbitrażu i arbitrów]
Warszawa 2011, pp. 612
Key issues: New York Convention, general works, state court assistance, arbitrability of dispute, arbitrator, arbitration agreement, arbitration procedure, jurisdiction of arbitral tribunal, settlement before arbitral tribunal, arbitration award, petition to set aside arbitration award, recognition and enforcement of domestic arbitration award, recognition and enforcement of foreign arbitration awardid: 31015
Wiśniewski Andrzej W.
Nadużycie prawa podmiotowego jako podstawa rozciągnięcia zapisu na sąd polubowny na podmioty powiązane kapitałowo [Original title: Abuse of Rights as the Basis for the Extension of an Arbitration Agreement to Associated Companies]
PPPM 2013, No. 13, p. 9-18
Key issues: arbitration agreement, jurisdiction of arbitral tribunalid: 31303
Wiśniewski Andrzej W.
Resolution of Corporate Disputes in Companies by Arbitration Courts – Statutory Law Regulation Perspective, Part 2 [Original title: Rozstrzyganie sporów korporacyjnych spółek kapitałowych przez sądy polubowne – perspektywa ustawowego rozstrzygnięcia, cz. 2]
Pr.S. 2005, No. 5, p. 9-17
Key issues: arbitrability of dispute, jurisdiction of arbitral tribunalid: 30382
Wiśniewski Andrzej W.
Resolution of Corporate Disputes in Companies by Arbitration Courts – Structure of the Problem, Part 1 [Original title: Rozstrzyganie sporów korporacyjnych spółek kapitałowych przez sądy polubowne – struktura problemu, cz. 1]
Pr.S. 2005, No. 4, p. 10-19
Key issues: arbitrability of dispute, jurisdiction of arbitral tribunalid: 30381
Wolak-Danecka Anna
Arbitration in the Czech Republic [Original title: Arbitraż w Republice Czeskiej]
Biul. Arb. 2010-2011, No. 4, p. 71-81
Key issues: general works, arbitrability of dispute, arbitrator, arbitration agreement, arbitration procedure, jurisdiction of arbitral tribunal, arbitration award, petition to set aside arbitration awardid: 30989
Wójcik Mariusz Piotr
a commentary to Art. 1154-1217
[in:] Jakubecki Andrzej (ed.), The Polish Civil Procedure Code. A commentary [Original title: Kodeks postępowania cywilnego. Komentarz], Warsaw 2015 (6th edition)
Key issues: New York Convention, general works, state court assistance, arbitrability of dispute, investment arbitration, arbitrator, arbitration agreement, arbitration procedure, costs of arbitration, interim measures, jurisdiction of arbitral tribunal, settlement before arbitral tribunal, arbitration award, petition to set aside arbitration award, recognition and enforcement of domestic arbitration award, recognition and enforcement of foreign arbitration awardid: 32467
Wójcik Mariusz Piotr
a commentary to Art. 1154-1217
[in:] Jakubecki Andrzej (ed.), The Polish Civil Procedure Code. An updated commentary. Vol. II. Art. 730-1217 [Original title: Kodeks postępowania cywilnego. Komentarz aktualizowany. Tom II. Art. 730-1217], LEX/el. 2019
Key issues: New York Convention, general works, state court assistance, arbitrability of dispute, investment arbitration, arbitrator, arbitration agreement, arbitration procedure, costs of arbitration, interim measures, jurisdiction of arbitral tribunal, settlement before arbitral tribunal, arbitration award, petition to set aside arbitration award, recognition and enforcement of domestic arbitration award, recognition and enforcement of foreign arbitration awardid: 32464
Wójcik Mariusz Piotr
a commentary to Art. 1154-1217
[in:] Jakubecki Andrzej (ed.), Tje Polish Civil Procedure Code. Vol. II. A commentary to Art. 730-1217 [Original title: Kodeks postępowania cywilnego. Tom II. Komentarz do art. 730-1217], Warsaw 2017 (7th edition)
Key issues: New York Convention, general works, state court assistance, arbitrability of dispute, investment arbitration, arbitrator, arbitration agreement, arbitration procedure, costs of arbitration, interim measures, jurisdiction of arbitral tribunal, settlement before arbitral tribunal, arbitration award, petition to set aside arbitration award, recognition and enforcement of domestic arbitration award, recognition and enforcement of foreign arbitration awardid: 32465
Wójcik Mariusz Piotr
a commentary to Art. 1154-1217
[in:] Jakubecki Andrzej (ed.), An updated commentary to the Polish Civil Procedure Code [Original title: Komentarz aktualizowany do Kodeksu postępowania cywilnego], LEX/el. 2016
Key issues: New York Convention, general works, state court assistance, arbitrability of dispute, investment arbitration, arbitrator, arbitration agreement, arbitration procedure, costs of arbitration, interim measures, jurisdiction of arbitral tribunal, settlement before arbitral tribunal, arbitration award, petition to set aside arbitration award, recognition and enforcement of domestic arbitration award, recognition and enforcement of foreign arbitration awardid: 32466
Wrześniewski Paweł
Legal Nature of an Arbitration Agreement [Original title: Charakter prawny zapisu na sąd polubowny]
Warszawa 2011, pp. 138
Key issues: arbitrability of dispute, arbitration agreement, jurisdiction of arbitral tribunalid: 31004
Zieliński Andrzej
a commentary to Art. 1154-1217
[in:] Zieliński Andrzej, Flaga-Gieruszyńska Kinga, The Polish Civil Procedure Code. A commentary 2014 [Original title: Kodeks postępowania cywilnego. Komentarz 2014], Warsaw 2013 (7th edition)
Key issues: New York Convention, general works, state court assistance, arbitrability of dispute, investment arbitration, arbitrator, arbitration agreement, arbitration procedure, costs of arbitration, interim measures, jurisdiction of arbitral tribunal, settlement before arbitral tribunal, arbitration award, petition to set aside arbitration award, recognition and enforcement of domestic arbitration award, recognition and enforcement of foreign arbitration awardid: 35241
Zieliński Andrzej
a commentary to Art. 1154-1217
[in:] Zieliński Andrzej, Flaga-Gieruszyńska Kinga, The Polish Civil Procedure Code. A commentary 2016 [Original title: Kodeks postępowania cywilnego. Komentarz 2016], Warsaw 2015 (8th edition)
Key issues: New York Convention, general works, state court assistance, arbitrability of dispute, investment arbitration, arbitrator, arbitration agreement, arbitration procedure, costs of arbitration, interim measures, jurisdiction of arbitral tribunal, settlement before arbitral tribunal, arbitration award, petition to set aside arbitration award, recognition and enforcement of domestic arbitration award, recognition and enforcement of foreign arbitration awardid: 35240
Zieliński Andrzej
a commentary to Art. 1154-1217
[in:] Zieliński Andrzej, Flaga-Gieruszyńska Kinga, The Polish Civil Procedure Code. A commentary 2017 [Original title: Kodeks postępowania cywilnego. Komentarz 2017], 9th edition, Legalis
Key issues: New York Convention, general works, state court assistance, arbitrability of dispute, investment arbitration, arbitrator, arbitration agreement, arbitration procedure, costs of arbitration, interim measures, jurisdiction of arbitral tribunal, settlement before arbitral tribunal, arbitration award, petition to set aside arbitration award, recognition and enforcement of domestic arbitration award, recognition and enforcement of foreign arbitration awardid: 35239
Zieliński Andrzej
a commentary to Art. 1154-1217
[in:] Zieliński Andrzej, Flaga-Gieruszyńska Kinga, The Polish Civil Procedure Code. A commentary 2012 [Original title: Kodeks postępowania cywilnego. Komentarz 2012], 6th edition, Legalis
Key issues: New York Convention, general works, state court assistance, arbitrability of dispute, investment arbitration, arbitrator, arbitration agreement, arbitration procedure, costs of arbitration, interim measures, jurisdiction of arbitral tribunal, settlement before arbitral tribunal, arbitration award, petition to set aside arbitration award, recognition and enforcement of domestic arbitration award, recognition and enforcement of foreign arbitration awardid: 35242
Zieliński Andrzej
a commentary to Art. 1154-1217
[in:] Zieliński Andrzej, Flaga-Gieruszyńska Kinga, The Polish Civil Procedure Code. A commentary 2011 [Original title: Kodeks postępowania cywilnego. Komentarz 2011], 5th edition, Legalis
Key issues: New York Convention, general works, state court assistance, arbitrability of dispute, investment arbitration, arbitrator, arbitration agreement, arbitration procedure, costs of arbitration, interim measures, jurisdiction of arbitral tribunal, settlement before arbitral tribunal, arbitration award, petition to set aside arbitration award, recognition and enforcement of domestic arbitration award, recognition and enforcement of foreign arbitration awardid: 35243
Zieliński Andrzej
a commentary to Art. 1154-1217
[in:] Zieliński Andrzej, Flaga-Gieruszyńska Kinga, The Polish Civil Procedure Code. A commentary 2008 [Original title: Kodeks postępowania cywilnego. Komentarz 2008], 3rd edition, Legalis
Key issues: New York Convention, general works, state court assistance, arbitrability of dispute, investment arbitration, arbitrator, arbitration agreement, arbitration procedure, costs of arbitration, interim measures, jurisdiction of arbitral tribunal, settlement before arbitral tribunal, arbitration award, petition to set aside arbitration award, recognition and enforcement of domestic arbitration award, recognition and enforcement of foreign arbitration awardid: 35245
Zieliński Andrzej
a commentary to Art. 1154-1217
[in:] Zieliński Andrzej, Flaga-Gieruszyńska Kinga, The Polish Civil Procedure Code. A commentary 2009 [Original title: Kodeks postępowania cywilnego. Komentarz 2009], 4th edition, Legalis
Key issues: New York Convention, general works, state court assistance, arbitrability of dispute, investment arbitration, arbitrator, arbitration agreement, arbitration procedure, costs of arbitration, interim measures, jurisdiction of arbitral tribunal, settlement before arbitral tribunal, arbitration award, petition to set aside arbitration award, recognition and enforcement of domestic arbitration award, recognition and enforcement of foreign arbitration awardid: 35244
Gajda-Roszczynialska Katarzyna
Alternative Dispute Resolution in Consumer Disputes – Arbitration, Selected Issues (part 3) [Original title: Alternatywne metody rozwiązywania sporów konsumenckich – arbitraż, wybrane zagadnienia (cz. III)]
ADR. Arbitraż i Mediacja 2008, No. 4 (4)
Key issues: arbitrability of dispute, arbitration agreement, jurisdiction of arbitral tribunalid: 50031
Kamieniecka Dorota
Civil Mediators’ Association in Wieluń [Original title: Stowarzyszenie Mediatorów Cywilnych w Wieluniu]
ADR. Arbitraż i Mediacja 2013, No. 3 (23)
Key issues: arbitrability of dispute, arbitration award, arbitration agreement, arbitration procedure, arbitrator, general works, jurisdiction of arbitral tribunal, petition to set aside arbitration award, recognition and enforcement of foreign arbitration award, settlement before arbitral tribunal, state court assistanceid: 50249
Suliński Grzegorz
Admissibility of Arbitration Court Jurisdiction in a Dispute Concerning Dissolution of a Polish Limited Liability Company [Original title: Dopuszczalność kognicji sądu polubownego w sporze o rozwiązanie spółki z o.o.]
ADR. Arbitraż i Mediacja 2008, No. 3 (3)
Key issues: arbitrability of dispute, jurisdiction of arbitral tribunalid: 50023
Wiśniewski Andrzej W.
The Consequences of Respondent’s Failure to Timely Object to the Jurisdiction of the Arbitral Tribunal
ADR. Arbitraż i Mediacja 2013, No. 4 (24)
Key issues: jurisdiction of arbitral tribunal, petition to set aside arbitration award, recognition and enforcement of foreign arbitration awardid: 50260
Zachariasiewicz Maciej, Zrałek Jacek
Does the Arbitration Agreement Extend to Entities Affiliated with the Company Being a Party to this Agreement? [Original title: Czy umowa arbitrażowa rozciąga się na podmioty powiązane ze spółką będącą stroną tej umowy?]
ADR. Arbitraż i Mediacja 2009, No. 2 (6)
Key issues: arbitration agreement, jurisdiction of arbitral tribunalid: 50073
