key issues
arbitrator
| all issuesAll documents for the issue: 392
Case law: 53 | Bibliography: 327 | Publications arbitraz.laszczuk.pl: 3 | Publications ADR. Arbitraż i Mediacja: 9Polish Supreme Court judgment dated 17 June 2021 Case No. V CSKP 30/21
1. Provisions regarding grounds of a petition to set aside an arbitration award (Art. 1206 § 1 and 2 of the PCPC) in proceedings initiated thereby constitute a basis for a substantive ruling on the merits of the case, which justifies treating them, in the context of the grounds for a cassation appeal, as a functional equivalent to substantive law provisions… .
2. [A]rbitrability of a dispute, which is one of the prerequisites of the effectiveness of an arbitration award, is subject to assessment by the court considering the petition to set aside an arbitration award, regardless of whether the petitioner has raised particular allegations in the arbitration proceedings or not, or has invoked particular allegations in the petition or not … .
3. Compliance with the requirements regarding the composition of an arbitral tribunal, including the correct appointment of arbitrators, may be … subject to assessment in the proceedings to set aside an arbitration award irrespective of whether an arbitral tribunal has decided on this matter previously.
4. Art. 1206 § 1 point 4 of the PCPC shall apply with regard to irregularities in the composition of an arbitral tribunal at all stages of the proceedings, including the stage of appointment of the arbitrators by the parties or a third party. This applies also to incorrect representation of these persons by appointment of the arbitrators.
5. Failure to comply with the requirements on composition of an arbitral tribunal constitutes a basis for setting aside an arbitration award regardless of its effect on the outcome of the case … .
6. Proceedings to set aside an arbitration award are proceedings separate from the prior arbitration proceedings and its aim is not to consider the dispute resolved by the arbitral tribunal on merits.
7. [S]pecific rules of representation of the defendant company in the proceedings regarding revocation or a declaration of invalidity of a shareholders’ resolution (art. 253 of the Commercial Companies Code) apply also in proceedings to set aside an arbitration award delivered in a dispute whose object is a claim for revocation or declaration of invalidity of a shareholders’ resolution.
8. The entity structure of the proceedings initiated by the petition to set aside the arbitration award, including the ability of the management board in corpore having special judicial capacity to act as a party is the same as in the prior arbitration proceedings, in which the arbitral tribunal ruled on potential defectiveness of a resolution, although procedural roles of the entities participating in the proceedings may change. A judgement delivered in the proceedings to set aside an arbitration award is decisive for the fact whether consideration on the merits of a resolution’s effectiveness remains in force, and indirectly, whether such consideration may acquire the same permanent legal force as a judgment of a state court (Art. 1212 § 1 of the PCPC). Therefore, the same risks regarding a conflict of interests on the side of the representatives of a company, which justify application of specific rules of representation in proceedings concerning revocation or declaration of invalidity of a shareholders’ resolution, are present in proceedings to set aside the award. In conjunction with a protective function of Art. 253 § 2 of the Commercial Companies Code, the aforementioned arguments are in favor of extending those specific rules to the proceedings to set aside an arbitration award, in which the arbitral tribunal ruled on a claim for declaration of invalidity or revocation of the shareholders’ resolution, regardless of the fact whether in such proceedings a company whose shareholders have adopted the resolution is the petitioner or the other party in the dispute.
9. The grounds of a petition to set aside an arbitration award are not of a disjunctive character; they may also be in a causal relation with respect to each other… .
10. One of the fundamental principles of arbitration is the principle of equal treatment of the parties (Art. 1183 of the PCPC). The principle is of a fundamental and axiological character in arbitration… . The principle concerns not only the equal treatment of the parties in the arbitration proceedings in the context of the right to be heard and the procedural means available to the parties, but also at the stage of formation of the arbitral tribunal. A violation thereof results, i.a. from the lack of the necessary equilibrium between the parties by appointment of the arbitrators, which may result not only from the wording of the arbitration agreement (Art. 1161 § 2 of the PCPC), but also from factual circumstances in which the appointment of arbitrators takes place.
Data wydania: 17-06-2021 | Sygnatura: V CSKP 30/21
Key issues: arbitrator, arbitration agreement, arbitration procedure, petition to set aside arbitration awardid: 20589
Katowice Court of Appeal order dated 3 February 2021 Case No. V AGo 5/20
1. One of the fundamental principles of the legal order, provided for in Art. 45 (1) of the Constitution of the Republic of Poland, is the right to court, an element of which is a party’s right to have its case heard by an independent court, in a fairly conducted procedure. The indicated principle of the legal order applies to all court proceedings, including arbitration proceedings.
2. In the light of Art. 1173 § 1 of the PCPC, an arbitrator shall be an independent and impartial person. … . This refers to the absence of such relations between an arbitrator and parties to a dispute which could affect the content of the award.
3. [I]t is indicated in the case law that it is only exceptionally permissible to invoke circumstances previously known to a party concerning an arbitrator and to invoke non-operation of the preclusion of the grounds for exclusion of the arbitrator in a situation when it comes to the circumstances of such a kind in which the arbitrator’s participation in rendering an award by an arbitral tribunal could be found to be justifying that the award is contrary to the fundamental principles of the public policy… .
Data wydania: 03-02-2021 | Sygnatura: V AGo 5/20
Key issues: arbitrator, arbitration procedureid: 20612
Polish Supreme Court judgment dated 28 February 2019 Case No. V CSK 63/18
Although one cannot exclude the admissibility of modification of the Rules of Arbitration by the parties, it needs to be assumed that in this respect the claimant and the respondent have not made any modifications. It cannot be assumed that such modifications resulted from the fact that the sole arbitrator preferred – by issuing procedural orders – the use of opinions of private experts appointed by each of the parties, since these orders could not modify the Rules of Arbitration and none of the parties understood them that way (…).
Data wydania: 28-02-2019 | Sygnatura: V CSK 63/18
Key issues: arbitrator, arbitration procedureid: 20535
Wrocław Court of Appeal judgment dated 31 August 2017 Case No. I ACa 536/17
1. Under Civil Procedure Code Art. 1183, “In a proceeding before the arbitral tribunal the parties shall be treated equally. Each party shall have the right to be heard and to present its arguments and evidence in support thereof.” Thus, in light of this requirement of Polish law, it should be recognized that the principle of equality of the parties is an overriding principle of civil procedure, even if not expressly addressed in any other provision of the Civil Procedure Code.
2. Impartiality is maintained when the arbitrator maintains the same distance in relation to each of the parties, is neutral, does not show favour, and also does not discriminate against either of the parties and is not prejudiced against any of the parties. These circumstances involving the failure to maintain impartiality by the arbitrator deciding the case are relevant under the grounds for setting aside an arbitration award. And thus, lack of impartiality of the arbitrator is the basis for an allegation of violation of the fundamental principles of procedure before the arbitral tribunal, as well as an allegation of inconsistency with fundamental principles of the legal order of the Republic of Poland (Civil Procedure Code Art. 1206 §1(4) and 1206 §2(2)).
3. The debtor of an attached claim should tender performance to the creditor. Fulfilment of such performance results in extinguishment of the debt to the original creditor. It is irrelevant whether this performance occurred outside a judicial enforcement proceeding or during the course of such proceeding as a result of measures taken by the court bailiff. Thus including such claim in an arbitration award violated a fundamental principle of the public policy of the Republic of Poland.
Data wydania: 31-08-2017 | Sygnatura: I ACa 536/17
Key issues: arbitrator, arbitration procedure, petition to set aside arbitration awardid: 20446
Katowice Court of Appeal judgment dated 23 March 2017 Case No. V ACa 415/16
1. That an arbitrator has knowledge about a given legal institution and presents it, evaluates specific legal institutions and financial instruments, conducts lectures and writes publications, does not constitute a circumstance raising doubts, let alone justified doubts, as to his impartiality and independence.
2. Publication of comments of an expert nature on specific subjects, analyzing them, preparing private opinions for other entities resulting from a broader analysis of practices on the foreign exchange market, reflecting all of the market participants and their intentions, does not constitute a circumstance disqualifying an arbitrator.
3. Under Civil Procedure Code Art. 1173 §1, an arbitrator must be an independent and impartial person. These are fundamental characteristics required of an arbitrator, as an element of the right to a fair trial is the party’s right to consideration of its case by an impartial and independent court. This has to do with the absence of relations between the arbitrator and the parties to the dispute that could affect the substance of the award.
4. The IBA Guidelines on Conflicts of Interest in International Arbitration … are designed to assist in the practice of determining the circumstances that may generate justified doubts as to an arbitrator’s impartiality and independence, which circumstances are subject under applicable national law to mandatory disclosure by a candidate for arbitrator, and which are justified by the open-ended nature of the concepts of “impartiality” and “independence.” The guidelines are not of normative relevance, but establish certain standards on how to evaluate specific situations from the point of view of the requirement for the arbitrator’s impartiality and independence. They are commonly recognized in arbitration practice as a document in the nature of best practice, indicating circumstances that enable an assessment, particularly in ambiguous situations. The document sets forth general standards concerning impartiality, independence and disclosure, and a detailed section with examples of conflict of interest, classifying them in terms of the possible occurrence of justified doubts as to an arbitrator’s impartiality and independence.
5. Civil Procedure Code Art. 1174 §2 is devoted to the issue of removal of an arbitrator, providing that an arbitrator may be removed only when circumstances exist generating justified doubts as to his impartiality or independence, although there is a sound argument that the circumstances involving a state court judge can help interpret this section by analogy. When evaluating this condition, objective criteria of assessment are relevant, not the subjective beliefs of the party filing the challenge.
6. In a situation where a party aware of circumstances that could give rise to justified doubts as to an arbitrator’s impartiality or independence does not exercise its rights, it forfeits the right to reserve them until filing an application to set aside the arbitration award (Civil Procedure Code Art. 1193). A party aware of a given circumstance cannot passively wait to see what kind of award is issued in the case and then condition its actions with respect to challenging the arbitrator on the result. What is relevant is that the circumstances relied on by the party were known to the party, and when they were known.
7. Whether a party exercised its right to present to the state court the ruling on the issue of the existence of grounds to remove an arbitrator is relevant to the further course of the proceedings. In a situation where the party did not challenge the arbitrator before the state court pursuant to Civil Procedure Code Art. 1176 §2, the party forfeits this basis for subsequent challenge to the arbitration award using an application to set aside the award relying on the grounds concerning the arbitrator which were previously existing and known to the party.
Data wydania: 23-03-2017 | Sygnatura: V ACa 415/16
Key issues: arbitrator, petition to set aside arbitration awardid: 20441
Łódź Court of Appeal judgment dated 3 March 2017 Case No. I ACa 1139/16
1. A petition [to set aside an arbitration award] in the current shape, maintaining its distinct character with all its limitations, in particular concerning the grounds of the petition, is similar to an appeal. If a petition is well-founded, a state court may only revoke an arbitration award, which does not lead to expiration of the arbitration agreement (Art. 1211 of the PCPC) and should not be treated as consideration of the merits of the case submitted to arbitration. A ruling of a state court frustrates the effects of an arbitration award if any of the grounds indicated in Art. 1206 of the PCPC occurred, however, a ruling of a state court does not resolve, as a matter of principle, the legal dispute between the parties which was referred to arbitration with the exception of determining that an arbitration agreement does not exist, is invalid, ineffective or lost its legal power according to the applicable law.
2. Commencement of proceedings to remove an arbitrator before the conclusion of the proceedings before an arbitral tribunal results in the proceedings regulated in Art. 1176 of the PCPC being the proper procedure to consider the application and the assessment whether there were grounds to remove an arbitrator. However, in the situation of conclusion of proceedings before an arbitral tribunal, the only way to challenge the composition of the arbitral tribunal delivering the award in the case are proceedings initiated by a petition to set aside an arbitration award.
3. In evaluating whether an arbitration award in inconsistent with the fundamental principles of the legal order, the content of the award should be considered, and not the correctness of the procedure before the arbitral tribunal or the correctness of the composition thereof.
4. Because of the fact that the relationships between the arbitral tribunal and the claimant are of institutional and permanent character and the mere arbitration agreement concerns purely and simply one relevant arbitral tribunal, it should be deemed consequently that the arbitration agreement of such content is at least ineffective, i.e. it does not bring any legal effects. It is also reasonable to assume that the arbitration agreement is invalid because the dispute cannot be adjudicated by the indicated arbitral tribunal, i.e. the arbitration award has no relevant content.
Data wydania: 03-03-2017 | Sygnatura: I ACa 1139/16
Key issues: arbitration agreement, arbitration award, arbitration procedure, arbitrator, petition to set aside arbitration awardid: 20562
Katowice Court of Appeal judgment dated 18 November 2016 Case No. V ACa 67/16
1. The set of fundamental principles of procedure before the arbitral tribunal includes only the rules arising under the Civil Procedure Code and the rules agreed by the parties, which does not include the custom [under §9(3) of the Code of Best Practice for Permanent Arbitration Courts, providing that a party applying for default appointment of an arbitrator subject to nomination by both parties or by the previously appointed arbitrators should notify the appointment authority of all candidacies considered and rejected by the parties or the arbitrators and none of those persons should be appointed in the default procedure].
2. The legal classification of a contract by the arbitral tribunal is not subject to review on a petition to set aside an arbitration award.
Data wydania: 18-11-2016 | Sygnatura: V ACa 67/16
Key issues: arbitrator, arbitration procedure, petition to set aside arbitration awardid: 20437
Polish Supreme Court judgment dated 16 November 2016 Case No. I CSK 780/15
1. The Polish Civil Procedure Code in Art. 1157 enables the parties to subject to arbitration certain categories of disputes. The provisions of part five of this Code and any other regulations contained in the procedural act do not indicate, however, that this type of examination of civil law cases is treated by the legislator as either being better or worse than judicial proceedings. To the contrary, it should be assumed that it is of equal character and it should be treated in the same way.
2. Therefore, by rejecting the strict (restrictive), and conversely, extended interpretation, which would be aimed at maintaining the jurisdiction of the arbitration tribunal at all costs, the arbitration agreement should be interpreted in a way that shall ensure finding of the joint will of the parties and respecting thereof.
3. To use arbitration as a method of dispute resolution, it is essential for the parties to conclude a special agreement – an arbitration agreement (…), in which they shall indicate the subject of the dispute or the legal relationship under which the dispute has arisen or may arise. This minimum content specified by the legislator is both necessary and at the same time sufficient, because in the absence of other provisions, the relevant provisions of the Polish Civil Procedure Code apply, which have enabled both appointment of an arbitration tribunal as well as conduct of arbitration proceedings and issue of an award.
4. Apart from the minimum content, an arbitration agreement may also contain additional provisions (Art. 1161 § 2 of the Polish Civil Procedure Code) by means of which the parties may shape the arbitration procedure according to their expectations and needs. Including in an arbitration agreement of such additional provisions (exceeding the statutory minimum) is always voluntary and is not necessary to have a case heard by arbitrators. So, if the parties had made additional arrangements and included them in the arbitration agreement, these arrangements cannot be treated as meaningless, quite to the contrary, they should be given the meaning resulting from the will of the parties.
5. Regulation of certain issues relating to the arbitration procedure in the broad sense in an arbitration agreement is an expression of the autonomy of the will of the parties and demonstrates unequivocally that the intention of the parties was not to subject their dispute to arbitrators, but to subject it on the terms and conditions specified by the parties. Moreover, it is justified to argue that since the content of the arbitration agreement was agreed upon by the parties, their consent to arbitration was conditional upon inclusion of certain provisions in the arbitration agreement.
6. An arbitration agreement is not only the source of judicial power of arbitrators (along with the relevant basis resulting from the statutory law, but also delimits this power (which an arbitration court cannot exceed) and the way of its exercise. Consequently, arbitrators must, by default, know the content of the arbitration agreement and should conduct proceedings in such a way that the will of the parties disclosed in the arbitration agreement is respected to the fullest extent possible.
7. [W]hen the parties include specific provisions in an arbitration agreement, they must be aware of their meaning and consequences which these provisions may have. When the parties include in an arbitration agreement a relatively short time limit for issue of an award, they should be aware that compliance with this time limit may be difficult or even impossible.
8. From the fact that the arbitrators did not comply with the provisions of the arbitration agreement and adopted a manner of proceeding which in advance excluded keeping the time limit specified in the arbitration agreement, under no circumstances can it be inferred what the original will of the parties was. Arbitrators are obliged to comply with the provisions of the arbitration agreement and they should be aware that failure to comply with the will of the parties expressed in the arbitration agreement may consequently result in setting aside of their award.
Data wydania: 16-11-2016 | Sygnatura: I CSK 780/15
Key issues: arbitrator, arbitration agreement, arbitration procedureid: 20552
Warsaw Court of Appeal judgment dated 15 December 2014 Case No. VI ACa 311/14
1. It is permissible to seek to set aside an arbitration award in part, if the challenged resolution can be separated from the remaining part of the award.
2. In a proceeding to set aside an arbitration award, the court cannot set aside the award in part if the petitioner applied to set aside the award in its entirety and there are grounds to grant the petition. This is because a demand to set aside an arbitration award in part is not a lesser included demand in a demand to set aside the award in its entirety; it is a different type of demand. Moreover, if the particular parts of the award interlock so that none of the parts can be separated from the other parts without materially deforming the entirety, it is impermissible to set aside the award in part.
3. Informing a party only in the justification of the award that (despite denying the claim in its entirety) one of the party’s demands was not considered because the fee for that claim was not paid, when that demand was the subject of examination during the evidentiary proceeding and was the subject of the response to the statement of claim and pleadings by both parties, while at the same time granting the demands of the opposing party in their entirety, which resolution was dependent on the resolution of the plaintiff’s demands, indicates that the arbitration award is contrary to the public policy clause, depriving the party of the ability to exercise the rights provided by regulations of substantive law and also indirectly depriving the party of a defence against the counterclaims of the opposing party. This method of proceeding before the arbitration court violates the party’s right to a fair and honest trial.
4. Resolving the respondent’s demands in their entirety before resolving the claimant’s complete demand, regardless of whether or not the party could apply for supplementation of the award, is also contrary to fundamental principles of the legal order, including violation of the principle of equal treatment of the parties. Moreover, the arbitration court would already be bound by the award issued by it in the part concerning the counterclaim, and thus it could not issue a ruling with different substantive legal consequences. Undoubtedly the principles of a fair trial require that the party be informed prior to issuance of an award of the possible taking of a procedural decision as to one of the party’s claims, regardless of whether the claimant’s claim is deemed to be an alternative claim (as it was worded, in the event that the main claim is not upheld) or as a separate procedural claim in an accumulation of claims.
5. The defence of the ineffectiveness of an arbitration clause may be asserted not only by the respondent, but also by the claimant. However, it is indicated in the legal literature that in such case, the claimant, as the party initiating the proceeding before the arbitration court, should make a thorough analysis of the factual and legal state of the case, including issues connected with the grounds for commencement of the proceeding before the arbitration court, and if it concludes that the clause is ineffective, it should file the case with the state court, which upon the objection of the respondent will resolve the issue of the effectiveness of the clause. As indicated in the literature, asserting the ineffectiveness of the clause only at this stage violates the principle of due diligence which a professional participant in commercial dealings is required to comply with.
6. An arbitration clause may cease to be in force in the instances set forth in Civil Procedure Code Art. 1168 and 1195 §4 or in the bankruptcy law, or in the occurrence of certain substantive legal events (e.g. repudiation of the legal consequences of a declaration of will), including those indicated by the parties as the reasons for the clause ceasing to be in force. The mere change in the rules of the arbitration court does not result in loss of force of the clause, either under the regulations currently in force or in accordance with the regulations in force on the date of conclusion of the clause.
7. The mere fact that one of the parties to the arbitration participated in creation of the list of arbitrators by nominating candidates for arbitrators from among persons who are authorities in the given field does not mean that there is dependency between the arbitrator and the party or that the party has greater rights. Despite the indirect influence of the banks over a portion of some panels of arbitrators, the rules of the Court of Arbitration at [the Polish Bank Association] ensure the impartially of the arbitration court and do not violate the principle of the equality of the parties in the arbitration proceeding. Because there are numerous arbitrators [on the list], and the party does not know which of them will hear the case and does not select a specific person as presiding arbitrator, it cannot be found that the party had greater rights than its opponent.
8. A petition to set aside an arbitration award may concern issues of the procedure followed only if fundamental principles of procedure before the arbitration court, arising out of a statute or specified by the parties, were not complied with (Civil Procedure Code Art. 1206 §1(4)). In essence this has to do with failure to comply with fundamental principles of civil procedure, but it was not demonstrated that the arbitration court failed to comply with such principles.
Data wydania: 15-12-2014 | Sygnatura: VI ACa 311/14
Key issues: arbitration agreement, arbitration award, arbitration procedure, arbitrator, petition to set aside arbitration awardid: 20387
Polish Supreme Court order dated 16 October 2014 Case No. III CZ 39/14
1. The subject of a ruling ending the proceedings in the case is the resolution of the dispute defined by the statement of claim or the conclusion of the proceedings with respect to that dispute. The dispute pending before the arbitration court in which an application was filed to remove an arbitrator will end before the state court with a ruling on the petition to set aside the arbitration award. It thus cannot be said that the route to consideration of the application was closed as a result of rejection of the applicant’s cassation appeal.
2. Issuance of an award by the arbitration court does not render moot a proceeding before the state court to remove an arbitrator, which proceeding will continue until the application is decided. Granting of the application could provide possible grounds for setting aside the arbitration award. Even if the application to remove an arbitrator has not been ruled on, a party which complied with the deadline for filing such application does not lose the right to rely on the existence of grounds to remove the arbitrator in the petition to set aside the award.
Data wydania: 16-10-2014 | Sygnatura: III CZ 39/14
Key issues: arbitrator, petition to set aside arbitration awardid: 20385
Szczecin Court of Appeal judgment dated 4 September 2014 Case No. I ACa 364/14
1. [I]n case of an ad hoc arbitral tribunal, there is no requirement that the same panel of arbitrators has to consider all cases arising out of a specific legal relationship. Under one contract – if the parties have different claims, there is no obstacle for each claim to be examined by different arbitrators, for example due to the fact that they can specialize in different categories of cases or have the expertise necessary to properly assess only one of the claims. It should be emphasized that a specific agreement (so-called receptum arbitrii) is concluded between a person entitled to appoint an arbitrator and the arbitrator. Such an agreement bounds each of the arbitrators with both parties and obliges: the arbitrators to resolve the dispute impartially and the parties to pay the remuneration… . A person appointed to be an arbitrator is not obliged to accept the position of the arbitrator. Since it is an agreement, both the person entitled to appoint an arbitrator and the appointed arbitrator need to know the scope of the agreement – in this case, the subject of the dispute.
2. There is a dispute in the doctrine of civil law as to what character – procedural or substantive – the choice of arbitrators has. The Court of Appeal shared the view that it is only a substantive legal statement. This character of the statement is not only supported by the fact that it is a part of a civil law agreement, but also by the specific limitation of the possibility of its revocation. Currently, both the doctrine and the case law provide that procedural statements are revocable by nature and substantive elements are revocable only when relevant statutory prerequisites exist. In the situation of appointment of an arbitrator, the law-maker in a significant way, by enumeration in the statutory law, has limited a party’s unilateral right to remove an arbitrator once selected by the party. It is commonly accepted that Art. 61 of the Polish Civil Code applies to this statement, i.e. a norm reserved for substantive law statements. The lack of a substantive law power of attorney and the lack of confirmation of this activity by the company being the respondent results in the statement not having the expected legal effects, i.e. it does not lead to appointment of an arbitrator or conclusion of an agreement between the parties and the person appointed to be an arbitrator.
3. [A]n arbitration award may be said to be contrary to the fundamental principles of the legal order only with respect to constitutional principles of the socio-economic system or the fundamental principles governing specific fields of substantive law. The fundamental principles of the legal order being the basis of an assessment of an arbitration award shall be understood not only as constitutional norms, but also as ground norms in particular fields of law. It has been recognized in the case law that such principles include, among other things, the principle of economic freedom and freedom of contracts…, the principle of the autonomy of the will of the parties and the equality of the parties and the principle of social justice… .
4. [T]he procedural public policy may be the basis for assessment of an arbitration award in two aspects. Firstly, the procedure which led to the delivery of an arbitration award is assessed for its compliance with the fundamental procedural principles of the legal order, secondly, the effects of the arbitration award are assessed from the perspective of their consistency with the procedural public policy, i.e. whether they are compatible with the procedural legal system, for example, whether they do not infringe res iudicata or the rights of third parties.
5. The public policy clause is not intended for a review of the merits (correctness) of an arbitration award. The prohibition of a review of the merits of an arbitration award is related to the essence of the application of the public policy clause. By application of this clause, the point is not to determine whether the award is consistent with all relevant mandatorily applicable legal regulations, but only to determine whether the award effected a result contrary to the fundamental principles of the domestic legal order.
6. A violation, by an arbitral tribunal, of substantive law applicable to the considered relationship, compliance with which is prescribed in Art. 1194 § 1 of the PCPC, may result in setting aside of an award of this tribunal only when it is connected with an infringement of the fundamental principles of the legal order.
7. An allegation of infringement of Art. 1183 of the PCPC may be justified when an arbitral tribunal conducts proceedings in omission of evidence offered by a party, if this evidence was necessary to resolve the case.
Data wydania: 04-09-2014 | Sygnatura: I ACa 364/14
Key issues: arbitrator, arbitration procedure, petition to set aside arbitration awardid: 20621
Katowice Court of Appeal order dated 7 March 2014 Case No. I ACz 121/14
1. The regulations of Title III, Part Five, of the Civil Procedure Code, concerning arbitration, clearly adopt the principle of the priority of the mutual intent of the parties as to the composition of the arbitral tribunal and the manner of appointment of the arbitrators and the presiding arbitrator.
2. Appointment of the presiding arbitrator by the arbitrators may occur after the end of the one-month period following their appointment provided in the act, but before consideration of the application by the state court. … Because the basis for the Civil Procedure Code regulations concerning arbitration is to award priority to the intent of the parties, it would be groundless, irrational and contrary to a purposive interpretation of these regulations to deny the parties the right to decide for themselves on the composition of the arbitral tribunal solely because a court case is already pending concerning this—prior to issuance of a judicial ruling. The one-month period under Civil Procedure Code Art. 1171 §2 should be regarded as establishing the right of a party to file an application to the state court for appointment of an arbitrator or presiding arbitrator, and not as a preclusive period after which the parties lose the right to decide for themselves on whom to appoint as members of the arbitral tribunal.
Data wydania: 07-03-2014 | Sygnatura: I ACz 121/14
Key issues: arbitrator, arbitration procedureid: 20412
Gdańsk Appellate Court order dated 11 February 2014 Case No. I ACz 1475/13
1. Because the [New York] Convention exhaustively governs the grounds for recognition and enforcement of a foreign arbitration award (Art. V of the Convention), the Polish court may not resort to Art. 1215 § 2 in connection with Art. 1214 § 3 (2) of the Civil Procedure Code.
2. The arbitrator’s and counsel’s membership in the same barristers’ chambers does not automatically constitute a source of a conflict of interest but should be considered on a case-by-case basis.
3. In a proceeding for enforcement of a foreign arbitration award, the public policy clause cannot take the place of the procedure for appointment of an arbitrator which the party to the arbitration proceeding declined to follow and which served to reduce the risk of abuse of non-meritorious objections concerning the independence and impartiality of the arbitrator after the completion of the arbitration proceeding.
Data wydania: 11-02-2014 | Sygnatura: I ACz 1475/13
Key issues: New York Convention, arbitrator, recognition and enforcement of foreign arbitration awardid: 20190
Warsaw Court of Appeal judgment dated 15 January 2014 Case No. VI ACa 663/13
1. An arbitrator must not be connected to any of the parties to the proceeding; he should be free of any obligations and pressures, and in performing the duties of arbitrator should decide solely in accordance with his own determination, based on the material gathered in the case. Disclosure of such circumstances must be made promptly after the person is appointed as arbitrator or the circumstances arise. [Civil Procedure Code Art. 1174 § 1] also refers to circumstances that could raise doubts as to the impartiality or independence of the arbitrator, not circumstances that do raise doubts.
2. The opposing party, and the not the arbitrator, is given the right to make an assessment of whether the circumstances disclosed by the arbitrator raise doubts or not, and potentially to initiate the procedure pursuant to Civil Procedure Code Art. 1176 § 3 and 4, including filing of an application to the state court to remove the arbitrator. It must be clearly stressed, however, that the existence of circumstances that could raise a doubt as to the independence or impartiality of an arbitrator is not equivalent to a finding of a lack of impartiality or independence of the person appointed as arbitrator.
3. The right to make a setoff is a subjective right of the holder and cannot be limited in its realization. Asserting this objection is also a procedural form of the respondent’s defence against the claimant, which it cannot be deprived of. In considering the defence of setoff asserted by the respondent as part of the examination of the justification for the principal claim, the arbitration court did not have to condition this examination on the existence of an arbitration clause in this respect.
4. The jurisdiction of the court considering a petition to set aside an arbitration award generally does not include review of the consistency of the award with substantive law or an examination of the correctness of the factual findings, other than a ruling based on a clearly selective and unobjective assessment of the evidence. Here, the grounds for the arbitration award are extensive, multifaceted and based on the indicated evidence, and explain the basis for the finding by the arbitration court that the claim for damages by the principal respondent asserted as a setoff to the claim of the principal claimant existed in the specified amount and the effectiveness of the setoff made, which resulted in denial of the principal claim. Examination of the justification for the petition is therefore not equivalent to substantive review of the award. Moreover, the appellant must remember that in deciding to submit the dispute for resolution by an arbitration court, it must be aware of both the positive and negative consequences. On one hand, the contracting parties are not exposed to the risk of lengthy proceedings, but on the other hand they waive certain procedural guarantees which apply in proceedings before the state court. Nor was there any barrier to the proceedings before the arbitration court being conducted in two instances (Civil Procedure Code Art. 1205 § 2).
Data wydania: 15-01-2014 | Sygnatura: VI ACa 663/13
Key issues: arbitrator, arbitration agreement, arbitration procedure, petition to set aside arbitration awardid: 20388
Warsaw Court of Appeal judgment dated 5 December 2013 Case No. I ACa 1107/12
1. Taking into consideration the additional argument related to the decisive influence of the parties on the choice of the arbitrator and its significance for the proper appointment of the arbitrator within the meaning of Art. 1206 § 1 point 4 of the PCPC, it shall not be questionable that in a situation when the person of an arbitrator was known to the petitioner before the rendering of the arbitration award, admissibility of filing of a petition to set aside an arbitration award on this basis shall be limited to the situation when an appropriate allegation has been made first, as well as that the omission, indirectly indicating acceptance of the person of the arbitrator, even if appointed in breach of the rules regarding his/her appointment laid down by the parties or provided for in the Arbitration Rules of a permanent court of arbitration, who was mutually appointed by the parties to resolve the dispute between them, shall result in non-admissibility of a petition based on such an allegation, since such a solution has been adopted in Art. 1193 of the PCPC.
2. [I]t unequivocally follows from this provision [Art. 1189 § 1 of the PCPC – insertion added], especially from the beginning of the second sentence, that a hearing before an arbitral tribunal is not obligatory and that the parties’ arrangements, which also means acceptance of the Arbitration Rules in force chosen by the parties to resolve a given case, are of essential significance.
3. It is also unjustified to find that the public policy clause is infringed by an omission of making a written declaration regarding impartiality by an arbitrator when no specific circumstances justifying the exclusion of the arbitrator were given and demonstrated, also in proceedings initiated by a petition [to set aside an arbitration award – insertion added] by the party who has not filed such a petition… .
4. [R]endering an award in disregard of the fact that a final ruling has been rendered in the case regarding the same claim and between the same parties before an arbitration award covered by the petition is rendered or infringement of third parties’ rights may advocate in favour of application of Art. 1206 § 2 point 2 of the PCPC for the benefit for the party filing the petition… .
Data wydania: 05-12-2013 | Sygnatura: I ACa 1107/12
Key issues: arbitrator, arbitration procedure, petition to set aside arbitration awardid: 20614
Warsaw Court of Appeal judgment dated 10 April 2013 Case No. I ACa 1260/12
1. Arbitrators perform duties delegated to them by the parties as private persons, and are not representatives of the state judiciary. … arbitral tribunals do not administer justice within the constitutional meaning (Art. 175 of the Constitution of the Republic of Poland).
2. It is noted in the doctrine that submitting a case to the competence of an arbitral tribunal may be treated as a resignation – within the limits set by law – from the constitutionally guaranteed right to court of the parties, i.e. a right to request a state court to hear and resolve the case. This does not mean, of course, a waiver of the right to court in general or a resignation in full from the judicial protection of rights afforded by state courts, but a decision to resign from legal protection in a particular case or cases which may arise out of a given legal relationship (that is within the limits indicated in the arbitration agreement) directly before a state court. This resignation is not, however, total, because, firstly, arbitration is based on specific rules which the parties cannot derogate and which are intended to ensure reliability of proceedings (provisions of part five of the Polish Civil Procedure Code), and secondly, arbitration awards are subject to review by state courts.
3. The rules resulting from the Constitution of the Republic of Poland referring to the state administration of justice, including Art. 45, cannot be applied to arbitration which derives its competence to resolve a given dispute from a free, autonomous decision of the parties as to the way of exercise of their private rights.
4. Art. 1161 § 1 and 3 of the Polish Civil Procedure Code makes it unequivocally clear that the error on which the claimant relied in the case, i.e. that the claimant did not know that if had no funds to pay the registration and arbitration fees, it would be deprived of the possibility to initiate proceedings before the Court of Arbitration at the Polish Chamber of Commerce, caused by the failure of defendant 1 to inform the claimant of the Arbitration Rules and fees table and to present them for approval, was not an error relating to the content of the legal act.
Data wydania: 10-04-2013 | Sygnatura: I ACa 1260/12
Key issues: arbitrator, arbitration agreement, arbitration procedureid: 20594
Szczecin Court of Appeal judgment Dated 21 March 2013 Case No. I ACa 855/12
1. Even though (if the parties did not agree otherwise) the arbitral tribunal shall resolve a dispute applying the regulations of substantive law applicable to the legal relationship, violation of substantive law by the arbitral tribunal is grounds for a petition to set aside the award only if as a result of the violation, the award is contrary to fundamental principles of the legal order of the Republic of Poland. In other words, if despite a violation of substantive law the award cannot be said to be contrary to fundamental principles of the legal order, the mere violation cannot constitute an effective basis for demanding that the award be set aside.
2. The construction of a petition to set aside an arbitration award indicates that this measure is not used to conduct substantive review by the state court of the correctness of the resolution by the arbitral tribunal, similar to appellate review in judicial proceedings.
3. An award is contrary to fundamental principles of the legal order when this concerns constitutional principles of the socio-economic system or leading principles governing specific fields of substantive law. The fundamental principles of the legal order constituting the basis for evaluation of an arbitration award should be understood not only as constitutional norms, but also the leading norms in specific fields of law. … The procedural legal order may be the basis for evaluation of an arbitration award in two aspects. First, the compliance of the procedure which led to issuance of the arbitration award with fundamental procedural principles of the legal order is subject to evaluation. Second, the consequences of the arbitration award from the point of view of their compliance with the procedural public order are subject to evaluation, i.e., whether they are reconcilable with the system of procedural law, e.g. whether they violate res judicata or the rights of third parties.
4. A party forfeits the right to challenge an arbitration award through a petition to set aside the award due to failure to raise objections to an arbitrator subject, in the party’s view, to removal, if the party did not demand removal in the proceeding before the arbitral tribunal.
5. The requirements established for persons serving as arbitrator should be combined with the entitlement of a party to the proceeding to obtain knowledge about any potential ties between the arbitrator and the entities appearing in the proceeding. Generally it is left to the party to evaluate whether the circumstances constitute grounds for a decision whether to select an arbitrator or a decision to challenge the arbitrator. In this sense, the arbitrator’s own assessment is irrelevant, as the essence of the fairness of the procedure is connected with external evaluations made by others.
6. Indeed, the right to a fair trial provided in Art. 45(1) of the Polish Constitution, an element of which is consideration of the case by an independent court in a fairly conducted proceeding, does fall within the fundamental principles of the legal order whose violation the state court must examine at its own initiative. However, it is indicated in the case law and the legal literature that Art. 45 of the Constitution does not apply at all to arbitration, only the state courts.
7. The institution of recusal of a judge is provided for by the Civil Procedure Code both in proceedings before the state court and in proceedings before an arbitration court. The fundamental difference in the regulation of this institution is that in a proceeding before an arbitration court, the code does not provide for removal of the arbitrator or presiding arbitrator by operation of law, as is the case with respect to a judge in proceedings before the state court (Civil Procedure Code Art. 48). The grounds for challenging an arbitrator indicated in Civil Procedure Code Art. 1174 §2 are circumstances raising justified doubts as to his impartiality or independence, as well as lack of qualifications specified in the parties’ agreement. The grounds for recusal of a judge listed in Art. 48 and 49 do not apply to challenge of an arbitrator, but in interpreting the concept of circumstances raising justified doubts as to impartiality or independence Art. 48 and 49 may have auxiliary application. In a proceeding before a state court, under Civil Procedure Code Art. 379(4), participation by a judge recused by operation of law becomes grounds for the invalidity of the proceeding and constitutes grounds to vacate the judgment by the appellate court, as well as by the Supreme Court, and this ground shall be considered by both of these courts at their own initiative (Civil Procedure Code Art. 378 §2 and 39311). … The Civil Procedure Code does not provide for such absolute invalidity in proceedings before an arbitration court. If a party did not challenge an arbitrator or presiding arbitrator despite possessing knowledge of the grounds for challenge, there are no legal grounds to challenge the arbitration award. As an exception only, participation in an arbitration panel by an arbitrator or presiding arbitrator whose rights and obligations could be affected by the result in the case could constitute grounds for setting aside the award, which did not occur in this case. This is because violation of the principle that no one can be a judge in his own case (nemo in re sua judex) would undoubtedly conflict with the fundamental principles of the legal order of the Republic of Poland.
Data wydania: 21-03-2013 | Sygnatura: I ACa 855/12
Key issues: arbitrator, arbitration award, petition to set aside arbitration awardid: 20405
Polish Supreme Court order dated 19 October 2012 Case No. V CSK 503/11
1. Violation of the principle of the equality of the parties may also occur through adoption of the specific wording of the rules of an arbitration court (Civil Procedure Code Art. 1161 §3). … Under the Civil Procedure Code provisions on arbitration, the equality of the parties means—generally speaking—awarding the parties equal rights, both within the main arbitration clause itself and in the rules of the permanent arbitration court, creating equal opportunities for the parties in the definitive resolution of the dispute covered by the agreement.
2. In determining whether the principle [of the equality of the parties] is complied with in the arbitration agreement, a clear distinction should be made between the content of the arbitration agreement itself (also including the provisions of the rules of the permanent arbitration court) and the general rules of operation of the permanent arbitration court. … The principle of the equality of the parties within the meaning of Civil Procedure Code Art. 1161 should be addressed to the content of the arbitration agreement itself, and not to such elements of an organizational nature, which only establish the necessary and proper legal and organizational infrastructure to assure the parties the ability to establish the appropriate panel of arbitrators within the individual legal dispute.
3. Organizational ties between permanent arbitration courts and various professional associations or business organizations are not determinative of a specific dependence on the organizations where the arbitration courts operate or a lack of impartiality of specific arbitrators.
Data wydania: 19-10-2012 | Sygnatura: V CSK 503/11
Key issues: arbitrator, arbitration agreement, arbitration procedureid: 20278
Polish Supreme Court resolution dated 8 September 2011 Case No. III CZP 41/11
1. An interlocutory appeal will lie against an order by the state court, as the court of first instance, denying a motion to challenge an arbitrator.
2. The issue of the independence and impartiality of the arbitrator goes to the essence of the arbitration proceeding as a non-judicial procedure for resolving private legal disputes.
3. Impartiality is a certain intellectual attitude, a psychological state of an objective judge (or arbitrator). In opposition to this, partiality is a characteristic connected with a real or apparent biased attitude of the decision-maker in favour of one of the parties or with respect to the issues in dispute.
4. It is asserted in the literature that “independence” refers only to issues arising out of a relationship between the judge (or arbitrator) and one of the parties. Independence means the lack of any relationship between the arbitrator and the parties to the dispute, in the past or during the course of the proceeding, that could affect the substance of the decision.
5. If the deadline indicated in Civil Procedure Code Art. 1176 passes without effect, the party obtains a right to apply to the state court (within two weeks) to recuse the arbitrator.
6. The proceeding before the state court is conducted on the basis of the Civil Procedure Code. Thus the issue of the permissibility of an interlocutory appeal against the order of the state court denying the motion to recuse the arbitrator should be considered on the basis of application of Civil Procedure Code Art. 394 §1 as relevant.
Data wydania: 08-09-2011 | Sygnatura: III CZP 41/11
Key issues: state court assistance, arbitratorid: 20357
Polish Supreme Court order dated 24 November 2010 Case No. II CSK 291/10
1. The impermissibility of the common court’s hearing a case because of a binding arbitration clause (absent the grounds set forth in Civil Procedure Code Art. 1165 §2) also occurs when resolution of the matter presented for determination by the common court is not possible without resolving a dispute subject to the arbitration clause.
2. The principle of equality expressed in [Civil Procedure Code] Art. 1161 §2 requires ... that neither of the parties to a dispute to be decided by an arbitration court enjoy special rights in the proceeding before such court. This plainly applies to the manner in which arbitrators are selected. This is expressly stated in Art. 1169 §3, which provides that provisions of an agreement awarding one of the parties greater rights in appointment of the arbitration court shall be ineffective. This should be applied as relevant to a situation in which a provision of this type is contained in the rules of the permanent arbitration court selected by the parties.
Data wydania: 24-11-2010 | Sygnatura: CSK 291/10
Key issues: arbitrability of dispute, arbitrator, arbitration agreementid: 20360
Polish Supreme Court judgment dated 9 September 2010 Case No. I CSK 535/09
1. A petition to set aside an arbitration award is an extraordinary means of review intended to set aside the award if at least one of the grounds exhaustively set forth in Civil Procedure Code Art. 1206 is justified.
2. When considering a petition [to set aside an arbitration award], the state court is bound by the grounds alleged by the petitioner. Only two of the grounds set forth in Civil Procedure Code Art. 1206 §2 are considered on the court’s motion: the non-arbitrability if the dispute and inconsistency of the arbitration award with the fundamental principles of the legal order of the Republic of Poland.
3. The assessment of whether an arbitration award is contrary to fundamental principles of the legal order is addressed to the content of the award, and not the correctness of the procedure before the arbitration court or the composition of the panel. … An arbitration award may be set aside under the public policy clause if it is found that the results included in the content of the award are not consistent with a specific norm which is regarded as one of the fundamental principles of the legal order in force in Poland. ... These principles include not only constitutional norms, but also the overriding norms in specific fields of law.
4. The requirements made of persons serving as arbitrators should be combined with a party’s right to learn about any ties the arbitrator may have to entities appearing in the proceeding. It is up to the party to evaluate such circumstances as grounds for a decision to select an arbitrator or to seek removal of an arbitrator. The arbitrator’s self-assessment is irrelevant, because the essence of a fair procedure is tied to objective judgment by others. ... The fundamental principles of the legal order include the right to a court as provided in Art. 45(1) of the Polish Constitution, an element of which is a party’s right to have its case heard by an independent court, in a fairly conducted procedure.
Data wydania: 09-09-2010 | Sygnatura: I CSK 535/09
Key issues: arbitrator, arbitration procedure, arbitration award, petition to set aside arbitration awardid: 20331
Polish Supreme Court judgment dated 27 November 2008 Case No. IV CSK 292/08
1. A judicial proceeding to set aside an arbitration award should be conducted through to the end in accordance with the provisions in force upon commencement of the proceeding, that is, applying Civil Procedure Code Art. 165 §1, at the time of filing of the petition to set aside the award with the proper court. Thus if the petition was filed prior to 17 October 2005 [when the law was amended], the proceeding thereby initiated should be conducted thereafter in accordance with Civil Procedure Code Art. 712–715, but a proceeding commenced by a petition filed on that date or later, in accordance with Civil Procedure Code Art. 1205–1211. Similarly, a proceeding before an arbitration court should be conducted through to the end in accordance with provisions in force upon commencement of the proceeding. However, in light of the rule set forth in Civil Procedure Code Art. 1186, the date of commencement of a proceeding before an arbitration court will generally be the date of service on the respondent of the document containing the demand for arbitration.
2. In instances in which arbitrators are appointed by each party independently, a new arbitrator appointed by one of the parties has the same status as the former arbitrator. Since the former arbitrator was unable to reach agreement on selection of a super-arbitrator and it was necessary for the super-arbitrator to be appointed by the court, the decision of the court in this respect could hardly be questioned just because of the appearance of a new arbitrator. There is no need to assure him an influence over appointment of the super-arbitrator, since his predecessor with an analogous status failed to make use of his opportunity in this respect.
3. There may be various reasons for loss of force of an arbitration clause. In addition to the procedural grounds listed in Civil Procedure Code Art. 1168 (previously Art. 702 §1) and Art. 1195 §4 (previously Art. 707 §2), it could also involve such events as dissolution of the arbitration agreement, occurrence of a suspensory condition, or lapse of the deadline by which an arbitration award should have been issued. Termination of the agreement containing the clause does not in and of itself constitute such grounds, however. This rule is now stated clearly by Civil Procedure Code Art. 1180, but should not have been in doubt prior to adoption of that provision.
Data wydania: 27-11-2008 | Sygnatura: IV CSK 292/08
Key issues: arbitrator, arbitration agreement, arbitration procedure, petition to set aside arbitration awardid: 20257
Supreme Court order dated 11 May 2006 Case No. I CZ 20/06
In accordance with the established view in the case law, no cassation appeal lies from an order by the court of second instance appointing an arbitrator, and such cassation appeal would be inadmissible.
Data wydania: 11-05-2006 | Sygnatura: I CZ 20/06
Key issues: arbitratorid: 20223
Supreme Court order dated 12 July 2005 Case No. I CZ 38/05
The subject of the motion is ... to appoint arbitrators. ... Regardless of which specific arbitration court the appointment of the arbitrators is to serve, the proceeding is by its nature incidental. The ruling issued in the case thus may not be regarded as ending the proceeding in the case, which under Civil Procedure Code Art. 392 is a condition for permissibility of a cassation appeal.
Data wydania: 12-07-2005 | Sygnatura: I CZ 38/05
Key issues: arbitratorid: 20217
Polish Supreme Court order dated 17 December 1999 Case No. I CZ 177/99
An order by the court of second instance denying a motion to appoint a substitute arbitrator ... is not an order concluding the proceeding in the matter within the meaning of Civil Procedure Code Art. 392 §1.
Data wydania: 17-12-1999 | Sygnatura: I CZ 177/99
Key issues: arbitratorid: 20321
Polish Supreme Court judgment dated 24 September 1999 Case No. I CKN 141/98
1. The institution of recusal of a judge is provided for by the Civil Procedure Code in a proceeding before the state court as well as in a proceeding before an arbitration court. There are differences in how this institution is governed by the code for the two types of proceedings. The fundamental difference is that in a proceeding before an arbitration court, the code does not provide for recusal of an arbitrator or presiding arbitrator by operation of law, as is the case with a judge in a proceeding before the state court (Civil Procedure Code Art. 48).
2. In a proceeding before the arbitration court, an arbitrator or presiding arbitrator may be challenged only upon motion of a party, on the same grounds that would justify recusal of a state judge.
3. If a party challenged an arbitrator or presiding arbitrator in the arbitration, and the challenge was not sustained despite the existence of grounds for the challenge, the party may challenge the arbitration award using a petition to set aside the award under Civil Procedure Code Art. 712 §1(3). If the party did not challenge the arbitrator or presiding arbitrator, it has no legal grounds to challenge the arbitration award. Exceptionally, only participation in the arbitration panel by an arbitrator or presiding arbitrator whose rights and obligations could be affected by the result in the case could serve as a basis for setting aside the arbitration award.
4. The wording of Civil Procedure Code Art. 712 §2 indicates without Any doubt that if the decision by the arbitration court exceeds the bounds of the arbitration clause, a party may seek to set aside the award only in the portion exceeding the arbitration clause, and only in a situation in which a party that actively participated in the proceeding before the arbitration court objected to consideration of the claims exceeding the bounds of the arbitration clause.
Data wydania: 24-09-1999 | Sygnatura: I CKN 141/98
Key issues: arbitratorid: 20164
Polish Supreme Court order dated 24 February 1998 Case No. I CKN 455/97
By permitting in a separate regulation (Civil Procedure Code Art. 701 §3) an interlocutory appeal against an order concerning, among other things, appointment of an arbitrator, the Parliament clearly let it be known that it does not treat them as ending the proceeding in the matter, as then the general rule set forth at the beginning of Civil Procedure Code Art. 394 §1 would apply.
Data wydania: 24-02-1998 | Sygnatura: I CKN 455/97
Key issues: state court assistance, arbitratorid: 20149
Polish Supreme Court order dated 22 January 1997 Case No. I CKN 48/96
1. Because Part 1, Chapter 3 of the Civil Procedure Code, covering the issue of arbitration, does not contain a special regulation on admissibility and deadlines for appellate instruments, the regulations from Chapter 1 will apply as relevant, including among them Civil Procedure Code Art. 392.
2. An order of the province court denying an interlocutory appeal from an order of the district court concerning appointment of an arbitrator and presiding arbitrator may not be regarded as an order ending the proceedings in the case. From the point of view of the proceedings before the state court, the case is ended only by an order ending the proceeding on the petition to set aside the arbitration award (Civil Procedure Code Art. 715), or, as the case may be, an order dismissing the statement of claim because of the existence of an arbitration clause (Civil Procedure Code Art. 199 §1(4)).
Data wydania: 22-01-1997 | Sygnatura: I CKN 48/96
Key issues: state court assistance, arbitratorid: 20144
Poznań Appellate Court judgment dated 23 May 1996 Case No. I ACr 189/96
1. Recusal of an entire court may not be demanded, but only recusal of specific judges (one or more of them), identified by name, but this does not mean that in this case the arbitration court itself could determine that the motion by the defendant should not be granted. The province court correctly stated that the arbitration court may not decide a motion to recuse an arbitrator, either on the merits or on procedural grounds, even if the motion was clearly unjustified or late.
2. The ruling issued as a result of a petition to set aside an arbitration award is in the nature of cassation, and thus the state court may only set aside the award or deny the petition, and may not rule on the merits. In consequence, when the state court sets aside an arbitration award by granting a petition under Civil Procedure Code Art. 712 §1(2)–(5), the arbitration court retains its jurisdiction to decide the dispute.
Data wydania: 23-05-1996 | Sygnatura: I ACr 189/96
Key issues: arbitrator, jurisdiction of arbitral tribunal, petition to set aside arbitration awardid: 20272
Polish Supreme Court resolution dated 12 October 1960 Case No. 3 CO 21/60
1. No review [by the province court] will lie against an order by the county court appointing an arbitrator pursuant to Civil Procedure Code Art. 492.
2. An interested party will be able to assert its allegations connected with appointment of an arbitrator under Civil Procedure Code Art. 492 in an eventual petition to set aside the arbitration award, which may be filed with the state court in the event of the existence of the defects referred to in Civil Procedure Code Art. 510 §1.
Data wydania: 12-10-1960 | Sygnatura: 3 CO 21/60
Key issues: arbitrator, petition to set aside arbitration awardid: 20098
Polish Supreme Court judgment dated 27 June 1960 Case No. 4 CR 874/59
1. An arbitration clause is an agreement which requires written form in order to be valid. For the clause to be valid, there must be submission of a dispute for determination by an arbitration court, in a written declaration (Civil Procedure Code Art. 486 and 487). It is not possible to conclude an agreement submitting a dispute to determination by an arbitration court in an implicit manner.
2. Appointment of an arbitrator is not ... in and of itself a declaration submitting a dispute for determination by an arbitration court, and is not equivalent to making and signing an arbitration clause.
Data wydania: 27-06-1960 | Sygnatura: 4 CR 874/59
Key issues: arbitrator, arbitration agreementid: 20097
Polish Supreme Court ruling dated 17 September 1956 Case No. 3 CR 505/56
1. It follows from Civil Procedure Code Art. 488 §2, which provides that each party shall appoint one arbitrator and the arbitrators so appointed “shall appoint a presiding arbitrator,” unless the arbitration clause provides otherwise, and from Art. 492, which provides that in the event of lack of agreement between the arbitrators, the presiding arbitrator shall be appointed by the state court, that the appointment of a presiding arbitrator is mandatory unless the arbitration clause provides otherwise.
2. Because as a result of failure to appoint a presiding arbitrator the arbitration court was not appointed in the prescribed composition, the award issued by an arbitration court composed of two arbitrators was made in an invalid proceeding.
3. Under applicable law, violation of regulations concerning the composition of the arbitration court constitute absolute grounds for setting aside the arbitration award in every instance.
Data wydania: 17-09-1956 | Sygnatura: 3 CR 505/56
Key issues: arbitrator, petition to set aside arbitration awardid: 20092
Polish Supreme Court ruling dated 16 March 1948 Case No. I C 1260/47
A clause under which one of the parties is given the right to select all or a majority of the arbitrators conflicts with fair practice, as it provides one party an advantage in appointing the arbitrators and subjects the other party to its discretionary power.
Data wydania: 16-03-1948 | Sygnatura: I C 1260/47
Key issues: arbitratorid: 20082
Polish Supreme Court ruling dated 21 May 1946 Case No. C III 879/46
1. It cannot be accepted ... that since the arbitration court decided to apply the regulations of the Civil Procedure Code in its proceedings, any failure to apply such regulations calls for setting aside the arbitration award. ... Requirements may not be imposed on the arbitration court that are stricter than those imposed on the state court.
2. Recusal is ruled on by the arbitration court, in which the presiding arbitrator or other arbitrator whose recusal is sought cannot be replaced by another judge, as in the state court; in the case of removal of the presiding arbitrator or one of the other arbitrators, the arbitration court would not be able to function at all.
3. Since the parties agreed to arbitration, and the arbitration agreement is binding on them, one party may not do anything by act or omission to prevent arbitration. Thus if a party refuses to appoint an arbitrator, the other party may apply to the state court to appoint an arbitrator, and if the arbitrators appointed by the parties, who may act in this respect in accordance with the wishes of the parties, do not reach agreement on appointment of a presiding arbitrator, a party may apply to the state court to appoint a presiding arbitrator.
4. The matter is different if the arbitration court cannot be empanelled or the arbitration cannot be held, without fault of the parties, or if the arbitration court cannot be empanelled in the composition or manner to which the parties agreed and expressed their intent in the arbitration clause. If, for example, the clause provides that the presiding arbitrator is to be selected mutually by the parties, but such agreement cannot be reached, the state court may not appoint the presiding arbitrator, as this would violate the clause, which in such case lapses and ceases to be in force. Similarly, if the clause provides that in the event of a lack of agreement by the arbitrators on selection of the presiding arbitrator, the presiding arbitrator is to be appointed not by the state court but by another institution or person, and such person or institution cannot appoint or refuses to appoint the presiding arbitrator, the arbitration court cannot be empanelled, without fault of the parties, and the parties may not be forced to submit the case to an arbitration court empanelled in a manner other than provided for in the clause. The Civil Procedure Code does not contain any provision under which in such case the state court could take the place of the institution or third party indicated in the clause. The clause thus lapses in this case as well. Of course, both parties may mutually amend the clause in the manner provided by law.
Data wydania: 21-05-1946 | Sygnatura: C III 879/46
Key issues: arbitrator, arbitration agreement, arbitration procedureid: 20080
Polish Supreme Court resolution dated 28 May 1938 Case Nos. C III 2479/36 and C III 1301/36
1. In a proceeding in the common court, governed by the regulations of Part 1, Book 3 of the Civil Procedure Code, if such book does not provide otherwise the provisions of Part 1, Book 2 of the Civil Procedure Code should be applied as relevant.
2. A proceeding commenced upon motion of a party to appoint an arbitrator or a presiding arbitrator is essentially a separate proceeding which is only to prepare the proceeding before the arbitration court. No interlocutory appeal will lie from the appointment of an arbitrator or presiding arbitrator (Civil Procedure Code Art. 485 §2), and thus there may not be a cassation appeal either, as there is no cassation appeal against an order by the court of first instance. However, an interlocutory appeal does lie from the refusal to make an appointment, and a cassation appeal lies from the order of the court of second instance upholding the negative determination of the court of first instance, as from an order ending the proceeding.
3. A proceeding upon a motion by an arbitrator to set his fee is also a separate proceeding, based on the arbitration agreement. Both the arbitrator and the parties litigating before the arbitration court may file interlocutory appeals against the order of the court of first instance and cassation appeals against the order of the court of second instance, as from an order ending the proceeding.
4. A proceeding commenced upon motion of a party seeking a ruling that an arbitration clause has expired is also a separate proceeding before the common court. Here, the state court rules after hearing the dispute between the parties concerning the effectiveness of the agreement. The order resolving this dispute should be considered comparable to a judgment, and thus the parties have a right to file an interlocutory appeal against the order of the court of first instance and a cassation appeal against the order of the court of second instance.
5. Finally, an order on enforceability of an arbitration award or a settlement concluded before the arbitration court also ends a separate proceeding commenced upon motion of a party. ... An interlocutory appeal will thus lie from the order of the court of first instance concerning enforceability, and a cassation appeal will lie from the order of the court of second instance.
6. The court filing fee should be charged on a cassation appeal in the cases referred to above in accordance with general rules.
7. In these instances, the amount in dispute and the amount of the appeal will be the amount in dispute that would be subject to resolution by the arbitration court.
8. In all the foregoing instances, a cassation appeal is obviously permissible only when the amount of the appeal is [at least] PLZ 500 (subject to [Civil Procedure Code] Art. 425 §§ 2 and 3 and Art. XX §1 of the regulations introducing [the Civil Procedure Code]).
Data wydania: 28-05-1938 | Sygnatura: C III 2479/36 and C III 1301/36
Key issues: state court assistance, arbitrator, arbitration agreement, recognition and enforcement of domestic arbitration awardid: 20075
Polish Supreme Court ruling dated 24 May 1938 Case No. C II 2690/37
1. A party bound by an arbitration clause which in its opinion is invalid may file a case in the state court, which will take up the issue of the validity of the clause only if the other party, prior to joining issue on the merits, asserts as a defence that the case belongs in arbitration; otherwise, even a valid clause will cease to be in force (Civil Procedure Code Art. 235).
2. An arbitrator may be recused for the same reasons as a state court judge, who is recused if there is a personal relationship between the judge and a party raising justified doubts as to the judge’s impartiality.
Data wydania: 24-05-1938 | Sygnatura: C II 2690/37
Key issues: arbitrator, arbitration agreementid: 20074
Polish Supreme Court ruling dated 19 November 1937 Case No. C I 2960/36
1. Interference in arbitration by the state courts must be limited to instances strictly provided for by statute. Thus, as Civil Procedure Code Art. 485 §1 provides for appointment of the presiding arbitrator by the state court upon application of a party only when the arbitrators have failed to agree on the selection, that court may not intervene in a case where the parties have failed to agreement on the selection of the presiding arbitrator who was to be appointed upon their mutual agreement.
2. [Civil Procedure Code] Art. 491 §1(4), which provides that an arbitration clause shall cease to be in force “if the parties cannot agree on an arbitrator whom under the clause they were to appoint jointly,” does not draw any distinction as to whether the parties failed to agree on selection of an arbitrator for a single-member panel or a three-member panel, or whether the person who was to be selected upon mutual agreement was intended to be a presiding arbitrator; thus what is fundamentally important is that the manner in which the parties agreed that the court would be empanelled proved impossible because of lack of agreement on selection of an arbitrator.
Data wydania: 19-11-1937 | Sygnatura: C I 2960/36
Key issues: state court assistance, arbitratorid: 20068
Polish Supreme Court ruling dated 8 February 1937 Case No. C III 1254/35
1. An arbitrator is never recused purely by operation of law, as is the case under Civil Procedure Code Art. 54, but recusal of an arbitrator occurs only via a party, and only Civil Procedure Code Art. 55 may be applicable.
2. Recusal of an arbitrator may not be raised for the first time via a petition under [Civil Procedure Code] Art. 503 §1.
3. Neither the German Civil Procedure Code, under which the arbitration clause was made, nor the Polish Civil Procedure Code defines the relationship under the clause as purely personal and not passing to the general successor by way of universal succession.
Data wydania: 08-02-1937 | Sygnatura: C III 1254/35
Key issues: arbitrator, arbitration agreementid: 20067
Polish Supreme Court ruling dated 15 September 1936 Case No. C I 398/36
Art. 1376 of the [Russian] Civil Procedure Code provides that changes in the persons serving as arbitrators may occur upon mutual consent of the parties. In instances of resignation, exclusion or failure to perform their duties by the arbitrators, a new arbitrator is appointed by the party who appointed the outgoing arbitrator. A party’s failure to appoint a new arbitrator does not stay consideration of the dispute, and the resolution by the remaining arbitrators will be lawful. It follows from the foregoing that intervention by the court in such a case is excluded.
Data wydania: 15-09-1936 | Sygnatura: C I 398/36
Key issues: arbitratorid: 20062
Polish Supreme Court ruling dated 8 February 1935 Case No. C III 664/34
1. As the code does not mention intervention by the state court with respect to removal of arbitrators, an interpretation drawn from the justification for the code, for which the applicants argue, would be justified if there were no other provisions indicating that in any instance in which the participation of the state court in an arbitration proceeding is to be permissible, a specific provision of the code is required.
2. As the code does not specifically provide for participation by the state court in the removal of arbitrators, consideration and resolution of this matter lie within the exclusive jurisdiction of the arbitration court.
Data wydania: 08-02-1935 | Sygnatura: C III 664/34
Key issues: arbitratorid: 20048
Polish Supreme Court ruling dated 9 January 1935 Case No. C II 2194/34
1. A party’s lack of confidence in an arbitrator may not constitute grounds for the arbitrator to decline to perform the duties. The arguments in the petition for review seeking to demonstrate that an arbitrator is a decision-maker and at the same time the trusted confidante of the party that appointed him are erroneous.
A party does demonstrate its confidence by choosing someone as an arbitrator in its case, but in the sense that the selected arbitrator will resolve the dispute impartially, not looking only to the interests of the party appointing him as an arbitrator. The arbitrator is not a judge only of that party, but of both parties, and the duty of impartiality arises out of his character as a judge.
2. Regardless of whether it is a matter of non-justiciability or lack of jurisdiction of the court, the arbitration court may not hold an arbitrator liable for payment of costs, but only one of the parties conducting the dispute, for costs caused by conducting the dispute itself.
Data wydania: 09-01-1935 | Sygnatura: C II 2194/34
Key issues: arbitratorid: 20047
Polish Supreme Court ruling dated 16 February 1934 Case No. C III 143/33
1. The state court could only either find the arbitration award enforceable in its entirety or refuse to find the award enforceable also in its entirety, as it is not the place of the state court in considering a case seeking recognition of an arbitration award as enforceable to review which of the reasons behind the award are justified or unjustified, or which item in an accounting was proved or acknowledged by a party, or to enter at all into consideration of the merits of the dispute.
2. The arbitration court may apply § 319 of the [former German] Civil Procedure Code, i.e. correct obvious errors of calculation, typographical errors or the like. It may not, however, amend its material content after service of the award on the parties, unless both parties consent to such amendment.
3. Resignation of appointment is a declaration by arbitrators that they refuse to perform their duties, that they renounce the agreement with the parties obliging them to resolve the dispute.
4. In light of the declaration by the arbitrators in the presence of the parties that they resign their appointments, and thus renounce the agreement to perform the duty of arbitrators, pursuant to § 1033 of the [former German] Civil Procedure Code the arbitration agreement ceased to be in force, and expired.
5. In light of expiration of the arbitration agreement, the arbitrators who resigned their appointments had no legal basis to take up their rights and obligations again upon the unilateral request of the plaintiff without the consent of the defendant, as they did.
Data wydania: 16-02-1934 | Sygnatura: C III 143/33
Key issues: arbitrator, arbitration agreement, arbitration procedure, recognition and enforcement of domestic arbitration awardid: 20040
Polish Supreme Court ruling dated 29 September 1933 Case No. C II Rw 1650/33
The legal relationship that arose between the parties as a result of the plaintiff’s appointment by the defendant as an arbitrator cannot be regarded as a service contract under Civil Law §§ 1151 and 1153 ... or as a contract to perform a specific work (Civil Law §§ 1165 et seq.) ... It is a distinct type of contract which, according to Civil Law § 1391, is governed more specifically by the Civil Procedure Code.
Data wydania: 29-09-1933 | Sygnatura: C II Rw 1650/33
Key issues: arbitratorid: 20038
Polish Supreme Court ruling dated 31 August 1933 Case No. C I 2776/32
Lack of a signature on the award by an arbitrator who has been outvoted cannot be grounds for invalidating the arbitration award.
Data wydania: 31-08-1933 | Sygnatura: C I 2776/32
Key issues: arbitrator, arbitration awardid: 20037
Polish Supreme Court ruling dated 18 August 1932 Case No. R 385/32
In light of the legal finality of the resolution ... appointing an arbitrator ..., there is no legal basis for holding the arbitration clause to be ineffective, because the basis that arose through [the arbitrator’s] resignation was cured as a result of appointment of another arbitrator by the state court. The arbitration clause may be deemed ineffective pursuant to [former Austrian] Civil Procedure Code § 583(2)(2) only if an arbitrator refused to perform his duties or is in excessive delay in performing his duties.
Data wydania: 18-08-1932 | Sygnatura: R 385/32
Key issues: state court assistance, arbitrator, arbitration agreementid: 20032
Polish Supreme Court ruling dated 23 March 1932 Case No. III R 106/32
The resolution [appointing an arbitrator] could not be appealed pursuant to [former Austrian Civil Code § 582(2)] by the petitioner’s opponent, and he did not appeal against it.
He had even less right to appeal against the order of the first court failing to grant the request by [the arbitrator] to release him from the appointment as arbitrator, as [the arbitrator] accepted this order by the court.
Data wydania: 23-03-1932 | Sygnatura: III R 106/32
Key issues: arbitratorid: 20030
Polish Supreme Court ruling dated 19 December 1931 Case No. III 1 Rw 1925/30
1. An arbitrator may not be ordered to sign the arbitration award by resort to the courts. Such a procedure is not provided for by the civil procedure code, which in a separate chapter governs the entire proceeding before the arbitration court. It only imposes an obligation on an arbitrator who fails to perform the duties connected with accepting the role of an arbitrator to redress the loss caused by such failure.
2. Signing of the arbitration award that has been handed down is the same obligation as the obligation to issue an award, as the signature is an essential requirement for the effectiveness of the arbitration award.
Data wydania: 19-12-1931 | Sygnatura: III 1 Rw 1925/30
Key issues: arbitrator, arbitration awardid: 20305
Polish Supreme Court ruling dated 8 August 1931 Case No. R 395/31
The demand for a holding that the arbitration clause is deprived of legal force is properly grounded on §583(2)(2) of the [former Austrian] Civil Procedure Code, pursuant to which an arbitration clause loses its binding force not only when an arbitrator expressly referred to in the clause refuses to perform the obligation imposed on him as a result of accepting the duties of an arbitrator, but also when this is done by an arbitrator appointed by a party pursuant to the arbitration clause. In both of these instances, both parties have a right to demand a ruling that the arbitration clause is deprived of legal force.
Data wydania: 08-08-1931 | Sygnatura: R 395/31
Key issues: arbitrator, arbitration agreementid: 20300
Polish Supreme Court ruling dated 23 January - 13 February 1931 Case No. C 1783/30
The amended Art. 1367, 1370 and 13701 of the [former Russian] Civil Procedure Code, insofar as they contain substantive legal norms, that is with respect to a compulsory submission to arbitration and appointment of arbitrators without the consent of both parties, may not be applied with respect to general arbitration clauses concluded before entry into force of the act of 16 July 1925 [amending the former Russian Civil Procedure Code].
Data wydania: 13-02-1931 | Sygnatura: C 1783/30
Key issues: arbitrator, arbitration agreementid: 20316
Polish Supreme Court ruling dated 18 October 1929 Case No. C 1162/28
Decisions issued by the court of first instance on appointment of arbitrators and specification of the terms of the submission, whether granting the application or denying it, are not subject to interlocutory appeal.
Data wydania: 18-10-1929 | Sygnatura: C 1162/28
Key issues: state court assistance, arbitratorid: 20020
Warsaw Appellate Court order dated 6 July 1926 Case No. IC N 89/26
This provision [former Civil Procedure Law Art. 13701] that consideration of claims referred to in Civil Procedure Law Art. 1370 shall lie with the court which would have jurisdiction in the event of a judicial dispute should be understood as reiterating the general rule with respect to jurisdiction of the court depending on the amount sought by the plaintiff.
Data wydania: 06-07-1926 | Sygnatura: IC N 89/26
Key issues: state court assistance, arbitratorid: 20306
Warsaw Regional Court ruling dated 6/17 February 1926 Case No. I C N 2991/25
The defendant’s objection to appointment of a super-arbitrator is not justified by Civil Procedure Law Art. 13701, which clearly vests this right with the court, and the arbitrators’ mutual selection of the super-arbitrator is not provided for in the statute.
Data wydania: 17-02-1926 | Sygnatura: I C N 2991/25
Key issues: arbitrator, arbitration agreementid: 20315
Polish Supreme Court resolution dated 8 November 1922 Case No. R 832/22
An arbitration agreement is governed by provisions of public law, not private law. Under the regulations concerning the judicial system, a person who is formally subject to guardianship due to mental illness may not become a judge; therefore, applying this rule by analogy, a person is not capable of serving as an arbitrator who at the time of appointment as an arbitrator was formally subject to guardianship due to mental illness, notwithstanding the claim that such person was already in fact mentally fit at that time or upon issuance of the award.
Data wydania: 08-11-1922 | Sygnatura: R 832/22
Key issues: arbitratorid: 20301
Aleksandrowicz Katarzyna, Gierba Konstancja
The Issue of Exclusion of an Arbitrator from Procedural Proceedings [Original title: Problematyka wyłączenia arbitra z postępowania procesowego]
[in:] A. Garnuszek, L. Mazur, A. Orzeł (eds.), Quo Vadis, Arbitrażu? Quo Vadis, Arbitration?, Warszawa 2013, p. 31-44
Key issues: arbitratorid: 31204
Allerhand Maurycy
Arbitration in the Transition Period [Original title: Sąd polubowny w okresie przejściowym]
Głos Prawa 1933, No. 4, p. 188-201
Key issues: arbitrator, arbitration agreement, settlement before arbitral tribunal, arbitration award, recognition and enforcement of domestic arbitration awardid: 30033
Allerhand Maurycy
Commentary on the Resolution of the Third Chamber of the Supreme Court dated 8 November 1922, R 832/22 (re: issuance of an Arbitration Award by a Mentally Ill Arbitrator) [Original title: Glosa do uchwały izby trzeciej sądu najwyższego z 8 listopada 1922, R 832/22 (dot. wydania wyroku sądu polubownego przez sędziego chorego umysłowo)]
OSP 1924 (vol. 3), item 13, p. 9-10
Key issues: arbitrator, jurisdiction of arbitral tribunalid: 30587
Apfelbaum Ignacy
Remarks on the Provisions of the Civil Procedure Code on Arbitration [Original title: Uwagi do postanowień k.p.c. o sądach polubownych]
Nowa Palestra 1933, No. 3, p. 11-17
Key issues: arbitrator, arbitration agreement, arbitration procedure, petition to set aside arbitration awardid: 30036
Świrgoń-Skok Renata, Arkuszewska Aneta
Relationship between alternative dispute resolution methods and effectiveness of legal protection [Original title: Wpływ alternatywnych sposobów rozwiązywania sporów na efektywność ochrony prawnej]
ZNKUL 2017, No. 3, p. 243-259
Key issues: arbitrator, arbitrator, arbitration agreement, arbitration agreement, arbitration procedure, arbitration procedure, arbitration award, arbitration awardid: 32089
Świrgoń-Skok Renata, Arkuszewska Aneta
Relationship between alternative dispute resolution methods and effectiveness of legal protection [Original title: Wpływ alternatywnych sposobów rozwiązywania sporów na efektywność ochrony prawnej]
ZNKUL 2017, No. 3, p. 243-259
Key issues: arbitrator, arbitrator, arbitration agreement, arbitration agreement, arbitration procedure, arbitration procedure, arbitration award, arbitration awardid: 32089
Asłanowicz Marcin
A judge as an arbitrator [Original title: Sędzia państwowy jako arbiter]
ADR. Arbitraż i Mediacja 2015, No. 2, p. 5-12
Key issues: arbitratorid: 32379
Asłanowicz Marcin
An arbitrator as a witness in civil proceedings – de lege lata and de lege ferenda remarks [Original title: Arbiter jako świadek w postępowaniu cywilnym - uwagi de lege lata oraz de lege ferenda]
PUG 2017, No. 12, p. 11-16
Key issues: arbitratorid: 32370
Asłanowicz Marcin
Appointment of an Arbitrator and His Impartiality and Independence [Original title: Sposób powołania arbitra a jego bezstronność i niezależność]
PPH 2015, No. 4, p. 11-16
Key issues: arbitratorid: 31362
Asłanowicz Marcin
Arbitration Court. Commentary to Articles 1154-1217 of the Civil Procedure Code [Original title: Sąd polubowny (arbitrażowy). Komentarz do art. 1154-1217 KPC]
Warsaw 2017, pp. 255
Key issues: arbitrability of dispute, arbitration agreement, arbitration award, arbitration procedure, arbitrator, costs of arbitration, general works, interim measures, jurisdiction of arbitral tribunal, New York Convention, petition to set aside arbitration award, recognition and enforcement of domestic arbitration award, recognition and enforcement of foreign arbitration award, settlement before arbitral tribunal, state court assistance, arbitrability of dispute, arbitration agreement, arbitration award, arbitration procedure, arbitrator, costs of arbitration, general works, interim measures, jurisdiction of arbitral tribunal, New York Convention, petition to set aside arbitration award, recognition and enforcement of domestic arbitration award, recognition and enforcement of foreign arbitration award, settlement before arbitral tribunal, state court assistanceid: 31909
Asłanowicz Marcin
Arbitration Court. Commentary to Articles 1154-1217 of the Civil Procedure Code [Original title: Sąd polubowny (arbitrażowy). Komentarz do art. 1154-1217 KPC]
Warsaw 2017, pp. 255
Key issues: arbitrability of dispute, arbitration agreement, arbitration award, arbitration procedure, arbitrator, costs of arbitration, general works, interim measures, jurisdiction of arbitral tribunal, New York Convention, petition to set aside arbitration award, recognition and enforcement of domestic arbitration award, recognition and enforcement of foreign arbitration award, settlement before arbitral tribunal, state court assistance, arbitrability of dispute, arbitration agreement, arbitration award, arbitration procedure, arbitrator, costs of arbitration, general works, interim measures, jurisdiction of arbitral tribunal, New York Convention, petition to set aside arbitration award, recognition and enforcement of domestic arbitration award, recognition and enforcement of foreign arbitration award, settlement before arbitral tribunal, state court assistanceid: 31909
Asłanowicz Marcin
Arbitrators and Arbitral Tribunal
[in:] Arbitration in Poland, Warszawa 2011, p. 65-80
Key issues: arbitratorid: 31038
Asłanowicz Marcin
Arbitrator’s Immunity [Original title: Immunitet arbitra]
[in:] Poczobut Jerzy, Wiśniewski Andrzej W. (eds), Private Law and Arbitration. Commemorative Volume Dedicated to Dr. Maciej Tomaszewski, Warszawa 2016, p. 27-39
Key issues: arbitratorid: 31520
Asłanowicz Marcin
Arbitrator’s Liability [Original title: Odpowiedzialność arbitra ]
PiP 2016, No. 2, p. 68-82
Key issues: arbitratorid: 31554
Asłanowicz Marcin
Challenge of an Arbitrator – Remarks in the Light of the Practices of the of Court of Arbitration at the Polish Confederation Lewiatan [Original title: Postępowanie o wyłączenie arbitra – uwagi na tle praktyki Sądu Arbitrażowego przy Konfederacji Lewiatan]
Arbitration e-Review 2013, No. 3-4, p. 6-14
Key issues: arbitrator, arbitration procedureid: 31246
Asłanowicz Marcin
Challenging of an Arbitrator – Analysis of Cases Pending before the Arbitration Court at the Polish Bank Association [Original title: Postępowanie o wyłączenie arbitra - analiza spraw toczonych przed Sądem Polubownym (Arbitrażowym) przy Związku Banków Polskich]
PUG 2013, No. 12, p. 26-37
Key issues: arbitratorid: 31200
Asłanowicz Marcin
Challenging of an Arbitrator – Analysis of Cases Pending before the Court of Arbitration at the Polish Chamber of Commerce in Warsaw [Original title: Postępowanie o wyłączenie arbitra – analiza spraw toczonych przed Sądem Arbitrażowym przy Krajowej Izbie Gospodarczej w Warszawie]
PUG 2013, No. 11, p. I-XV
Key issues: arbitratorid: 31201
Asłanowicz Marcin
Disqualification of a Judge and Disqualification of an Arbitrator [Original title: Wyłączenie sędziego a wyłączenie arbitra]
PPH 2014, No. 6, p. 36-40
Key issues: arbitratorid: 31268
Asłanowicz Marcin
Emergency Arbitrator [Original title: Arbiter doraźny]
PUG 2013, No. 8, p. 18-22
Key issues: arbitrator, arbitration procedureid: 31188
Asłanowicz Marcin
Extent of Disclosure in the Light of an Arbitrator's Impartiality and Independence in Arbitration [Original title: Zakres ujawnienia a bezstronność i niezależność arbitra w postępowaniu arbitrażowym]
PUG 2014, No. 4, p. 22-32
Key issues: arbitratorid: 31264
Asłanowicz Marcin
Grounds for Challenging an Arbitrator – an Analysis of Cases Before Selected Foreign Standing Arbitration Courts
[in:] B. Gessel-Kalinowska vel Kalisz (ed.), The Challenges and the Future of Commercial and Investment Arbitration. Liber Amicorum Professor Jerzy Rajski, Warsaw 2015, p. 29-47
Key issues: arbitratorid: 31399
Asłanowicz Marcin
Legal Position of an Arbitrator in Commercial Arbitration [Original title: Pozycja prawna arbitra w arbitrażu handlowym]
Warsaw 2019, pp. 596, [2nd edition]
Key issues: general works, general works, arbitrator, arbitrator, arbitration procedure, arbitration procedureid: 32017
Asłanowicz Marcin
Legal Position of an Arbitrator in Commercial Arbitration [Original title: Pozycja prawna arbitra w arbitrażu handlowym]
Warsaw 2019, pp. 596, [2nd edition]
Key issues: general works, general works, arbitrator, arbitrator, arbitration procedure, arbitration procedureid: 32017
Asłanowicz Marcin
Legal Position of the Arbitrator in Commercial Arbitration [Original title: Pozycja prawna arbitra w arbitrażu handlowym]
Warszawa 2015, pp. 359
Key issues: arbitrator, arbitration procedureid: 31470
Asłanowicz Marcin
Loss of the Arbitrator’s Legitimacy to Perform his/her Function [Original title: Utrata przez arbitra legitymacji do dalszego wykonywania swojej funkcji]
PPH 2014, No. 11, p. 22-27
Key issues: arbitrator, arbitration procedure, petition to set aside arbitration awardid: 31309
Asłanowicz Marcin
Rules and Procedure of Challenge to a Member of the Arbitral Tribunal in the Arbitration Proceedings [Original title: Zasady i tryb wyłączenia członka zespołu orzekającego w postępowaniu arbitrażowym]
PPH 2013, No. 8, p. 11-17
Key issues: state court assistance, arbitratorid: 31180
Asłanowicz Marcin
Status of the Arbitrator in the Arbitration Proceedings [Original title: Status arbitra w postępowaniu arbitrażowym]
Stud. Prawn. 2013, No. 3, p. 123-152
Key issues: arbitratorid: 31266
Asłanowicz Marcin
Truncated Arbitral Tribunals [Original title: Kadłubowe zespoły orzekające]
PUG 2015, No. 3, p. 9-16
Key issues: arbitrator, arbitration procedure, petition to set aside arbitration awardid: 31363
Asłanowicz Marcin
UNCITRAL - Rules and Model Law [Original title: UNCITRAL - Regulamin i Ustawa Modelowa]
Stud.Prawn. 2013, No. 1, p. 7-33
Key issues: arbitrator, arbitration agreement, arbitration procedureid: 31265
Asłanowicz Marcin, Piotrowska Sylwia
Legal Character and Scope of the Changes in ICC Rules of Arbitration [Original title: Charakter i zakres zmian Regulaminu Arbitrażowego ICC]
[in:] M. Łaszczuk (chair), M. Furtek, S. Pieckowski, J. Poczobut, A. Szumański, M. Tomaszewski (eds.), Arbitration and Mediation. A Commemorative Volume Dedicated to Dr Andrzej Tynel [Arbitraż i mediacja. Księga jubileuszowa dedykowana doktorowi Andrzejowi Tynelowi], Warszawa 2012, p. 36-53
Key issues: arbitrator, arbitration procedure, jurisdiction of arbitral tribunalid: 31077
Balcerzak Filip
a commentary to Art. 1154-1156, 1158-1160, 1169-1179
[in:] Rylski Piotr (ed.), The Polish Civil Procedure Code. A commentary 2022 [Original title: Kodeks postępowania cywilnego. Komentarz 2022], 1st edition, Legalis
Key issues: general works, arbitrator, arbitration procedureid: 32453
Barańska Anna
Remarks on the Position of Arbitrator in Italian Arbitration Law [Original title: Słów kilka o pozycji arbitra we włoskim prawie arbitrażowym]
Internetowy Przegląd Prawniczy TBSP UJ 2017, No. 9, p. 5-13
Key issues: arbitrator, arbitratorid: 31905
Barańska Anna
Remarks on the Position of Arbitrator in Italian Arbitration Law [Original title: Słów kilka o pozycji arbitra we włoskim prawie arbitrażowym]
Internetowy Przegląd Prawniczy TBSP UJ 2017, No. 9, p. 5-13
Key issues: arbitrator, arbitratorid: 31905
Pörnbacher Karl, Baur Sebastian
The New French Arbitration Law, the UNCITRAL Arbitration Rules and IBA Rules on the Taking of Evidence in International Arbitration
Biul. Arb. 2010-2011, No. 4, p. 52-64
Key issues: general works, state court assistance, arbitrator, arbitration agreement, arbitration procedure, arbitration award, petition to set aside arbitration awardid: 30992
Białecki Marcin
a commentary to Art. 1154-1179
[in:] Jankowski Janusz (ed.), The Polish Civil Procedure Code. A commentary 2015. Vol. II. Art. 730-1217 [Original title: Kodeks postępowania cywilnego. Komentarz 2015. Tom II. Art.730-1217], 2nd edition, Legalis
Key issues: general works, arbitrability of dispute, arbitrator, arbitration agreement, arbitration procedure, interim measuresid: 35249
Białecki Marcin
a commentary to Art. 1154-1179
[in:] Jankowski Janusz (ed.), The Polish Civil Proceudre Code. A commentary 2019. Vol. II. Art. 730-1217 [Original title: Kodeks postępowania cywilnego. Komentarz 2019. Tom II. Art. 730-1217], 3rd edition, Legalis
Key issues: general works, arbitrability of dispute, arbitrator, arbitration agreement, arbitration procedure, interim measuresid: 35247
Bieniak Michał
Challenge of the Arbitrator or the Presiding Arbitrator – Commentary on the Supreme Court Judgement of 24.9.1999, I CKN 141/98 [Original title: Wyłączenie arbitra lub superarbitra - glosa do wyroku SN z 24.9.1999 r., I CKN 141/98]
MoP 2001, No. 21, p. 1086-1087
Key issues: arbitratorid: 30193
Blanke Gordon
EU Commitment Arbitrations - a Brief Introduction [Arbitraż w sprawach o naruszenie zobowiązań unijnych - wprowadzenie]
Arbitration e-Review 2013, No. 1-2, p. 39-46
Key issues: arbitrator, arbitration agreement, arbitration procedureid: 31196
Błaszczak Łukasz, Gessel-Kalinowska vel Kalisz Beata, Sikorski Rafał, Zachariasiewicz Maciej, Zawiślak Karol, Żmij Grzegorz
White Book. Proposed legislative changes aimed at improving the legal framework of arbitration in Poland [Original title: Biała Księga. Propozycje zmian legislacyjnych mających na celu ulepszenie ram prawnych sądownictwa polubownego w Polsce]
Warsaw - Katowice - Kraków - Wrocław - Poznań 2014, pp. 80
Key issues: arbitrability of dispute, arbitration agreement, arbitration award, arbitration procedure, arbitrator, costs of arbitration, general works, interim measures, jurisdiction of arbitral tribunal, New York Convention, petition to set aside arbitration award, settlement before arbitral tribunal, arbitrability of dispute, arbitration agreement, arbitration award, arbitration procedure, arbitrator, costs of arbitration, general works, interim measures, jurisdiction of arbitral tribunal, New York Convention, petition to set aside arbitration award, settlement before arbitral tribunalid: 32149
Błaszczak Łukasz, Gessel-Kalinowska vel Kalisz Beata, Sikorski Rafał, Zachariasiewicz Maciej, Zawiślak Karol, Żmij Grzegorz
White Book. Proposed legislative changes aimed at improving the legal framework of arbitration in Poland [Original title: Biała Księga. Propozycje zmian legislacyjnych mających na celu ulepszenie ram prawnych sądownictwa polubownego w Polsce]
Warsaw - Katowice - Kraków - Wrocław - Poznań 2014, pp. 80
Key issues: arbitrability of dispute, arbitration agreement, arbitration award, arbitration procedure, arbitrator, costs of arbitration, general works, interim measures, jurisdiction of arbitral tribunal, New York Convention, petition to set aside arbitration award, settlement before arbitral tribunal, arbitrability of dispute, arbitration agreement, arbitration award, arbitration procedure, arbitrator, costs of arbitration, general works, interim measures, jurisdiction of arbitral tribunal, New York Convention, petition to set aside arbitration award, settlement before arbitral tribunalid: 32149
Nowaczyk Piotr, Bogucka Elżbieta
Ethics of an International Arbitrator [Original title: Etyka Międzynarodowego Arbitra]
Konsultant 2012, No. 25, p. 26-27
Key issues: arbitratorid: 32177
Bolard Georges
Contradictory Principle Before Arbitrators [Original title: Zasada kontradyktoryjności przed arbitrami]
Annales UMCS 1999, No. 46, p. 63-67
Key issues: arbitratorid: 30459
Bruner Philip L.
Why Arbitrate? [Dlaczego arbitraż?]
Arbitration e-Review 2012, No. 1, p. 6-12
Key issues: arbitrator, arbitration agreement, arbitration procedure, arbitration awardid: 31168
Morek Rafał, Budniak-Rogala Aleksandra
a commentary to Art. 1154-1163, 1165-1213, 1214-1217
[in:] Marszałkowska-Krześ Elwira (ed.), The Polish Civil Procedure Code - a commentary 2020 [Original title: Kodeks postępowania cywilnego - komentarz 2020], 26th edition, Legalis
Key issues: New York Convention, general works, state court assistance, arbitrability of dispute, arbitrator, arbitration agreement, arbitration procedure, interim measures, jurisdiction of arbitral tribunal, settlement before arbitral tribunal, arbitration award, petition to set aside arbitration award, recognition and enforcement of domestic arbitration award, recognition and enforcement of foreign arbitration awardid: 32489
Morek Rafał, Budniak-Rogala Aleksandra
a commentary to Art. 1154-1163, 1165-1213, 1214-1217
[in:] Marszałkowska-Krześ Elwira (ed.), The Polish Civil Procedure Code - a commentary 2019 [Original title: Kodeks postępowania cywilnego - komentarz 2019], 25th edition, Legalis
Key issues: New York Convention, general works, state court assistance, arbitrability of dispute, arbitrator, arbitration agreement, arbitration procedure, interim measures, jurisdiction of arbitral tribunal, settlement before arbitral tribunal, arbitration award, petition to set aside arbitration award, recognition and enforcement of domestic arbitration award, recognition and enforcement of foreign arbitration awardid: 32491
Morek Rafał, Budniak-Rogala Aleksandra
a commentary to Art. 1154-1163, 1165-1213, 1214-1217
[in:] Marszałkowska-Krześ Elwira (ed.), The Polish Civil Procedure Code - a commentary 2020 [Original title: Kodeks postępowania cywilnego - komentarz 2020], 27th edition, Legalis
Key issues: New York Convention, general works, state court assistance, arbitrability of dispute, arbitrator, arbitration agreement, arbitration procedure, interim measures, jurisdiction of arbitral tribunal, settlement before arbitral tribunal, arbitration award, petition to set aside arbitration award, recognition and enforcement of domestic arbitration award, recognition and enforcement of foreign arbitration awardid: 32487
Morek Rafał, Budniak-Rogala Aleksandra
a commentary to Art. 1154-1163, 1165-1213, 1214-1217
[in:] Marszałkowska-Krześ Elwira (ed.), The Polish Civil Procedure Code - a commentary 2020 [Original title: Kodeks postępowania cywilnego - komentarz 2020], 28th edition, Legalis
Key issues: New York Convention, general works, state court assistance, arbitrability of dispute, arbitrator, arbitration agreement, arbitration procedure, interim measures, jurisdiction of arbitral tribunal, settlement before arbitral tribunal, arbitration award, petition to set aside arbitration award, recognition and enforcement of domestic arbitration award, recognition and enforcement of foreign arbitration awardid: 32485
Morek Rafał, Budniak-Rogala Aleksandra
a commentary to Art. 1154-1163, 1165-1213, 1214-1217
[in:] Marszałkowska-Krześ Elwira (ed.), The Polish Civil Procedure Code - a commentary 2021 [Original title: Kodeks postępowania cywilnego - komentarz 2021], 29th, Legalis
Key issues: New York Convention, general works, state court assistance, arbitrability of dispute, arbitrator, arbitration agreement, arbitration procedure, interim measures, jurisdiction of arbitral tribunal, settlement before arbitral tribunal, arbitration award, petition to set aside arbitration award, recognition and enforcement of domestic arbitration award, recognition and enforcement of foreign arbitration awardid: 32483
Morek Rafał, Budniak-Rogala Aleksandra
a commentary to Art. 1154-1163, 1165-1213, 1214-1217
[in:] Marszałkowska-Krześ Elwira (ed.), The Polish Civil Procedure Code - a commentary 2021 [Original title: Kodeks postępowania cywilnego - komentarz 2021], 30th edition Legalis
Key issues: New York Convention, general works, state court assistance, arbitrability of dispute, arbitrator, arbitration agreement, arbitration procedure, interim measures, jurisdiction of arbitral tribunal, settlement before arbitral tribunal, arbitration award, petition to set aside arbitration award, recognition and enforcement of domestic arbitration award, recognition and enforcement of foreign arbitration awardid: 32481
Morek Rafał, Budniak-Rogala Aleksandra
a commentary to Art. 1154-1163, 1165-1213, 1214-1217
[in:] Marszałkowska-Krześ Elwira (ed.), The Polish Civil Procedure Code - a commentary 2019 [Original title: Kodeks postępowania cywilnego - komentarz 2019], 24th edition, Legalis
Key issues: New York Convention, general works, state court assistance, arbitrability of dispute, arbitrator, arbitration agreement, arbitration procedure, interim measures, jurisdiction of arbitral tribunal, settlement before arbitral tribunal, arbitration award, petition to set aside arbitration award, recognition and enforcement of domestic arbitration award, recognition and enforcement of foreign arbitration awardid: 32493
Morek Rafał, Budniak-Rogala Aleksandra
a commentary to Art. 1154-1163, 1165-1213, 1214-1217
[in:] Marszałkowska-Krześ Elwira (ed.), The Polish Civil Procedure Code - a commentary 2018 [Original title: Kodeks postępowania cywilnego - komentarz 2018], 23rd edition, Legalis
Key issues: New York Convention, general works, state court assistance, arbitrability of dispute, arbitrator, arbitration agreement, arbitration procedure, interim measures, jurisdiction of arbitral tribunal, settlement before arbitral tribunal, arbitration award, petition to set aside arbitration award, recognition and enforcement of domestic arbitration award, recognition and enforcement of foreign arbitration awardid: 32495
Morek Rafał, Budniak-Rogala Aleksandra
a commentary to Art. 1154-1163, 1165-1213, 1214-1217
[in:] Marszałkowska-Krześ Elwira (ed.), The Polish Civil Procedure Code - a commentary 2018 [Original title: Kodeks postępowania cywilnego - komentarz 2018], 22nd edition, Legalis
Key issues: New York Convention, general works, state court assistance, arbitrability of dispute, arbitrator, arbitration agreement, arbitration procedure, interim measures, jurisdiction of arbitral tribunal, settlement before arbitral tribunal, arbitration award, petition to set aside arbitration award, recognition and enforcement of domestic arbitration award, recognition and enforcement of foreign arbitration awardid: 32497
Morek Rafał, Budniak-Rogala Aleksandra
a commentary to Art. 1154-1163, 1165-1213, 1214-1217
[in:] Gil Izabella (ed.), Marszałkowska-Krześ Elwira (ed.), The Polish Civil Procedure Code. A commentary 2023 [Original title: Kodeks postępowania cywilnego. Komentarz 2023], 31st edition, Legalis
Key issues: New York Convention, general works, state court assistance, arbitrability of dispute, arbitrator, arbitration agreement, arbitration procedure, interim measures, jurisdiction of arbitral tribunal, settlement before arbitral tribunal, arbitration award, petition to set aside arbitration award, recognition and enforcement of domestic arbitration award, recognition and enforcement of foreign arbitration awardid: 32450
Morek Rafał, Budniak-Rogala Aleksandra
a commentary to Art. 1174, 1194, 1206-1208, 1210, 1213, 1214-1215
[in:] Marszałkowska-Krześ Elwira (ed.), The Polish Civil Procedure Code - a commentary 2018 [Original title: Kodeks postępowania cywilnego - komentarz 2018], 21st edition, Legalis
Key issues: general works, arbitrator, arbitration award, petition to set aside arbitration award, recognition and enforcement of domestic arbitration award, recognition and enforcement of foreign arbitration awardid: 32499
Morek Rafał, Budniak-Rogala Aleksandra
a commentary to Art. 1174, 1194, 1206-1208, 1210, 1213, 1214-1215
[in:] Marszałkowska-Krześ Elwira (ed.), The Polish Civil Procedure Code - a commentary 2017 [Original title: Kodeks postępowania cywilnego - komentarz 2017], 19th edition, Legalis
Key issues: general works, arbitrator, arbitration award, petition to set aside arbitration award, recognition and enforcement of domestic arbitration award, recognition and enforcement of foreign arbitration awardid: 32505
Morek Rafał, Budniak-Rogala Aleksandra
a commentary to Art. 1174, 1194, 1206-1208, 1210, 1213, 1214-1215
[in:] Marszałkowska-Krześ Elwira (ed.), The Polish Civil Procedure Code - a commentary 2017 [Original title: Kodeks postępowania cywilnego - komentarz 2017], 20th edition, Legalis
Key issues: general works, arbitrator, arbitration award, petition to set aside arbitration award, recognition and enforcement of domestic arbitration award, recognition and enforcement of foreign arbitration awardid: 32502
Buzzo Beata
Chapter V. Arbitration Court at the General Prosecutor’s Office of the Republic of Poland [Original title: Rozdział V. Sąd polubowny przy Prokuratorii Generalnej RP]
[in:] Moras Małgorzata, Nuzzo Beata, Szostak Ryszard, Out-of-court Resolution of Public Procurement Disputes [Original title: Pozasądowe rozwiązywanie sporów w zamówieniach publicznych], Warsaw 2023, p. 171-214
Key issues: general works, arbitrator, arbitration procedure, recognition and enforcement of domestic arbitration awardid: 35279
Całus Andrzej, Pazdan Maksymilian, Sołtysiński Stanisław, Wardyński Tomasz, Włodyka Stanisław, Okolski Józef
A Commemorative Volume for 60 years of the Court of Arbitration at the Polish Chamber of Commerce in Warsaw [Original title: Księga pamiątkowa 60-lecia Sądu Arbitrażowego przy Krajowej Izbie Gospodarczej w Warszawie]
Warszawa 2010, pp. 887
Key issues: New York Convention, general works, state court assistance, arbitrability of dispute, investment arbitration, arbitrator, arbitration agreement, arbitration procedure, jurisdiction of arbitral tribunal, settlement before arbitral tribunal, arbitration award, petition to set aside arbitration award, recognition and enforcement of domestic arbitration award, recognition and enforcement of foreign arbitration awardid: 30952
Chyla Łukasz, Olechowski Piotr
The advantages of corporate arbitration in comparison to the state litigation in the context of intra-corporate disputes [Original title: O przewadze arbitrażu nad sądownictwem powszechnym w kontekście sporów uchwałowych]
Kortowski Przegląd Prawniczy 2017, No. 1, p. 62-67
Key issues: New York Convention, New York Convention, arbitrability of dispute, arbitrability of dispute, arbitrator, arbitrator, arbitration procedure, arbitration procedure, recognition and enforcement of foreign arbitration award, recognition and enforcement of foreign arbitration awardid: 32024
Chyla Łukasz, Olechowski Piotr
The advantages of corporate arbitration in comparison to the state litigation in the context of intra-corporate disputes [Original title: O przewadze arbitrażu nad sądownictwem powszechnym w kontekście sporów uchwałowych]
Kortowski Przegląd Prawniczy 2017, No. 1, p. 62-67
Key issues: New York Convention, New York Convention, arbitrability of dispute, arbitrability of dispute, arbitrator, arbitrator, arbitration procedure, arbitration procedure, recognition and enforcement of foreign arbitration award, recognition and enforcement of foreign arbitration awardid: 32024
Ciaptacz Jan
Jurisdiction in Disputes Arising out of Receptum Arbitrii under the Brussels I Bis Regulation [Original title: Jurysdykcja krajowa w sprawach wynikających z recepti arbitrii na gruncie rozporządzenia Bruksela I bis]
EPS 2022, No. 7, p. 18-24
Key issues: general works, arbitratorid: 32272
Ciemiński Marcin, Prokop Adelina
The Arbitration Agreement Regarding the Arbitration Court at the Polish Bank Association. Commentary to the Supreme Court Judgement Dated 24 November 2010 (II CSK 291/10)[Original title: Zapis na Sąd Polubowny przy Związku Banków Polskich. Glosa do wyroku Sądu Najwyższego z 24 listopada 2010 r. (II CSK 291/10)]
MPB 2011, No. 10, p.
Key issues: arbitrator, arbitration agreementid: 31120
Cieplińska Zuzanna Ewa
Dissenting opinions in arbitral awards – issues of recognition and enforcement in different jurisdictions with special focus on the issue of secrecy of deliberations
Biuletyn Arbitrażowy 2020, No. 27, p. 58-64
Key issues: general works, arbitrator, arbitration procedure, arbitration award, recognition and enforcement of foreign arbitration awardid: 32155
Ciszewski Maciej
The provisions of the rules of permanent arbitration courts concerning the arbiters and the adjudicating committee [Original title: Postanowienia regulaminów stałych sądów arbitrażowych dotyczące arbitrów i zespołu orzekającego]
Pieniądze i Więź 2014, No. 62
Key issues: arbitratorid: 32384
Comi Urszula
Arbitration – Comparative Look on the Polish and French Statutory Law Regulations [Original title: Arbitraż - prawnoporównawcze spojrzenie na regulacje ustawodawstwa polskiego i francuskiego]
[in:] A. Garnuszek, L. Mazur, A. Orzeł (eds.), Quo Vadis, Arbitrażu? Quo Vadis, Arbitration?, Warszawa 2013, p. 45-73
Key issues: arbitrability of dispute, arbitrator, arbitration agreement, arbitration procedure, jurisdiction of arbitral tribunal, arbitration award, petition to set aside arbitration award, recognition and enforcement of domestic arbitration awardid: 31205
Cudak Arkadiusz
a commentary to Art. 1169-1179
[in:] Marciniak Andrzej (ed.), The Polish Civil Procedure Code. A commentary 2017. Vol. IV. Art. 1096-1217 [Original title: Kodeks postępowania cywilnego. Komentarz 2017. Tom IV. Art. 1096-1217], 1st edition, Legalis
Key issues: general works, arbitratorid: 35230
Cudak Arkadiusz
a commentary to Art. 1169-1179
[in:] Marciniak Andrzej (ed.), The Polish Civil Procedure Code. A commentary 2020. Vol. V. Art. 1096-1217 [Original title: Kodeks postępowania cywilnego. Komentarz 2020. Tom V. Art. 1096-1217], 1st edition, Legalis
Key issues: general works, arbitratorid: 32475
Czarny Gierc
Draft of the Amendments to the Civil Procedure Code and the Issues of Arbitration [Original title: Projekt nowelizacji K.P.C., a zagadnienia sądownictwa polubownego]
Wil.Prz.Praw. 1936, No. 12, p. 431-435
Key issues: state court assistance, arbitrator, arbitration awardid: 30041
Czarny Gierc
Issues of Arbitration Court Practice. An Addition to the Lecture of Dr Kuratowski [Original title: Z zagadnień praktyki sądów polubownych. Na marginesie referatu D-ra Kuratowskiego.]
Wil.Prz.Praw. 1933, No. 6, p. 161-168, [part IV]
Key issues: arbitrator, arbitration procedureid: 30048
Czarny Gierc
Issues of Arbitration Court Practice. An Addition to the Lecture of Dr Kuratowski [Original title: Z zagadnień praktyki sądów polubownych. Na marginesie referatu D-ra Kuratowskiego.]
Wil.Prz.Praw. 1933, No. 5, p. 129-133, [part III]
Key issues: arbitrator, arbitration procedureid: 30047
Czarny Gierc
Issues of Arbitration Court Practice. An Addition to the Lecture of Dr Kuratowski [Original title: Z zagadnień praktyki sądów polubownych. Na marginesie referatu D-ra Kuratowskiego.]
Wil.Prz.Praw. 1933, No. 2, p. 33-37, [part I]
Key issues: arbitrator, arbitration procedureid: 30045
Czerwiński Stanisław
Some Remarks on Courts of Arbitration [Original title: Kilka uwag o sądach polubownych]
Głos Sądownictwa 1938, No. 3, p. 201-203
Key issues: arbitratorid: 30051
Czuchryta Joanna
Civil Liability of the Arbitrator [Original title: Odpowiedzialność odszkodowawcza arbitra]
ADR. Arbitraż i Mediacja 2018, No. 3, p. 33-40
Key issues: arbitrator, arbitratorid: 31968
Czuchryta Joanna
Civil Liability of the Arbitrator [Original title: Odpowiedzialność odszkodowawcza arbitra]
ADR. Arbitraż i Mediacja 2018, No. 3, p. 33-40
Key issues: arbitrator, arbitratorid: 31968
Diaby Anna
Deprivation of a Party of the Right to Have a Case Heard by an Impartial Court as the Basis for Setting Aside of an Arbitral Award (Article 1206 § 2 p. 2 of the Polish Civil Procedure Code)[Original title: Pozbawienie strony prawa do rozpoznania sprawy przez bezstronny sąd jako podstawa do uchylenia wyroku sądu polubownego (art. 1206 § 2 pkt 2 k.p.c.)]
Biul.Arb. - Młody Arbitraż 2015, No. 22, p. 154-166
Key issues: arbitrator, petition to set aside arbitration awardid: 31333
Domański Grzegorz
Arbitrators in Treaty-Based Investment Arbitration – a Few Practical Reflections [Original title: Arbitrzy w traktatowym arbitrażu inwestycyjnym - kilka refleksji praktycznych
[in:] Józef Okolski (chair), Andrzej Całus, Maksymilian Pazdan, Stanisław Sołtysiński, Tomasz Wardyński, Stanisław Włodyka (ed.) Essays in Honour of 60 years of the Court of Arbitration at the Polish Chamber of Commerce in Warsaw [Księga pamiątkowa 60-lecia Sądu Arbitrażowego przy Krajowej Izbie Gospodarczej w Warszawie], Warszawa 2010, p. 349-358
Key issues: investment arbitration, arbitratorid: 30924
Zawicki Kamil, Durbas Maciej, Gąsiorowski Kuba
Poland – The Supreme Court Judgements and Decisions of Appellate Courts
[in:] Alexander J. Bělohlávek, Naděžda Rozehnalová (eds.), Czech (& Central European) Yearbook of Arbitration 2015, Vol. V, Interaction of Arbitration and Courts, New York 2015, p. 643-654
Key issues: arbitrator, arbitration agreement, petition to set aside arbitration award, recognition and enforcement of foreign arbitration awardid: 31368
Durbas Maciej, Kos Rafał
Conflict of interest in corporate disputes arbitration
Lexology 2022
Key issues: arbitrator, arbitration procedureid: 32252
Durbas Maciej, Kos Rafał
ICC award set aside due to irregularities in arbitrator’s appointment
ICC award set aside due to irregularities in arbitrator’s appointment, 2017
Key issues: arbitrator, arbitration procedure, petition to set aside arbitration awardid: 32202
Dziurda Marcin, Szrajer Marta
International Commercial Arbitration in the Latest Case Law of the Supreme Court [Original title: Międzynarodowy arbitraż handlowy w najnowszym orzecznictwie Sądu Najwyższego]
PPH 2019, No. 10, p. 4-13
Key issues: general works, general works, arbitrator, arbitrator, petition to set aside arbitration award, petition to set aside arbitration award, recognition and enforcement of foreign arbitration award, recognition and enforcement of foreign arbitration awardid: 31990
Dziurda Marcin, Szrajer Marta
International Commercial Arbitration in the Latest Case Law of the Supreme Court [Original title: Międzynarodowy arbitraż handlowy w najnowszym orzecznictwie Sądu Najwyższego]
PPH 2019, No. 10, p. 4-13
Key issues: general works, general works, arbitrator, arbitrator, petition to set aside arbitration award, petition to set aside arbitration award, recognition and enforcement of foreign arbitration award, recognition and enforcement of foreign arbitration awardid: 31990
Elsing Siegfred H.
The Disqualification of Arbitrators in ICSID Arbitration
[in:] B. Gessel-Kalinowska vel Kalisz (ed.), The Challenges and the Future of Commercial and Investment Arbitration. Liber Amicorum Professor Jerzy Rajski, Warsaw 2015, p. 48-62
Key issues: investment arbitration, arbitratorid: 31400
Ereciński Tadeusz
a commentary to Art. 1154, 1158-1159, 1169-1217
[in:] Ereciński Tadeusz (ed.), The Polish Civil Procedure Code. A commentary. Vol. IV. International civil procedure. Arbitration [Original title: Kodeks postępowania cywilnego. Komentarz. Tom IV. Międzynarodowe postępowanie cywilne. Sąd polubowny (arbitrażowy)], Warsaw 2017 (5th edition)
Key issues: New York Convention, general works, state court assistance, arbitrator, arbitration procedure, interim measures, jurisdiction of arbitral tribunal, settlement before arbitral tribunal, arbitration award, petition to set aside arbitration award, recognition and enforcement of domestic arbitration award, recognition and enforcement of foreign arbitration awardid: 32468
Ereciński Tadeusz
Lack of Arbitrator’s Independence and Impartiality and Grounds for Setting Aside an Arbitral Award [Original title: Brak bezstronności i niezależności arbitra a podstawy skargi o uchylenie wyroku sądu polubownego]
[in:] Grzegorczyk Paweł, Knoppek Krzysztof, Walasik Marcin (eds.), Civil Procedure. Study-Codification-Practice. A Commemorative Volume Dedicated to Professor Feliks Zedler [Proces cywilny. Nauka-Kodyfikacja-Praktyka. Księga jubileuszowa dedykowana Profesorowi Feliksowi Zedlerowi], Warszawa 2012, p. 845-857
Key issues: arbitrator, petition to set aside arbitration awardid: 31463
Fenichel Zygmunt
Arbitration Courts Under Civil Procedure Code [Original title: Sądy polubowne wedle kodeksu postępowania cywilnego.]
PPiA 1931, No. 3, p. 303-322
Key issues: arbitrator, arbitration agreement, jurisdiction of arbitral tribunalid: 30060
Fenichel Zygmunt
What Are the Consequences of State Judge Participation in Issuance of an Arbitration Award? [Original title: Jakie są skutki udziału sędziego państwowego w wydaniu orzeczenia sądu polubownego?]
PPC 1938, No. 9-10, p. 300-301
Key issues: arbitrator, arbitration procedureid: 30057
Fenichel Zygmunt
What Procedure Should be Applied in Proceedings Before State Courts in Arbitration Cases? [Original title: W jakim trybie toczyć się winno postępowanie przed sądem państwowym w sprawach sądownictwa polubownego?]
PPC 1934, No. 18, p. 571-572
Key issues: state court assistance, arbitrator, petition to set aside arbitration awardid: 30061
Fenichel Zygmunt
Which – Arbitration Court or State Court – is Competent to Recognise the Challenge of an Arbitrator? [Original title: Jaki sąd – polubowny czy państwowy – właściwy jest do rozpoznania wniosku o wyłączenie sędziego polubownego?]
NPC 1933, No. 15, p. 476-477
Key issues: arbitrator, arbitration procedureid: 30056
Flaga-Gieruszyńska Kinga, Zieliński Andrzej
a commentary to Art. 1154-1217
[in:] Zieliński Andrzej, Flaga-Gieruszyńska Kinga, The Polish Civil Procedure Code. A commentary 2022 [Original title: Kodeks postępowania cywilnego. Komentarz 2022], 11th edition, Legalis
Key issues: New York Convention, general works, state court assistance, arbitrability of dispute, investment arbitration, arbitrator, arbitration agreement, arbitration procedure, costs of arbitration, interim measures, jurisdiction of arbitral tribunal, settlement before arbitral tribunal, arbitration award, petition to set aside arbitration award, recognition and enforcement of domestic arbitration award, recognition and enforcement of foreign arbitration awardid: 32452
Flaga-Gieruszyńska Kinga, Zieliński Andrzej
a commentary to Art. 1154-1217
[in:] Zieliński Andrzej, Flaga-Gieruszyńska Kinga, The Polish Civil Procedure Code. A commentary 2019 [Original title: Kodeks postępowania cywilnego. Komentarz 2019], 10th edition, Legalis
Key issues: New York Convention, general works, state court assistance, arbitrability of dispute, investment arbitration, arbitrator, arbitration agreement, arbitration procedure, costs of arbitration, interim measures, jurisdiction of arbitral tribunal, settlement before arbitral tribunal, arbitration award, petition to set aside arbitration award, recognition and enforcement of domestic arbitration award, recognition and enforcement of foreign arbitration awardid: 35238
Frątczak Klaudia, Mikołajczyk Natalia
Reform of the French Code of Civil Procedure - Revolutionary Changes in Arbitration Law [Original title: Nowelizacja francuskiego Kodeksu Postępowania Cywilnego: Rewolucyjne zmiany w prawie arbitrażowym]
Arbitration e-Review 2011, No. 2, p. 38-41
Key issues: general works, state court assistance, arbitrator, arbitration agreement, arbitration procedure, arbitration award, petition to set aside arbitration awardid: 30985
Furtek Marek, Pieckowski Sylwester, Poczobut Jerzy, Szumański Andrzej, Tomaszewski Maciej, Łaszczuk Maciej
Arbitration and Mediation. A Commemorative Volume Dedicated to Dr Andrzej Tynel [Original tilte: Arbitraż i mediacja. Księga jubileuszowa dedykowana doktorowi Andrzejowi Tynelowi]
Warszawa 2012, pp. 732
Key issues: New York Convention, general works, state court assistance, arbitrability of dispute, investment arbitration, arbitrator, arbitration agreement, arbitration procedure, jurisdiction of arbitral tribunal, settlement before arbitral tribunal, arbitration award, petition to set aside arbitration award, recognition and enforcement of domestic arbitration award, recognition and enforcement of foreign arbitration awardid: 31075
Ganobis Marta, Zawiślak Karol
Rules of Appointment and Revocation of an Arbitrator and Certain Issues Related to the Issue of Shaping Legal Position of an Arbitrator in Relation to the Washington Convention of 18.3.1965 [Original title: Zasady powoływania i odwoływania arbitra oraz niektóre zagadnienia związane z kwestią ukształtowania pozycji prawnej arbitra w świetle Konwencji Waszyngtońskiej z 18.3.1965 r.]
MoP 2009, No. 1, special issue, p. 25-29
Key issues: arbitratorid: 30228
Garnuszek Anita, Mazur Laura, Orzeł Aleksandra
Quo Vadis, Arbitration? [Original title: Quo Vadis, Arbitrażu? Quo Vadis, Arbitration?]
Warszawa 2013, pp. 709
Key issues: New York Convention, general works, state court assistance, arbitrability of dispute, investment arbitration, arbitrator, arbitration agreement, arbitration procedure, jurisdiction of arbitral tribunal, settlement before arbitral tribunal, arbitration award, petition to set aside arbitration award, recognition and enforcement of domestic arbitration award, recognition and enforcement of foreign arbitration awardid: 31202
Gąsiorowski Kuba
The Looming Threat of Judicialization of Arbitration and Means of Combating It – Remarks on the Current Statistics and Trends
Arbitration Bulletin - Young Arbitration 2016, No. 24, p. 181-189
Key issues: general works, arbitratorid: 31566
Gessel-Kalinowska vel Kalisz Beata
Diagnosis for Arbitration. Functioning of Arbitration Law and the Directions of Postulated Changes [Original title: Diagnoza arbitrażu. Funkcjonowanie prawa o arbitrażu i kierunki postulowanych zmian]
Wrocław 2014, pp. 593
Key issues: New York Convention, general works, arbitrability of dispute, arbitrator, arbitration agreement, arbitration procedure, jurisdiction of arbitral tribunal, settlement before arbitral tribunal, arbitration award, petition to set aside arbitration award, recognition and enforcement of domestic arbitration award, recognition and enforcement of foreign arbitration awardid: 31452
Gessel-Kalinowska vel Kalisz Beata
Polish arbitration law
Wrocław 2014, pp. 646
Key issues: New York Convention, general works, arbitrability of dispute, arbitrator, arbitration agreement, arbitration procedure, jurisdiction of arbitral tribunal, settlement before arbitral tribunal, arbitration award, petition to set aside arbitration award, recognition and enforcement of domestic arbitration award, recognition and enforcement of foreign arbitration awardid: 31445
Gessel-Kalinowska vel Kalisz Beata
Setting Aside an Arbitration Award and Composition of the Arbitral Tribunal in Case of Retrial [Original title: Uchylenie wyroku arbitrażowego a skład sądu polubownego w przypadku ponownego rozpoznania sprawy]
[in:] Jelonek-Jarco Barbara, Kos Rafał, Zawadzka Julita (eds), Usus magister est optimus. Legal Papers Dedicated to Professor Andrzej Kubas [Original title: Usus magister est optimus. Rozprawy prawnicze ofiarowane Profesorowi Andrzejowi Kubasowi], Warszawa 2016, p. 669-677
Key issues: arbitrator, petition to set aside arbitration awardid: 31542
Gessel-Kalinowska vel Kalisz Beata
Some Remarks on the Conflict of Interest in Case of Arbitrators from Multi-Person Legal Offices [Original title: Kilka uwag w przedmiocie konfliktu interesów w przypadku arbitrów pochodzących z wieloosobowych kancelarii prawnych]
[in:] Sylwester Pieckowski (chair), Piotr Nowaczyk, Jerzy Poczobut, Andrzej Szumański, Andrzej Tynel (ed.), Polish and International Commercial Arbitration at the Threshold of the 21st Century: A Commemorative Volume in Honour of Dr Tadeusz Szurski [Międzynarodowy i krajowy arbitraż handlowy u progu XXI wieku. Księga pamiątkowa dedykowana doktorowi habilitowanemu Tadeuszowi Szurskiemu], Warszawa 2008, p. 15-25
Key issues: arbitratorid: 30119
Gessel-Kalinowska vel Kalisz Beata
UNCITRAL Model Law: Composition of the Arbitration Tribunal Re-considering the Case upon Setting Aside of the Original Arbitration Award
Journal of International Arbitration 2017, Vol. 34, Issue 1, p. 17-33
Key issues: arbitrator, arbitrator, arbitration procedure, arbitration procedure, petition to set aside arbitration award, petition to set aside arbitration awardid: 31828
Gessel-Kalinowska vel Kalisz Beata
UNCITRAL Model Law: Composition of the Arbitration Tribunal Re-considering the Case upon Setting Aside of the Original Arbitration Award
Journal of International Arbitration 2017, Vol. 34, Issue 1, p. 17-33
Key issues: arbitrator, arbitrator, arbitration procedure, arbitration procedure, petition to set aside arbitration award, petition to set aside arbitration awardid: 31828
Głodowski Włodzimierz
Confidentiality of arbitration in Poland [Original title: Poufność arbitrażu w Polsce]
[in:] Barańska Anna, Cieślak Sławomir (eds), Ars in vita. Ars in iure. Professor Janusz Jankowski anniversary volume [Original title: Ars in vita. Ars in iure. Księga Jubileuszowa dedykowana Profesorowi Januszowi Jankowskiemu], Warsaw 2018, p. 661-670
Key issues: arbitrator, arbitration procedureid: 32104
Gołąb Stanisław
Arbitration Courts in the Draft Polish Civil Procedure [Original title: Sądy polubowne według projektu polskiej procedury cywilnej.]
Pal. 1926, p. 49-66
Key issues: arbitrability of dispute, arbitrator, arbitration agreement, arbitration procedure, arbitration award, recognition and enforcement of domestic arbitration awardid: 30072
Gortad Konrad
Arbitrator’s immunity – is it necessary? [Original title: Immunitet arbitra sądu polubownego - czy konieczny?]
ADR. Arbitraż i Mediacja 2022, No. 2, p. 19-26
Key issues: arbitratorid: 32284
Gudowski Jacek
The Polish Civil Procedure Code. Case law. Doctrine. Vol. V [Original title: Kodeks postępowania cywilnego. Orzecznictwo. Piśmiennictwo. Tom V]
Warsaw 2020, pp. 936
Key issues: arbitrability of dispute, arbitration agreement, arbitration award, arbitration procedure, arbitrator, costs of arbitration, general works, interim measures, investment arbitration, jurisdiction of arbitral tribunal, New York Convention, petition to set aside arbitration award, recognition and enforcement of domestic arbitration award, recognition and enforcement of foreign arbitration award, settlement before arbitral tribunal, state court assistanceid: 32459
Hartung Monika
Transparency in Arbitration Institutions’ Scrutiny of Arbitrators
[in:] Klausegger Christian, Klein Peter, Kremslehner Florian, Petsche Alexander, Pitkowitz Nikolaus, Welser Irene, Zeiler Gerold (eds), Austrian Yearbook on International Arbitration 2018, Vienna 2018, p. 41-51
Key issues: arbitrator, arbitratorid: 31934
Hartung Monika
Transparency in Arbitration Institutions’ Scrutiny of Arbitrators
[in:] Klausegger Christian, Klein Peter, Kremslehner Florian, Petsche Alexander, Pitkowitz Nikolaus, Welser Irene, Zeiler Gerold (eds), Austrian Yearbook on International Arbitration 2018, Vienna 2018, p. 41-51
Key issues: arbitrator, arbitratorid: 31934
Hartung Monika
Transparency In Arbitration Institutions’ Scrutiny Of Arbitrators
[in:] Klausegger Christian, Klein Peter, Kremslehner Florian, Petsche Alexander, Pitkowitz Nikolaus, Welser Irene, Zeiler Gerold (eds), Austrian Yearbook on International Arbitration 2018, Vienna 2018, p. 41-52
Key issues: arbitrator, arbitration procedureid: 35299
Hauser-Morel Maria
New ICC "Arbitrator Statement of Acceptance, Availability & Independence” [Original title: Nowe "Oświadczenie akceptacji, dyspozycyjności i niezależności" arbitra Międzynarodowej Izby Handlowej]
e-Przegląd Arbitrażowy 2010, No. 2, p. 23-26
Key issues: arbitratorid: 30842
Hauser-Morel Maria
Views Previously Expressed by an Arbitrator as Grounds for [Original title: Uprzednio wyrażane poglądy jako podstawa wyłączenia arbitra - uwagi w świetle decyzji ICSID w sprawie Urbaser]
Arbitration e-Review 2010, No. 3, p. 32-37
Key issues: arbitratorid: 30948
Horodyski Dominik
a commentary to Art. 1169-1193
[in:] Piaskowska Olga Maria (ed.), The Polish Civil Procedure Code. Enforcement procedure. International civil procedure. Arbitration. An updated commentary [Original title: Kodeks postępowania cywilnego. Postępowanie egzekucyjne. Międzynarodowe postępowanie cywilne. Sąd polubowny (arbitrażowy). Komentarz aktualizowany], Lex/el. 2023
Key issues: general works, arbitrator, arbitration procedure, jurisdiction of arbitral tribunalid: 35270
Horodyski Dominik
a commentary to Art. 1169-1993
[in:] Piaskowska Olga Maria (ed.), The Polish Civil Procedure Code. Enforcement procedure. International civil procedure. Arbitration. A commentary [Original title: Kodeks postępowania cywilnego. Postępowanie egzekucyjne. Międzynarodowe postępowanie cywilne. Sąd polubowny (arbitrażowy). Komentarz], Warsaw 2022
Key issues: general works, arbitrator, arbitration procedure, jurisdiction of arbitral tribunalid: 32446
Kierska Maria, Horodyski Dominik
Enforcement of Emergency Arbitrators’ Decisions under Polish Law
Polish Yearbook of International Law (PYIL) 2016, Vol. 36, p. 231-244
Key issues: arbitrator, arbitrator, interim measures, interim measuresid: 31953
Kierska Maria, Horodyski Dominik
Enforcement of Emergency Arbitrators’ Decisions under Polish Law
Polish Yearbook of International Law (PYIL) 2016, Vol. 36, p. 231-244
Key issues: arbitrator, arbitrator, interim measures, interim measuresid: 31953
Jakubecki Andrzej
a commentary to Art. 1154-1217
[in:] Wiśniewski Tadeusz (ed.), The Polish Civil Procedure Code. A commentary. Vol. V. Art. 1096-1217 [Original title: Kodeks postępowania cywilnego. Komentarz. Tom V. Art. 1096-1217], Warsaw 2021
Key issues: New York Convention, general works, state court assistance, arbitrability of dispute, investment arbitration, arbitrator, arbitration agreement, arbitration procedure, costs of arbitration, interim measures, jurisdiction of arbitral tribunal, settlement before arbitral tribunal, arbitration award, petition to set aside arbitration award, recognition and enforcement of domestic arbitration award, recognition and enforcement of foreign arbitration awardid: 32458
Jakubecki Andrzej
a commentary to Art. 1514-1217
[in:] Wiśniewski Tadeusz (ed.), The Polish Civil Procedure Code. A commentary. Vol. V. Art. 1096-1217 [Original title: Kodeks postępowania cywilnego. Komentarz. Tom V. Art. 1096-1217], Warsaw 2013 (2nd edition)
Key issues: New York Convention, general works, state court assistance, arbitrability of dispute, investment arbitration, arbitrator, arbitration agreement, arbitration procedure, costs of arbitration, interim measures, jurisdiction of arbitral tribunal, settlement before arbitral tribunal, arbitration award, petition to set aside arbitration award, recognition and enforcement of domestic arbitration award, recognition and enforcement of foreign arbitration awardid: 32471
Jakubowski Jerzy
Permanent Courts of Arbitration in Poland [Original title: Stałe sądy arbitrażowe w Polsce]
Warszawa 1961, ss. 39
Key issues: New York Convention, general works, arbitrator, arbitration procedure, arbitration award, petition to set aside arbitration award, recognition and enforcement of foreign arbitration awardid: 30127
Jakubowski Jerzy, Wiśniewski Andrzej W.
UNCITRAL Arbitration Rules [Original title: Regulamin arbitrażowy UNCITRAL]
PPHZ 1979, No. 3, p. 25-36
Key issues: general works, arbitrator, arbitration procedure, arbitration awardid: 30477
Jasiak Mikołaj
Arbitration Law Reform in Spain [Original title: Reforma prawa arbitrażowego w Hiszpanii]
Arbitration e-Review 2010, No. 3, p. 51-52
Key issues: general works, state court assistance, arbitrator, arbitration procedure, petition to set aside arbitration awardid: 30951
Jaworski Adam
Commentary to the Resolution of the Supreme Court – Civil Chamber of 8 September 2011, III CZP 41/11 [Original title: Glosa do uchwały Sądu Najwyższego - Izby Cywilnej z dnia 8 września 2011 r., III CZP 41/11]
OSP 2012, Nr 10, p. 654-658
Key issues: arbitratorid: 31074
Zawadzka Julita, Jelonek-Jarco Barbara
The Influence of Violation of the Independence and Impartiality Rules on the Enforeability and Effectiveness of the Arbitral Award
[in:] Alexander J. Bělohlávek, Filip Černý, Naděžda Rozehnalová (eds.), Czech (& Central European) Yearbook of Arbitration 2014, Vol. IV, New York 2014, p. 151-169
Key issues: New York Convention, arbitrator, recognition and enforcement of foreign arbitration awardid: 31287
Jeżewski Marek
International Investment Law [Original title: Międzynarodowe prawo inwestycyjne]
Warszawa 2011, pp. 496
Key issues: New York Convention, investment arbitration, arbitrator, arbitration agreement, arbitration procedure, arbitration award, petition to set aside arbitration award, recognition and enforcement of domestic arbitration award, recognition and enforcement of foreign arbitration awardid: 31171
Jodłowski Jerzy
Can a Party Validly Appoint an Arbitrator after the Lapse of a Week from Having Been Summoned by the Opposing Party, and if Yes, What is the Final Deadline to Do So? [Original title: Czy strona może wyznaczyć skutecznie sędziego polubownego po upływie tygodnia od wezwania strony przeciwnej, a jeśli tak – w jakim terminie ostatecznym wyznaczenie powinno nastąpić?]
PPC 1936, No. 10, p. 311-313
Key issues: arbitrator, arbitration procedureid: 30075
Jóźwiak Marcin
The Problem of Arbitrator’s Independence – an Innovative Proposal of the International Institute for Conflict Prevention & Resolution [Original title: Problematyka niezależności arbitrów – innowacyjna propozycja International Institute for Conflict Prevention & Resolution]
e-Przegląd Arbitrażowy 2017, No. 1-2, s. 20-23
Key issues: arbitrator, arbitratorid: 31914
Jóźwiak Marcin
The Problem of Arbitrator’s Independence – an Innovative Proposal of the International Institute for Conflict Prevention & Resolution [Original title: Problematyka niezależności arbitrów – innowacyjna propozycja International Institute for Conflict Prevention & Resolution]
e-Przegląd Arbitrażowy 2017, No. 1-2, s. 20-23
Key issues: arbitrator, arbitratorid: 31914
Jurcewicz Witold
Arbitrator as a Witness in the Court Proceedings [Original title: Arbiter jako świadek w postępowaniu sądowym]
PPH 2013, No. 7, p. 21-26
Key issues: arbitratorid: 31174
Jurcewicz Witold
Special Types of Proceedings to Assure Expedited Arbitration Process [Original title: Szczególne tryby postępowania mające na celu zapewnienie szybkości postępowania arbitrażowego]
[in:] M. Łaszczuk (chair), M. Furtek, S. Pieckowski, J. Poczobut, A. Szumański, M. Tomaszewski (eds.), Arbitration and Mediation. A Commemorative Volume Dedicated to Dr Andrzej Tynel [Arbitraż i mediacja. Księga jubileuszowa dedykowana doktorowi Andrzejowi Tynelowi], Warszawa 2012, p. 206-227
Key issues: arbitrator, arbitration procedureid: 31085
Kajkowska Ewelina, Zembrzuski Tadeusz
Impartiality and independence of an arbitrator – Polish legal regulations and international standards [Original title: Bezstronność i niezależność arbitra - polskie regulacje prawne a standardy międzynarodowe]
[in:] Głodowski Włodzimierz (ed.), Alternative dispute resolution methods in the Polish legal system [Original title: Alternatywne metody rozwiązywania sporów w polskim systemie prawnym], Poznań 2020, p. 79-100
Key issues: arbitratorid: 32353
Kalinowski Jacek M.
A National Arbitral Tribunal arbitrator as a taxpayer of the goods and services tax – selected aspects [Original title: Arbiter Krajowego Sądu Polubownego jako podatnik podatku od towarów i usług - wybrane aspekty]
[in:] Czura-Kalinowska Dorota (ed.), Mediation and arbitration. Volume II: selected issues [Original title: Mediacja i arbitraż. Tom drugi: wybrane zagadnienia], Poznań 2010, [1st edition]
Key issues: arbitratorid: 32395
Kamiński Ireneusz C.
Competence of Judges and Arbitrators Adjudicating on the Basis of the Equity Principle [Original title: Uprawnienia sędziów i arbitrów orzekających na podstawie reguł słuszności]
PPHZ 2000, No. 19-20, p. 66-78
Key issues: arbitratorid: 30249
Karkowski Paweł, Stefaniuk Weronika
Comparison of Polish and Slovak Regulations on Arbitration [Original title: Porównanie polskich i słowackich regulacji z zakresu prawa arbitrażowego]
Internetowy Przegląd Prawniczy TBSP UJ 2018, No. 3, p. 40-47
Key issues: arbitrability of dispute, arbitrability of dispute, arbitrator, arbitrator, arbitration agreement, arbitration agreementid: 32027
Karkowski Paweł, Stefaniuk Weronika
Comparison of Polish and Slovak Regulations on Arbitration [Original title: Porównanie polskich i słowackich regulacji z zakresu prawa arbitrażowego]
Internetowy Przegląd Prawniczy TBSP UJ 2018, No. 3, p. 40-47
Key issues: arbitrability of dispute, arbitrability of dispute, arbitrator, arbitrator, arbitration agreement, arbitration agreementid: 32027
Kąkolecki Andrzej
Best Practice in ICC Arbitration [Original title: Dobre praktyki w arbitrażu Międzynarodowej Izby Handlowej (ICC)]
[in:] M. Łaszczuk (chair), M. Furtek, S. Pieckowski, J. Poczobut, A. Szumański, M. Tomaszewski (eds.), Arbitration and Mediation. A Commemorative Volume Dedicated to Dr Andrzej Tynel [Arbitraż i mediacja. Księga jubileuszowa dedykowana doktorowi Andrzejowi Tynelowi], Warszawa 2012, p. 228-244
Key issues: arbitrator, arbitration procedure, arbitration awardid: 31086
Kąkolecki Andrzej
Modern Arbitration Rules [Original title: Nowoczesne regulaminy arbitrażowe]
Biul. Arb. 2013, No. 20, p. 88-92
Key issues: arbitrator, arbitration procedure, arbitration awardid: 31177
Kąkolecki Andrzej
Qualifications and Challenge of Arbitrators [Original title: Kwalifikacje i wyłączanie sędziów sądu polubownego (arbitrów)]
R.Pr. 2006, No. 4, p. 82-95
Key issues: arbitratorid: 30480
Kąkolecki Andrzej, Nowaczyk Piotr
A New Set of Rules of the Court of Arbitration at the Polish Chamber of Commerce / Un nou set de Reguli emise de Curtea de Arbitraj de pe lângă Camera de Comerţ din Polonia
Revista Română de Arbitraj 2009, No. 1 (9), p. 10-21
Key issues: arbitrator, arbitration procedure, arbitration awardid: 31290
Kąkolecki Andrzej, Nowaczyk Piotr
New ICC Rules of Arbitration [Original title: Nowy Regulamin Arbitrażowy Międzynarodowej Izby Handlowej]
Biul. Arb. 2012, No. 17, p. 55-70
Key issues: general works, arbitrator, arbitration procedure, jurisdiction of arbitral tribunal, arbitration awardid: 31046
Kocur Michał, Kieszczyński Jan
Arbitrate in Poland like it’s 2016
Kluwer Arbitration Blog 2016
Key issues: general works, arbitrator, costs of arbitrationid: 32323
Kocur Michał, Kieszczyński Jan
The Court of Arbitration at the Polish Chamber of Commerce Adopts New Rules
Kluwer Arbitration Blog 2014
Key issues: arbitrator, arbitration procedure, costs of arbitration, interim measures, arbitration awardid: 32328
Kita Ewelina
Arbitration clause in matters concerning labour law [Original title: Zapis na sąd polubowny w sprawach ze stosunku pracy]
ELSA 2015, No. 3, p. 89-100
Key issues: arbitrability of dispute, arbitrability of dispute, arbitrator, arbitrator, arbitration agreement, arbitration agreement, jurisdiction of arbitral tribunal, jurisdiction of arbitral tribunal, arbitration award, arbitration awardid: 32025
Kita Ewelina
Arbitration clause in matters concerning labour law [Original title: Zapis na sąd polubowny w sprawach ze stosunku pracy]
ELSA 2015, No. 3, p. 89-100
Key issues: arbitrability of dispute, arbitrability of dispute, arbitrator, arbitrator, arbitration agreement, arbitration agreement, jurisdiction of arbitral tribunal, jurisdiction of arbitral tribunal, arbitration award, arbitration awardid: 32025
Pörnbacher Karl, Knief Inken
Protection of Confidentiality in International Arbitration
[in:] M. Łaszczuk (chair), M. Furtek, S. Pieckowski, J. Poczobut, A. Szumański, M. Tomaszewski (eds.), Arbitration and Mediation. A Commemorative Volume Dedicated to Dr Andrzej Tynel [Arbitraż i mediacja. Księga jubileuszowa dedykowana doktorowi Andrzejowi Tynelowi], Warszawa 2012, p. 456-480
Key issues: arbitrator, arbitration procedureid: 31098
Kochanowski Maciej
Foreseeability of Damage under CISG Applied in International Arbitration - New Solutions to Old Problems?
[in:] Klausegger Christian, Klein Peter, Kremslehner Florian, Petsche Alexander, Pitkowitz Nikolaus, Welser Irene, Zeiler Gerold (eds), Austrian Yearbook on International Arbitration 2020, Vienna 2020, p. 233-264
Key issues: general works, arbitrator, arbitration procedure, arbitration awardid: 35295
Koredczuk Józef
Arbitrators Under the Civil Procedure Code of 1930 [Original title: Sędziowie polubowni według kodeksu postępowania cywilnego z 1930 roku]
Acta UWr 2006, No. 298, p. 295-317
Key issues: arbitratorid: 30484
Korpalski Mariusz
Partial Ineffectiveness of the Arbitration Agreement of the Arbitration Court at the Polish Bank Association. Commentary to the Warsaw Regional Court Judgement of 26 October 2011 (XXV Co 111/11) [Original title: Częściowa bezskuteczność zapisu na Sąd Polubowny przy Związku Banków Polskich. Glosa do wyroku SO w Warszawie z 26 października 2011 r. (XXV Co 111/11)]
MPB 2012, Nr 3, p. 25-29
Key issues: arbitrator, arbitration agreementid: 31072
Kroft, van der Remco
Netherlands Arbitration Institute (Brief Presentation)[Original title: Holenderski Instytut Arbitrażu (krótka prezentacja)]
Biul. Arb. 2009, Nr 11, p. 70-80
Key issues: general works, arbitrator, arbitration agreement, arbitration procedure, arbitration awardid: 30872
Kroński Aleksander
Arbitration in the Light of the Hitherto Case Law and Civil Procedure Code [Original title: Sądy polubowne w świetle dotychczasowego orzecznictwa i kodeksu postępowania cywilnego.]
Pal. 1931, No. 3, p. 107-116, [part I]
Key issues: arbitrator, arbitration agreementid: 30082
Wierzbowski Marek, Krysiak Anna
Impartiality and Independence as the Key Characteristics of any Arbitrator [Original title: Bezstronność i niezależność jako kluczowe cechy każdego arbitra]
[in:] Józef Okolski (chair), Andrzej Całus, Maksymilian Pazdan, Stanisław Sołtysiński, Tomasz Wardyński, Stanisław Włodyka (ed.) Essays in Honour of 60 years of the Court of Arbitration at the Polish Chamber of Commerce in Warsaw [Księga pamiątkowa 60-lecia Sądu Arbitrażowego przy Krajowej Izbie Gospodarczej w Warszawie], Warszawa 2010, p. 359-375
Key issues: arbitratorid: 30925
Wierzbowski Marek, Krysiak Anna
Lack of Impartiality and Independence as Grounds for Challenging An Arbitrator (Article 1174 of the Polish Civil Procedure Code) [Original title: Brak bezstronności i niezależności jako podstawowe przesłanki wyłączenia arbitra (art. 1174 k.p.c.)]
[in:] J. Gudowski, K. Weitz (ed.), Aurea praxis, aurea theoria. Księga pamiątkowa ku czci Profesora Tadeusza Erecińskiego, tom II [Aurea praxis, aurea theoria. A Commemorative Volume in Honour of Professor Tadeusz Ereciński, Vol. II], Warszawa 2011, p. 1747-1764
Key issues: arbitratorid: 31020
Wierzbowski Marek, Krysiak Anna
The Significance and Practical Application of the IBA Guidelines on Conflicts of Interest in Intenational Arbitration in Domestic Polish Arbitration [Original title: Znaczenie i stosowanie w praktyce Wytycznych IBA w ramach arbitrażu krajowego]
[in:] M. Łaszczuk (chair), M. Furtek, S. Pieckowski, J. Poczobut, A. Szumański, M. Tomaszewski (eds.), Arbitration and Mediation. A Commemorative Volume Dedicated to Dr Andrzej Tynel [Arbitraż i mediacja. Księga jubileuszowa dedykowana doktorowi Andrzejowi Tynelowi], Warszawa 2012, p. 254-264
Key issues: arbitratorid: 31087
Krzemiński Jacek
Party-appointed arbitrator in international arbitration [Original title: Arbiter jednostronnie mianowany przez stronę w arbitrażu międzynarodowym]
St. Iur. Torun. 2013, No. 1, Vol. 12, p. 151-173
Key issues: arbitratorid: 32223
Krześniak Eligiusz
Remarks on Arbitrator’s Independence and Impartiality in the Light of Organizational Rules in Sport and Commercial Arbitration [Original title: Uwagi na temat niezależności i bezstronności arbitra na tle zasad organizacyjnych w arbitrażu sportowym i arbitrażu handlowym]
PPH 2017, No. 3, p. 24-33
Key issues: arbitrator, arbitrator, recognition and enforcement of domestic arbitration award, recognition and enforcement of domestic arbitration award, recognition and enforcement of foreign arbitration award, recognition and enforcement of foreign arbitration awardid: 31825
Krześniak Eligiusz
Remarks on Arbitrator’s Independence and Impartiality in the Light of Organizational Rules in Sport and Commercial Arbitration [Original title: Uwagi na temat niezależności i bezstronności arbitra na tle zasad organizacyjnych w arbitrażu sportowym i arbitrażu handlowym]
PPH 2017, No. 3, p. 24-33
Key issues: arbitrator, arbitrator, recognition and enforcement of domestic arbitration award, recognition and enforcement of domestic arbitration award, recognition and enforcement of foreign arbitration award, recognition and enforcement of foreign arbitration awardid: 31825
Krześniak Eligiusz
The Court of Arbitration for Sport at the Polish Olympic Committee v The Court of Arbitration for Sport (CAS) – Background, Powers and Authority
Arbitration Bulletin - Young Arbitration 2016, No. 24, p. 199-209
Key issues: general works, arbitrator, arbitration procedureid: 31568
Kubala Agnieszka, Zacharzewski Andrzej
Can a Bank Challenge a Decision of a Banking Arbitrator? [Original title: Czy bank może zaskarżyć orzeczenie Arbitra Bankowego?]
Pr.B. 2003, No. 4, p. 110-115
Key issues: arbitratorid: 30260
Kuratowski Roman
Commentary on the Resolution of the First Chamber of the Supreme Court dated 22 January – 13 February 1931, C. 1783/30 (re: the Character of the Arbitration Clause and the State Court Ruling on the Appointment of Arbitrator) [Original title: Glosa do orzeczenia izby pierwszej sądu najwyższego z 23 stycznia - 13 lutego 1931 r., C. 1783/30 r. (dot. charakteru zapisu na sąd polubowny oraz orzeczenia sądu państwowego w przedmiocie wyznaczenia arbitra)]
OSP 1932 (vol. 9), item 46, p. 49-51
Key issues: arbitrator, arbitration agreementid: 30590
Kuratowski Roman
Liability of the Parties for Remuneration of the Arbitrators [Original title: Odpowiedzialność stron za wynagrodzenie sędziów polubownych.]
NPC 1933, No. 20, p. 624-630
Key issues: arbitratorid: 30086
Kuźmicka-Sulikowska Joanna
Odpowiedzialność cywilna arbitra sądu polubownego – zagadnienia wybrane [Original title: Civil Liability of an Arbitrator of an Arbitration Court – Selected Issues]
Prz.Praw.Publ. 2014, No. 10, p. 66-92
Key issues: arbitratorid: 31351
Kwiatkowska-Falęcka Elżbieta
The Independence - Common Principle of Arbitrator, Barrister and Legal Adviser [Original title: Niezależność - wspólna cecha arbitra, adwokata i radcy prawnego]
[in:] M. Łaszczuk (chair), M. Furtek, S. Pieckowski, J. Poczobut, A. Szumański, M. Tomaszewski (eds.), Arbitration and Mediation. A Commemorative Volume Dedicated to Dr Andrzej Tynel [Arbitraż i mediacja. Księga jubileuszowa dedykowana doktorowi Andrzejowi Tynelowi], Warszawa 2012, p. 285-311
Key issues: arbitratorid: 31090
Lichoń Kamila
Principle of Concentration of Evidence with Respect to the Construction and Manner of Examination of (Consumer) Disputes in the Procedure in Arbitration [Original title: Zasada koncentracji materiału procesowego w odniesieniu do konstrukcji I sposobu rozpatrywania sporów (konsumenckich) w ramach procedury arbitrażowej]
PPH 2020, No. 11, p. 41-45
Key issues: arbitrator, arbitrator, arbitration procedure, arbitration procedureid: 32125
Lichoń Kamila
Principle of Concentration of Evidence with Respect to the Construction and Manner of Examination of (Consumer) Disputes in the Procedure in Arbitration [Original title: Zasada koncentracji materiału procesowego w odniesieniu do konstrukcji I sposobu rozpatrywania sporów (konsumenckich) w ramach procedury arbitrażowej]
PPH 2020, No. 11, p. 41-45
Key issues: arbitrator, arbitrator, arbitration procedure, arbitration procedureid: 32125
Łaszczuk Maciej
A Few Remarks on Ethics of Arbitrators [Original title: Kilka uwag o etyce arbitra]
Olszewski Jan, Błaszczak Łukasz, Morek Rafał (eds). Arbitraż i mediacja - perspektywy prywatnoprawna i publicznoprawna. Między teorią a praktyką. Księga pamiątkowa ku czci Profesora Jana Łukasiewicza, Rzeszów 2018, p. 235-247
Key issues: arbitratorid: 31980
Łaszczuk Maciej
A Few Remarks on the Duties, Independence and Impartiality of Arbitrators [Original title: Kilka uwag o obowiązkach, niezależności i bezstronności arbitrów]
[in:] M. Łaszczuk (chair), M. Furtek, S. Pieckowski, J. Poczobut, A. Szumański, M. Tomaszewski (eds.), Arbitration and Mediation. A Commemorative Volume Dedicated to Dr Andrzej Tynel [Arbitraż i mediacja. Księga jubileuszowa dedykowana doktorowi Andrzejowi Tynelowi], Warszawa 2012, p. 321-332
Key issues: arbitratorid: 31092
Łaszczuk Maciej, Szpara Justyna
Commercial Arbitration Know - how 2020 (the chapter on Poland)
Commercial Arbitration Know - how 2020
Key issues: arbitrability of dispute, arbitration agreement, arbitration award, arbitration procedure, arbitrator, costs of arbitration, general works, interim measures, New York Convention, petition to set aside arbitration award, recognition and enforcement of domestic arbitration award, recognition and enforcement of foreign arbitration award, state court assistance, arbitrability of dispute, arbitration agreement, arbitration award, arbitration procedure, arbitrator, costs of arbitration, general works, interim measures, New York Convention, petition to set aside arbitration award, recognition and enforcement of domestic arbitration award, recognition and enforcement of foreign arbitration award, state court assistanceid: 32057
Łaszczuk Maciej, Szpara Justyna
Commercial Arbitration Know - how 2020 (the chapter on Poland)
Commercial Arbitration Know - how 2020
Key issues: arbitrability of dispute, arbitration agreement, arbitration award, arbitration procedure, arbitrator, costs of arbitration, general works, interim measures, New York Convention, petition to set aside arbitration award, recognition and enforcement of domestic arbitration award, recognition and enforcement of foreign arbitration award, state court assistance, arbitrability of dispute, arbitration agreement, arbitration award, arbitration procedure, arbitrator, costs of arbitration, general works, interim measures, New York Convention, petition to set aside arbitration award, recognition and enforcement of domestic arbitration award, recognition and enforcement of foreign arbitration award, state court assistanceid: 32057
Łaszczuk Maciej, Szumański Andrzej
The Arbitration Rules of the Court of Arbitration at the Polish Chamber of Commerce. Commentary [Original title: Regulamin Arbitrażowy Sądu Arbitrażowego przy KIG. Komentarz]
Warsaw 2017, pp. 604
Key issues: general works, arbitrability of dispute, arbitrator, arbitration agreement, arbitration procedure, costs of arbitration, interim measures, jurisdiction of arbitral tribunal, settlement before arbitral tribunal, arbitration awardid: 31829
Łyda Zbigniew
Arbitrator’s Impartiality and the Prohibition of "Interest in the Case" [Original title: Bezstronność arbitra a zakaz "zainteresowania w sprawie"]
PiP 1996, No. 2, p. 45-54
Key issues: arbitratorid: 30497
Melis Werner
Arbitrators Fees
Biul.Arb. 2013, No. 19, p. 65-70
Key issues: arbitrator, arbitration procedureid: 31244
Merezhko Oleksandr
International Commercial Arbitration from the Perspective of the Psychological Theory of Law [Original title: Międzynarodowy arbitraż handlowy z perspektywy psychologicznej teorii prawa]
Arbitration e-Review 2013, Special Edition, p. 6-11
Key issues: investment arbitration, arbitrator, arbitration procedure, petition to set aside arbitration award, recognition and enforcement of domestic arbitration award, recognition and enforcement of foreign arbitration awardid: 31159
Weber Anne-Marie, Milejska Magdalena
Women’s share in arbitral appointments – gender diversity in arbitration in the light of the ICCA Report [Original title: Udział kobiet w powołaniach na arbitrów - różnorodność płciowa w arbitrażu na tle Raportu ICCA]
ADR. Arbitraż i Mediacja 2021, No. 4, p. 33-42
Key issues: arbitratorid: 32251
Miśko Tomasz, Sagan Dominika
Arbitraż i mediacja - praktyczne aspekty stosowania przepisów (Iwonicz Zdrój 18-20.10.2007 r.) - sprawozdanie
ADR. Arbitraż i Mediacja 2008, Nr 1, s. 79 - 91
Key issues: general works, state court assistance, arbitrability of dispute, arbitrator, arbitration agreement, arbitration procedure, jurisdiction of arbitral tribunal, settlement before arbitral tribunal, arbitration award, petition to set aside arbitration award, recognition and enforcement of domestic arbitration award, recognition and enforcement of foreign arbitration awardid: 30500
Morek Rafał
a commentary to Art. 1154-1163, 1165-1173, 1175-1193, 1195-1205, 1209, 1211-1212, 1216-1217
[in:] Marszałkowska-Krześ Elwira (ed.), The Polish Civil Procedure Code - a commentary 2018 [Original title: Kodeks postępowania cywilnego - komentarz 2018], 21st edition, Legalis
Key issues: New York Convention, general works, state court assistance, arbitrability of dispute, arbitrator, arbitration agreement, arbitration procedure, interim measures, jurisdiction of arbitral tribunal, settlement before arbitral tribunal, arbitration award, petition to set aside arbitration award, recognition and enforcement of domestic arbitration award, recognition and enforcement of foreign arbitration awardid: 32501
Morek Rafał
a commentary to Art. 1154-1163, 1165-1173, 1175-1193, 1195-1205, 1209, 1211-1212, 1216-1217
[in:] Marszałkowska-Krześ Elwira (ed.), The Polish Civil Procedure Code - a commentary 2017 [Original title: Kodeks postępowania cywilnego - komentarz 2017], 19th edition, Legalis
Key issues: New York Convention, general works, state court assistance, arbitrability of dispute, arbitrator, arbitration agreement, arbitration procedure, interim measures, jurisdiction of arbitral tribunal, settlement before arbitral tribunal, arbitration award, petition to set aside arbitration award, recognition and enforcement of domestic arbitration award, recognition and enforcement of foreign arbitration awardid: 32507
Morek Rafał
a commentary to Art. 1154-1163, 1165-1173, 1175-1193, 1195-1205, 1209, 1211-1212, 1216-1217
[in:] Marszałkowska-Krześ Elwira (ed.), The Polish Civil Procedure Code - a commentary 2017 [Original title: Kodeks postępowania cywilnego - komentarz 2017], 20th edition, Legalis
Key issues: New York Convention, general works, state court assistance, arbitrability of dispute, arbitrator, arbitration agreement, arbitration procedure, interim measures, jurisdiction of arbitral tribunal, settlement before arbitral tribunal, arbitration award, petition to set aside arbitration award, recognition and enforcement of domestic arbitration award, recognition and enforcement of foreign arbitration awardid: 32504
Morek Rafał
a commentary to Art. 1154-1163, 1165-1193, 1195-1205, 1207-1213, 1215-1217
[in:] Marszałkowska-Krześ Elwira (ed.), The Polish Civil Procedure Code - a commentary 2017 [Original title: Kodeks postępowania cywilnego - komentarz 2017], 18th edition, Legalis
Key issues: New York Convention, general works, state court assistance, arbitrability of dispute, arbitrator, arbitration agreement, arbitration procedure, interim measures, jurisdiction of arbitral tribunal, settlement before arbitral tribunal, arbitration award, petition to set aside arbitration award, recognition and enforcement of domestic arbitration award, recognition and enforcement of foreign arbitration awardid: 32508
Morek Rafał
a commentary to Art. 1154-1217
[in:] Marszałkowska-Krześ Elwira (ed.), The Polish Civil Procedure Code - a commentary 2011 [Original title: Kodeks postępowania cywilnego - komentarz 2011], 2nd edition, Legalis
Key issues: New York Convention, general works, state court assistance, arbitrability of dispute, investment arbitration, arbitrator, arbitration agreement, arbitration procedure, costs of arbitration, interim measures, jurisdiction of arbitral tribunal, settlement before arbitral tribunal, arbitration award, petition to set aside arbitration award, recognition and enforcement of domestic arbitration award, recognition and enforcement of foreign arbitration awardid: 35226
Morek Rafał
a commentary to Art. 1154-1217
[in:] Marszałkowska-Krześ Elwira (ed.), The Polish Civil Procedure Code - a commentary 2016 [Original title: Kodeks postępowania cywilnego - komentarz 2016], 17th edition, Legalis
Key issues: New York Convention, general works, state court assistance, arbitrability of dispute, investment arbitration, arbitrator, arbitration agreement, arbitration procedure, costs of arbitration, interim measures, jurisdiction of arbitral tribunal, settlement before arbitral tribunal, arbitration award, petition to set aside arbitration award, recognition and enforcement of domestic arbitration award, recognition and enforcement of foreign arbitration awardid: 32511
Morek Rafał
a commentary to Art. 1154-1217
[in:] Marszałkowska-Krześ Elwira (ed.), The Polish Civil Procedure Code - a commentary 2016 [Original title: Kodeks postępowania cywilnego - komentarz 2016], 16th edition, Legalis
Key issues: New York Convention, general works, state court assistance, arbitrability of dispute, investment arbitration, arbitrator, arbitration agreement, arbitration procedure, costs of arbitration, interim measures, jurisdiction of arbitral tribunal, settlement before arbitral tribunal, arbitration award, petition to set aside arbitration award, recognition and enforcement of domestic arbitration award, recognition and enforcement of foreign arbitration awardid: 32512
Morek Rafał
a commentary to Art. 1154-1217
[in:] Marszałkowska-Krześ Elwira (ed.), The Polish Civil Procedure Code - a commentary 2016 [Original title: Kodeks postępowania cywilnego - komentarz 2016], 15th edition, Legalis
Key issues: New York Convention, general works, state court assistance, arbitrability of dispute, investment arbitration, arbitrator, arbitration agreement, arbitration procedure, costs of arbitration, interim measures, jurisdiction of arbitral tribunal, settlement before arbitral tribunal, arbitration award, petition to set aside arbitration award, recognition and enforcement of domestic arbitration award, recognition and enforcement of foreign arbitration awardid: 32513
Morek Rafał
a commentary to Art. 1154-1217
[in:] Marszałkowska-Krześ Elwira (ed.), The Polish Civil Procedure Code - a commentary 2015 [Original title: Kodeks postępowania cywilnego - komentarz 2015], 14th edition, Legalis
Key issues: New York Convention, general works, state court assistance, arbitrability of dispute, investment arbitration, arbitrator, arbitration agreement, arbitration procedure, costs of arbitration, interim measures, jurisdiction of arbitral tribunal, settlement before arbitral tribunal, arbitration award, petition to set aside arbitration award, recognition and enforcement of domestic arbitration award, recognition and enforcement of foreign arbitration awardid: 32514
Morek Rafał
a commentary to Art. 1154-1217
[in:] Marszałkowska-Krześ Elwira (ed.), The Polish Civil Procedure Code - a commentary 2015 [Original title: Kodeks postępowania cywilnego - komentarz 2015], 13th edition, Legalis
Key issues: arbitrability of dispute, arbitration agreement, arbitration award, arbitration procedure, arbitrator, costs of arbitration, general works, interim measures, investment arbitration, jurisdiction of arbitral tribunal, New York Convention, petition to set aside arbitration award, recognition and enforcement of domestic arbitration award, recognition and enforcement of foreign arbitration award, settlement before arbitral tribunal, state court assistanceid: 32515
Morek Rafał
a commentary to Art. 1154-1217
[in:] Marszałkowska-Krześ Elwira (ed.), The Polish Civil Procedure Code - a commentary 2015 [Original title: Kodeks postępowania cywilnego - komentarz 2015], 12th edition, Legalis
Key issues: arbitrability of dispute, arbitration agreement, arbitration award, arbitration procedure, arbitrator, costs of arbitration, general works, interim measures, investment arbitration, jurisdiction of arbitral tribunal, New York Convention, petition to set aside arbitration award, recognition and enforcement of domestic arbitration award, recognition and enforcement of foreign arbitration award, settlement before arbitral tribunal, state court assistanceid: 32516
Morek Rafał
a commentary to Art. 1154-1217
[in:] Marszałkowska-Krześ Elwira (ed.), The Polish Civil Procedure Code - a commentary 2014 [Original title: Kodeks postępowania cywilnego - komentarz 2014], 11th edition, Legalis
Key issues: New York Convention, general works, state court assistance, arbitrability of dispute, investment arbitration, arbitrator, arbitration agreement, arbitration procedure, costs of arbitration, interim measures, jurisdiction of arbitral tribunal, settlement before arbitral tribunal, arbitration award, petition to set aside arbitration award, recognition and enforcement of domestic arbitration award, recognition and enforcement of foreign arbitration awardid: 32517
Morek Rafał
a commentary to Art. 1154-1217
[in:] Marszałkowska-Krześ Elwira (ed.), The Polish Civil Procedure Code - a commentary 2014 [Original title: Kodeks postępowania cywilnego - komentarz 2014], 10th edition, Legalis
Key issues: New York Convention, general works, state court assistance, arbitrability of dispute, investment arbitration, arbitrator, arbitration agreement, arbitration procedure, costs of arbitration, interim measures, jurisdiction of arbitral tribunal, settlement before arbitral tribunal, arbitration award, petition to set aside arbitration award, recognition and enforcement of domestic arbitration award, recognition and enforcement of foreign arbitration awardid: 32518
Morek Rafał
a commentary to Art. 1154-1217
[in:] Marszałkowska-Krześ Elwira (ed.), The Polish Civil Procedure Code - a commentary 2013 [Original title: Kodeks postępowania cywilnego - komentarz 2013], 9th edition, Legalis
Key issues: New York Convention, general works, state court assistance, arbitrability of dispute, investment arbitration, arbitrator, arbitration agreement, arbitration procedure, costs of arbitration, interim measures, jurisdiction of arbitral tribunal, settlement before arbitral tribunal, arbitration award, petition to set aside arbitration award, recognition and enforcement of domestic arbitration award, recognition and enforcement of foreign arbitration awardid: 32519
Morek Rafał
a commentary to Art. 1154-1217
[in:] Marszałkowska-Krześ Elwira (ed.), The Polish Civil Procedure Code - a commentary 2013 [Original title: Kodeks postępowania cywilnego - komentarz 2013], 8th edition, Legalis
Key issues: New York Convention, general works, state court assistance, arbitrability of dispute, investment arbitration, arbitrator, arbitration agreement, arbitration procedure, costs of arbitration, interim measures, jurisdiction of arbitral tribunal, settlement before arbitral tribunal, arbitration award, petition to set aside arbitration award, recognition and enforcement of domestic arbitration award, recognition and enforcement of foreign arbitration awardid: 32520
Morek Rafał
a commentary to Art. 1154-1217
[in:] Marszałkowska-Krześ Elwira (ed.), The Polish Civil Procedure Code - a commentary 2012 [Original title: Kodeks postępowania cywilnego - komentarz 2012], 7th edition, Legalis
Key issues: arbitrability of dispute, arbitration agreement, arbitration award, arbitration procedure, arbitrator, costs of arbitration, general works, interim measures, investment arbitration, jurisdiction of arbitral tribunal, New York Convention, petition to set aside arbitration award, recognition and enforcement of domestic arbitration award, recognition and enforcement of foreign arbitration award, settlement before arbitral tribunal, state court assistanceid: 32521
Morek Rafał
a commentary to Art. 1154-1217
[in:] Marszałkowska-Krześ Elwira (ed.), The Polish Civil Procedure Code - a commentary 2012 [Original title: Kodeks postępowania cywilnego - komentarz 2012], 6th edition, Legalis
Key issues: New York Convention, general works, state court assistance, arbitrability of dispute, investment arbitration, arbitrator, arbitration agreement, arbitration procedure, costs of arbitration, interim measures, jurisdiction of arbitral tribunal, settlement before arbitral tribunal, arbitration award, petition to set aside arbitration award, recognition and enforcement of domestic arbitration award, recognition and enforcement of foreign arbitration awardid: 32522
Morek Rafał
a commentary to Art. 1154-1217
[in:] Marszałkowska-Krześ Elwira (ed.), The Polish Civil Procedure Code - a commentary 2012 [Original title: Kodeks postępowania cywilnego - komentarz 2012], 5th edition, Legalis
Key issues: New York Convention, general works, state court assistance, arbitrability of dispute, investment arbitration, arbitrator, arbitration agreement, arbitration procedure, costs of arbitration, interim measures, jurisdiction of arbitral tribunal, settlement before arbitral tribunal, arbitration award, petition to set aside arbitration award, recognition and enforcement of domestic arbitration award, recognition and enforcement of foreign arbitration awardid: 32523
Morek Rafał
a commentary to Art. 1154-1217
[in:] Marszałkowska-Krześ Elwira (ed.), The Polish Civil Procedure Code - a commentary 2012 [Original title: Kodeks postępowania cywilnego - komentarz 2012], 4th edition, Legalis
Key issues: New York Convention, general works, state court assistance, arbitrability of dispute, investment arbitration, arbitrator, arbitration agreement, arbitration procedure, costs of arbitration, interim measures, jurisdiction of arbitral tribunal, settlement before arbitral tribunal, arbitration award, petition to set aside arbitration award, recognition and enforcement of domestic arbitration award, recognition and enforcement of foreign arbitration awardid: 35224
Morek Rafał
a commentary to Art. 1154-1217
[in:] Marszałkowska-Krześ Elwira (ed.), The Polish Civil Procedure Code - a commentary 2011 [Original title: Kodeks postępowania cywilnego - komentarz 2011], 3rd edition, Legalis
Key issues: New York Convention, general works, state court assistance, arbitrability of dispute, investment arbitration, arbitrator, arbitration agreement, arbitration procedure, costs of arbitration, interim measures, jurisdiction of arbitral tribunal, settlement before arbitral tribunal, arbitration award, petition to set aside arbitration award, recognition and enforcement of domestic arbitration award, recognition and enforcement of foreign arbitration awardid: 35225
Morek Rafał
a commentary to Art. 1154-1217
[in:] Marszałkowska-Krześ Elwira (ed.), The Polish Civil Procedure Code - a commentary 2011 [Original title: Kodeks postępowania cywilnego - komentarz 2011], 1st edition, Legalis
Key issues: New York Convention, general works, state court assistance, arbitrability of dispute, investment arbitration, arbitrator, arbitration agreement, arbitration procedure, costs of arbitration, interim measures, jurisdiction of arbitral tribunal, settlement before arbitral tribunal, arbitration award, petition to set aside arbitration award, recognition and enforcement of domestic arbitration award, recognition and enforcement of foreign arbitration awardid: 35227
Morek Rafał
Commentary on the Supreme Court Ruling of 19.10.2012, V CSK 503/11 [Original title: Glosa do wyroku Sądu Najwyższego z 19 października 2012 r., V CSK 503/11]
M. Pr. Bank. 2014, No 1, p. 54-62
Key issues: arbitrator, arbitration agreement, arbitration procedureid: 31510
Morek Rafał
Resolution of disputes by the Arbitral Tribunal in the light of applicable law [Original title: Rozstrzyganie sporów przez Sąd Arbitrażowy w świetle obowiązującego prawa]
Konsultant 2014, No. 34-35, p. 3-6
Key issues: arbitrator, arbitration agreement, arbitration procedure, settlement before arbitral tribunal, arbitration award, petition to set aside arbitration award, recognition and enforcement of domestic arbitration award, recognition and enforcement of foreign arbitration awardid: 32172
Morek Rafał
Selected Court Decisions Related to Arbitral Proceedings [Original title: Przegląd orzecznictwa Sądu Najwyższego i sądów apelacyjnych]
Biul. Arb. 2012, No. 17, p. 109-112
Key issues: arbitrator, arbitration agreementid: 31050
Morek Rafał
The Iura Novit Arbiter Principle in Foreign Court Case Law [Original title: Zasad iura novit arbiter w orzecznictwie sądów zagranicznych
[in:] M. Modrzejewska (ed.), 21st Century Commercial Law. Time of Stabilisation, Evolution or Revolution. A Commemorative Volume for Prof. Józef Okolski [Original title: Prawo handlowe XXI wieku. Czas stabilizacji, ewolucji czy rewolucji. Księga jubileuszowa Profesora Józefa Okolskiego], Warszawa 2010, p. 620-632
Key issues: arbitrator, arbitration procedureid: 30955
Moskal Anna
The Problem of Disclosure of Third-Party Funding in International Investment Arbitration [Original title: Problem ujawnienia finansowania przez osoby trzecie w międzynarodowym arbitrażu inwestycyjnym]
ADR Arbitraż i Mediacja 2018, No. 3, p. 69-77
Key issues: general works, general works, arbitrator, arbitratorid: 31971
Moskal Anna
The Problem of Disclosure of Third-Party Funding in International Investment Arbitration [Original title: Problem ujawnienia finansowania przez osoby trzecie w międzynarodowym arbitrażu inwestycyjnym]
ADR Arbitraż i Mediacja 2018, No. 3, p. 69-77
Key issues: general works, general works, arbitrator, arbitratorid: 31971
Nanowski Zbigniew
On Substitutive Appointment of Arbitrators [Original title: W sprawie zastępczej nominacji arbitrów]
PPHZ 1977, No. 1, p. 65-75
Key issues: arbitratorid: 30509
Nanowski Zbigniew
On the Notion of Arbitrator’s "Neutrality" [Original title: W sprawie pojęcia "neutralności" arbitra]
PHZ 1969, No. 23-24, p. 40
Key issues: arbitratorid: 30615
Neumann Marek
Public Policy and the Content of an Arbitral Award - commentary on the Supreme Court's ruling of 9 September 2010 (I CSK 535/09) [Original title: Klauzula porządku publicznego a treść wyroku sądu polubownego - glosa do wyroku Sądu Najwyższego z 9.09.2010 r. (I CSK 535/09)]
Glosa 2011, No. 2, p. 61-67
Key issues: arbitrator, arbitration award, petition to set aside arbitration awardid: 30994
Nowacki Artur
A truncated tribunal formed as a result of expiry of an arbitrator’s appointment [Original title: Kadłubowy zespół orzekający powstały wskutek wygaśnięcia mandatu arbitra]
ADR. Arbitraż i Mediacja 2019, No. 3, p. 73-82
Key issues: arbitrator, arbitrator, arbitration procedure, arbitration procedureid: 32004
Nowacki Artur
A truncated tribunal formed as a result of expiry of an arbitrator’s appointment [Original title: Kadłubowy zespół orzekający powstały wskutek wygaśnięcia mandatu arbitra]
ADR. Arbitraż i Mediacja 2019, No. 3, p. 73-82
Key issues: arbitrator, arbitrator, arbitration procedure, arbitration procedureid: 32004
Nowacki Artur
The Procedure for Challenging an Arbitrator [Original title: Procedura wyłączenia arbitra]
PPC 2018, No. 4, p. 496-515
Key issues: arbitrator, arbitratorid: 31962
Nowacki Artur
The Procedure for Challenging an Arbitrator [Original title: Procedura wyłączenia arbitra]
PPC 2018, No. 4, p. 496-515
Key issues: arbitrator, arbitratorid: 31962
Nowaczyk Piotr
Arbitration and Mediation. Inter-cultural aspects of mediation [Original title: Arbitraż i mediacja. Międzykulturowe aspekty mediacji]
Biul. Arb., 2013, No. 19, p. 71-77
Key issues: arbitratorid: 31135
Nowaczyk Piotr
Arbitrator in the 21st Century – Challenges and Expectations (in Search of the Ideal Arbitrator) [Original title: Arbiter XXI w. – wyzwania i oczekiwania (w poszukiwaniu arbitra idealnego)], Part of a Book in the Memory of dr. hab. Tadeusz Szurski, Honorary President of the Court of Arbitration at the Polish Chamber of Commerce
Biul. Arb. 2008, No. 5, p. 6-15
Key issues: arbitratorid: 30863
Nowaczyk Piotr
Arbitrator in the 21st Century – Challenges and Expectations (in Search of the Ideal Arbitrator) [Original title: Arbiter XXI w. - wyzwania i oczekiwania (w poszukiwaniu arbitra idealnego)]
[in:] Sylwester Pieckowski (chair), Piotr Nowaczyk, Jerzy Poczobut, Andrzej Szumański, Andrzej Tynel (ed.), Polish and International Commercial Arbitration at the Threshold of the 21st Century: A Commemorative Volume in Honour of Dr Tadeusz Szurski [Międzynarodowy i krajowy arbitraż handlowy u progu XXI wieku. Księga pamiątkowa dedykowana doktorowi habilitowanemu Tadeuszowi Szurskiemu], Warszawa 2008, p. 99-108
Key issues: arbitratorid: 30142
Nowaczyk Piotr
International Arbitrator – Position, Mission, or Career?
[in:] B. Gessel-Kalinowska vel Kalisz (ed.), The Challenges and the Future of Commercial and Investment Arbitration. Liber Amicorum Professor Jerzy Rajski, Warsaw 2015, p. 63-72
Key issues: arbitratorid: 31401
Nowaczyk Piotr
Is It Moral to Charge VAT on Arbitration?
Revista Română de Arbitraj 2015, No. 1 (33), p. 11-14
Key issues: arbitratorid: 31352
Nowaczyk Piotr
Is it Morally Right to Charge VAT on Arbitration? [Original title: Czy moralne jest oVATowanie arbitrażu?]
Biul. Arb. 2013, No. 20, p. 82-87
Key issues: general works, arbitratorid: 31178
Nowaczyk Piotr
Reflection on What Is Special in an Arbitrator’s Life
[in:] Kaj Hober, Annette Magnusson, Marie Öhrström (eds), Liber Amoricorum: Between East and West: Essays in Honour of Ulf Franke, New York 2010, p. 365-382
Key issues: general works, arbitratorid: 35268
Nowaczyk Piotr
What’s so special about an arbitrator’s life? [Original title: Cóż jest niezwykłego w życiu arbitra?]
Palestra 2023, No. 1-2, p. 220-238
Key issues: general works, arbitratorid: 35257
Nowaczyk Piotr, Syp Szymon
International Commercial Arbitration and Competition Law - Selected Theoretical and Practical Issues [Original title: Arbitraż a prawo konkurencji - wybrane zagadnienia teoretyczne i praktyczne]
iKAR 2013, No. 5, p. 81-89
Key issues: arbitrability of dispute, arbitratorid: 31186
Nowaczyk Piotr, Syp Szymon
Rules of Arbitration of the International Chamber of Commerce [Original title: Regulamin Arbitrażowy Międzynarodowej Izby Handlowej]
iKAR 2013, No. 5, p. 129-132
Key issues: general works, arbitrator, arbitration procedure, settlement before arbitral tribunal, arbitration awardid: 31187
Nowak Łucja
Jirvraj v. Hashwani - Why Is Arbitrator not an Employee?
Arbitration e-Review 2011, No. 4, p. 15-20
Key issues: arbitratorid: 31063
Olaś Andrzej
May International Arbitral Tribunals Declare Laws Unconstitutional? An International and a Polish Perspective on the Issue of Dealing with Unlawful Laws
Journal of International Arbitration 2017, Vol. 34, Issue 1, p. 169-206
Key issues: arbitrator, arbitrator, arbitration procedure, arbitration procedureid: 31837
Olaś Andrzej
May International Arbitral Tribunals Declare Laws Unconstitutional? An International and a Polish Perspective on the Issue of Dealing with Unlawful Laws
Journal of International Arbitration 2017, Vol. 34, Issue 1, p. 169-206
Key issues: arbitrator, arbitrator, arbitration procedure, arbitration procedureid: 31837
Opaliński Łukasz
Arbitration in Domestic Trade [Original title: Arbitraż w krajowym obrocie gospodarczym]
[in:] Prace laureatów konkursu im. Prof. Jerzego Jakubowskiego, edycja druga [Works of the Winners of Prof. Jerzy Jakubowski Contest, Second Edition], Warszawa 2005, p. 195-244
Key issues: general works, state court assistance, arbitrability of dispute, arbitrator, arbitration agreement, arbitration procedure, jurisdiction of arbitral tribunal, settlement before arbitral tribunal, arbitration award, petition to set aside arbitration award, recognition and enforcement of domestic arbitration awardid: 30960
Orawiec Bartłomiej
Removal of Arbitrators for Bias in the UK: Recent Case Law
ADR. Arbitraż i Mediacja 2018, No. 3, p. 79-85
Key issues: arbitrator, arbitratorid: 31972
Orawiec Bartłomiej
Removal of Arbitrators for Bias in the UK: Recent Case Law
ADR. Arbitraż i Mediacja 2018, No. 3, p. 79-85
Key issues: arbitrator, arbitratorid: 31972
Orecki Marcin
Arbitration and state courts in the context of the principle of non-interference of state courts in the activity of arbitration courts and their composition [Original title: Sądownictwo polubowne a sądy państwowe wobec zasady nieingerencji sądu państwowego w działalność sądu polubownego I jego skład]
Warsaw 2019, pp. 432
Key issues: arbitration agreement, arbitration procedure, arbitrator, costs of arbitration, general works, interim measures, jurisdiction of arbitral tribunal, state court assistance, arbitration agreement, arbitration procedure, arbitrator, costs of arbitration, general works, interim measures, jurisdiction of arbitral tribunal, state court assistanceid: 32094
Orecki Marcin
Arbitration and state courts in the context of the principle of non-interference of state courts in the activity of arbitration courts and their composition [Original title: Sądownictwo polubowne a sądy państwowe wobec zasady nieingerencji sądu państwowego w działalność sądu polubownego I jego skład]
Warsaw 2019, pp. 432
Key issues: arbitration agreement, arbitration procedure, arbitrator, costs of arbitration, general works, interim measures, jurisdiction of arbitral tribunal, state court assistance, arbitration agreement, arbitration procedure, arbitrator, costs of arbitration, general works, interim measures, jurisdiction of arbitral tribunal, state court assistanceid: 32094
Orecki Marcin
Polish Provisions on Courts of Arbitration - de Lege Ferenda Remarks [Original title: Polskie przepisy o sądzie polubownym (arbitrażowym) - uwagi de lege ferenda]
PPC 2014, No. 2, p. 198-237
Key issues: general works, arbitrability of dispute, arbitrator, arbitration agreement, arbitration procedure, jurisdiction of arbitral tribunal, arbitration award, petition to set aside arbitration awardid: 31272
Szpara Justyna, Orzeł-Jakubowska Aleksandra
Country report on local requirements for the validity of the arbitral award - Poland
[w:] International Bar Association - Validity of arbitral awards - country reports
Key issues: general works, general works, arbitrator, arbitrator, arbitration agreement, arbitration agreement, arbitration procedure, arbitration procedure, costs of arbitration, costs of arbitration, arbitration award, arbitration awardid: 32098
Szpara Justyna, Orzeł-Jakubowska Aleksandra
Country report on local requirements for the validity of the arbitral award - Poland
[w:] International Bar Association - Validity of arbitral awards - country reports
Key issues: general works, general works, arbitrator, arbitrator, arbitration agreement, arbitration agreement, arbitration procedure, arbitration procedure, costs of arbitration, costs of arbitration, arbitration award, arbitration awardid: 32098
Osiński Marcin
Proceedings Before Polish Arbitration Courts – Selected Issues [Original title: Postępowanie przed polskimi sądami polubownymi - wybrane zagadnienia]
[in:] Prace laureatów konkursu im. Prof. Jerzego Jakubowskiego, edycja druga [Works of the Winners of Prof. Jerzy Jakubowski Contest, Second Edition], Warszawa 2005, p.121-193
Key issues: general works, state court assistance, arbitrator, arbitration agreement, arbitration procedure, jurisdiction of arbitral tribunal, settlement before arbitral tribunal, arbitration award, petition to set aside arbitration award, recognition and enforcement of domestic arbitration awardid: 30961
Paszkowski Jerzy
a commentary to Art. 1154-1182
[in:] Szanciło Tomasz (ed.), The Polish Civil Procedure Code. A commentary 2023. Vol. II. Art. 506-1217 [Original title: Kodeks postępowania cywilnego. Komentarz 2023. Tom II. Art. 506-1217], 2nd edition, Legalis
Key issues: general works, arbitrability of dispute, arbitrator, arbitration agreement, arbitration procedure, interim measures, jurisdiction of arbitral tribunalid: 35281
Paszkowski Jerzy
a commentary to Art. 1154-1182
[in:] Szanciło Tomasz (ed.), The Polish Civil Procedure Code. A commentary 2019. Vol. II. Art. 506-1217 [Original title: Kodeks postępowania cywilnego. Komentarz 2019. Tom II. Art. 506-1217], 1st edition, Legalis
Key issues: general works, arbitrability of dispute, arbitrator, arbitration agreement, arbitration procedure, interim measures, jurisdiction of arbitral tribunalid: 35236
Paśnik Jerzy
Selected aspects of the organization and activity of the Arbitration Court for Sport at the Polish Olympic Committee [Original title: Wybrane aspekty organizacji i działalności Trybunału Arbitrażowego do spraw Sportu przy Polskim Komitecie Olimpijskim]
Przegląd Prawa Publicznego 2020, No. 4, p. 23-35
Key issues: general works, arbitrator, arbitration agreement, arbitration procedure, interim measures, jurisdiction of arbitral tribunal, arbitration awardid: 32014
Pazdan Maksymilian
Governing Law for the Agreement Between the Parties and the Arbitrator(s) in International Commercial Arbitration [Original title: Prawo właściwe dla umowy stron z arbitrem (arbitrami) w międzynarodowym arbitrażu handlowym]
[in:] Ewa Łętowska (ed.), Procedure and Law. Book in Memory of Prof. Jerzy Jodłowski [Proces i prawo. Księga pamiątkowa ku czci profesora Jerzego Jodłowskiego], Wrocław 1989, p. 183-192
Key issues: arbitratorid: 30428
Pazdan Maksymilian
Governing Law for the Agreement Between the Parties and the Arbitrator(s) under the 1980 Rome Convention and Rome I Regulation [Original title: Prawo właściwe dla umowy stron z arbitrem (arbitrami) według Konwencji rzymskiej z 1980 r. i rozporządzenia Rzym I]
[in:] J. Gudowski, K. Weitz (ed.), Aurea praxis, aurea theoria. Księga pamiątkowa ku czci Profesora Tadeusza Erecińskiego, tom II [Aurea praxis, aurea theoria. A Commemorative Volume in Honour of Professor Tadeusz Ereciński, Vol. II], Warszawa 2011, p. 1765-1775
Key issues: arbitratorid: 31021
Pazdan Maksymilian
Legal Aspects of the Function of an Arbitrator [Original title: Prawne aspekty funkcji arbitra]
PUG 1994, No. 2, p. 8-14
Key issues: arbitratorid: 30305
Pazdan Maksymilian
The Agreement Between the Parties and the Arbitrator(s) in International Commercial Arbitration [Original title: Umowa stron z arbitrem (arbitrami) w międzynarodowym arbitrażu handlowym]
PPHZ 1987, No. 11, p. 25-57
Key issues: arbitratorid: 30516
Pączek Jarosław
Arbitrators’ Conflict of Interest in Dommo, Vidatel and Saad - Three Landmark Decisions of the (New) International Commercial Chamber of the Paris Court of Appeal
Przegląd Prawa Egzekucyjnego 2022, No. 1, p. 5-21
Key issues: arbitrator, arbitration awardid: 32337
Pączek Jarosław
Halliburton v. Chubb. An Arbitrator’s Duty of Disclosure - Is it a Matter of the Best Practice or a Matter of Law?
Przegląd Prawa Egzekucyjnego 2021, No. 6, p. 23-43
Key issues: general works, arbitratorid: 32278
Philippe Mirèze
Fast-Track & Emergency Measures in M&A & JV Disputes in ICC Arbitration [Tryb uproszczony i środki doraźne w toczących się przed ICC postępowaniach arbitrażowych dotyczących fuzji i przejęć oraz wspólnych przedsięwzięć]
Arbitration e-Review 2013, No. 1-2, p. 6-22
Key issues: arbitrator, arbitration procedureid: 31193
Piaskowska Olga Maria
The Polish Civil Procedure Code. A selection of case law. A judicial commentary [Original title: Kodeks postępowania cywilnego. Wybór orzecznictwa. Komentarz orzeczniczy[
Warsaw 2014, pp. 1064
Key issues: New York Convention, general works, state court assistance, arbitrability of dispute, investment arbitration, arbitrator, arbitration agreement, arbitration procedure, costs of arbitration, interim measures, jurisdiction of arbitral tribunal, settlement before arbitral tribunal, arbitration award, petition to set aside arbitration award, recognition and enforcement of domestic arbitration award, recognition and enforcement of foreign arbitration awardid: 32470
Piechota Rafał
Out-of-court forms of sports disputes resolution [Original title: Pozasądowe formy rozwiązywania sporów sportowych]
PWPMEiP 2006, No. 4, p. 33-54
Key issues: general works, general works, arbitrator, arbitrator, arbitration procedure, arbitration procedure, jurisdiction of arbitral tribunal, jurisdiction of arbitral tribunalid: 32076
Piechota Rafał
Out-of-court forms of sports disputes resolution [Original title: Pozasądowe formy rozwiązywania sporów sportowych]
PWPMEiP 2006, No. 4, p. 33-54
Key issues: general works, general works, arbitrator, arbitrator, arbitration procedure, arbitration procedure, jurisdiction of arbitral tribunal, jurisdiction of arbitral tribunalid: 32076
Pietkiewicz Paweł
Challenge of an Arbitrator. Selected Procedural Issues under the Fifth Part of the Civil Procedure Code [Original title: Wyłączenie arbitra. Wybrane problemy proceduralne na tle przepisów Części piątej Kodeksu postępowania cywilnego]
[in:] Sylwester Pieckowski (chair), Piotr Nowaczyk, Jerzy Poczobut, Andrzej Szumański, Andrzej Tynel (ed.), Polish and International Commercial Arbitration at the Threshold of the 21st Century: A Commemorative Volume in Honour of Dr Tadeusz Szurski [Międzynarodowy i krajowy arbitraż handlowy u progu XXI wieku. Księga pamiątkowa dedykowana doktorowi habilitowanemu Tadeuszowi Szurskiemu], Warszawa 2008, p. 135-149
Key issues: arbitratorid: 30152
Pochodyła Michał
Impartiality and Independence of Arbitrators – Regulations and Case Law of English Courts [Original title: Bezstronność i niezależność arbitrów – regulacje i orzecznictwo sądów angielskich]
MoP 2009, No. 1, special issue, p. 30-32
Key issues: arbitratorid: 30879
Poczobut Jerzy, Wiśniewski Andrzej W.
Private Law and Arbitration. Commemorative Volume Dedicated to Dr. Maciej Tomaszewski [Original title: Prawo prywatne i arbitraż. Księga jubileuszowa dedykowana doktorowi Maciejowi Tomaszewskiemu]
Warszawa 2016, pp. 460
Key issues: general works, arbitrability of dispute, arbitrator, arbitration procedureid: 31519
Presser W.
From the Studies on the Institution of Arbitration Courts. II. On Arbitrators. [Original title: Ze studjów nad instytucją sądów polubownych. II. O sędziach polubownych.]
Nowa Palestra 1933, No. 6, p. 9-13
Key issues: arbitratorid: 30093
Prusinowska Monika
Key Considerations for Drafting Effective Arbitration Agreements in the Context of Poland and China
Arbitration Bulletin - Young Arbitration 2016, No. 24, p. 143-151
Key issues: arbitrator, arbitration agreementid: 31563
Pruś Piotr
a commentary to Art. 1154-1217
[in:] Manowska Małgorzata (ed.), The Polish Civil Procedure Code. A commentary. Vol. II. Art. 478-1217 [Original title: Kodeks postępowania cywilnego. Komentarz. Tom II. Art. 478-1217], Warsaw 2021 (IVth edition)
Key issues: arbitrability of dispute, arbitration agreement, arbitration award, arbitration procedure, arbitrator, costs of arbitration, general works, interim measures, investment arbitration, jurisdiction of arbitral tribunal, New York Convention, petition to set aside arbitration award, recognition and enforcement of domestic arbitration award, recognition and enforcement of foreign arbitration award, settlement before arbitral tribunal, state court assistanceid: 32460
Pruś Piotr
a commentary to Art. 1154-1217
[in:] Manowska Małgorzata (ed.), The Polish Civil Procedure Code. An updated commentary. Vol. II, Art. 478-1217 [Original title: Kodeks postępowania cywilnego. Komentarz aktualizowany. Tom II, Art. 478-1217], LEX/el. 2022
Key issues: New York Convention, general works, state court assistance, arbitrability of dispute, investment arbitration, arbitrator, arbitration agreement, arbitration procedure, costs of arbitration, interim measures, jurisdiction of arbitral tribunal, settlement before arbitral tribunal, arbitration award, petition to set aside arbitration award, recognition and enforcement of domestic arbitration award, recognition and enforcement of foreign arbitration awardid: 32449
Pruś Piotr
a commentary to Art. 1154-1217
[in:] Manowska Małgorzata (ed.), The Polish Civil Procedure Code. A commentary. Vol. II {Original title: Kodeks postępowania cywilnego. Komentarz. Tom II], LEX/el. 2020
Key issues: New York Convention, general works, state court assistance, arbitrability of dispute, investment arbitration, arbitrator, arbitration agreement, arbitration procedure, costs of arbitration, interim measures, jurisdiction of arbitral tribunal, settlement before arbitral tribunal, arbitration award, petition to set aside arbitration award, recognition and enforcement of domestic arbitration award, recognition and enforcement of foreign arbitration awardid: 32461
Pruś Piotr
a commentary to Art. 1154-1217
[in:] Manowska Małgorzata (ed.), The Polish Civil Procedure Code. A commentary. Vol. II. Art. 506-1217 [Original title: Kodeks postępowania cywilnego. Komentarz. Tom II. Art. 506-1217], Warsaw 2015 (3rd edition)
Key issues: New York Convention, general works, state court assistance, arbitrability of dispute, investment arbitration, arbitrator, arbitration agreement, arbitration procedure, costs of arbitration, interim measures, jurisdiction of arbitral tribunal, settlement before arbitral tribunal, arbitration award, petition to set aside arbitration award, recognition and enforcement of domestic arbitration award, recognition and enforcement of foreign arbitration awardid: 32463
Pruś Piotr
a commentary to Art. 1154-1217
[in:] Manowska Małgorzata (ed.), The Polish Civil Procedure Code. A commentary [Original title: Kodeks postępowania cywilnego. Komentarz], Warsaw 2013 (2nd edition)
Key issues: New York Convention, general works, state court assistance, arbitrability of dispute, investment arbitration, arbitrator, arbitration agreement, arbitration procedure, costs of arbitration, interim measures, jurisdiction of arbitral tribunal, settlement before arbitral tribunal, arbitration award, petition to set aside arbitration award, recognition and enforcement of domestic arbitration award, recognition and enforcement of foreign arbitration awardid: 32462
Radel Krzysztof
Legal Status of the Arbitrator [Original title: Status prawny arbitra]
Administracja Publiczna. Studia krajowe i międzynarodowe 2007, No. 2, p. 150-164
Key issues: arbitratorid: 30313
Rewald Roman
The clause of Concurrent Mediation-Arbitration (CMA) [Original title: Klauzula Równoczesnej Mediacji-Arbitrażu CMA]
Biuletyn Arbitrażowy 2020, No. 27, p. 65-72
Key issues: general works, arbitrator, arbitration procedureid: 32156
Romanowski Michał
Significance of Arbitrator’s Independence and Impartiality in Arbitration Proceedings in the Light of the Constitutional Right to Be Heard by a Court [Original title: Znaczenie niezależności i bezstronności arbitra w postępowaniu arbitrażowym w świetle konstytucyjnego prawa do sądu]
[in:] Józef Okolski (chair), Andrzej Całus, Maksymilian Pazdan, Stanisław Sołtysiński, Tomasz Wardyński, Stanisław Włodyka (ed.) Essays in Honour of 60 years of the Court of Arbitration at the Polish Chamber of Commerce in Warsaw [Księga pamiątkowa 60-lecia Sądu Arbitrażowego przy Krajowej Izbie Gospodarczej w Warszawie], Warszawa 2010, p. 376-384
Key issues: arbitratorid: 30926
Romańczuk Henryk
Arbitration of Disputes between Consumers and Providers of Telecommunications Services [Original title: Polubowne rozstrzyganie sporów między konsumentami a dostawcami usług telekomunikacyjnych]
[in:] M. Łaszczuk (chair), M. Furtek, S. Pieckowski, J. Poczobut, A. Szumański, M. Tomaszewski (eds.), Arbitration and Mediation. A Commemorative Volume Dedicated to Dr Andrzej Tynel [Arbitraż i mediacja. Księga jubileuszowa dedykowana doktorowi Andrzejowi Tynelowi], Warszawa 2012, p. 493-509
Key issues: general works, arbitrability of dispute, arbitrator, arbitration agreement, arbitration procedure, settlement before arbitral tribunal, arbitration awardid: 31100
Różalska-Kucal Agnieszka
Arbitration and European Union Law [Original title: Arbitraż a prawo Unii Europejskiej]
[in:] Cezary Mik (ed.), Arbitration in the International Law [Original title: Arbitraż w prawie międzynarodowym], Warsaw 2014, p. 237-256
Key issues: New York Convention, arbitrator, recognition and enforcement of foreign arbitration awardid: 31349
Rysiński Jan
Conference of Arbitrators: Practical Issues
Arbitration Bulletin - Young Arbitration 2016, Nr 24, s. 58-70
Key issues: arbitrator, arbitration procedureid: 31558
Selivon Mykola
Price/Quality/Promptness Ratio in the Dispute Resolution by the International Commercial Arbitration Court at the Ukrainian Chamber of Commerce and Industry [Original title: Wskaźnik cena-jakość-czas w rozstrzyganiu sporów przez Międzynarodowy Handlowy Sąd Arbitrażowy przy Ukraińskiej Izbie Handlowo-Przemysłowej]
Arbitration e-Review 2013, Special Edition, p. 23-26
Key issues: arbitrator, arbitration procedure, petition to set aside arbitration award, recognition and enforcement of domestic arbitration awardid: 31162
Siwik Robert
Arbitral tribunal – effective dispute resolution in Poland [Original title: Das Schiedsgericht - die effektive Lösung von Streitigkeiten in Polen]
Osteuropa Recht 2008, No. 6, p. 377-384
Key issues: arbitrability of dispute, arbitrability of dispute, arbitrator, arbitrator, arbitration agreement, arbitration agreement, arbitration procedure, arbitration procedure, arbitration award, arbitration awardid: 32065
Siwik Robert
Arbitral tribunal – effective dispute resolution in Poland [Original title: Das Schiedsgericht - die effektive Lösung von Streitigkeiten in Polen]
Osteuropa Recht 2008, No. 6, p. 377-384
Key issues: arbitrability of dispute, arbitrability of dispute, arbitrator, arbitrator, arbitration agreement, arbitration agreement, arbitration procedure, arbitration procedure, arbitration award, arbitration awardid: 32065
Skoczylas Józef
Arbitration in the Amendment to the Civil Procedure Code of 28 July 2005 [Original title: Sądownictwo arbitrażowe w nowelizacji kodeksu postępowania cywilnego z 28 lipca 2005 r.]
[in:] Jan Olszewski (ed.), Arbitration and Mediation. Current Theoretical and Practical Problems of Functioning of Arbitral Tribunals and Mediation Institutions. Conference Materials (Nałęczów Zdrój 8 - 10.05.2009) [Arbitraż i mediacja. Aktualne problemy teorii i praktyki funkcjonowania sądów polubownych i ośrodków mediacyjnych. Materiały konferencyjne (Nałęczów Zdrój 8 - 10.05.2009 r.)], Rzeszów 2009, p. 349-362
Key issues: general works, state court assistance, arbitrability of dispute, arbitrator, arbitration agreement, arbitration procedure, jurisdiction of arbitral tribunal, settlement before arbitral tribunal, arbitration award, petition to set aside arbitration awardid: 30675
Skrzypczak Rafał
The Institution of Exclusion, Revocation and Resignation of an Arbitrator under Polish Law [Original title: Instytucja wyłączenia, odwołania i ustąpienia arbitra w prawie polskim]
[in:] Prace laureatów konkursu na najlepszą pracę magisterską dotyczącą problemów sądownictwa polubownego i mediacji im. prof. dr. hab. Jerzego Jakubowskiego, edycja czwarta [Works of the Winners of Prof. Jerzy Jakubowski Contest for the Best M.A. Thesis concerning the Issues of Arbitration and Mediation, Fourth Edition], Warszawa 2009, p. 435-539
Key issues: arbitratorid: 30966
Slate II William K.
Arbitration Ethics in the United States
[in:] Sylwester Pieckowski (chair), Piotr Nowaczyk, Jerzy Poczobut, Andrzej Szumański, Andrzej Tynel (ed.), Polish and International Commercial Arbitration at the Threshold of the 21st Century: A Commemorative Volume in Honour of Dr Tadeusz Szurski [Międzynarodowy i krajowy arbitraż handlowy u progu XXI wieku. Księga pamiątkowa dedykowana doktorowi habilitowanemu Tadeuszowi Szurskiemu], Warszawa 2008, p. 181-193
Key issues: arbitratorid: 30921
Stefanowicz Krzysztof
Arbitration Landscape in Poland - a Subjective View
[in:] Beata Gessel-Kalinowska vel Kalisz (ed.), Arbitration in Poland, Warszawa 2011, p. 9-18, [also Polish version]
Key issues: general works, state court assistance, arbitrability of dispute, investment arbitration, arbitrator, petition to set aside arbitration awardid: 30997
Stefanowicz Krzysztof
Conflicts of Interest by Selected Arbitration Institutions [Original title: Problematyka konfliktu interesów arbitrów według wybranych instytucji arbitrażowych]
[in:] M. Łaszczuk (chair), M. Furtek, S. Pieckowski, J. Poczobut, A. Szumański, M. Tomaszewski (eds.), Arbitration and Mediation. A Commemorative Volume Dedicated to Dr Andrzej Tynel [Arbitraż i mediacja. Księga jubileuszowa dedykowana doktorowi Andrzejowi Tynelowi], Warszawa 2012, p. 523-536
Key issues: arbitratorid: 31101
Stefanowicz Krzysztof
Dissenting Opinions in Arbitration – Briefly in Favor
[in:] B. Gessel-Kalinowska vel Kalisz (ed.), The Challenges and the Future of Commercial and Investment Arbitration. Liber Amicorum Professor Jerzy Rajski, Warsaw 2015, p. 401-411
Key issues: arbitrator, arbitration awardid: 31424
Strumiłło Tomasz
Recognition by the Court of Arbitration of the Petition Concerning Securing the Claims [Original title: Tryb rozpoznania przez sąd polubowny wniosku o udzielenie zabezpieczenia]
PPE 2012, No. 2, p. 20-47
Key issues: state court assistance, arbitrator, arbitration procedureid: 31122
Sztejnert Olga
Petition to set aside an arbitration award – IV CSK 292/08 [Original title: Skarga o uchylenie wyroku sądu polubownego - IV CSK 292/08]
MoP 2010, No. 10, bonus, [Case-law of the Polish Supreme Court in the field of civil procedure (2008-2009) through the eyes of practitioners]
Key issues: arbitrator, arbitration agreement, arbitration procedure, petition to set aside arbitration awardid: 32433
Szumańska Joanna
Security of the claim made by an emergency arbitrator against the proceedings for granting security in a court of law [Original title: Zabezpieczenie roszczenia przez arbitra doraźnego na tle postępowania o udzielenie zabezpieczenia przed sądem powszechnym]
Przegląd Prawno-Ekonomiczny 2018, No. 3/1, p. 324-335
Key issues: arbitrator, arbitrator, arbitration procedure, arbitration procedure, interim measures, interim measuresid: 32081
Szumańska Joanna
Security of the claim made by an emergency arbitrator against the proceedings for granting security in a court of law [Original title: Zabezpieczenie roszczenia przez arbitra doraźnego na tle postępowania o udzielenie zabezpieczenia przed sądem powszechnym]
Przegląd Prawno-Ekonomiczny 2018, No. 3/1, p. 324-335
Key issues: arbitrator, arbitrator, arbitration procedure, arbitration procedure, interim measures, interim measuresid: 32081
Szumański Andrzej
Appointing (Nominating) Authority’s New Competences in the Light of the 2010 UNCITRAL Arbitration Rules [Original title: Nowe kompetencje organu powołującego (nominacyjnego) w świetle Regulaminu Arbitrażowego UNCITRAL z roku 2010]
[in:] Grzegorczyk Paweł, Knoppek Krzysztof, Walasik Marcin (eds.), Civil Procedure. Study-Codification-Practice. A Commemorative Volume Dedicated to Professor Feliks Zedler [Proces cywilny. Nauka-Kodyfikacja-Praktyka. Księga jubileuszowa dedykowana Profesorowi Feliksowi Zedlerowi], Warszawa 2012, p. 873-891
Key issues: arbitratorid: 31465
Szumański Andrzej
Arbitrators and Arbitral Tribunal [Original title: Arbitrzy i zespół orzekający]
[in:] Andrzej Szumański (ed.), The System of Commercial Law. Commercial Arbitration. Volume 8, Chapter 8 [Original title: System Prawa Handlowego. Arbitraż handlowy. Tom 8, Rozdział 8], Warszawa 2015, p. 407-522
Key issues: arbitratorid: 31482
Szumański Andrzej
Arbitrators and the Adjudicating Panel [Original title: Arbitrzy i zespół orzekający]
[in:] Andrzej Szumański (ed.), The System of Commercial Law. Commercial Arbitration. Volume 8, Chapter 8 [System Prawa Handlowego. Arbitraż handlowy. Tom 8, Rozdział 8], Warszawa 2009, p. 357-497
Key issues: arbitratorid: 30782
Szumański Andrzej
Contractual and Statutory Procedures for Challenging an Arbitrator in Institutional and Ad Hoc Arbitrations (Interpreting Art. 1176 § 2 of the Polsich Civil Procedure Code [Original title: Umowny i ustawowy tryb wyłączenia arbitra w arbitrażu instytucjonalnym oraz w arbitrażu ad hoc (wykładnia art. 1176 § 2 k.p.c.)]
[in:] M. Łaszczuk (chair), M. Furtek, S. Pieckowski, J. Poczobut, A. Szumański, M. Tomaszewski (eds.), Arbitration and Mediation. A Commemorative Volume Dedicated to Dr Andrzej Tynel [Arbitraż i mediacja. Księga jubileuszowa dedykowana doktorowi Andrzejowi Tynelowi], Warszawa 2012, p. 553-571
Key issues: state court assistance, arbitratorid: 31104
Szumański Andrzej
Participation of Third Parties in the Preparation of an Arbitral Award and in the Determination of its Final Wording [Original title: Udział osób trzecich w przygotowaniu wyroku sądu arbitrażowego oraz nadaniu jego treści ostatecznego brzmienia]
Olszewski Jan, Błaszczak Łukasz, Morek Rafał (eds). Arbitraż i mediacja - perspektywy prywatnoprawna i publicznoprawna. Między teorią a praktyką. Księga pamiątkowa ku czci profesora Jana Łukasiewicza, Rzeszów 2018, p. 515-533
Key issues: arbitrator, arbitrator, arbitration award, arbitration award, petition to set aside arbitration award, petition to set aside arbitration awardid: 31984
Szumański Andrzej
Participation of Third Parties in the Preparation of an Arbitral Award and in the Determination of its Final Wording [Original title: Udział osób trzecich w przygotowaniu wyroku sądu arbitrażowego oraz nadaniu jego treści ostatecznego brzmienia]
Olszewski Jan, Błaszczak Łukasz, Morek Rafał (eds). Arbitraż i mediacja - perspektywy prywatnoprawna i publicznoprawna. Między teorią a praktyką. Księga pamiątkowa ku czci profesora Jana Łukasiewicza, Rzeszów 2018, p. 515-533
Key issues: arbitrator, arbitrator, arbitration award, arbitration award, petition to set aside arbitration award, petition to set aside arbitration awardid: 31984
Szumański Andrzej
Possible Impact of the 2010 UNCITRAL Arbitration Rules on the Polish Arbitration Law (Selected Issues) [Original title: Możliwy wpływ regulaminu arbitrażowego UNCITRAL w wersji z roku 2010 na polskie prawo arbitrażowe (zagadnienia wybrane)]
[in:] J. Gudowski, K. Weitz (ed.), Aurea praxis, aurea theoria. Księga pamiątkowa ku czci Profesora Tadeusza Erecińskiego, tom II [Aurea praxis, aurea theoria. A Commemorative Volume in Honour of Professor Tadeusz Ereciński, Vol. II], Warszawa 2011, p. 1871-1897
Key issues: general works, arbitrator, arbitration agreement, arbitration procedureid: 31027
Szumański Andrzej
The System of Commercial Law. Commercial Arbitration. Volume 8 [Original title: System Prawa Handlowego. Arbitraż handlowy. Tom 8]
Warszawa 2015, pp. 1175
Key issues: arbitrability of dispute, arbitration agreement, arbitration award, arbitration procedure, arbitrator, general works, investment arbitration, jurisdiction of arbitral tribunal, New York Convention, petition to set aside arbitration award, recognition and enforcement of domestic arbitration award, recognition and enforcement of foreign arbitration award, settlement before arbitral tribunal, state court assistanceid: 31474
Szumański Andrzej
The System of Commercial Law. Commercial Arbitration. Volume 8 [Original title: System Prawa Handlowego. Arbitraż handlowy. Tom 8]
Warszawa 2009, pp. 1200
Key issues: New York Convention, general works, state court assistance, arbitrability of dispute, investment arbitration, arbitrator, arbitration agreement, arbitration procedure, jurisdiction of arbitral tribunal, settlement before arbitral tribunal, arbitration award, petition to set aside arbitration award, recognition and enforcement of domestic arbitration award, recognition and enforcement of foreign arbitration awardid: 30683
Szurski Tadeusz
On the Status of the Arbitrator in International Commercial Arbitration [Original title: O statusie arbitra w międzynarodowym arbitrażu handlowym]
[in:] Kazimierz Lankosz (ed.), Current Problems of International Law in Contemporary World. Book in Memory of Prof. Marian Iwanejko [Aktualne problemy prawa międzynarodowego we współczesnym świecie. Księga pamiątkowa poświęcona pamięci Profesora Mariana Iwanejko], Kraków 1995, p. 177-192
Key issues: arbitratorid: 30437
Tomaszewski Maciej
2010 UNCITRAL Arbitration Rules [Original title: Regulamin Arbitrażowy UNCITRAL 2010]
Arbitration e-Review 2010, No. 3, p. 5-15
Key issues: general works, arbitrator, arbitration agreement, arbitration procedure, arbitration awardid: 30945
Tomaszewski Maciej
Challenge of an Arbitrator and the Mode of Consideration Thereof [Original title: Wniosek o wyłączenie arbitra i tryb rozpoznania wniosku]
PS 2012, No. 2, p. 25-45
Key issues: arbitrator, petition to set aside arbitration awardid: 31045
Tomaszewski Maciej
Effectiveness of Legal Protection before Arbitration Courts. Polish Experience [Original title: Skuteczność ochrony prawnej przed sądami polubownymi. Doświadczenia polskie]
PS 2006, No. 1, p. 34-64
Key issues: state court assistance, arbitrator, arbitration procedure, arbitration award, recognition and enforcement of domestic arbitration award, recognition and enforcement of foreign arbitration awardid: 30357
Tomaszewski Maciej
Reasons for Challenge of an Arbitrator under the Polish Law [Original title: Przyczyny wyłączenia arbitra w świetle prawa polskiego]
[in:] Sylwester Pieckowski (chair), Piotr Nowaczyk, Jerzy Poczobut, Andrzej Szumański, Andrzej Tynel (ed.), Polish and International Commercial Arbitration at the Threshold of the 21st Century: A Commemorative Volume in Honour of Dr Tadeusz Szurski [Międzynarodowy i krajowy arbitraż handlowy u progu XXI wieku. Księga pamiątkowa dedykowana doktorowi habilitowanemu Tadeuszowi Szurskiemu], Warszawa 2008, p. 245-260
Key issues: arbitratorid: 30173
Tynel Andrzej
Authority for Substitutive Arbitrator Appointment [Original title: Organ zastępczej nominacji arbitrów]
[in:] Andrzej Janik (ed.), Studies and Papers. Anniversary Book Dedicated to Professor Andrzej Całus [Studia i rozprawy. Księga jubileuszowa dedykowana profesorowi Andrzejowi Całusowi], Warszawa 2009
Key issues: arbitratorid: 30691
Tynel Andrzej
Excluding a Member of a Adjudication Panel in Arbitration Court Practice at the National Economic Chamber [Original title: Wyłączenie członka Zespołu Orzekającego w praktyce Sądu Arbitrażowego przy KIG]
PUG 2011, No. 7, p. 28-29
Key issues: arbitratorid: 31069
Uliasz Marcin
a commentary to Art. 1154-1217
[in:] Uliasz Marcin, The Polish Civil Procedure Code. A commentary 2008 [Original title: Kodeks postępowania cywilnego. Komentarz 2008], 2nd edition, Legalis
Key issues: New York Convention, general works, state court assistance, arbitrability of dispute, investment arbitration, arbitrator, arbitration agreement, arbitration procedure, costs of arbitration, interim measures, jurisdiction of arbitral tribunal, settlement before arbitral tribunal, arbitration award, petition to set aside arbitration award, recognition and enforcement of domestic arbitration award, recognition and enforcement of foreign arbitration awardid: 35246
Uliasz Roman
Eligibility of Arbitrators and Mediators in the Polish Civil Procedure [Original title: Kwalifikacje podmiotowe arbitrów i mediatorów]
ADR. Arbitraż i Mediacja 2014, No. 4, p. 75-85
Key issues: arbitratorid: 31322
Warwas Barbara
The Function of Emergency Arbitrators in Emergency Arbitrator Proceedings - The New Solutions Adopted by the Court of Arbitration at the Polish Confederation of Private Employees Lewiatan in light of the International Regulations: a Comparative Perspective.
e-Przegląd Arbitrażowy 2012, No. 3-4 (10-11), p. 44-54
Key issues: arbitrator, arbitration procedureid: 31149
Waś Maciej
Expiration of an arbitrator’s appointment in the light of the Polish Civil Procedure Code, UNCITRAL Model Law on International Commercial Arbitration of 1985 and UNCITRAL Arbitration Rules of 2010 (comparative aspect) [Original title: Wygaśnięcie powołania arbitra w świetle polskiego kodeksu postępowania cywilnego, ustawy wzorcowej UNCITRAL o międzynarodowym arbitrażu handlowym z 1985 r. oraz Regulaminu UNCITRAL z 2010 r. (aspekt porównawczy)]
[in:] Banaszyńska Judyta, Kamińska Anna, Wenda-Uszyńska Samanta (eds), Selected issues of comparative civil law. Part one [Original title: Wybrane zagadnienia prawa cywilnego porównawczego. Część pierwsza], Warsaw 2014, p. 87-97
Key issues: arbitratorid: 32385
Welser Irene
Fast Track Proceedings, Expedited Procedure and Emergency Arbitrator – Pros and Cons
[in:] B. Gessel-Kalinowska vel Kalisz (ed.), The Challenges and the Future of Commercial and Investment Arbitration. Liber Amicorum Professor Jerzy Rajski, Warsaw 2015, p. 215-224
Key issues: arbitrator, arbitration procedureid: 31412
Więzowska-Czepiel Beata
Artificial Intelligence in arbitration – AI as an arbitrator? [Original title: Sztuczna inteligencja w arbitrażu - AI w roli arbitra?]
Studia Prawnicze. Rozprawy i Materiały 2020, No. 2, p. 133-150
Key issues: general works, general works, arbitrator, arbitrator, arbitration award, arbitration awardid: 32136
Więzowska-Czepiel Beata
Artificial Intelligence in arbitration – AI as an arbitrator? [Original title: Sztuczna inteligencja w arbitrażu - AI w roli arbitra?]
Studia Prawnicze. Rozprawy i Materiały 2020, No. 2, p. 133-150
Key issues: general works, general works, arbitrator, arbitrator, arbitration award, arbitration awardid: 32136
Więzowska-Czepiel Beata
Artificial Intelligence in Arbitration – Supporting Arbitrators in Decision-making Process [Original title: Sztuczna inteligencja w arbitrażu - wsparcie dla arbitrów w procesie podejmowania decyzji]
Studia Prawnicze. Rozprawy i Materiały 2019, No. 2, s. 57-65
Key issues: arbitrator, arbitrator, arbitration procedure, arbitration procedureid: 32071
Więzowska-Czepiel Beata
Artificial Intelligence in Arbitration – Supporting Arbitrators in Decision-making Process [Original title: Sztuczna inteligencja w arbitrażu - wsparcie dla arbitrów w procesie podejmowania decyzji]
Studia Prawnicze. Rozprawy i Materiały 2019, No. 2, s. 57-65
Key issues: arbitrator, arbitrator, arbitration procedure, arbitration procedureid: 32071
Więzowska-Czepiel Beata
New Arbitration Regulations in Disputes Resulting from Contracts Concluded with a Consumer [Original title: Nowe uregulowania sądownictwa polubownego w sporach wynikających z umów, których stroną jest konsument]
PPH 2017, No. 3, p. 43-49
Key issues: arbitrator, arbitrator, arbitration agreement, arbitration agreement, petition to set aside arbitration award, petition to set aside arbitration awardid: 31827
Więzowska-Czepiel Beata
New Arbitration Regulations in Disputes Resulting from Contracts Concluded with a Consumer [Original title: Nowe uregulowania sądownictwa polubownego w sporach wynikających z umów, których stroną jest konsument]
PPH 2017, No. 3, p. 43-49
Key issues: arbitrator, arbitrator, arbitration agreement, arbitration agreement, petition to set aside arbitration award, petition to set aside arbitration awardid: 31827
Wiśniewski Andrzej W.
Independence and Impartiality of Arbitrators in the Light of the Polish Law and International Practice [Original title: Niezależność i bezstronność arbitrów w świetle prawa polskiego i praktyki międzynarodowej]
[in:] J. Gudowski, K. Weitz (ed.), Aurea praxis, aurea theoria. Księga pamiątkowa ku czci Profesora Tadeusza Erecińskiego, tom II [Aurea praxis, aurea theoria. A Commemorative Volume in Honour of Professor Tadeusz Ereciński, Vol. II], Warszawa 2011, p. 1961-1986
Key issues: arbitratorid: 31030
Wiśniewski Andrzej W.
International Commercial Arbitration in Poland. The Legal Status of Arbitration and Arbitrators [Original title: Międzynarodowy arbitraż handlowy w Polsce. Status prawny arbitrażu i arbitrów]
Warszawa 2011, pp. 612
Key issues: New York Convention, general works, state court assistance, arbitrability of dispute, arbitrator, arbitration agreement, arbitration procedure, jurisdiction of arbitral tribunal, settlement before arbitral tribunal, arbitration award, petition to set aside arbitration award, recognition and enforcement of domestic arbitration award, recognition and enforcement of foreign arbitration awardid: 31015
Wiśniewski Andrzej W.
Problems Connected with the Agreement Between an Arbitrator and an Arbitration Institution - a Few Comments in the Light of the Polish Practice [Original title: Problemy związane z umową pomiędzy arbitrem a instytucją arbitrażową - uwag kilka na tle polskiej praktyki]
ADR. Arbitraż i Mediacja 2014, No. 3, p. 69-79
Key issues: arbitratorid: 31318
Witkowska Anna
Composition of the Arbitral Tribunal After the Award is Set Aside [Original title: Skład zespołu orzekającego po uchyleniu wyroku sądu polubownego]
e-Przegląd Arbitrażowy 2015, No. 3-4, p. 26-33
Key issues: arbitrator, arbitrator, arbitration procedure, arbitration procedure, petition to set aside arbitration award, petition to set aside arbitration awardid: 31802
Witkowska Anna
Composition of the Arbitral Tribunal After the Award is Set Aside [Original title: Skład zespołu orzekającego po uchyleniu wyroku sądu polubownego]
e-Przegląd Arbitrażowy 2015, No. 3-4, p. 26-33
Key issues: arbitrator, arbitrator, arbitration procedure, arbitration procedure, petition to set aside arbitration award, petition to set aside arbitration awardid: 31802
Wojas Jakub
The Institution of Arbitration in the Country of Cherry Blossoms [Original title: Instytucja arbitrażu w Kraju Kwitnącej Wiśni]
[in:] A. Garnuszek, L. Mazur, A. Orzeł (eds.), Quo Vadis, Arbitrażu? Quo Vadis, Arbitration?, Warszawa 2013, p. 624-644
Key issues: general works, state court assistance, arbitrator, arbitration agreement, arbitration procedure, arbitration award, petition to set aside arbitration awardid: 31234
Wolak-Danecka Anna
Arbitration in the Czech Republic [Original title: Arbitraż w Republice Czeskiej]
Biul. Arb. 2010-2011, No. 4, p. 71-81
Key issues: general works, arbitrability of dispute, arbitrator, arbitration agreement, arbitration procedure, jurisdiction of arbitral tribunal, arbitration award, petition to set aside arbitration awardid: 30989
Wójcik Mariusz Piotr
a commentary to Art. 1154-1217
[in:] Jakubecki Andrzej (ed.), An updated commentary to the Polish Civil Procedure Code [Original title: Komentarz aktualizowany do Kodeksu postępowania cywilnego], LEX/el. 2016
Key issues: New York Convention, general works, state court assistance, arbitrability of dispute, investment arbitration, arbitrator, arbitration agreement, arbitration procedure, costs of arbitration, interim measures, jurisdiction of arbitral tribunal, settlement before arbitral tribunal, arbitration award, petition to set aside arbitration award, recognition and enforcement of domestic arbitration award, recognition and enforcement of foreign arbitration awardid: 32466
Wójcik Mariusz Piotr
a commentary to Art. 1154-1217
[in:] Jakubecki Andrzej (ed.), The Polish Civil Procedure Code. A commentary [Original title: Kodeks postępowania cywilnego. Komentarz], Warsaw 2015 (6th edition)
Key issues: New York Convention, general works, state court assistance, arbitrability of dispute, investment arbitration, arbitrator, arbitration agreement, arbitration procedure, costs of arbitration, interim measures, jurisdiction of arbitral tribunal, settlement before arbitral tribunal, arbitration award, petition to set aside arbitration award, recognition and enforcement of domestic arbitration award, recognition and enforcement of foreign arbitration awardid: 32467
Wójcik Mariusz Piotr
a commentary to Art. 1154-1217
[in:] Jakubecki Andrzej (ed.), The Polish Civil Procedure Code. An updated commentary. Vol. II. Art. 730-1217 [Original title: Kodeks postępowania cywilnego. Komentarz aktualizowany. Tom II. Art. 730-1217], LEX/el. 2019
Key issues: New York Convention, general works, state court assistance, arbitrability of dispute, investment arbitration, arbitrator, arbitration agreement, arbitration procedure, costs of arbitration, interim measures, jurisdiction of arbitral tribunal, settlement before arbitral tribunal, arbitration award, petition to set aside arbitration award, recognition and enforcement of domestic arbitration award, recognition and enforcement of foreign arbitration awardid: 32464
Wójcik Mariusz Piotr
a commentary to Art. 1154-1217
[in:] Jakubecki Andrzej (ed.), Tje Polish Civil Procedure Code. Vol. II. A commentary to Art. 730-1217 [Original title: Kodeks postępowania cywilnego. Tom II. Komentarz do art. 730-1217], Warsaw 2017 (7th edition)
Key issues: New York Convention, general works, state court assistance, arbitrability of dispute, investment arbitration, arbitrator, arbitration agreement, arbitration procedure, costs of arbitration, interim measures, jurisdiction of arbitral tribunal, settlement before arbitral tribunal, arbitration award, petition to set aside arbitration award, recognition and enforcement of domestic arbitration award, recognition and enforcement of foreign arbitration awardid: 32465
Wydra Łukasz
Civil Law Liability of an Arbitrator and the Rules of Arbitration Institutions[Original title: Odpowiedzialność cywilnoprawna arbitra a regulaminy sądów polubownych]
ADR. Arbitraż i Mediacja 2017, No. 2, p. 105-123
Key issues: arbitrator, arbitratorid: 31900
Wydra Łukasz
Civil Law Liability of an Arbitrator and the Rules of Arbitration Institutions[Original title: Odpowiedzialność cywilnoprawna arbitra a regulaminy sądów polubownych]
ADR. Arbitraż i Mediacja 2017, No. 2, p. 105-123
Key issues: arbitrator, arbitratorid: 31900
Wydra Łukasz
Commentary to the Order of the Supreme Court Dated 16 October 2014 (docket no. III CZ 39/14) [Original title: Glosa do postanowienia Sądu Najwyższego z 16.10.2014 r. (sygn. akt: III CZ 39/14)]
ADR 2016, No. 2, p. 71-83
Key issues: arbitrator, petition to set aside arbitration award, petition to set aside arbitration awardid: 31785
Wysok Violetta
A Few Remarks on the New ICC Rules of Arbitration in Force from 1 January 2012 [Original title: Kilka uwag o nowym Regulaminie Arbitrażowym ICC obowiązującym od 1 stycznia 2012 roku]
[in:] M. Łaszczuk (chair), M. Furtek, S. Pieckowski, J. Poczobut, A. Szumański, M. Tomaszewski (eds.), Arbitration and Mediation. A Commemorative Volume Dedicated to Dr Andrzej Tynel [Arbitraż i mediacja. Księga jubileuszowa dedykowana doktorowi Andrzejowi Tynelowi], Warszawa 2012, p. 688-697
Key issues: arbitrator, arbitration agreement, arbitration procedure, arbitration awardid: 31112
Zachariasiewicz Maciej
A Few Reflections Regarding the Possibility of Development of Class Arbitration in Poland [Original title: Kilka refleksji w odniesieniu do możliwości rozwoju postępowań grupowych w arbitrażu w Polsce]
ADR. Arbitraż i Mediacja 2014, No. 1, p. 51-77
Key issues: arbitrability of dispute, arbitrator, arbitration agreement, arbitration procedureid: 31275
Zachariasiewicz Maciej
Management of arbitration proceedings – discussion of a survey results [Original title: Zarządzanie postępowaniami arbitrażowymi - omówienie wyników badania ankietowego]
ADR. Arbitraż i Mediacja 2019, No. 3, p. 83-110
Key issues: general works, general works, arbitrator, arbitrator, arbitration procedure, arbitration procedure, costs of arbitration, costs of arbitrationid: 32005
Zachariasiewicz Maciej
Management of arbitration proceedings – discussion of a survey results [Original title: Zarządzanie postępowaniami arbitrażowymi - omówienie wyników badania ankietowego]
ADR. Arbitraż i Mediacja 2019, No. 3, p. 83-110
Key issues: general works, general works, arbitrator, arbitrator, arbitration procedure, arbitration procedure, costs of arbitration, costs of arbitrationid: 32005
Zawiślak Karol
Composition of the Arbitral Tribunal
[in:] Gessel-Kalinowska vel Kalisz Beata (ed.), Polish arbitration law, Wrocław 2014, p. 173-280
Key issues: arbitratorid: 31448
Zawiślak Karol
Composition of the Arbitral Tribunal [Original title: Skład sądu polubownego]
[in:] Gessel-Kalinowska vel Kalisz Beata (ed.), Diagnosis for Arbitration. Functioning of Arbitration Law and the Directions of Postulated Changes [Diagnoza arbitrażu. Funkcjonowanie prawa o arbitrażu i kierunki postulowanych zmian], Wrocław 2014, p. 161-254
Key issues: arbitratorid: 31455
Zawiślak Karol
Receptum arbitrii - some remarks on substantive legal character of a contract between parties to the dispute and an arbitrator [Original title: „Receptum arbitrii” - uwagi o materialno-prawnym charakterze umowy pomiędzy stronami sporu a arbitrem]
ADR. Arbitraż i Mediacja 2014, No. 3, p. 81-91
Key issues: arbitratorid: 31319
Zawiślak Karol
The Contract with the Arbitrator (Receptum Arbitrii) and the Contract of Mandate - a Comparative Analysis [Original title: Umowa o pełnienie funkcji arbitra (receptum arbitrii) a umowa zlecenia – analiza porównawcza]
Arbitration e-Review 2014, No. 3-4, p. 62-76
Key issues: arbitratorid: 31356
Zielińska Alicja
Arbitral Secretaries – Responsibilities and Appointment
Arbitration Bulletin - Young Arbitration 2016, No. 24, p. 9-21
Key issues: general works, arbitrator, arbitration procedureid: 31555
Zieliński Andrzej
a commentary to Art. 1154-1217
[in:] Zieliński Andrzej, Flaga-Gieruszyńska Kinga, The Polish Civil Procedure Code. A commentary 2016 [Original title: Kodeks postępowania cywilnego. Komentarz 2016], Warsaw 2015 (8th edition)
Key issues: New York Convention, general works, state court assistance, arbitrability of dispute, investment arbitration, arbitrator, arbitration agreement, arbitration procedure, costs of arbitration, interim measures, jurisdiction of arbitral tribunal, settlement before arbitral tribunal, arbitration award, petition to set aside arbitration award, recognition and enforcement of domestic arbitration award, recognition and enforcement of foreign arbitration awardid: 35240
Zieliński Andrzej
a commentary to Art. 1154-1217
[in:] Zieliński Andrzej, Flaga-Gieruszyńska Kinga, The Polish Civil Procedure Code. A commentary 2014 [Original title: Kodeks postępowania cywilnego. Komentarz 2014], Warsaw 2013 (7th edition)
Key issues: New York Convention, general works, state court assistance, arbitrability of dispute, investment arbitration, arbitrator, arbitration agreement, arbitration procedure, costs of arbitration, interim measures, jurisdiction of arbitral tribunal, settlement before arbitral tribunal, arbitration award, petition to set aside arbitration award, recognition and enforcement of domestic arbitration award, recognition and enforcement of foreign arbitration awardid: 35241
Zieliński Andrzej
a commentary to Art. 1154-1217
[in:] Zieliński Andrzej, Flaga-Gieruszyńska Kinga, The Polish Civil Procedure Code. A commentary 2008 [Original title: Kodeks postępowania cywilnego. Komentarz 2008], 3rd edition, Legalis
Key issues: New York Convention, general works, state court assistance, arbitrability of dispute, investment arbitration, arbitrator, arbitration agreement, arbitration procedure, costs of arbitration, interim measures, jurisdiction of arbitral tribunal, settlement before arbitral tribunal, arbitration award, petition to set aside arbitration award, recognition and enforcement of domestic arbitration award, recognition and enforcement of foreign arbitration awardid: 35245
Zieliński Andrzej
a commentary to Art. 1154-1217
[in:] Zieliński Andrzej, Flaga-Gieruszyńska Kinga, The Polish Civil Procedure Code. A commentary 2009 [Original title: Kodeks postępowania cywilnego. Komentarz 2009], 4th edition, Legalis
Key issues: New York Convention, general works, state court assistance, arbitrability of dispute, investment arbitration, arbitrator, arbitration agreement, arbitration procedure, costs of arbitration, interim measures, jurisdiction of arbitral tribunal, settlement before arbitral tribunal, arbitration award, petition to set aside arbitration award, recognition and enforcement of domestic arbitration award, recognition and enforcement of foreign arbitration awardid: 35244
Zieliński Andrzej
a commentary to Art. 1154-1217
[in:] Zieliński Andrzej, Flaga-Gieruszyńska Kinga, The Polish Civil Procedure Code. A commentary 2011 [Original title: Kodeks postępowania cywilnego. Komentarz 2011], 5th edition, Legalis
Key issues: New York Convention, general works, state court assistance, arbitrability of dispute, investment arbitration, arbitrator, arbitration agreement, arbitration procedure, costs of arbitration, interim measures, jurisdiction of arbitral tribunal, settlement before arbitral tribunal, arbitration award, petition to set aside arbitration award, recognition and enforcement of domestic arbitration award, recognition and enforcement of foreign arbitration awardid: 35243
Zieliński Andrzej
a commentary to Art. 1154-1217
[in:] Zieliński Andrzej, Flaga-Gieruszyńska Kinga, The Polish Civil Procedure Code. A commentary 2017 [Original title: Kodeks postępowania cywilnego. Komentarz 2017], 9th edition, Legalis
Key issues: New York Convention, general works, state court assistance, arbitrability of dispute, investment arbitration, arbitrator, arbitration agreement, arbitration procedure, costs of arbitration, interim measures, jurisdiction of arbitral tribunal, settlement before arbitral tribunal, arbitration award, petition to set aside arbitration award, recognition and enforcement of domestic arbitration award, recognition and enforcement of foreign arbitration awardid: 35239
Zieliński Andrzej
a commentary to Art. 1154-1217
[in:] Zieliński Andrzej, Flaga-Gieruszyńska Kinga, The Polish Civil Procedure Code. A commentary 2012 [Original title: Kodeks postępowania cywilnego. Komentarz 2012], 6th edition, Legalis
Key issues: New York Convention, general works, state court assistance, arbitrability of dispute, investment arbitration, arbitrator, arbitration agreement, arbitration procedure, costs of arbitration, interim measures, jurisdiction of arbitral tribunal, settlement before arbitral tribunal, arbitration award, petition to set aside arbitration award, recognition and enforcement of domestic arbitration award, recognition and enforcement of foreign arbitration awardid: 35242
Łaszczuk Maciej
A Few Remarks on the Duties, Independence and Impartiality of Arbitrators
Publication arbitraz.laszczuk.pl
Key issues: arbitratorid: 40016
Buchman Louis B.
How to select an arbitrator?
Publication arbitraz.laszczuk.pl
Key issues: arbitratorid: 40002
Łaszczuk Maciej
A Few Thoughts on the Ethics of an Arbitrator
Publication arbitraz.laszczuk.pl
Key issues: arbitratorid: 40027
Bilewska Katarzyna, Paczoska Dorota
Impartiality and Independence of an Arbitrator [Original title: Bezstronność oraz niezależność arbitra]
ADR. Arbitraż i Mediacja 2009, No. 1 (5)
Key issues: arbitratorid: 50047
Bodnar Adam, Ploszka Adam
The Influence of the European Convention on Human Rights on Amicable Proceedings (Arbitration) [Original title: Wpływ Europejskiej Konwencji Praw Człowieka na postępowanie polubowne (arbitraż)]
ADR. Arbitraż i Mediacja 2013, No. 3 (23)
Key issues: arbitrator, arbitration agreement, arbitration procedure, arbitration awardid: 50242
Flejszar Radosław
Arbitrator - Judge of Choice [Arbiter - sędzia z wyboru]
ADR. Arbitraż i Mediacja 2010, No. 4 (12)
Key issues: arbitratorid: 50120
Głodowski Włodzimierz
Legal Situation of an Arbitrator (Rights and Obligations) [Original title: Sytuacja prawna arbitra (uprawnienia i obowiązki)]
ADR. Arbitraż i Mediacja 2011, No. 4 (16)
Key issues: arbitratorid: 50163
Janus Piotr
Functioning of the Court of Arbitration at the Chamber of Commerce in Opole in the Context of its Regulations [Original title: Funkcjonowanie Sądu Arbitrażowego przy Opolskiej Izbie Gospodarczej w świetle jego regulaminu]
ADR. Arbitraż i Mediacja 2012, No. 3 (19)
Key issues: general works, arbitrator, arbitration agreement, arbitration procedure, arbitration awardid: 50203
Kamieniecka Dorota
Civil Mediators’ Association in Wieluń [Original title: Stowarzyszenie Mediatorów Cywilnych w Wieluniu]
ADR. Arbitraż i Mediacja 2013, No. 3 (23)
Key issues: arbitrability of dispute, arbitration award, arbitration agreement, arbitration procedure, arbitrator, general works, jurisdiction of arbitral tribunal, petition to set aside arbitration award, recognition and enforcement of foreign arbitration award, settlement before arbitral tribunal, state court assistanceid: 50249
Karwowska Anna
Termination of a Contract with an Arbitrator [Original title: Zakończenie umowy z arbitrem]
ADR. Arbitraż i Mediacja 2013, No. 4 (24)
Key issues: arbitratorid: 50256
Kolber Joanna
Arbitrator as an Employee; a Controversial View on the Role of an Arbitrator [Original title: Arbiter pracownikiem, czyli kontrowersyjne ujęcie funkcji arbitra]
ADR. Arbitraż i Mediacja 2012, No. 1 (17)
Key issues: arbitratorid: 50175
Wach Małgorzata
Liability of an Arbitrator of an Arbitration Court [Original title: Odpowiedzialność arbitra sądu polubownego]
ADR. Arbitraż i Mediacja 2009, No. 4 (8)
Key issues: arbitratorid: 50087
