polish

key issues

recognition and enforcement of foreign arbitration award

| all issues

All documents for the issue: 156

Case law: 27 | Bibliography: 117 | Publications arbitraz.laszczuk.pl: 1 | Publications ADR. Arbitraż i Mediacja: 11

Polish Supreme Court order dated 27 October 2016 Case no. V CSK 66/16

The assertion of the impermissibility of the cassation appeal because it does not meet the requirement set forth in Art. 3982 §1 of the Civil Procedure Code concerning the amount in dispute in the cassation appeal is groundless. The requirement set forth in that provision does not apply to a cassation appeal in a proceeding for recognition and enforcement of an arbitration award or a settlement concluded before an arbitral tribunal (Civil Procedure Code Art. 1215 §3), because the permissibility of a cassation appeal is governed in each proceeding in a specific manner, which means that the reference provided in Civil Procedure Code Art. 13 §2 does not apply to the issue of the permissibility of this instrument of review in proceedings other than a civil trial.

Data wydania: 27-10-2016 | Sygnatura: V CSK 66/16

Key issues: arbitration agreement, recognition and enforcement of foreign arbitration award

id: 20438

Polish Supreme Court resolution of 28 September 2016 Case No. III CZP 40/16

1. Enforcement of an arbitration award issued in the Republic of Poland or a settlement concluded before such arbitral tribunal is ruled on by the court of appeal in closed session in a panel of a single judge.

2. A proceeding for recognition or enforcement of an arbitration award issued in Poland or a settlement concluded before an arbitral tribunal in Poland is an auxiliary proceeding, while a proceeding for recognition or enforcement of an arbitration award issued abroad or a settlement concluded before such a foreign arbitral tribunal is analogous to a proceeding on the merits of the case.

3. Art. 12131 §2 of the Civil Procedure Code justifies application as relevant of Art. 390 §1 of the Civil Procedure Code.

4. Recognition and enforcement are treated in the law uniformly, with respect to an arbitration award issued in Poland or a settlement concluded before an arbitral tribunal in Poland, on the one hand, and an arbitration award issued abroad or a settlement concluded before a foreign arbitral tribunal, on the other hand.

5. In proceeding for recognition or enforcement of an arbitration award issued in Poland or a settlement concluded before an arbitral tribunal in Poland, review of the order is provided for through an interlocutory appeal to another panel of the court of appeal (Civil Procedure Code Art. 1214 §4). Such review is conducted in a panel of three judges (Civil Procedure Code Art. 367 §3, first sentence, in connection with Art. 397 §2, first sentence, Art. 3942 §2 and Art. 1214 §4).

Data wydania: 28-09-2016 | Sygnatura: III CZP 40/16

Key issues: recognition and enforcement of domestic arbitration award, recognition and enforcement of foreign arbitration award

id: 20431

Polish Supreme Court order dated 25 May 2016 Case V CSK 257/15

The term “agreement in writing” referred to in Art. II (1) and (2) of the [New York] Convention also includes an agreement which provides for transfer of the rights covered by the agreement. Submission by a party seeking enforcement of a foreign arbitration award of a written agreement containing an assignment of a claim covered by an arbitration clause thus constitutes a formal requirement for the application identical to the requirement set forth in Art. IV(1)(b) of the convention.

Data wydania: 25-05-2016 | Sygnatura: V CSK 257/15

Key issues: recognition and enforcement of foreign arbitration award

id: 20423

Polish Supreme Court judgment dated 4 December 2015 Case No. I CSK 26/15

The concept of “public policy” is included in numerous provisions of Polish public law. This concept under the New York Convention corresponds to the concept of “fundamental principles of the legal order” included in a dozen or more provisions of Polish law. Fundamental principles of the legal order constituting grounds for evaluating an arbitration award should be understood to mean not only constitutional norms, but also the principal norms in specific fields of law.

Data wydania: 04-12-2015 | Sygnatura: I CSK 26/15

Key issues: New York Convention, recognition and enforcement of foreign arbitration award

id: 20408

Judgment of the Court of Justice of 13 May 2015, Gazprom

Council Regulation (EC) No 44/2001 of 22 December 2000 on jurisdiction and the recognition and enforcement of judgments in civil and commercial matters must be interpreted as not precluding a court of a Member State from recognising and enforcing, or from refusing to recognise and enforce, an arbitral award prohibiting a party from bringing certain claims before a court of that Member State, since that regulation does not govern the recognition and enforcement, in a Member State, of an arbitral award issued by an arbitral tribunal in another Member State.

Data wydania: 13-05-2015 | Sygnatura: C-536/13

Key issues: New York Convention, jurisdiction of arbitral tribunal, recognition and enforcement of foreign arbitration award

id: 20392

Warsaw Court of Appeal order dated 31 March 2015 Case No. I ACz 358/15

1. Rulings of arbitration courts, like rulings of foreign courts, may have content departing from the requirements imposed on such domestic rulings by Polish law.

2. The absence of an express regulation with respect to adjustment of arbitration rulings does not exclude such adjustment if as a result of an indubitable interpretation of the arbitration ruling it is possible to conduct an interpretation of the foreign writ so that it would exert the same effects as a domestic ruling by indentifying the relief and its scope.

2. As Art. 783 §1 of the Civil Procedure Code provides for the possibility of including in the enforcement clause, when needed, information concerning identification of the relief subject to execution and the scope of execution, this means that the possibility of the court making an interpretation of a writ of execution in the form of a ruling of an arbitration court is not excluded if it involves only identification of the relief and its scope.

3. Only in a situation where making an objective interpretation is not possible should the application be denied, because issuance of an enforcement order which the execution authorities cannot execute would conflict with public order. Interpretation does not consist of issuing the court’s own ruling, replacing or amending the ruling of the arbitration court, but should only display or make more understandable the intention of the arbitration court already expressed in the ruling—even if it is set forth imperfectly and inadequately defined for purposes of its enforcement—and in this respect help give effect to that intention.

4. It is incorrect to refuse to issue an enforcement clause solely because the award somewhat less precisely describes the scope of the parties’ settlements with respect to the costs of the proceeding.

Data wydania: 31-03-2015 | Sygnatura: I ACz 358/15

Key issues: costs of arbitration, recognition and enforcement of foreign arbitration award

id: 20428

Supreme Court of Poland order dated 23 January 2015 Case No. V CSK 672/13

1. Interpretations of Art. IV of the New York Convention must reflect its functional connection with Art. II of the convention, which specifies the requirements for an agreement including an arbitration clause. Art. II(2) of the New York Convention provides that an “agreement in writing” for purposes of Art. I(1) [sic—Art. II(1)] shall include an arbitral clause in a contract or an arbitration agreement for example in the form of an exchange of letters or telegrams. It is beyond dispute that Art. II(2) of the New York Convention contains an autonomous regulation of arbitration agreements. It is commonly accepted in the case law and commentaries that the wording of Art. II(2) of the New York Convention calls for a liberal understanding of the concept of an “agreement in writing” as the requirement for effectiveness of an arbitration clause, and requires an acceptance that the parties have freedom with respect to selection of the form of the agreement in which they submit to the jurisdiction of the arbitration court. It is thus possible to conclude such agreement also using means of reaching agreement at a distance, e.g. by an exchange of faxes or statements by email. Following this line, the view that is aptly presented in the commentaries is that the applicant fulfils the requirement of submission of the agreement in the original if it files a document which constitutes evidence of conclusion of the specific agreement, regardless of its form. Thus it is obvious that to evaluate whether the applicant has filed the required document concerning the agreement containing the arbitration clause, it was necessary to determine whether the form of the document is consistent with the manner in which the agreement was concluded. Written form of the agreement is not excluded, for example, if the respondent in the proceeding sent a fax of the text of the agreement signed by it, and the applicant placed its signature on that.

2. A condition of recognition or enforcement of an arbitration award should be the existence of the arbitration agreement, and not submission of a document confirming its conclusion. For this reason the position is also presented that the applicant’s failure to submit the agreement referred to in Art. IV of the New York Convention does not prevent granting the application if the existence of the clause for arbitration before a foreign arbitration court is undisputed.

Data wydania: 23-01-2015 | Sygnatura: V CSK 672/13

Key issues: New York Convention, arbitration agreement, recognition and enforcement of foreign arbitration award

id: 20393

Polish Supreme Court order dated 14 January 2015 Case No. I CZ 97/14

1. In a situation where the proceeding before an arbitration court was located abroad and the arbitration award was issued abroad or a settlement was concluded before the arbitration court abroad, it may be said that the proceeding for recognition or enforcement allows legal consequences to be obtained equivalent to those that exist if the proceeding before the arbitration court is located in Poland and an award is issued here or a settlement is concluded here. This proceeding is therefore not limited to the functions fulfilled by a proceeding for recognition or enforcement of an arbitration award issued in Poland or a settlement concluded before an arbitration court in Poland. In effect, a proceeding for recognition or enforcement of an arbitration award issued abroad or a settlement concluded before an arbitration court abroad cannot be reduced to the role of a proceeding of an auxiliary nature, as is the case with a proceeding for recognition or enforcement of an arbitration award issued in Poland or a settlement concluded before an arbitration court in Poland. This conclusion is confirmed by the broader scope of review of an award or settlement by the state court in the case of an arbitration award issued abroad or a settlement concluded before an arbitration court abroad. For these reasons, a proceeding for recognition or enforcement of an arbitration award issued abroad or a settlement concluded before an arbitration court abroad should be treated as the “counterpart” of the proceeding in the case.

2. When amending Civil Procedure Code Art. 1215 via the Act of 22 July 2010 Amending the Civil Code, the Civil Procedure Code and the Bankruptcy and Recovery Law (Journal of Laws Dz.U. 2010 No. 155 item 1037), the Parliament decided the issue of the scope of permissibility of a cassation appeal by permitting it only against an order of the court of second instance on recognition or enforcement of an arbitration award issued abroad or a settlement concluded before an arbitration court abroad. This allows the conclusion a contrario that a cassation appeal is not permitted against an order of the court of second instance on recognition or enforcement of an arbitration award issued in Poland or a settlement concluded before an arbitration court in Poland.

Data wydania: 14-01-2015 | Sygnatura: I CZ 97/14

Key issues: recognition and enforcement of domestic arbitration award, recognition and enforcement of foreign arbitration award

id: 20386

Gdańsk Appellate Court order dated 11 February 2014 Case No. I ACz 1475/13

1. Because the [New York] Convention exhaustively governs the grounds for recognition and enforcement of a foreign arbitration award (Art. V of the Convention), the Polish court may not resort to Art. 1215 § 2 in connection with Art. 1214 § 3 (2) of the Civil Procedure Code.

2. The arbitrator’s and counsel’s membership in the same barristers’ chambers does not automatically constitute a source of a conflict of interest but should be considered on a case-by-case basis.

3. In a proceeding for enforcement of a foreign arbitration award, the public policy clause cannot take the place of the procedure for appointment of an arbitrator which the party to the arbitration proceeding declined to follow and which served to reduce the risk of abuse of non-meritorious objections concerning the independence and impartiality of the arbitrator after the completion of the arbitration proceeding.

Data wydania: 11-02-2014 | Sygnatura: I ACz 1475/13

Key issues: New York Convention, arbitrator, recognition and enforcement of foreign arbitration award

id: 20190

Polish Supreme Court order dated 23 January 2013 Case No. I CSK 186/12

1. Pursuant to Civil Procedure Code Art. 1215 §1, the court shall rule on recognition or enforcement of an arbitration award issued abroad or a settlement concluded before an arbitration court abroad after conducting a hearing. This provision confirms the rule provided for adversarial proceedings in Civil Procedure Code Art. 148 §1 that cases are considered at a hearing. A departure from this rule should be interpreted narrowly. Therefore, if a provision specifies the type of cases that are considered at a hearing, this method of consideration applies regardless of whether the court upholds the claim (or application) or denies it.

2. The [New York] Convention sets forth the material conditions for recognition (primarily in Art. IV and V), and therefore a proceeding for recognition of a foreign arbitration award should be conducted primarily in accordance with the provisions set forth in the Convention, and on the basis of the Civil Procedure Code in other respects not governed there.

3. The requirements with respect to the form of conclusion of an arbitration agreement should be assessed according to the [New York] Convention, and not according to Civil Procedure Code Art. 1162.

4. A liberal interpretation of [New York Convention Art. II(2)] is accepted in practice, recognizing that the enumeration therein of methods of concluding an agreement is not exhaustive, but also includes other techniques used for reaching agreement at a distance.

5. It should be accepted that the law of the state in which an arbitration award was issued should decide on the issue of certification of the contents of the award.

6. The view that failure to enclose the documents specified in Civil Procedure Code Art. 1213 with an application for recognition does not constitute a formal defect that is subject to supplementation pursuant to Civil Procedure Code Art. 130 §1 in connection with Art. 13 §2 is incorrect.

7. The respondent was not named in the arbitration award, but only the business name under which he trades was stated. The correctness and effectiveness of such identification should be decided by the law of the state of origin of the award.

Data wydania: 23-01-2013 | Sygnatura: I CSK 186/12

Key issues: New York Convention, arbitration agreement, arbitration award, recognition and enforcement of foreign arbitration award

id: 20269

Katowice Court of Appeal order dated 12 December 2012 Case No. V ACz 914/12

1. The ineffectiveness of an arbitration clause results from events arising after the clause is made which nonetheless do not affect its validity. It must be stressed in this respect that the arbitration clause itself is treated as an act of a dual nature, that is, of both substantive and procedural law. This leads to the conclusion that when making an arbitration clause, the parties can condition its effectiveness, as with any other contract, on the passage of a certain time or fulfilment of a certain suspensory condition. The Convention on the Recognition and Enforcement of [Foreign] Arbitral Awards, in particular Art. II, does not provide for limitations in this respect. On the contrary, Art. II(2) indicates a broad interpretation of the concept of “agreement in writing under which the parties undertake to submit to arbitration all or any differences”, which justifies the conclusion that this wording is not infringed by introduction into the agreement of regulations prior to the arbitration proceeding.

2. The essence of the New York Convention is the requirement for the parties to proceed in accordance with good faith and fair practice, and thus a prohibition against acting contrary to these principles. This interpretation stands in the way of actions disloyal to the other participants and the arbitration court, and deprives of justification objections by a party to the proceeding of the non-existence or invalidity of the arbitration clause in a proceeding for recognition or enforcement of an arbitration award in Poland, even though preclusion of such an objection is not expressly provided for in the regulations of the convention, if the party joined issue on the merits of the dispute before the arbitration court without asserting the court’s lack of jurisdiction.

Data wydania: 12-12-2012 | Sygnatura: V ACz 914/12

Key issues: New York Convention, arbitration agreement, recognition and enforcement of foreign arbitration award

id: 20414

Polish Supreme Court order dated 13 September 2012 Case No. V CSK 323/11

1. A proceeding for recognition and enforcement of foreign rulings is a proceeding on the merits of the case, which is based on substantive law…. The court of appeal could therefore apply the law of the [New York] Convention as the applicable substantive law.

2. Art. II(2) [of the New York Convention] is more liberal, also permitting conclusion of an arbitration clause by electronic means, even without the signatures of the parties. This is also a fundamental provision, determining the permissible form of the agreement, while the requirements connected with submission of the arbitration agreement included in Art. IV( 1) should be considered in light of the form in which the agreement could be concluded. Consequently, Art. IV is derivative in nature and thus cannot undermine the rationale of the rule set forth in Art. II of the convention.

3. A party which joined issue on the merits of the dispute before the arbitration court without alleging the lack of jurisdiction of such court (e.g. because of the ineffectiveness of the clause) loses such allegation in the proceeding for recognition or enforcement of the arbitration award before the national court. … The essence of the New York Convention is a requirement for the parties to act in accordance with principles of good faith and fair dealing, and hence a prohibition against acting in violation of such principles. Such interpretation frustrates actions disloyal to the other parties and the arbitration court, causing unnecessary costs and a waste of time. There is no concern in this respect that the party’s procedural rights will be limited, because the party decides on the arbitration clause autonomously.

Data wydania: 13-09-2012 | Sygnatura: V CSK 323/11

Key issues: New York Convention, arbitration agreement, recognition and enforcement of foreign arbitration award

id: 20270

Warsaw Appellate Court order dated 18 October 2011 Case No. I ACz 1627/11

1. Although the court ruling on an application for enforcement of an arbitration award is not bound in any respect by the ruling of the Vienna Commercial Court in the action to set aside the arbitration award, it must not be ignored that the New York Convention provides grounds for the domestic court deciding on enforcement of a foreign arbitration award to consider, upon application of a party, a ruling setting aside the arbitration award as grounds to refuse enforcement of the award.

2. If a proceeding to set aside or stay enforcement of an arbitration award is only pending, that does not justify refusal to issue or confirm the enforceability of the award, but may justify postponing a decision on the matter.

Data wydania: 18-10-2011 | Sygnatura: I ACz 1627/11

Key issues: New York Convention, petition to set aside arbitration award, recognition and enforcement of foreign arbitration award

id: 20367

Polish Supreme Court order dated 20 May 2011 Case No. IV CZ 18/11

1. Final refusal to issue an order enforcing an arbitration award definitively eliminates the possibility of treating the award as equivalent to a state court judgment, and thus eliminates the result of the proceeding up to that point before the arbitration court.

2. Without doubt, the debtor has standing to file a petition to set aside an arbitration award. The creditor is deprived of such possibility, however. A party satisfied with the resolution may only commence a proceeding provided for in Civil Procedure Code Art. 1212 §2. In the situation of the creditor, the proceeding for recognition or enforcement of the award is the only procedure available to such entity for review of the propriety and legality of the determination by a domestic arbitration court.

3. The Civil Procedure Code provides for two forms of review of the rulings of the arbitration court. Alongside the proceeding for enforcement of the rbitration award is the petition to set aside the arbitration award. ... These are independent proceedings, based on independent grounds. ... From the point of view of the proceeding before the state court, the case is definitively ended only by the proceeding on the petition to set aside the arbitration award.

4. An order on recognition or enforcement of an arbitration award issued abroad—unlike an order on recognition or enforcement of a domestic arbitration award—is analogous to rulings issued in the main proceedings on the merits of the case.

5. A cassation appeal on recognition or enforcement of a domestic arbitration award is impermissible.

Data wydania: 20-05-2011 | Sygnatura: IV CZ 18/11

Key issues: petition to set aside arbitration award, recognition and enforcement of domestic arbitration award, recognition and enforcement of foreign arbitration award

id: 20355

Polish Supreme Court order dated 6 November 2009 Case No. I CSK 159/09

1. Whether a given ruling of a foreign court may be legally relevant cannot be determined in advance at the time of recognition. Thus it cannot be anticipated what effects the ruling might have or in what circumstances a given entity might rely on it in the future. Thus the petitioner is right in asserting that Civil Procedure Code Art. 1145 §1 does not provide grounds to refuse recognition of a ruling by a foreign court only because in the view of the court where recognition is sought it will not exert legal effects in Poland.

2. If the petitioner [seeking recognition] appeared as a party in a proceeding before an Austrian court, it not only has a legal interest to have standing in the recognition proceeding before the Polish court, but such interest also means that if the grounds set forth in Civil Procedure Code Art. 1146 do not exist, it may obtain recognition of the award as effective in Poland.

3. A ruling denying a petition to set aside an arbitration award, formally speaking, is a merits decision and not only procedural. Such rulings thus, as a rule, are capable of recognition. It should be pointed out, however, that the dispute between the parties on the merits was resolved by the arbitration court, acting on the basis of the intent of the parties as expressed in the arbitration clause. The judgment in a proceeding to set aside an arbitration award is therefore only a resolution with respect to the state’s exercise of oversight of arbitration rulings.

4. A judgment by a domestic court issued in a proceeding upon a petition to set aside an arbitration award must be taken into consideration in a proceeding seeking recognition of a foreign arbitration award only when permitted by the provisions governing such proceeding. As grounds for denial of recognition, the Civil Procedure Code and the New York Convention provide only for the court in the country deciding on recognition of a foreign arbitration award to consider, upon motion of a party, a judgment setting aside the arbitration award.

5. Given the specific nature of an arbitration award, which is issued based on the intent of the parties, and the function performed by a foreign court that denies a petition to set aside an arbitration award, there is no legal basis for recognition of such judgment by the foreign court, which essentially involves only oversight and not the merits. The connection between such judgment by a foreign court and the arbitration award, and thus the not entirely independent nature of the judgment, is primarily a barrier to treating the judgment as a ruling that may be recognized in Poland under Civil Procedure Code Art. 1145 §1.

Data wydania: 06-11-2009 | Sygnatura: I CSK 159/09

Key issues: New York Convention, arbitration award, petition to set aside arbitration award, recognition and enforcement of foreign arbitration award

id: 20298

Warsaw Appellate Court order dated 24 September 2009 Case No. I ACa 995/08

1. The New York Convention does not contain provisions indicating the form in which the parties should make a choice of law governing the arbitration clause. Art. V(1)[(a)] of the New York Convention does not require that the choice of law governing the arbitration clause be made in writing. The term “indication” should be interpreted to mean behaviour by a person in the form of writing, or any other behaviour that sufficiently reveals the person’s intent. Art. VI(2) of the European Convention on International Commercial Arbitration made at Geneva on 21 April 1961 uses the term “indication” without specifying the form, and thus “indication” should be interpreted as any behaviour by the parties indicating their joint intent.

2. It is not possible to conclude a settlement where, based on the nature of the disputed legal relations, the parties cannot freely dispose of the rights. Thus the appellate court holds that a dispute over the effectiveness of an agreement on sale of shares in a limited-liability company is not arbitrable.

3. The plaintiff determines who is a party when it initiates a dispute. The attribute of being a party is purely formal in nature and is not tied to the existence of a substantive legal claim, nor does it determine the jurisdiction of the arbitration court to decide the merits of the case. In a case where the arbitration court finds that it lacks jurisdiction over a “party,” it cannot be inferred that the ruling on the merits of the dispute is binding on that party. The party was not a party to the dispute on the merits because the arbitration court did not have jurisdiction over it.

4. Assessment of procedural acts of the parties in an arbitration proceeding lies within the power of the arbitration court, and a court ruling on recognition of an award may not make assessments contrary to that of the arbitration court, or assessments under the Polish Civil Procedure Code, which was not applicable in the proceeding before the arbitration court.

5. The state court is bound by the ruling of the arbitration court concerning its lack of jurisdiction to resolve specific disputes, regardless of whether the arbitration court’s interpretation of the scope of the arbitration clause was correct or not. It is clear that the arbitration court is authorized to rule on its own jurisdiction.

6. In order to decide on its jurisdiction, the arbitration court must consider the grounds for or against its jurisdiction. This cannot mean, however, that in cases in which the same issues are decisive of both the jurisdiction of the arbitration and the resolution on the merits the authority to resolve the issue of jurisdiction is also authority to decide the merits of the dispute. Otherwise the party would de facto be deprived of the ability to effectively assert the defence of lack of jurisdiction on the part of the arbitration court.

7. None of the provisions of law providing the arbitration court the authority to decide on its jurisdiction and analyze all factual and legal issues necessary to perform this task provides it a priori authority to decide the merits of the case. If the jurisdictional determination is negative, the arbitration court must refrain from deciding the merits of case. Review of the merits in such instance serves only as a basis for the jurisdictional ruling.

8. It is impermissible that res judicata effect of a ruling by the arbitration court would exert effects in Poland with respect to persons not covered by the legal finality of such ruling in the country of origin.

Data wydania: 24-09-2009 | Sygnatura: I ACa 995/08

Key issues: arbitrability of dispute, arbitration agreement, jurisdiction of arbitral tribunal, recognition and enforcement of foreign arbitration award

id: 20294

Polish Supreme Court order dated 24 June 2009 Case No. I CSK 538/08

1. Where Civil Procedure Code Art. 1215 §1 states that the court “shall rule after conducting a hearing,” it refers only to a court of first instance, as in the preceding Art. 1214 §1.

2. Civil Procedure Code 1151 §2 categorically states that with respect to enforceability of a ruling of a foreign court, “the court shall rule after conducting a hearing,” with no more specific explanation of the stage of the proceedings to which this requirement applies. Notwithstanding such wording, neither the doctrine nor the precedent has taken the view that a court of second instance is required to consider an interlocutory appeal at a hearing. To the contrary, it is accepted under Civil Procedure Code Art. 397 §1 in connection with Art. 13 §2 that it should be considered by the court in closed session. ... There is no reason to interpret the wording of Civil Procedure Code Art. 1215 §1 differently.

Data wydania: 24-06-2009 | Sygnatura: I CSK 538/08

Key issues: recognition and enforcement of foreign arbitration award

id: 20266

Polish Supreme Court order dated 4 July 2008 Case No. I CZ 139/07

1. An analysis of the current regulations of Part Five of the Civil Procedure Code supports ... arguments in favour of accepting the differentiation so far in admissibility of a cassation appeal from the ruling of the court of second instance on recognition or enforcement of an arbitration award issued in Poland, or issued abroad.

2. The nature of a proceeding for recognition or enforcement of an arbitration award or a settlement concluded before an arbitration court is not uniform, and must be viewed differently depending on whether the proceeding concerns an arbitration award issued in Poland or a settlement concluded in Poland, or an arbitration award issued abroad or a settlement concluded before an arbitration court abroad.

3. A proceeding for recognition or enforcement of an arbitration award issued abroad or a settlement concluded before an arbitration court abroad cannot be relegated to the role of an auxiliary proceeding as is the case with a proceeding for recognition or enforcement of an arbitration award issued in Poland or a settlement concluded before an arbitration court in Poland. This conclusion is confirmed by the broader scope of review of an award or settlement by the state court in the case of an arbitration award issued abroad or a settlement concluded before an arbitration court abroad. For these reasons, a proceeding for recognition or enforcement of an arbitration award issued abroad or a settlement concluded before an arbitration court abroad should be treated as a “counterpart” to the proceeding in the matter.

4. Pursuant to Civil Procedure Code Art. 3941 §2 in connection with Art. 13 §2, an interlocutory appeal to the Supreme Court from an order of the court of second instance dismissing a petition to renew the proceeding in a case seeking recognition or enforcement of an arbitration award issued in Poland or a settlement concluded before an arbitration court in Poland is impermissible.

Data wydania: 04-07-2008 | Sygnatura: I CZ 139/07

Key issues: recognition and enforcement of domestic arbitration award, recognition and enforcement of foreign arbitration award

id: 20250

Polish Supreme Court resolution dated 17 January 2008 Case No. III CZP 112/07

1. In a case seeking recognition or enforcement of an arbitration award issued abroad, insofar as not governed by Part Five of the Civil Procedure Code, including Art. 1212, the provisions concerning trials apply (Civil Procedure Code Art. 13 §2), not the provisions concerning recognition of judgments of foreign state courts.

2. In a case seeking recognition or enforcement of an arbitration award issued abroad, the court rules in a panel of a single judge, and orders outside of the hearing are issued by the presiding judge (Civil Procedure Code Art. 47 §1 in connection with Art. 13 §2).

3. In a case seeking recognition of an arbitration award issued abroad, the court of first instance, when dismissing an interlocutory appeal in closed session, rules in a panel of a single judge (Civil Procedure Code Art. 370 in connection with Art. 397 §2, Art. 47 §§ 1 and 3, and Art. 13 §2).

Data wydania: 17-01-2008 | Sygnatura: III CZP 112/07

Key issues: recognition and enforcement of foreign arbitration award

id: 20247

Polish Supreme Court order dated 17 July 2007 Case No. III CZP 55/07

1. Standing to file an action [in a proceeding for enforcement of a foreign judgment] is held by a person that may rely on the ruling in question in the state of origin that is subject to the motion for endorsement [exequatur], while standing to be sued is held by the person against whom the ruling may be asserted, and thus a person that bears the obligation of performing under the judgment.

2. The position of creditor and debtor, as well as legal succession, should be assessed under the law of the state of origin of a ruling, which is obvious because otherwise there could be different treatment of the same ruling and the same persons in different countries.

3. Enforcement of a ruling in the state of performance should be denied for or against a person with respect to whom it would not be possible (or permissible) in the state of origin.

4. Standing to be sued in a proceeding [for enforcement by issuance of an enforcement clause for a foreign arbitration award] is held by a person against whom, under the law of the country of origin of the award, the plaintiff (creditor) may rely on the award for enforcement.

5. In determining the country of origin of an arbitration award, in light of the various conceptions of the location of arbitration, the country that should be considered is either the one in which the award was issued, or the one whose law was applied when conducting the arbitration and issuing the award. The law of the country thus determined becomes the proper law for assessing who is entitled to rely on the specific arbitration award or against whom the award may be enforced, subject to consideration of legal succession, if any.

6. The law of the country of origin of an arbitration award is proper ... for an assessment ... of whether an award that refers in the operative wording to an entity as the respondent that under applicable law does not have legal or judicial capacity or capacity to be sued may be relied on for enforcement against the entity that, in substantive legal terms, should have been indicated in the award as the respondent.

Data wydania: 17-07-2007 | Sygnatura: III CZP 55/07

Key issues: recognition and enforcement of foreign arbitration award

id: 20239

Polish Supreme Court order dated 18 January 2007 Case No. I CSK 330/06

1. The fact that the New York Convention defines “substantive” grounds for recognition ... does not change the fact that a proceeding for recognition of a foreign arbitration award must be conducted in accordance with the regulations governing the course of such proceedings, set forth partially in the convention and otherwise in the Civil Procedure Code (Art. 1145–1149, excluding Art. 1146, concerning grounds for recognition, and regulations concerning trials under Art. 13 §2). In terms of the grounds for cassation, it should be concluded that allegations concerning violation of “substantive” conditions for recognition should be asserted under the first ground for cassation (Civil Procedure Code Art. 3983 §1(1) in connection with Art. 13 §2).

2. A proceeding for recognition of a foreign ruling is a specific type of judicial proceeding generally taking a bilateral form. Those who must participate in the proceeding, apart from the movant, whose source of standing to bring suit is a legal interest (Civil Procedure Code Art. 1147 §1), include all of the persons taking part in the foreign proceeding as a party or respondent, as they are subject to the substantive legal finality of the ruling; then they have standing to be sued. This applies respectively to any legal successors of such persons if they are subject to the substantive legal finality of the ruling undergoing recognition. An exception from this rule may be allowed only in a situation in which the motion for recognition of the foreign ruling would concern part of the decision set forth in the ruling and the part does not refer to all the parties or respondents. In such case, it should be found that participation in the proceeding for recognition is necessary only for the parties or respondents in the foreign proceeding affected by the part of the ruling that is included in the motion for recognition.

3. Regulations concerning trials apply as relevant to a proceeding for recognition of a foreign ruling (Civil Procedure Code Art. 13 §2). The specific nature of such proceeding consists in the fact that it does not decide on the rights and obligations of the parties, but whether the ruling issued abroad is to be effective in Poland. For this reasons regulations concerning principal and auxiliary intervention cannot be applicable.

Data wydania: 18-01-2007 | Sygnatura: I CSK 330/06

Key issues: New York Convention, recognition and enforcement of foreign arbitration award

id: 20234

Polish Supreme Court order dated 9 March 2004 (Case No. I CK 412/03)

1. The concept of “public policy” primarily extends to principles arising under the Constitution and the leading principles of specific fields of law. … Under civil contractual arrangements ... this means first and foremost the principle of the autonomy of the will of the parties and the equal standing of the parties. These principles would have been applied if the Polish court had itself applied the law under which the foreign arbitration award was issued.

2. If a ruling by a foreign court is an example of application of a legal institution that is recognized under Polish law, such ruling cannot be regarded as contrary to the fundamental principles of the legal order, and Civil Procedure Code Art. 1146 §1(5) is no barrier to recognition of the ruling by the foreign court.

Data wydania: 09-03-2004 | Sygnatura: I CK 412/03

Key issues: recognition and enforcement of foreign arbitration award

id: 20203

Polish Supreme Court order dated 20 February 2003 Case No. I CZ 10/03

1. Entry into force of Civil Procedure Code Art. 1148 §3 in its new wording did not exclude at all the permissibility of a cassation appeal in a proceeding for enforcement of a foreign judgment, but only prevented further reliance on Civil Procedure Code Art. 392 in connection with Art. 13 §2 for the permissibility of a cassation appeal in a proceeding for recognition or enforcement of a foreign judgment. From that point, the basis for permissibility of a cassation appeal in such proceedings thus became Civil Procedure Code Art. 1148 §3—with respect to a proceeding for recognition, express grounds, and with respect to a proceeding for enforcement, grounds by way of analogy.

2. In a proceeding for enforcement of a foreign judgment, as well as an arbitration award issued abroad, a cassation appeal ... is permissible on the basis of Civil Procedure Code Art. 1148 §3 applied by way of analogy. An order of the court of second instance concerning enforcement of a foreign judgment and an order of the court of second instance concerning enforcement of an arbitration award issued abroad are subject to review using this appellate instrument.

Data wydania: 20-02-2003 | Sygnatura: I CZ 10/03

Key issues: recognition and enforcement of foreign arbitration award

id: 20194

Polish Supreme Court order dated 9 February 1999 Case No. I CKN 887/98

1. A cassation appeal from an order of the court of second instance concluding the proceeding in cases seeking enforcement of a ruling of a foreign court or an arbitration award issued abroad is permissible.

2. It follows from their essence and basic functions that arbitration courts are non-state courts, established by the will of the parties, within the bounds in which they may dispose of private rights and within the framework of applicable laws. There is thus no justification for regarding arbitration courts as an organ of the state.

3. There is no requirement in [the New York Convention] that a foreign arbitration award be “capable of enforcement by way of execution,” as is provided in Civil Procedure Code Art. 1150 §1. The convention does not provide for separate proceedings for recognition and enforcement of an arbitration award, but provides uniform conditions for denial of the motion with respect to both forms of award.

Data wydania: 09-02-1999 | Sygnatura: I CKN 887/98

Key issues: recognition and enforcement of foreign arbitration award

id: 20159

Katowice Appellate Court order dated 6 October 1998 Case No. I ACz 841/98

It follows from the very nature of entering into a contract through implicit acts that this may involve only acts that were actually performed by the parties. In a situation where the opposing party denies submitting the dispute to the arbitration court, it cannot be said that an arbitration clause was concluded implicitly.

Data wydania: 06-10-1998 | Sygnatura: I ACz 841/98

Key issues: arbitration agreement, recognition and enforcement of foreign arbitration award

id: 20279

Polish Supreme Court order dated 24 September 1998 Case No. III CKN 628/98

The scope of application of the 1994 Treaty between Poland and Belarus on Legal Assistance and Legal Relations in Civil, Family, Employment and Criminal Matters does not cover recognition and enforcement of arbitration awards.

Data wydania: 24-09-1998 | Sygnatura: III CKN 628/98

Key issues: recognition and enforcement of foreign arbitration award

id: 20156

Judgment of the Court of Justice of 25 July 1989, C-190/89, Marc Rich and Co. A.G. v. Società Italiana Impianti P.A.

1. By excluding arbitration from the scope of the Convention of 27 September 1968 on Jurisdiction and the Enforcement of Judgments in Civil and Commercial Matters, by virtue of Article 1(4) thereof, on the ground that it was already covered by international conventions, the Contracting Parties intended to exclude arbitration in its entirety, including proceedings brought before national courts.

2. Consequently, the abovementioned provision must be interpreted as meaning that the exclusion provided for therein extends to litigation pending before a national court concerning the appointment of an arbitrator, even if the existence or validity of an arbitration agreement is a preliminary issue in that litigation.

Data wydania: 25-07-1989 | Sygnatura: C-190/89

Key issues: recognition and enforcement of foreign arbitration award

id: 20318

Artwich Armen

Application of the Delocalisation Theory in Current International Commercial Arbitration Practice

Prz.Prawn.UW 2010, No. 1-2, p. 130-143

Key issues: arbitration agreement, arbitration procedure, arbitration award, recognition and enforcement of foreign arbitration award

id: 30932

Asłanowicz Marcin

Amendment to the Fifth Part of the Code of Civil Procedure – the End or the Beginning of Changes? [Original title: Nowelizacja części piątej KPC – koniec, czy początek zmian?]

e-Przegląd Arbitrażowy 2015, No. 1-2, p. 34-37

Key issues: petition to set aside arbitration award, recognition and enforcement of domestic arbitration award, recognition and enforcement of foreign arbitration award

id: 31780

Balbiano di Colcavagno Pietro

Setting Aside and Refusing the Recognition and Enforcement of the Awards in Italy: Grounds and Procedural Issues [Original title: Uchylenie oraz odmowa uznania i stwierdzenia wykonalności wyroku arbitrażowego we Włoszech - przesłanki i kwestie procesowe]

Arbitration e-Review 2014, No. 1-2, p. 51-60

Key issues: arbitration award, petition to set aside arbitration award, recognition and enforcement of foreign arbitration award

id: 31281

Barański Jakub

Lost Opportunity – Corporate Arbitration and the Amendment of the Arbitration Law [Original title: Utracona okazja – arbitraż korporacyjny a nowelizacja prawa arbitrażowego]

PEP 2015, No 12 (138), p. 41-43

Key issues: arbitrability of dispute, arbitration agreement, petition to set aside arbitration award, recognition and enforcement of domestic arbitration award, recognition and enforcement of foreign arbitration award

id: 31507

Bareła Monika

Judicial Review of Arbitration Proceedings in Light of International Practice [Original title: Sądowa kontrola postępowania arbitrażowego z perspektywy doświadczeń międzynarodowych]

Stud.Prawn. 2013, No. 1, p. 35-67

Key issues: New York Convention, investment arbitration, arbitration award, petition to set aside arbitration award, recognition and enforcement of domestic arbitration award, recognition and enforcement of foreign arbitration award

id: 31189

Biała Barbara

Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards under the Convention on the Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards and the Code of Civil Procedure [Original title: Uznawanie i wykonywanie zagranicznych orzeczeń arbitrażowych na gruncie Konwencji o uznawaniu i wykonywaniu zagranicznych orzeczeń arbitrażowych oraz Kodeksu postępowania cywilnego]

[in:] J. Olszewski, B. Fuchs (eds.), Arbitration. Between Theory and Practice [Arbitraż. Między teorią a praktyką], Rzeszów 2014, p. 64-74

Key issues: New York Convention, recognition and enforcement of foreign arbitration award

id: 31385

Biały Aneta

Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Arbitration Awards [Original title: Uznanie i stwierdzenie wykonalności zagranicznych orzeczeń sądów polubownych]

[in:] Jan Olszewski (ed.), Arbitration and Mediation – Practical Aspects of Application of Provisions (Iwonicz-Zdrój 18–20.10.2007) [Arbitraż i mediacja. Praktyczne aspekty stosowania przepisów. Materiały konferencyjne (Iwonicz Zdrój, 18-20.10.2007 r.)], Rzeszów 2007, p. 23-33

Key issues: recognition and enforcement of foreign arbitration award

id: 30399

Biały Aneta

Time Limits of Recognition of a Foreign Arbitration Award – One of the Outcomes of the Recognition [Original title: Granice czasowe uznania orzeczenia zagranicznego – jeden ze skutków uznania]

[in:] Jan Olszewski (ed.), Arbitration and Mediation - Practical Aspects of Application of Provisions (Iwonicz-Zdrój 18-20.10.2007) [Arbitraż i mediacja. Praktyczne aspekty stosowania przepisów. Materiały konferencyjne (Iwonicz Zdrój, 18-20.10.2007 r.)], Rzeszów 2007, p. 19-27

Key issues: recognition and enforcement of foreign arbitration award

id: 30867

Błaszczak Łukasz

Arbitration Award in Civil Proceedings [Original title: Wyrok sądu polubownego w postępowaniu cywilnym]

Warszawa 2010, pp. 505

Key issues: settlement before arbitral tribunal, arbitration award, petition to set aside arbitration award, recognition and enforcement of domestic arbitration award, recognition and enforcement of foreign arbitration award

id: 30886

Błaszczak Łukasz

Proceeding for enforcement of domestic and foreign arbitration award (selected issues) [Original title: Postępowanie o stwierdzenie wykonalności krajowego i zagranicznego wyroku sądu polubownego (wybrane zagadnienia)]

R.Pr. - dod. 2012, Nr 126, p. 15-21

Key issues: recognition and enforcement of domestic arbitration award, recognition and enforcement of foreign arbitration award

id: 31136

Błaszczak Łukasz

The Recognition and the Declaration of Enforceability of Foreign Arbitral Awards on the Basis of Article 1215 k.p.c. and the New York Convention. Selected Issues [Original title: Uznanie i stwierdzenie wykonalności zagranicznych orzeczeń arbitrażowych w świetle art. 1215 k.p.c. oraz konwencji nowojorskiej. Wybrane zagadnienia]

Opolskie Studia Administracyjno-Prawne 2014, No. XII/2, p. 25-38

Key issues: New York Convention, recognition and enforcement of domestic arbitration award, recognition and enforcement of foreign arbitration award

id: 31442

Błaszczak Łukasz, Kuźmicka-Sulikowska Joanna

Application for Court Enforcement Clause and Application for Declaration of Enforceability in Relation to Interruption of Period of Claim Limitation [Original title: Wniosek o nadanie klauzuli wykonalności i wniosek o stwierdzenie wykonalności a przerwanie biegu przedawnienia roszczeń]

PPC 2012, No. 2, p. 209-244

Key issues: recognition and enforcement of domestic arbitration award, recognition and enforcement of foreign arbitration award

id: 31052

Dunin-Wąsowicz Jan K., Boykin James H.

Judicial Review of Arbitral Awards in the United States - the Uncertain Future of "Manifest Disregard of the Law" [Original title: Sądowa kontrola wyroków arbitrażowych w Stanach Zjednoczonych - niepewna przyszłość doktryny „rażącego naruszenia prawa”]

Arbitration e-Review 2014, No. 1-2, p. 42-50

Key issues: New York Convention, arbitration award, petition to set aside arbitration award, recognition and enforcement of foreign arbitration award

id: 31280

Brekoulakis Stavros

Public Policy Rules in English Arbitration Law

[in:] B. Gessel-Kalinowska vel Kalisz (ed.), The Challenges and the Future of Commercial and Investment Arbitration. Liber Amicorum Professor Jerzy Rajski, Warsaw 2015, p. 292-314

Key issues: petition to set aside arbitration award, recognition and enforcement of domestic arbitration award, recognition and enforcement of foreign arbitration award

id: 31416

Bülow Arthur

On the New York Convention of 10.6.1958 on the Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards [Original title: O konwencji nowojorskiej z 10.6.1958 o uznawaniu i wykonywaniu zagranicznych orzeczeń arbitrażowych]

Studia et Documenta 1960, No. 24-25, pp. 103

Key issues: New York Convention, recognition and enforcement of foreign arbitration award

id: 30206

Byelousov Pavlo I., Perepelynska Olena S.

Recognition and Enforcement Procedure in Ukraine: Reload [Original title: Uznawanie i wykonywanie orzeczeń arbitrażowych na Ukrainie: Nowy rozdział]

Arbitration e-Review 2011, No. 2, p. 23-25

Key issues: recognition and enforcement of foreign arbitration award

id: 30983

Pazdan Maksymilian, Sołtysiński Stanisław, Wardyński Tomasz, Włodyka Stanisław, Okolski Józef, Całus Andrzej

A Commemorative Volume for 60 years of the Court of Arbitration at the Polish Chamber of Commerce in Warsaw [Original title: Księga pamiątkowa 60-lecia Sądu Arbitrażowego przy Krajowej Izbie Gospodarczej w Warszawie]

Warszawa 2010, pp. 887

Key issues: New York Convention, general works, state court assistance, arbitrability of dispute, investment arbitration, arbitrator, arbitration agreement, arbitration procedure, jurisdiction of arbitral tribunal, settlement before arbitral tribunal, arbitration award, petition to set aside arbitration award, recognition and enforcement of domestic arbitration award, recognition and enforcement of foreign arbitration award

id: 30952

Carpentieri Leonardo

Arbitration in France – Some New Trends

ADR. Arbitraż i Mediacja 2015, No. 1, p. 13-24

Key issues: arbitration award, petition to set aside arbitration award, recognition and enforcement of domestic arbitration award, recognition and enforcement of foreign arbitration award

id: 31374

Mourre Alexis, Chessa Valentine

A Comparative Approach to the Standard of Review of Arbitral Awards under Substantive Public Policy

[in:] B. Gessel-Kalinowska vel Kalisz (ed.), The Challenges and the Future of Commercial and Investment Arbitration. Liber Amicorum Professor Jerzy Rajski, Warsaw 2015, p. 379-383

Key issues: petition to set aside arbitration award, recognition and enforcement of domestic arbitration award, recognition and enforcement of foreign arbitration award

id: 31422

Czech Konrad

Application of the New York Convention of 10 June 1958 on the Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards in Polish Practice on the Example of the Supreme Court Case Law [Original title: Stosowanie Konwencji nowojorskiej z 10 czerwca 1958 r. o uznawaniu i wykonywaniu zagranicznych wyroków arbitrażowych w praktyce polskiej na przykładzie orzecznictwa Sądu Najwyższego]

PS 2010, No. 11-12, p. 141-150

Key issues: New York Convention, recognition and enforcement of foreign arbitration award

id: 30954

Dąbrowska Katarzyna, Sidor Artur

Securing the enforceability of an award in the context of the new Rules of the Lewiatan Court of Arbitration

e-Przegląd Arbitrażowy 2012, No. 3-4 (10-11), p. 32-43

Key issues: arbitration award, recognition and enforcement of domestic arbitration award, recognition and enforcement of foreign arbitration award

id: 31148

Zawicki Kamil, Durbas Maciej, Gąsiorowski Kuba

Poland – The Supreme Court Judgements and Decisions of Appellate Courts

[in:] Alexander J. Bělohlávek, Naděžda Rozehnalová (eds.), Czech (& Central European) Yearbook of Arbitration 2015, Vol. V, Interaction of Arbitration and Courts, New York 2015, p. 643-654

Key issues: arbitrator, arbitration agreement, petition to set aside arbitration award, recognition and enforcement of foreign arbitration award

id: 31368

Durbas Maciej, Kos Rafał

The Arbitrators' (Perceived) Power to Revise a Contract vs. the Power of the Public Policy Clause

[in:] Christian Klausegger, Peter Klein, Florian Kremslehner, Alexander Petsche, Nikolaus Pitkowitz, Jenny Power, Irene Welser, Gerold Zeiler (eds.), Austrian Yearbook on International Arbitration 2014, Vienna 2014, p. 135-147

Key issues: petition to set aside arbitration award, recognition and enforcement of domestic arbitration award, recognition and enforcement of foreign arbitration award

id: 31291

Ereciński Tadeusz, Weitz Karol

Shortening the Course of Post-Arbitration Litigation – Remarks De Lege Ferenda

[in:] B. Gessel-Kalinowska vel Kalisz (ed.), The Challenges and the Future of Commercial and Investment Arbitration. Liber Amicorum Professor Jerzy Rajski, Warsaw 2015, p. 330-346

Key issues: petition to set aside arbitration award, recognition and enforcement of domestic arbitration award, recognition and enforcement of foreign arbitration award

id: 31418

Kolber Joanna, Fierens Jean-Pierre

The 2013 Developments in Belgian Arbitration Law

ADR. Arbitraż i Mediacja 2015, No. 1, p. 26-38

Key issues: arbitration award, petition to set aside arbitration award, recognition and enforcement of domestic arbitration award, recognition and enforcement of foreign arbitration award

id: 31375

Franusz Anna

Impact of Declaration of Bankruptcy of an Entrepreneur on Arbitration Proceedings [Original title: Wpływ ogłoszenia upadłości przedsiębiorcy na postępowanie arbitrażowe]

Studia Prawnoustrojowe 2011, No. 14, p. 283-293

Key issues: arbitration agreement, arbitration procedure, arbitration award, petition to set aside arbitration award, recognition and enforcement of domestic arbitration award, recognition and enforcement of foreign arbitration award

id: 31121

Frejowski Sebastian

Binding of an Arbitration Tribunal by the State Court Ruling That Recognized or Enforced a Prior Arbitration Tribunal Award [Original title: Związanie sądu arbitrażowego orzeczeniem sądu powszechnego, który uznał lub stwierdził wykonalność wyroku sądu polubownego]

Glosa 2013, No. 2, p. 63-67

Key issues: arbitration award, petition to set aside arbitration award, recognition and enforcement of domestic arbitration award, recognition and enforcement of foreign arbitration award

id: 31154

Łaszczuk Maciej, Pieckowski Sylwester, Poczobut Jerzy, Szumański Andrzej, Tomaszewski Maciej, Furtek Marek

Arbitration and Mediation. A Commemorative Volume Dedicated to Dr Andrzej Tynel [Original tilte: Arbitraż i mediacja. Księga jubileuszowa dedykowana doktorowi Andrzejowi Tynelowi]

Warszawa 2012, pp. 732

Key issues: New York Convention, general works, state court assistance, arbitrability of dispute, investment arbitration, arbitrator, arbitration agreement, arbitration procedure, jurisdiction of arbitral tribunal, settlement before arbitral tribunal, arbitration award, petition to set aside arbitration award, recognition and enforcement of domestic arbitration award, recognition and enforcement of foreign arbitration award

id: 31075

Galuschenko German

Enforcement of Investment Arbitral Awards in Ukraine [Original title: Wykonywanie na terytorium Ukrainy wyroków wydanych w arbitrażu inwestycyjnym]

Arbitration e-Review 2013, Special Edition, p. 31-32

Key issues: investment arbitration, recognition and enforcement of domestic arbitration award, recognition and enforcement of foreign arbitration award

id: 31164

Garnuszek Anita

How a State May Evade Enforcement of Arbitral Awards? - The Notion of Enforcement Immunity

[in:] A. Garnuszek, L. Mazur, A. Orzeł (eds.), Quo Vadis, Arbitrażu? Quo Vadis, Arbitration?, Warszawa 2013, p. 131-160

Key issues: recognition and enforcement of foreign arbitration award

id: 31209

Garnuszek Anita

Immunity Defences in Enforcement Proceedings Concerning Awards Rendered in International Commercial Arbitration Involving States and State Entities

[in:] K. Drličková, T. Kyselovská (red.) Resolution of International Disputes. Public Law in the Context of Immigration Crisis, COFOLA INTERNATIONAL 2016, Conference proceedings, Acta Universitatis Brunensis, Vol. 562, Brno 2016, p. 38-55

Key issues: New York Convention, recognition and enforcement of foreign arbitration award

id: 31798

Zawicki Kamil, Gąsiorowski Kuba, Matejczyk Magdalena

Poland – the Supreme Court Judgments

[in:] Bělohlávek Alexander J., Rozehnalová Naděžda (eds), Czech Yearbook of International Law. International Dispute Resolution, The Hague 2016, Vol. VII, p. 213-223

Key issues: New York Convention, arbitration agreement, arbitration procedure, arbitration award, petition to set aside arbitration award, recognition and enforcement of foreign arbitration award

id: 31552

Gąsiorowski Kuba, Wandzel Wojciech

Enforcement Issues in the Conduct of Arbitration and National Laws in International Arbitration

[in:] Bělohlávek Alexander J., Rozehnalová Naděžda (eds), Czech (& Central European) Yearbook of Arbitration. Conduct of Arbitration, The Hague 2017, Vol. VII, p. 153-169

Key issues: New York Convention, arbitration procedure, recognition and enforcement of foreign arbitration award

id: 31840

Gembiś Łukasz

Manifest Disregard of the Law as a Ground for Vacatur Domestic and International Arbitral Awards in the United States [Original title: Rażące naruszenie prawa jako podstawa do uchylenia krajowego oraz międzynarodowego wyroku arbitrażowego w USA]

Arbitration e-Review 2014, No. 1-2, p. 25-41

Key issues: New York Convention, petition to set aside arbitration award, recognition and enforcement of foreign arbitration award

id: 31279

Gessel-Kalinowska vel Kalisz Beata

Diagnosis for Arbitration. Functioning of Arbitration Law and the Directions of Postulated Changes [Original title: Diagnoza arbitrażu. Funkcjonowanie prawa o arbitrażu i kierunki postulowanych zmian]

Wrocław 2014, pp. 593

Key issues: New York Convention, general works, arbitrability of dispute, arbitrator, arbitration agreement, arbitration procedure, jurisdiction of arbitral tribunal, settlement before arbitral tribunal, arbitration award, petition to set aside arbitration award, recognition and enforcement of domestic arbitration award, recognition and enforcement of foreign arbitration award

id: 31452

Golędzinowski Piotr

Complicated Relations Between Court and Arbitration Proceedings under the Brussels I Bis Regulation [Original title: Skomplikowane relacje postępowań sądowych i arbitrażowych na gruncie rozporządzenia Bruksela I bis]

PEP 2015, No 1(127), p. 20-22

Key issues: New York Convention, recognition and enforcement of foreign arbitration award

id: 31503

Gorywoda Łukasz

Institutionalization of an Arbitral Appeal Mechanism – American Arbitration Association's new Optional Appellate Arbitration Rules [Original title: Instytucjonalizacja dwuinstancyjności postępowania arbitrażowego – apelacja arbitrażowa według nowych reguł American Arbitration Association]

PPH 2015, No. 4, p. 17-22

Key issues: arbitration agreement, arbitration procedure, arbitration award, petition to set aside arbitration award, recognition and enforcement of foreign arbitration award

id: 31364

Grzegorczyk Paweł

Which Cassation Ground Should Be the Basis for the Plea of Infringement of the Provisions Regulating the Conditions of Recognition of a Foreign Judgement or a Foreign Award? [Original title: W ramach której z podstaw kasacyjnych należy zarzucać naruszenie przepisów regulujących warunki uznania orzeczenia sądu państwa obcego lub wyroku sądu polubownego wydanego za granicą?]

PPC 2010, No. 1, p. 77-82

Key issues: recognition and enforcement of foreign arbitration award

id: 30908

Kierska Maria, Horodyski Dominik

Enforcement of Emergency Arbitrator’s Decisions - Legal Problems and Global Trends

ADR. Arbitraż i Mediacja 2016, No. 1, p. 27-38

Key issues: New York Convention, interim measures, recognition and enforcement of domestic arbitration award, recognition and enforcement of foreign arbitration award

id: 31574

Irmiński Mateusz

The Scope in which Courts of Arbitration Are Bound by the EU Law in the Light of the Bases for Setting Aside an Arbitral Award or Refusal to Recognize or Declare its Enforceability [Original title: Zakres związania sądów arbitrażowych prawem Unii Europejskiej w świetle podstaw do uchylenia wyroku sądu arbitrażowego bądź odmowy uznania lub stwierdzenia jego wykonalności]

Biul.Arb. - Młody Arbitraż 2015, No. 22, p. 167-182

Key issues: petition to set aside arbitration award, recognition and enforcement of domestic arbitration award, recognition and enforcement of foreign arbitration award

id: 31334

Jakubowski Jerzy

Permanent Courts of Arbitration in Poland [Original title: Stałe sądy arbitrażowe w Polsce]

Warszawa 1961, ss. 39

Key issues: New York Convention, general works, arbitrator, arbitration procedure, arbitration award, petition to set aside arbitration award, recognition and enforcement of foreign arbitration award

id: 30127

Jakubowski Jerzy

Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Arbitration Awards in Poland [Original title: Uznawanie i wykonywanie zagranicznych orzeczeń arbitrażowych w Polsce]

Studia Iuridica 1976, No. 5, p. 99-109

Key issues: recognition and enforcement of foreign arbitration award

id: 30476

Jarco Bartłomiej

Setting Aside of a Foreign Arbitration Award and its Recognition in Poland [Original title: Uchylenie zagranicznego wyroku sądu polubownego a jego uznanie na terytorium Polski]

PPH 2008, No. 2, p. 30-38

Key issues: recognition and enforcement of foreign arbitration award

id: 30244

Zawadzka Julita, Jelonek-Jarco Barbara

The Influence of Violation of the Independence and Impartiality Rules on the Enforeability and Effectiveness of the Arbitral Award

[in:] Alexander J. Bělohlávek, Filip Černý, Naděžda Rozehnalová (eds.), Czech (& Central European) Yearbook of Arbitration 2014, Vol. IV, New York 2014, p. 151-169

Key issues: New York Convention, arbitrator, recognition and enforcement of foreign arbitration award

id: 31287

Jochemczak Michał

The Dallah Real Estate v. Slovakia Case [Original title: Sprawa Dallah Real Estate v. Słowacja]

e-Przegląd Arbitrażowy 2010, No. 2, p. 48-51

Key issues: recognition and enforcement of foreign arbitration award

id: 30849

Jodłowski Jerzy

Right Moment for Determination of the Conditions of Recognition of Foreign Arbitration Awards [Original title: Chwila miarodajna dla ustalenia warunków uznania orzeczeń zagranicznych]

NP 1977, No. 12, p. 1571-1578

Key issues: recognition and enforcement of foreign arbitration award

id: 30478

Kała Dariusz P.

Filing a Motion for Recognition or Declaration of Enforcement of an Arbitration Award or a Settlement Reached Before the Arbitration Court [Original title: Wniesienie wniosku o uznanie lub stwierdzenie wykonalności wyroku sądu polubownego lub ugody przed nim zawartej]

Rej. 2013, No. 5, p. 54-67

Key issues: New York Convention, recognition and enforcement of domestic arbitration award, recognition and enforcement of foreign arbitration award

id: 31170

Kała Dariusz P.

Grounds for Refusal to Recognise and Enforce an Arbitration Award or a Settlement Reached Before an Arbitration Court (Part I) [Original title: Podstawy odmowy uznania i wykonania wyroku sądu polubownego lub ugody przed nim zawartej (cz. I)]

R.Pr. 2013, No. 134, p. 8-10

Key issues: New York Convention, recognition and enforcement of domestic arbitration award, recognition and enforcement of foreign arbitration award

id: 31156

Kała Dariusz P.

Grounds for Refusal to Recognise and Enforce an Arbitration Award or a Settlement Reached Before an Arbitration Court (Part II) [Original title: Podstawy odmowy uznania i wykonania wyroku sądu polubownego lub ugody przed nim zawartej (cz. II)]

R.Pr. 2013, No. 135, p. 8-12

Key issues: New York Convention, recognition and enforcement of domestic arbitration award, recognition and enforcement of foreign arbitration award

id: 31155

Kała Dariusz P.

Interlocutory Appeal Against a Ruling on Recognition of a Foreign Arbitration Award. Commentary to the Ruling of 24 June 2009 (I CSK 538/08) [Original title: Zażalenie na postanowienie w przedmiocie uznania wyroku sądu polubownego wydanego za granicą. Glosa do postanowienia z dnia 24 czerwca 2009 r. (I CSK 538/08)]

PS 2011, No. 2, p. 118-122

Key issues: recognition and enforcement of foreign arbitration award

id: 30975

Kała Dariusz P.

Recognition and Enforcement of an Arbitration Award or Settlement Entered Into Before an Arbitration Court (Selected Issues) [Original title: Uznanie i stwierdzenie wykonalności wyroku sądu polubownego lub ugody przed nim zawartej (zagadnienia wybrane)]

Pal. 2013, No. 5-6, p. 79-84

Key issues: petition to set aside arbitration award, recognition and enforcement of domestic arbitration award, recognition and enforcement of foreign arbitration award

id: 31158

Kocon Agnieszka

Poland

[in:] Ned Beale, Barbara Lautenschlager, Giuseppe Scotti, Leo Van den hole (eds.), Dispute Resolution Clauses in International Contracts. A Global Guide, Zurich-Basel-Geneva 2013, p. 433-458

Key issues: New York Convention, state court assistance, arbitrability of dispute, arbitration agreement, jurisdiction of arbitral tribunal, petition to set aside arbitration award, recognition and enforcement of foreign arbitration award

id: 31292

Szmit-Fąderska Izabela, Kowaczyk Bartłomiej

Enforcement of an Arbitration Award on Costs of Proceedings. A commentary to the Order of the Warsaw Court of Apeal dated 31 March 2015 (I Acz 358/15) [Original title: Stwierdzenie wykonalności wyroku sądu polubownego w zakresie kosztów postępowania. Glosa do postanowienia Sądu Apelacyjnego w Warszawie z 31.03.2015 r. (I Acz 358/15)]

Glosa 2016, No. 3, p. 58-65

Key issues: costs of arbitration, recognition and enforcement of domestic arbitration award, recognition and enforcement of foreign arbitration award

id: 31782

Krześniak Eligiusz

Remarks on Arbitrator’s Independence and Impartiality in the Light of Organizational Rules in Sport and Commercial Arbitration [Original title: Uwagi na temat niezależności i bezstronności arbitra na tle zasad organizacyjnych w arbitrażu sportowym i arbitrażu handlowym]

PPH 2017, No. 3, p. 24-33

Key issues: arbitrator, recognition and enforcement of domestic arbitration award, recognition and enforcement of foreign arbitration award

id: 31825

Zawicki Kamil, Kubas Andrzej, Selwa Magdalena

Current Case Law - Poland

[in:] Alexander J. Bělohlávek, Filip Černý, Naděžda Rozehnalová (eds.), Czech (& Central European) Yearbook of Arbitration 2013, Vol. III, New York 2013, P. 211-237

Key issues: New York Convention, arbitrability of dispute, arbitration agreement, arbitration award, petition to set aside arbitration award, recognition and enforcement of domestic arbitration award, recognition and enforcement of foreign arbitration award

id: 31308

Zawicki Kamil, Kubas Andrzej

The Scope of Mandatory Provisions of Procedural and Substantive Law Binding upon a Court of Arbitration

[in:] Alexander J. Bělohlávek, Filip Černý, Naděžda Rozehnalová (eds.), Czech (& Central European) Yearbook of Arbitration 2013, Vol. III, New York 2013, p. 3-24

Key issues: New York Convention, arbitrability of dispute, arbitration agreement, arbitration procedure, recognition and enforcement of domestic arbitration award, recognition and enforcement of foreign arbitration award

id: 31288

Kuropatwiński Maciej

Recognition of Annulled Foreign Arbitration Awards in Poland? [Original title: Uznawalność uchylonych orzeczeń zagranicznych sądów arbitrażowych w Polsce?]

Biul.Arb. 2009, No. 9, p. 100-118

Key issues: recognition and enforcement of foreign arbitration award

id: 30265

Lipiński Kazimierz

Recognition of Foreign Court Judgements [Original title: Uznawanie zagranicznych orzeczeń sądowych]

NP 1957, No. 11, p. 44-58

Key issues: recognition and enforcement of foreign arbitration award

id: 30611

Lubiński Kazimierz

Ruling of a Polish Court on Recognition of a Ruling of a Foreign Court [Original title: Orzeczenie sądu polskiego o uznaniu orzeczenia sądu zagranicznego]

PS 2009, No. 3, p. 5-20

Key issues: recognition and enforcement of foreign arbitration award

id: 30719

Łaszczuk Maciej, Szpara Justyna

Post-Arbitration Proceeding [Original title: Postępowanie postarbitrażowe]

[in:] Andrzej Szumański (ed.), The System of Commercial Law. Commercial Arbitration. Volume 8, Chapter 12 [Original title: System Prawa Handlowego. Arbitraż handlowy. Tom 8, Rozdział 12], Warszawa 2015, p. 663-843

Key issues: New York Convention, settlement before arbitral tribunal, recognition and enforcement of domestic arbitration award, recognition and enforcement of foreign arbitration award

id: 31486

Łaszczuk Maciej, Szpara Justyna

Post-Arbitration Proceedings [Original title: Postępowanie postarbitrażowe]

[in:] Andrzej Szumański (ed.), The System of Commercial Law. Commercial Arbitration. Volume 8, Chapter 12 [System Prawa Handlowego. Arbitraż handlowy. Tom 8, Rozdział 12], Warszawa 2009, p. 559-717

Key issues: New York Convention, petition to set aside arbitration award, recognition and enforcement of domestic arbitration award, recognition and enforcement of foreign arbitration award

id: 30757

Marcisz Paweł, Orzeł Aleksandra

Anti-Suit Injunctions Issued by Arbitration Tribunals in the Light of the Judgement of the Court of Justice of 13 May 2015, C-536/13, Gazprom [Original title: Anti-suit injunctions wydawane przez sądy polubowne w świetle wyroku Trybunału Sprawiedliwości z 13.05.2015 r., C-536/13, Gazprom]

PPC 2017, No. 3, p. 379-402

Key issues: New York Convention, arbitration agreement, interim measures, jurisdiction of arbitral tribunal, recognition and enforcement of domestic arbitration award, recognition and enforcement of foreign arbitration award

id: 31890

Merezhko Oleksandr

International Commercial Arbitration from the Perspective of the Psychological Theory of Law [Original title: Międzynarodowy arbitraż handlowy z perspektywy psychologicznej teorii prawa]

Arbitration e-Review 2013, Special Edition, p. 6-11

Key issues: investment arbitration, arbitrator, arbitration procedure, petition to set aside arbitration award, recognition and enforcement of domestic arbitration award, recognition and enforcement of foreign arbitration award

id: 31159

Mędrzecka Joanna, Skierkowska Wiesława

On the Issue of Foreign Arbitration Awards Recognition [Original title: Z problematyki uznawania zagranicznych orzeczeń]

Biul.MS 1963, No. 3, p. 14-24

Key issues: recognition and enforcement of foreign arbitration award

id: 30276

Morek Rafał

Review of the Rulings of the Supreme Court and of Appellate Courts [Original title: Przegląd orzecznictwa Sądu Najwyższego i sądów apelacyjnych]

Biul. Arb. 2013, No. 20, p. 93-95

Key issues: New York Convention, arbitration agreement, jurisdiction of arbitral tribunal, recognition and enforcement of foreign arbitration award

id: 31176

Morek Rafał

Selected Rulings Concerning Arbitration [Original title: Wybrane orzeczenia dotyczące sądownictwa arbitrażowego]

Biul. Arb. 2008, No. 5, p. 24-26

Key issues: recognition and enforcement of foreign arbitration award

id: 30828

Morek Rafał, Sadowski Wojciech

Recognition and Enforcement of Arbitral Awards in Poland

[in:] Arbitration in Poland, Warszawa 2011, p. 125-140

Key issues: New York Convention, settlement before arbitral tribunal, arbitration award, recognition and enforcement of domestic arbitration award, recognition and enforcement of foreign arbitration award

id: 31042

Nowaczyk Piotr

Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards - Polish Law and Practice

[in:] Croatian Arbitration Yearbook 2013, Vol. 20, Zagreb 2013, p. 99-109

Key issues: New York Convention, recognition and enforcement of domestic arbitration award, recognition and enforcement of foreign arbitration award

id: 31289

Olaś Andrzej

Between the Autonomy of Arbitration and the Protection of the Parties’ Rights and the Public Interest. Remarks on the Basis of the Act of 10 September 2015 Amending Some Statues in Connection with Supporting Amicable Dispute Resolution Methods [Original title: Pomiędzy autonomią arbitrażu a ochroną praw stron i interesu publicznego. Skarga o uchylenie wyroku sądu polubownego po zmianach wprowadzonych na mocy ustawy z dnia 10 września 2015 r. o zmianie niektórych ustaw w związku ze wspieraniem polubownych metod rozwiązywania sporów]

Palestra 2016, No. 11, p. 46-55

Key issues: petition to set aside arbitration award, recognition and enforcement of domestic arbitration award, recognition and enforcement of foreign arbitration award

id: 31808

Olechowski Marcin

Law Applicable to the Assessment of the Effects of a Recognised International Arbitration Award [Original title: Prawo właściwe do oceny skutków uznawanego międzynarodowego wyroku arbitrażowego]

[in:] Józef Okolski (chair), Andrzej Całus, Maksymilian Pazdan, Stanisław Sołtysiński, Tomasz Wardyński, Stanisław Włodyka (ed.) Essays in Honour of 60 years of the Court of Arbitration at the Polish Chamber of Commerce in Warsaw [Księga pamiątkowa 60-lecia Sądu Arbitrażowego przy Krajowej Izbie Gospodarczej w Warszawie], Warszawa 2010, p. 573-585

Key issues: New York Convention, arbitration award, recognition and enforcement of foreign arbitration award

id: 30935

Olechowski Marcin

Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards under the New Polish Arbitration Law [Original title: Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards under the New Polish Arbitration Law]

Biul. Arb. 2008, No. 6, p. 70-75

Key issues: recognition and enforcement of foreign arbitration award

id: 30295

Orzeł Aleksandra

A Few Remarks on Enforceability of Unilateral Dispute Resolution Clauses Involving Arbitration

[in:] K. Drličková, T. Kyselovská (red.) Resolution of International Disputes. Public Law in the Context of Immigration Crisis, COFOLA INTERNATIONAL 2016, Conference proceedings, Acta Universitatis Brunensis, Vol. 562, Brno 2016, p. 116-133

Key issues: arbitration agreement, petition to set aside arbitration award, recognition and enforcement of domestic arbitration award, recognition and enforcement of foreign arbitration award

id: 31797

Pagacz Gabriela

Contents of the Polish Public Policy

Biul. Arb. 2012, No. 17, p. 89-96, [Article in English]

Key issues: petition to set aside arbitration award, recognition and enforcement of domestic arbitration award, recognition and enforcement of foreign arbitration award

id: 31048

Pierewa Inna

New Rules of Recognition and Enforcement of a Foreign Arbitration Award in the Republic of Belarus [Original title: Nowe zasady uznania i wykonania zagranicznych orzeczeń sądów polubownych (arbitrażowych) w Republice Białorusi]

PUG 2001, No. 1, p. 26 - 27, [translation by Małgorzata Tynel]

Key issues: recognition and enforcement of foreign arbitration award

id: 30520

Tynel Małgorzata, Pierewa Inna

Enforcement of International Arbitration Awards in Belarus [Original title: Wykonywanie orzeczeń międzynarodowych sądów arbitrażowych na Białorusi]

PUG 1997, No. 10, p. 23-25

Key issues: recognition and enforcement of foreign arbitration award

id: 30521

Pilich Mateusz

Public Policy Clause in Proceedings for Recognition and Enforcement of a Foreign Arbitration Award [Original title: Klauzula porządku publicznego w postępowaniu o uznanie i wykonanie zagranicznego orzeczenia arbitrażowego]

KPP 2003, No. 1, p. 157-187

Key issues: recognition and enforcement of foreign arbitration award

id: 30522

Popiołek Wojciech

Effects of Foreign Arbitral Award in Poland [Original title: Skutki zagranicznego orzeczenia arbitrażowego w Polsce]

PPH 2014, No. 6, s. 5-10

Key issues: New York Convention, arbitration award, recognition and enforcement of foreign arbitration award

id: 31269

Popiołek Wojciech

Refusal to Recognize (Enforce) a Foreign Arbitration Award under Article V of the New York Convention [Original title: Odmowa uznania (wykonania) zagranicznego orzeczenia arbitrażowego na podstawie art. V Konwencji nowojorskiej]

[in:] J. Gudowski, K. Weitz (ed.), Aurea praxis, aurea theoria. Księga pamiątkowa ku czci Profesora Tadeusza Erecińskiego, tom II [Aurea praxis, aurea theoria. A Commemorative Volume in Honour of Professor Tadeusz Ereciński, Vol. II], Warszawa 2011, p. 1799-1811

Key issues: New York Convention, recognition and enforcement of foreign arbitration award

id: 31023

Rajski Jerzy

The Limits of Arbitral Tribunal's Autonomy in Respect of Application of Provisions of Law in Commercial Cases [Original title: Granice autonomii sądu arbitrażowego w odniesieniu do stosowania przepisów prawa w sprawach ze stosunków gospodarczych]

PPH 2011, No. 1, p. 6-9

Key issues: arbitration procedure, petition to set aside arbitration award, recognition and enforcement of domestic arbitration award, recognition and enforcement of foreign arbitration award

id: 30967

Rajski Jerzy

The Limits of the Arbitral Tribunal's Freedom in Respect of Applying Provisions of Law in Commercial Cases [Original title: Granice swobody sądu arbitrażowego w zakresie stosowania przepisów prawa w sprawach gospodarczych]

Arbitration e-Review 2011, No. 1, p. 5-10

Key issues: arbitration procedure, petition to set aside arbitration award, recognition and enforcement of domestic arbitration award, recognition and enforcement of foreign arbitration award

id: 30969

Różalska-Kucal Agnieszka

Arbitration and European Union Law [Original title: Arbitraż a prawo Unii Europejskiej]

[in:] Cezary Mik (ed.), Arbitration in the International Law [Original title: Arbitraż w prawie międzynarodowym], Warsaw 2014, p. 237-256

Key issues: New York Convention, arbitrator, recognition and enforcement of foreign arbitration award

id: 31349

Ryszkowski Karol

Public Policy Clause as a General Clause in Commercial Arbitration in the Polish Law [Original title: Klauzula porządku publicznego jako klauzula generalna w arbitrażu handlowym w prawie polskim]

PPH 2014, No. 3, p. 17-20

Key issues: petition to set aside arbitration award, recognition and enforcement of domestic arbitration award, recognition and enforcement of foreign arbitration award

id: 31239

Schütze Rolf A.

Die Doppelexequierung ausländischer Schiedssprüche

[in:] J. Gudowski, K. Weitz (ed.), Aurea praxis, aurea theoria. Księga pamiątkowa ku czci Profesora Tadeusza Erecińskiego, tom II [Aurea praxis, aurea theoria. A Commemorative Volume in Honour of Professor Tadeusz Ereciński, Vol. II], Warszawa 2011, p. 1827-1838, [Article in German]

Key issues: recognition and enforcement of foreign arbitration award

id: 31025

Siedlecki Władysław

Several Remarks on Recognition in Poland of Foreign Arbitration Awards in Civil Cases [Original title: Kilka uwag w związku z uznaniem w Polsce zagranicznych orzeczeń sądowych w sprawach cywilnych]

[in:] Wacław Osuchowski, Mieczysław Sośniak, Bronisław Walaszek, Legal Studies. A Book Commemorating the Scientific Work of Kazimierz Przybyłowski, [Rozprawy prawnicze: Księga pamiątkowa dla uczczenia pracy naukowej Kazimierza Przybyłowskiego], Warszawa 1964, p. 265-273

Key issues: recognition and enforcement of foreign arbitration award

id: 30595

Sołtysiński Stanisław

Investment Arbitration, Cohabitation with the System of Justice, Increasing Costs and Other Problems of Arbitration [Original title: Arbitraż inwestycyjny, kohabitacja z wymiarem sprawiedliwości, rosnące koszty i inne problemy sądownictwa polubownego]

[in:] J. Gudowski, K. Weitz (ed.), Aurea praxis, aurea theoria. Księga pamiątkowa ku czci Profesora Tadeusza Erecińskiego, tom II [Aurea praxis, aurea theoria. A Commemorative Volume in Honour of Professor Tadeusz Ereciński, Vol. II], Warszawa 2011, p. 1839-1870

Key issues: general works, state court assistance, investment arbitration, arbitration procedure, petition to set aside arbitration award, recognition and enforcement of domestic arbitration award, recognition and enforcement of foreign arbitration award

id: 31026

Strumiłło Tomasz

Legal Effects of an Arbitral Award [Original title: Skutki prawne wyroku arbitrażowego]

Biul. Arb. 2010, No. 3, p. 96-115

Key issues: arbitration award, petition to set aside arbitration award, recognition and enforcement of domestic arbitration award, recognition and enforcement of foreign arbitration award

id: 30883

Szczęśniak Alicja

The Function of the Public Policy Clause and the Method of Controlling Consistency of an Arbitration Award with Public Policy of the Republic of Poland [Original title: Funkcja klauzuli porządku publicznego i metoda kontroli zgodności wyroku sądu polubownego z porządkiem publicznym Rzeczypospolitej Polskiej]

[in:] Ereciński Tadeusz, Gudowski Jacek, Pazdan Maksymilian, Tomalak Michał (eds), Ius est a iustitia appellatum. Księga jubileuszowa dedykowana Profesorowi Tadeuszowi Wiśniewskiemu, Warsaw 2017, p. 1165-1178

Key issues: New York Convention, petition to set aside arbitration award, recognition and enforcement of domestic arbitration award, recognition and enforcement of foreign arbitration award

id: 31862

Sznajder-Peroń Katarzyna

Interface Between State Court and Arbitration Proceedings – Remarks in the Light of European Procedural Regulations [Original title: Kolizja postępowań przed sądem państwowym i polubownym - uwagi na tle europejskich uregulowań procesowych]

PPPM 2012, Vol. 10, p. 49-70

Key issues: New York Convention, state court assistance, arbitration agreement, arbitration procedure, recognition and enforcement of foreign arbitration award

id: 31182

Ś. S.

Several Words on Enforcement of a Foreign Arbitration Awards in Poland [Original title: Parę słów o wykonalności w Polsce wyroków polubownych zagranicznych.]

Gazeta Sądowa Warszawska 1928, No. 13, p. 196-197

Key issues: recognition and enforcement of foreign arbitration award

id: 30580

Świątkowski Marek

Application of MFN Clause to Dispute Resolution Provisions of Investment Treaties [Original title: Modyfikacja przepisów jurysdykcyjnych traktatu inwestycyjnego na podstawie klauzuli MFN]

PPH 2013, No. 12, p. 30-36

Key issues: New York Convention, investment arbitration, arbitration agreement, jurisdiction of arbitral tribunal, recognition and enforcement of foreign arbitration award

id: 31191

Świątkowski Marek

Execution of Awards Rendered in Investment Arbitration [Original title: Egzekucja wyroków wydanych w arbitrażu inwestycyjnym]

[in:] Poczobut Jerzy, Wiśniewski Andrzej W. (eds), Private Law and Arbitration. Commemorative Volume Dedicated to Dr. Maciej Tomaszewski [Original title: Prawo prywatne i arbitraż. Księga jubileuszowa dedykowana doktorowi Maciejowi Tomaszewskiemu], Warszawa 2016, p. 360-379

Key issues: investment arbitration, recognition and enforcement of domestic arbitration award, recognition and enforcement of foreign arbitration award

id: 31532

Tevini Anna Giulia

Recognition and Enforcement of Arbitration Awards in the People’s Republic of China [Original title: Die Anerkennung und Vollstreckung von Schiedssprüchen in der Volksrepublik China]

[in:] Józef Okolski (chair), Andrzej Całus, Maksymilian Pazdan, Stanisław Sołtysiński, Tomasz Wardyński, Stanisław Włodyka (ed.) Essays in Honour of 60 years of the Court of Arbitration at the Polish Chamber of Commerce in Warsaw [Księga pamiątkowa 60-lecia Sądu Arbitrażowego przy Krajowej Izbie Gospodarczej w Warszawie], Warszawa 2010, p. 650-668

Key issues: recognition and enforcement of domestic arbitration award, recognition and enforcement of foreign arbitration award

id: 30953

Tomaszewski Maciej

Commentary to the Decision of the Supreme Court of 16 XI 2009, I CSK 159/09 [Original title: Glosa do postanowienia SN z 16 XI 2009, I CSK 159/09]

OSP 2010, No. 10, p. 689-691

Key issues: recognition and enforcement of foreign arbitration award

id: 30968

Tomaszewski Maciej

Effectiveness of Legal Protection before Arbitration Courts. Polish Experience [Original title: Skuteczność ochrony prawnej przed sądami polubownymi. Doświadczenia polskie]

PS 2006, No. 1, p. 34-64

Key issues: state court assistance, arbitrator, arbitration procedure, arbitration award, recognition and enforcement of domestic arbitration award, recognition and enforcement of foreign arbitration award

id: 30357

Tynel Andrzej

Domestic and Foreign Arbitration Awards Recognition and Enforcement Procedure in the Russian Federation [Original title: Procedura wykonania krajowych i zagranicznych orzeczeń arbitrażowych w Federacji Rosyjskiej]

PUG 1997, No. 2, p. 21-26

Key issues: recognition and enforcement of domestic arbitration award, recognition and enforcement of foreign arbitration award

id: 30556

Weitz Karol

A Cassation Complaint in Cases concerning Ascertainment or Recognition of Executability of a Sentence of the Arbitration Court or a Settlement Reached in Such Court [Original title: Skarga kasacyjna w sprawach o uznanie lub stwierdzenie wykonalności wyroku sądu polubownego lub ugody zawartej przed takim sądem]

Pal. 2009, No. 3-4, p. 226-231; Pal. 2010, No. 3, p. 212-216

Key issues: recognition and enforcement of domestic arbitration award, recognition and enforcement of foreign arbitration award

id: 30377

Weitz Karol

Notion of Foreign Award Recognition [Original title: Pojęcie uznania orzeczenia zagranicznego]

PS 1998, No. 7-8, p. 52-87

Key issues: recognition and enforcement of foreign arbitration award

id: 30720

Weitz Karol

Stipulations and Directions of the Reform of the Civil Procedure Code Provisions on Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Arbitration Awards [Original title: Założenia i kierunki reformy przepisów kodeksu postępowania cywilnego o uznawaniu i wykonywaniu zagranicznych orzeczeń]

KPP 2001, No. 4, p. 879-946

Key issues: recognition and enforcement of foreign arbitration award

id: 30562

Weitz Karol

The Requirement of Conducting a Hearing in the Court of First Instance in Cases for Recognition or Enforcement of Foreign Arbitration Awards [Original title: Wymaganie przeprowadzenia rozprawy w pierwszej instancji w sprawach o uznanie albo stwierdzenie wykonalności zagranicznych orzeczeń arbitrażowych]

Pal. 2013, No. 9-10, p. 165-169

Key issues: recognition and enforcement of foreign arbitration award

id: 31183

Wiśniewski Andrzej W.

Consequences of Engaging in a Dispute before the Arbitration Court Abroad Despite the Lack of an Effective Arbitration Agreement. A Commentary to the Supreme Court Decision of 13 September 2012, file no. V CSK 323/11 [Original title: Skutki wdania się w spór przed arbitrażem za granicą pomimo braku skutecznej umowy o arbitraż. Glosa do postanowienia Sądu Najwyższego z dnia 13 września 2012 r., V CSK 323/11]

PPC 2013, No. 4, p. 571-582

Key issues: New York Convention, arbitration agreement, jurisdiction of arbitral tribunal, recognition and enforcement of foreign arbitration award

id: 31184

Wiśniewski Andrzej W.

International Commercial Arbitration in Poland. The Legal Status of Arbitration and Arbitrators [Original title: Międzynarodowy arbitraż handlowy w Polsce. Status prawny arbitrażu i arbitrów]

Warszawa 2011, pp. 612

Key issues: New York Convention, general works, state court assistance, arbitrability of dispute, arbitrator, arbitration agreement, arbitration procedure, jurisdiction of arbitral tribunal, settlement before arbitral tribunal, arbitration award, petition to set aside arbitration award, recognition and enforcement of domestic arbitration award, recognition and enforcement of foreign arbitration award

id: 31015

Włosińska Aleksandra

Enforcement of Foreign Arbitration Awards on the Basis of the New York Convention on the Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards [Original title: Wykonywanie orzeczeń zagranicznych sądów polubownych na podstawie konwencji nowojorskiej o uznawaniu i wykonywaniu zagranicznych orzeczeń arbitrażowych]

[in:] Dorota Czura-Kalinowska (ed.), Mediation and Arbitration as a Means of Amicable Dispute Resolution [Mediacja i arbitraż jako sposoby polubownego rozstrzygania sporów], Poznań 2009, p. 247-258

Key issues: New York Convention, recognition and enforcement of foreign arbitration award

id: 30696

Wysocka Barbara

Commentary on the Supreme Court Judgement dated 27.8.1982, II CR 214/82 (re: Foreign Arbitration Awards and Polish Courts Jurisdiction) [Original title: Glosa do orzeczenia Sądu Najwyższego z 27.8.1982 r., II CR 214/82 (dot. zagranicznego orzeczenia arbitrażowego i jurysdykcji sądów polskich)]

PiP 1984, No. 8, p. 140-143

Key issues: recognition and enforcement of foreign arbitration award

id: 30570

Wysocka Barbara

Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Arbitration Awards in Poland [Original title: Uznawanie i wykonywanie zagranicznych orzeczeń arbitrażowych w Polsce]

Warszawa 1988, pp. 178

Key issues: recognition and enforcement of foreign arbitration award

id: 30600

Wysocka Barbara

The Notion of Foreign Award in Commercial Arbitration and its Evolution [Original title: Pojęcie zagranicznego orzeczenia w arbitrażu handlowym i jego ewolucja]

PiP 1977, No. 6, p. 55-67

Key issues: arbitration award, recognition and enforcement of foreign arbitration award

id: 30569

Zachariasiewicz Maciej

Post-Award Proceedings: Claim for Annulment of Arbitral Award and the Recognition and Enforcement of Arbitral Awards

[in:] Gessel-Kalinowska vel Kalisz Beata (ed.), Polish arbitration law, Wrocław 2014, p. 441-624

Key issues: New York Convention, petition to set aside arbitration award, recognition and enforcement of domestic arbitration award, recognition and enforcement of foreign arbitration award

id: 31451

Zachariasiewicz Maciej

Post-Award Proceedings: Claim for Annulment of Arbitral Award and the Recognition and Enforcement of Arbitral Awards [Original title: Postępowania post-arbitrażowe: skarga o uchylenie orzeczenia sądu polubownego oraz uznawanie i wykonywanie orzeczeń arbitrażowych]

[in:] Gessel-Kalinowska vel Kalisz Beata (ed.), Diagnosis for Arbitration. Functioning of Arbitration Law and the Directions of Postulated Changes [Diagnoza arbitrażu. Funkcjonowanie prawa o arbitrażu i kierunki postulowanych zmian], Wrocław 2014, p. 402-593

Key issues: New York Convention, petition to set aside arbitration award, recognition and enforcement of domestic arbitration award, recognition and enforcement of foreign arbitration award

id: 31458

Zachariasiewicz Maciej

Public Policy as a Ground for Refusing the Recognition or Enforcement of the Arbitral Award in the Polish Arbitration Law Under a Comparative Perspective [Original title: Klauzula porządku publicznego jako podstawa odmowy uznania lub wykonania orzeczenia sądu polubownego w polskim prawie arbitrażowym na tle prawnoporównawczym]

PPPM 2010, No. 6, p. 61-114

Key issues: New York Convention, arbitrability of dispute, recognition and enforcement of domestic arbitration award, recognition and enforcement of foreign arbitration award

id: 30977

Zachariasiewicz Maciej

The Law Applicable to the Effects of an Arbitral Award [Original title: Prawo właściwe dla skutków orzeczenia arbitrażowego]

Arbitration e-Review 2014, No. 3-4, p. 41-61

Key issues: New York Convention, arbitration award, recognition and enforcement of foreign arbitration award

id: 31355

Zachariasiewicz Maciej, Zrałek Jacek

On the Need to Amend the Provisions on Jurisdiction and Competence of Courts upon Reduction of Instance Supervision in Arbitration Cases [Original title: O potrzebie zmiany przepisów dotyczących jurysdykcji i właściwości sądów po zredukowaniu kontroli instancyjnej w sprawach arbitrażowych]

PS 2016, No 7-8, p. 132-158

Key issues: petition to set aside arbitration award, recognition and enforcement of domestic arbitration award, recognition and enforcement of foreign arbitration award

id: 31788

Zielony Andrzej

Introduction of an Arbitration Award to the Domestic Legal System on the Example of Selected Foreign Legal Systems [Original title: Wprowadzanie wyroku sądu polubownego do krajowego porządku prawnego na przykładzie wybranych obcych systemów prawnych]

[in:] J. Gudowski, K. Weitz (ed.), Aurea praxis, aurea theoria. Księga pamiątkowa ku czci Profesora Tadeusza Erecińskiego, tom II [Aurea praxis, aurea theoria. A Commemorative Volume in Honour of Professor Tadeusz Ereciński, Vol. II], Warszawa 2011, p. 2005-2080

Key issues: arbitration award, petition to set aside arbitration award, recognition and enforcement of domestic arbitration award, recognition and enforcement of foreign arbitration award

id: 31031

Błaszczak Łukasz

A Non-Existing Arbitration Award in the Proceedings for Recognition and Enforcement (Selected Issues) [Original title: Wyrok arbitrażowy nieistniejący w postępowaniu o uznanie i stwierdzenie wykonalności (wybrane zagadnienia)]

ADR. Arbitraż i Mediacja 2009, No. 1 (5)

Key issues: arbitration award, recognition and enforcement of domestic arbitration award, recognition and enforcement of foreign arbitration award

id: 50048

Błaszczak Łukasz

Revision of an Arbitration Award with a Special Consideration of Public Policy Clause [Original title: Kontrola orzeczenia arbitrażowego ze szczególnym uwzględnieniem klauzuli porządku publicznego]

ADR. Arbitraż i Mediacja 2008, No. 3 (3)

Key issues: petition to set aside arbitration award, recognition and enforcement of domestic arbitration award, recognition and enforcement of foreign arbitration award

id: 50017

Błaszczak Łukasz, Marszałkowska-Krześ Elwira

Control of an Arbitration Award by a State Court [Original title: Kontrola wyroku sądu polubownego przez sąd powszechny]

ADR. Arbitraż i Mediacja 2011, No. 4 (16)

Key issues: New York Convention, petition to set aside arbitration award, recognition and enforcement of domestic arbitration award, recognition and enforcement of foreign arbitration award

id: 50159

Mularczyk Krystian, Cioch Paweł

Report from the Scientific Seminar “Court Control of Arbitration Awards and Mediation Settlements” [Sprawozdanie z seminarium naukowego ,,Sądowa kontrola rozstrzygnięć arbitrażowych i ugód mediacyjnych”]

ADR. Arbitraż i Mediacja 2010, No. 4 (12)

Key issues: petition to set aside arbitration award, recognition and enforcement of domestic arbitration award, recognition and enforcement of foreign arbitration award

id: 50125

Ereciński Tadeusz

Proceedings for Enforcement of a Foreign Arbitration Award (Selected Issues) [Original title: Postępowanie o stwierdzenie wykonalności zagranicznego wyroku arbitrażowego (zagadnienia wybrane)]

ADR. Arbitraż i Mediacja 2009, No. 1 (5)

Key issues: recognition and enforcement of foreign arbitration award

id: 50052

Kamieniecka Dorota

Civil Mediators’ Association in Wieluń [Original title: Stowarzyszenie Mediatorów Cywilnych w Wieluniu]

ADR. Arbitraż i Mediacja 2013, No. 3 (23)

Key issues: general works, state court assistance, arbitrability of dispute, arbitrator, arbitration agreement, arbitration procedure, jurisdiction of arbitral tribunal, settlement before arbitral tribunal, arbitration award, petition to set aside arbitration award, recognition and enforcement of foreign arbitration award

id: 50249

Laužikas Egidijus, Kozubovska Beata

The Practice of Resolving Arbitration Issues by the Lithuanian Supreme Court [Original title: Praktyka Sądu Najwyższego Litwy w rozwiązywaniu problemów arbitrażu]

ADR. Arbitraż i Mediacja 2011, No. 4 (16)

Key issues: arbitrability of dispute, arbitration agreement, recognition and enforcement of foreign arbitration award

id: 50161

Remin Andrzej

Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Arbitration Awards in Comparative Aspects Between Germany, Austria, Poland and Switzerland [Original title: Uznawanie i wykonywanie zagranicznych orzeczeń arbitrażowych w aspekcie porównawczym między Niemcami, Austrią, Polską i Szwajcarią]

ADR. Arbitraż i Mediacja 2009, No. 2 (6)

Key issues: recognition and enforcement of foreign arbitration award

id: 50060

Szpara Justyna

Place where the Award Was Made and Place of Arbitration (in the Context of Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Arbitration Awards) [Original title: Miejsce wydania wyroku a miejsce arbitrażu (w kontekście uznawania i wykonywania zagranicznych orzeczeń arbitrażowych]

ADR. Arbitraż i Mediacja 2009, No. 2 (6)

Key issues: arbitration award, recognition and enforcement of foreign arbitration award

id: 50065

Torbus Andrzej

Selected Issues of Application of the New York Convention on the Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards [Original title: Wybrane zagadnienia stosowania Konwencji nowojorskiej o uznawaniu i wykonywaniu zagranicznych orzeczeń arbitrażowych]

ADR. Arbitraż i Mediacja 2008, No. 4 (4)

Key issues: New York Convention, recognition and enforcement of foreign arbitration award

id: 50042

Wiśniewski Andrzej W.

The Consequences of Respondent’s Failure to Timely Object to the Jurisdiction of the Arbitral Tribunal

ADR. Arbitraż i Mediacja 2013, No. 4 (24)

Key issues: jurisdiction of arbitral tribunal, petition to set aside arbitration award, recognition and enforcement of foreign arbitration award

id: 50260

scroll up