All documents for the issue: 96
Case Law: 16 » | Bibliography: 75 » | Publications arbitraz.laszczuk.pl: 1 » | Publications ADR. Arbirtaż i Mediacja: 4 »
id: 20357
Polish Supreme Court resolution dated 8 September 2011 Case No. III CZP 41/11 »
1. An interlocutory appeal will lie against an order by the state court, as the court of first instance, denying a motion to challenge an arbitrator.
2. The issue of the independence and impartiality of the arbitrator goes to the essence of the arbitration proceeding as a non-judicial procedure for resolving private legal disputes.
3. Impartiality is a certain intellectual attitude, a psychological state of an objective judge (or arbitrator). In opposition to this, partiality is a characteristic connected with a real or apparent biased attitude of the decision-maker in favour of one of the parties or with respect to the issues in dispute.
4. It is asserted in the literature that “independence” refers only to issues arising out of a relationship between the judge (or arbitrator) and one of the parties. Independence means the lack of any relationship between the arbitrator and the parties to the dispute, in the past or during the course of the proceeding, that could affect the substance of the decision.
5. If the deadline indicated in Civil Procedure Code Art. 1176 passes without effect, the party obtains a right to apply to the state court (within two weeks) to recuse the arbitrator.
6. The proceeding before the state court is conducted on the basis of the Civil Procedure Code. Thus the issue of the permissibility of an interlocutory appeal against the order of the state court denying the motion to recuse the arbitrator should be considered on the basis of application of Civil Procedure Code Art. 394 §1 as relevant.
Case no.: III CZP 41/11
Key issues: state court assistance, arbitrator
id: 20360
Polish Supreme Court order dated 24 November 2010 (Case No. II CSK 291/10) »
1. The impermissibility of the common court’s hearing a case because of a binding arbitration clause (absent the grounds set forth in Civil Procedure Code Art. 1165 §2) also occurs when resolution of the matter presented for determination by the common court is not possible without resolving a dispute subject to the arbitration clause.
2. The principle of equality expressed in [Civil Procedure Code] Art. 1161 §2 requires ... that neither of the parties to a dispute to be decided by an arbitration court enjoy special rights in the proceeding before such court. This plainly applies to the manner in which arbitrators are selected. This is expressly stated in Art. 1169 §3, which provides that provisions of an agreement awarding one of the parties greater rights in appointment of the arbitration court shall be ineffective. This should be applied as relevant to a situation in which a provision of this type is contained in the rules of the permanent arbitration court selected by the parties.
Case no.: CSK 291/10
Key issues: arbitrability of dispute, arbitration clause, arbitrator
id: 20331
Polish Supreme Court judgment dated 9 September 2010 Case No. I CSK 535/09 »
1. A petition to set aside an arbitration award is an extraordinary means of review intended to set aside the award if at least one of the grounds exhaustively set forth in Civil Procedure Code Art. 1206 is justified.
2. When considering a petition [to set aside an arbitration award], the state court is bound by the grounds alleged by the petitioner. Only two of the grounds set forth in Civil Procedure Code Art. 1206 §2 are considered on the court’s motion: the non-arbitrability if the dispute and inconsistency of the arbitration award with the fundamental principles of the legal order of the Republic of Poland.
3. The assessment of whether an arbitration award is contrary to fundamental principles of the legal order is addressed to the content of the award, and not the correctness of the procedure before the arbitration court or the composition of the panel. … An arbitration award may be set aside under the public policy clause if it is found that the results included in the content of the award are not consistent with a specific norm which is regarded as one of the fundamental principles of the legal order in force in Poland. ... These principles include not only constitutional norms, but also the overriding norms in specific fields of law.
4. The requirements made of persons serving as arbitrators should be combined with a party’s right to learn about any ties the arbitrator may have to entities appearing in the proceeding. It is up to the party to evaluate such circumstances as grounds for a decision to select an arbitrator or to seek removal of an arbitrator. The arbitrator’s self-assessment is irrelevant, because the essence of a fair procedure is tied to objective judgment by others. ... The fundamental principles of the legal order include the right to a court as provided in Art. 45(1) of the Polish Constitution, an element of which is a party’s right to have its case heard by an independent court, in a fairly conducted procedure.
Case no.: I CSK 535/09
Key issues: arbitrator, arbitration award, arbitration court procedure, petition to set aside arbitration award
id: 20257
Polish Supreme Court judgment dated 27 November 2008 Case No. IV CSK 292/08 »
1. A judicial proceeding to set aside an arbitration award should be conducted through to the end in accordance with the provisions in force upon commencement of the proceeding, that is, applying Civil Procedure Code Art. 165 §1, at the time of filing of the petition to set aside the award with the proper court. Thus if the petition was filed prior to 17 October 2005 [when the law was amended], the proceeding thereby initiated should be conducted thereafter in accordance with Civil Procedure Code Art. 712–715, but a proceeding commenced by a petition filed on that date or later, in accordance with Civil Procedure Code Art. 1205–1211. Similarly, a proceeding before an arbitration court should be conducted through to the end in accordance with provisions in force upon commencement of the proceeding. However, in light of the rule set forth in Civil Procedure Code Art. 1186, the date of commencement of a proceeding before an arbitration court will generally be the date of service on the respondent of the document containing the demand for arbitration.
2. In instances in which arbitrators are appointed by each party independently, a new arbitrator appointed by one of the parties has the same status as the former arbitrator. Since the former arbitrator was unable to reach agreement on selection of a super-arbitrator and it was necessary for the super-arbitrator to be appointed by the court, the decision of the court in this respect could hardly be questioned just because of the appearance of a new arbitrator. There is no need to assure him an influence over appointment of the super-arbitrator, since his predecessor with an analogous status failed to make use of his opportunity in this respect.
3. There may be various reasons for loss of force of an arbitration clause. In addition to the procedural grounds listed in Civil Procedure Code Art. 1168 (previously Art. 702 §1) and Art. 1195 §4 (previously Art. 707 §2), it could also involve such events as dissolution of the arbitration agreement, occurrence of a suspensory condition, or lapse of the deadline by which an arbitration award should have been issued. Termination of the agreement containing the clause does not in and of itself constitute such grounds, however. This rule is now stated clearly by Civil Procedure Code Art. 1180, but should not have been in doubt prior to adoption of that provision.
Case no.: IV CSK 292/08
Key issues: arbitrator, arbitration clause, arbitration court procedure, petition to set aside arbitration award
id: 20223
Supreme Court order dated 11 May 2006 Case No. I CZ 20/06 »
In accordance with the established view in the case law, no cassation appeal lies from an order by the court of second instance appointing an arbitrator, and such cassation appeal would be inadmissible.
Case no.: I CZ 20/06
Key issues: arbitrator
id: 20217
Supreme Court order dated 12 July 2005 (Case No. I CZ 38/05) »
The subject of the motion is ... to appoint arbitrators. ... Regardless of which specific arbitration court the appointment of the arbitrators is to serve, the proceeding is by its nature incidental. The ruling issued in the case thus may not be regarded as ending the proceeding in the case, which under Civil Procedure Code Art. 392 is a condition for permissibility of a cassation appeal.
Case no.: I CZ 38/05
Key issues: arbitrator
id: 20321
Polish Supreme Court order dated 17 December 1999 Case No. I CZ 177/99 »
An order by the court of second instance denying a motion to appoint a substitute arbitrator ... is not an order concluding the proceeding in the matter within the meaning of Civil Procedure Code Art. 392 §1.
Case no.: I CZ 177/99
Key issues: arbitrator
id: 20164
Polish Supreme Court judgment dated 24 September 1999 Case No. I CKN 141/98 »
1. The institution of recusal of a judge is provided for by the Civil Procedure Code in a proceeding before the state court as well as in a proceeding before an arbitration court. There are differences in how this institution is governed by the code for the two types of proceedings. The fundamental difference is that in a proceeding before an arbitration court, the code does not provide for recusal of an arbitrator or presiding arbitrator by operation of law, as is the case with a judge in a proceeding before the state court (Civil Procedure Code Art. 48).
2. In a proceeding before the arbitration court, an arbitrator or presiding arbitrator may be challenged only upon motion of a party, on the same grounds that would justify recusal of a state judge.
3. If a party challenged an arbitrator or presiding arbitrator in the arbitration, and the challenge was not sustained despite the existence of grounds for the challenge, the party may challenge the arbitration award using a petition to set aside the award under Civil Procedure Code Art. 712 §1(3). If the party did not challenge the arbitrator or presiding arbitrator, it has no legal grounds to challenge the arbitration award. Exceptionally, only participation in the arbitration panel by an arbitrator or presiding arbitrator whose rights and obligations could be affected by the result in the case could serve as a basis for setting aside the arbitration award.
4. The wording of Civil Procedure Code Art. 712 §2 indicates without Any doubt that if the decision by the arbitration court exceeds the bounds of the arbitration clause, a party may seek to set aside the award only in the portion exceeding the arbitration clause, and only in a situation in which a party that actively participated in the proceeding before the arbitration court objected to consideration of the claims exceeding the bounds of the arbitration clause.
Case no.: I CKN 141/98
Key issues: arbitrator
id: 20149
Polish Supreme Court order dated 24 February 1998 Case No. I CKN 455/97 »
By permitting in a separate regulation (Civil Procedure Code Art. 701 §3) an interlocutory appeal against an order concerning, among other things, appointment of an arbitrator, the Parliament clearly let it be known that it does not treat them as ending the proceeding in the matter, as then the general rule set forth at the beginning of Civil Procedure Code Art. 394 §1 would apply.
Case no.: I CKN 455/97
Key issues: state court assistance, arbitrator
id: 20144
Polish Supreme Court order dated 22 January 1997 Case No. I CKN 48/96 »
1. Because Part 1, Chapter 3 of the Civil Procedure Code, covering the issue of arbitration, does not contain a special regulation on admissibility and deadlines for appellate instruments, the regulations from Chapter 1 will apply as relevant, including among them Civil Procedure Code Art. 392.
2. An order of the province court denying an interlocutory appeal from an order of the district court concerning appointment of an arbitrator and presiding arbitrator may not be regarded as an order ending the proceedings in the case. From the point of view of the proceedings before the state court, the case is ended only by an order ending the proceeding on the petition to set aside the arbitration award (Civil Procedure Code Art. 715), or, as the case may be, an order dismissing the statement of claim because of the existence of an arbitration clause (Civil Procedure Code Art. 199 §1(4)).
Case no.: I CKN 48/96
Key issues: state court assistance, arbitrator
id: 20272
Poznań Appellate Court judgment dated 23 May 1996 Case No. I ACr 189/96 »
1. Recusal of an entire court may not be demanded, but only recusal of specific judges (one or more of them), identified by name, but this does not mean that in this case the arbitration court itself could determine that the motion by the defendant should not be granted. The province court correctly stated that the arbitration court may not decide a motion to recuse an arbitrator, either on the merits or on procedural grounds, even if the motion was clearly unjustified or late.
2. The ruling issued as a result of a petition to set aside an arbitration award is in the nature of cassation, and thus the state court may only set aside the award or deny the petition, and may not rule on the merits. In consequence, when the state court sets aside an arbitration award by granting a petition under Civil Procedure Code Art. 712 §1(2)–(5), the arbitration court retains its jurisdiction to decide the dispute.
Case no.: I ACr 189/96
Key issues: arbitrator, jurisdiction of arbitration court, petition to set aside arbitration award
id: 20098
Polish Supreme Court resolution dated 12 October 1960 Case No. 3 CO 21/60 »
1. No review [by the province court] will lie against an order by the county court appointing an arbitrator pursuant to Civil Procedure Code Art. 492.
2. An interested party will be able to assert its allegations connected with appointment of an arbitrator under Civil Procedure Code Art. 492 in an eventual petition to set aside the arbitration award, which may be filed with the state court in the event of the existence of the defects referred to in Civil Procedure Code Art. 510 §1.
Case no.: 3 CO 21/60
Key issues: petition to set aside arbitration award, arbitrator
id: 20097
Polish Supreme Court judgment dated 27 June 1960 Case No. 4 CR 874/59 »
1. An arbitration clause is an agreement which requires written form in order to be valid. For the clause to be valid, there must be submission of a dispute for determination by an arbitration court, in a written declaration (Civil Procedure Code Art. 486 and 487). It is not possible to conclude an agreement submitting a dispute to determination by an arbitration court in an implicit manner.
2. Appointment of an arbitrator is not ... in and of itself a declaration submitting a dispute for determination by an arbitration court, and is not equivalent to making and signing an arbitration clause.
Case no.: 4 CR 874/59
Key issues: arbitration clause, arbitrator
id: 20092
Polish Supreme Court ruling dated 17 September 1956 Case No. 3 CR 505/56 »
1. It follows from Civil Procedure Code Art. 488 §2, which provides that each party shall appoint one arbitrator and the arbitrators so appointed “shall appoint a presiding arbitrator,” unless the arbitration clause provides otherwise, and from Art. 492, which provides that in the event of lack of agreement between the arbitrators, the presiding arbitrator shall be appointed by the state court, that the appointment of a presiding arbitrator is mandatory unless the arbitration clause provides otherwise.
2. Because as a result of failure to appoint a presiding arbitrator the arbitration court was not appointed in the prescribed composition, the award issued by an arbitration court composed of two arbitrators was made in an invalid proceeding.
3. Under applicable law, violation of regulations concerning the composition of the arbitration court constitute absolute grounds for setting aside the arbitration award in every instance.
Case no.: 3 CR 505/56
Key issues: petition to set aside arbitration award, arbitrator
id: 20306
Warsaw Appellate Court order dated 6 July 1926 Case No. IC N 89/26 »
This provision [former Civil Procedure Law Art. 13701] that consideration of claims referred to in Civil Procedure Law Art. 1370 shall lie with the court which would have jurisdiction in the event of a judicial dispute should be understood as reiterating the general rule with respect to jurisdiction of the court depending on the amount sought by the plaintiff.
Case no.: IC N 89/26
Key issues: state court assistance, arbitrator
id: 20315
Warsaw Regional Court ruling dated 6/17 February 1926 Case No. I C N 2991/25 »
The defendant’s objection to appointment of a super-arbitrator is not justified by Civil Procedure Law Art. 13701, which clearly vests this right with the court, and the arbitrators’ mutual selection of the super-arbitrator is not provided for in the statute.
Case no.: I C N 2991/25
Key issues: arbitration clause, arbitrator
id 30033
Allerhand Maurycy
Arbitration in the Transition Period [Original title: Sąd polubowny w okresie przejściowym]
Głos Prawa 1933, No. 4, p. 188-201
Key issues:
arbitrator,
arbitration award,
arbitration clause,
recognition and enforcement of domestic arbitration award,
settlement before arbitration court
id 30587
Allerhand Maurycy
Commentary on the Resolution of the Third Chamber of the Supreme Court dated 8 November 1922, R 832/22 (re: issuance of an Arbitration Award by a Mentally Ill Arbitrator) [Original title: Glosa do uchwały izby trzeciej sądu najwyższego z 8 listopada 1922, R 832/22 (dot. wydania wyroku sądu polubownego przez sędziego chorego umysłowo)]
OSP 1924 (vol. 3), item 13, p. 9-10
Key issues:
arbitrator,
jurisdiction of arbitration court
id 30036
Apfelbaum Ignacy
Remarks on the Provisions of the Civil Procedure Code on Arbitration [Original title: Uwagi do postanowień k.p.c. o sądach polubownych]
Nowa Palestra 1933, No. 3, p. 11-17
Key issues:
arbitrator,
arbitration clause,
arbitration court procedure,
petition to set aside arbitration award
id 31038
Asłanowicz Marcin
Arbitrators and Arbitral Tribunal
[in:] Arbitration in Poland, Warszawa 2011, p. 65-80
Key issues:
arbitrator
id 30992
Pörnbacher Karl, Baur Sebastian
The New French Arbitration Law, the UNCITRAL Arbitration Rules and IBA Rules on the Taking of Evidence in International Arbitration
Biul. Arb. 2010-2011, No. 4, p. 52-64
Key issues:
general works
id 30193
Bieniak Michał
Challenge of the Arbitrator or the Presiding Arbitrator – Commentary on the Supreme Court Judgement of 24.9.1999, I CKN 141/98 [Original title: Wyłączenie arbitra lub superarbitra - glosa do wyroku SN z 24.9.1999 r., I CKN 141/98]
MoP 2001, No. 21, p. 1086-1087
Key issues:
arbitrator
id 30459
Bolard Georges
Contradictory Principle Before Arbitrators [Original title: Zasada kontradyktoryjności przed arbitrami]
Annales UMCS 1999, No. 46, p. 63-67
Key issues:
arbitrator
id 30952
Pazdan Maksymilian, Sołtysiński Stanisław, Wardyński Tomasz, Włodyka Stanisław, Okolski Józef, Całus Andrzej
A Commemorative Volume for 60 years of the Court of Arbitration at the Polish Chamber of Commerce in Warsaw [Original title: Księga pamiątkowa 60-lecia Sądu Arbitrażowego przy Krajowej Izbie Gospodarczej w Warszawie]
Warszawa 2010, pp. 887
Key issues:
general works
id 30041
Czarny Gierc
Draft of the Amendments to the Civil Procedure Code and the Issues of Arbitration [Original title: Projekt nowelizacji K.P.C., a zagadnienia sądownictwa polubownego]
Wil.Prz.Praw. 1936, No. 12, p. 431-435
Key issues:
arbitrator,
arbitration award,
state court assistance
id 30045
Czarny Gierc
Issues of Arbitration Court Practice. An Addition to the Lecture of Dr Kuratowski [Original title: Z zagadnień praktyki sądów polubownych. Na marginesie referatu D-ra Kuratowskiego.]
Wil.Prz.Praw. 1933, No. 2, p. 33-37, [part I]
Key issues:
arbitrator,
arbitration court procedure
id 30048
Czarny Gierc
Issues of Arbitration Court Practice. An Addition to the Lecture of Dr Kuratowski [Original title: Z zagadnień praktyki sądów polubownych. Na marginesie referatu D-ra Kuratowskiego.]
Wil.Prz.Praw. 1933, No. 6, p. 161-168, [part IV]
Key issues:
arbitrator,
arbitration court procedure
id 30047
Czarny Gierc
Issues of Arbitration Court Practice. An Addition to the Lecture of Dr Kuratowski [Original title: Z zagadnień praktyki sądów polubownych. Na marginesie referatu D-ra Kuratowskiego.]
Wil.Prz.Praw. 1933, No. 5, p. 129-133, [part III]
Key issues:
arbitrator,
arbitration court procedure
id 30051
Czerwiński Stanisław
Some Remarks on Courts of Arbitration [Original title: Kilka uwag o sądach polubownych]
Głos Sądownictwa 1938, No. 3, p. 201-203
Key issues:
arbitrator
id 30924
Domański Grzegorz
Arbitrators in Treaty-Based Investment Arbitration – a Few Practical Reflections [Original title: Arbitrzy w traktatowym arbitrażu inwestycyjnym - kilka refleksji praktycznych
[in:] Józef Okolski, Andrzej Całus, Maksymilian Pazdan, Stanisław Sołtysiński, Tomasz Wardyński, Stanisław Włodyka (ed.) Essays in Honour of 60 years of the Court of Arbitration at the Polish Chamber of Commerce in Warsaw [Księga pamiątkowa 60-lecia Sądu Arbitrażowego przy Krajowej Izbie Gospodarczej w Warszawie], Warszawa 2010, p. 349-358
Key issues:
investment arbitration,
arbitrator
id 30060
Fenichel Zygmunt
Arbitration Courts Under Civil Procedure Code [Original title: Sądy polubowne wedle kodeksu postępowania cywilnego.]
PPiA 1931, No. 3, p. 303-322
Key issues:
arbitrator,
arbitration clause,
jurisdiction of arbitration court
id 30057
Fenichel Zygmunt
What Are the Consequences of State Judge Participation in Issuance of an Arbitration Award? [Original title: Jakie są skutki udziału sędziego państwowego w wydaniu orzeczenia sądu polubownego?]
PPC 1938, No. 9-10, p. 300-301
Key issues:
arbitrator,
arbitration court procedure
id 30061
Fenichel Zygmunt
What Procedure Should be Applied in Proceedings Before State Courts in Arbitration Cases? [Original title: W jakim trybie toczyć się winno postępowanie przed sądem państwowym w sprawach sądownictwa polubownego?]
PPC 1934, No. 18, p. 571-572
Key issues:
arbitrator,
petition to set aside arbitration award,
state court assistance
id 30056
Fenichel Zygmunt
Which – Arbitration Court or State Court – is Competent to Recognise the Challenge of an Arbitrator? [Original title: Jaki sąd – polubowny czy państwowy – właściwy jest do rozpoznania wniosku o wyłączenie sędziego polubownego?]
NPC 1933, No. 15, p. 476-477
Key issues:
arbitrator,
arbitration court procedure
id 30985
Frątczak Klaudia, Mikołajczyk Natalia
Reform of the French Code of Civil Procedure - Revolutionary Changes in Arbitration Law [Original title: Nowelizacja francuskiego Kodeksu Postępowania Cywilnego: Rewolucyjne zmiany w prawie arbitrażowym]
Arbitration e-Review 2011, No. 2, p. 38-41
Key issues:
general works
id 30228
Ganobis Marta, Zawiślak Karol
Rules of Appointment and Revocation of an Arbitrator and Certain Issues Related to the Issue of Shaping Legal Position of an Arbitrator in Relation to the Washington Convention of 18.3.1965 [Original title: Zasady powoływania i odwoływania arbitra oraz niektóre zagadnienia związane z kwestią ukształtowania pozycji prawnej arbitra w świetle Konwencji Waszyngtońskiej z 18.3.1965 r.]
MoP 2009, No. 1, special issue, p. 25-29
Key issues:
arbitrator
id 30119
Gessel-Kalinowska vel Kalisz Beata
Some Remarks on the Conflict of Interest in Case of Arbitrators from Multi-Person Legal Offices [Original title: Kilka uwag w przedmiocie konfliktu interesów w przypadku arbitrów pochodzących z wieloosobowych kancelarii prawnych]
[in:] Piotr Nowaczyk, Sylwester Pieckowski, Jerzy Poczobut, Andrzej Szumański, Andrzej Tynel (ed.), Polish and International Commercial Arbitration at the Treshold of the 21st Century: A Commemorative Volume in Honour of Dr Tadeusz Szurski [Międzynarodowy i krajowy arbitraż handlowy u progu XXI wieku. Księga pamiątkowa dedykowana doktorowi habilitowanemu Tadeuszowi Szurskiemu], Warszawa 2008, p. 15-25
Key issues:
arbitrator
id 30072
Gołąb Stanisław
Arbitration Courts in the Draft Polish Civil Procedure [Original title: Sądy polubowne według projektu polskiej procedury cywilnej.]
Pal. 1926, p. 49-66
Key issues:
arbitrator,
arbitrability of dispute,
arbitration award,
arbitration clause,
arbitration court procedure,
recognition and enforcement of domestic arbitration award
id 30842
Hauser-Morel Maria
New ICC "Arbitrator Statement of Acceptance, Availability & Independence” [Original title: Nowe "Oświadczenie akceptacji, dyspozycyjności i niezależności" arbitra Międzynarodowej Izby Handlowej]
e-Przegląd Arbitrażowy 2010, No. 2, p. 23-26
Key issues:
arbitrator
id 30948
Hauser-Morel Maria
Views Previously Expressed by an Arbitrator as Grounds for [Original title: Uprzednio wyrażane poglądy jako podstawa wyłączenia arbitra - uwagi w świetle decyzji ICSID w sprawie Urbaser]
Arbitration e-Review 2010, No. 3, p. 32-37
Key issues:
arbitrator
id 30127
Jakubowski Jerzy
Permanent Courts of Arbitration in Poland [Original title: Stałe sądy arbitrażowe w Polsce]
Warszawa 1961, ss. 39
Key issues:
general works
id 30477
Jakubowski Jerzy, Wiśniewski Andrzej W.
UNCITRAL Arbitration Rules [Original title: Regulamin arbitrażowy UNCITRAL]
PPHZ 1979, No. 3, p. 25-36
Key issues:
general works
id 30951
Jasiak Mikołaj
Arbitration Law Reform in Spain [Original title: Reforma prawa arbitrażowego w Hiszpanii]
Arbitration e-Review 2010, No. 3, p. 51-52
Key issues:
general works
id 30075
Jodłowski Jerzy
Can a Party Validly Appoint an Arbitrator after the Lapse of a Week from Having Been Summoned by the Opposing Party, and if Yes, What is the Final Deadline to Do So? [Original title: Czy strona może wyznaczyć skutecznie sędziego polubownego po upływie tygodnia od wezwania strony przeciwnej, a jeśli tak – w jakim terminie ostatecznym wyznaczenie powinno nastąpić?]
PPC 1936, No. 10, p. 311-313
Key issues:
arbitrator,
arbitration court procedure
id 30249
Kamiński Ireneusz C.
Competence of Judges and Arbitrators Adjudicating on the Basis of the Equity Principle [Original title: Uprawnienia sędziów i arbitrów orzekających na podstawie reguł słuszności]
PPHZ 2000, No. 19-20, p. 66-78
Key issues:
arbitrator
id 30480
Kąkolecki Andrzej
Qualifications and Challenge of Arbitrators [Original title: Kwalifikacje i wyłączanie sędziów sądu polubownego (arbitrów)]
R.Pr. 2006, No. 4, p. 82-95
Key issues:
arbitrator
id 31046
Kąkolecki Andrzej, Nowaczyk Piotr
New ICC Rules of Arbitration [Original title: Nowy Regulamin Arbitrażowy Międzynarodowej Izby Handlowej]
Biul. Arb. 2012, No. 17, p. 55-70
Key issues:
general works
id 30484
Koredczuk Józef
Arbitrators Under the Civil Procedure Code of 1930 [Original title: Sędziowie polubowni według kodeksu postępowania cywilnego z 1930 roku]
Acta UWr 2006, No. 298, p. 295-317
Key issues:
arbitrator
id 30872
Kroft, van der Remco
Netherlands Arbitration Institute (Brief Presentation)[Original title: Holenderski Instytut Arbitrażu (krótka prezentacja)]
Biul. Arb. 2009, Nr 11, p. 70-80
Key issues:
general works
id 30082
Kroński Aleksander
Arbitration in the Light of the Hitherto Case Law and Civil Procedure Code [Original title: Sądy polubowne w świetle dotychczasowego orzecznictwa i kodeksu postępowania cywilnego.]
Pal. 1931, No. 3, p. 107-116, [part I]
Key issues:
arbitrator,
arbitration clause
id 30925
Krysiak Anna, Wierzbowski Marek
Impartiality and Independence as the Key Characteristics of any Arbitrator [Original title: Bezstronność i niezależność jako kluczowe cechy każdego arbitra]
[in:] Józef Okolski, Andrzej Całus, Maksymilian Pazdan, Stanisław Sołtysiński, Tomasz Wardyński, Stanisław Włodyka (ed.) Essays in Honour of 60 years of the Court of Arbitration at the Polish Chamber of Commerce in Warsaw [Księga pamiątkowa 60-lecia Sądu Arbitrażowego przy Krajowej Izbie Gospodarczej w Warszawie], Warszawa 2010, p. 359-375
Key issues:
arbitrator
id 31020
Wierzbowski Marek, Krysiak Anna
Lack of Impartiality and Independence as Grounds for Challenging An Arbitrator (Article 1174 of the Polish Civil Procedure Code) [Original title: Brak bezstronności i niezależności jako podstawowe przesłanki wyłączenia arbitra (art. 1174 k.p.c.)]
[in:] J. Gudowski, K. Weitz (ed.), Aurea praxis, aurea theoria. Księga pamiątkowa ku czci Profesora Tadeusza Erecińskiego, tom II [Aurea praxis, aurea theoria. A Commemorative Volume in Honour of Professor Tadeusz Ereciński, Vol. II], Warszawa 2011, p. 1747-1764
Key issues:
arbitrator
id 30260
Kubala Agnieszka, Zacharzewski Andrzej
Can a Bank Challenge a Decision of a Banking Arbitrator? [Original title: Czy bank może zaskarżyć orzeczenie Arbitra Bankowego?]
Pr.B. 2003, No. 4, p. 110-115
Key issues:
arbitrator
id 30590
Kuratowski Roman
Commentary on the Resolution of the First Chamber of the Supreme Court dated 22 January – 13 February 1931, C. 1783/30 (re: the Character of the Arbitration Clause and the State Court Ruling on the Appointment of Arbitrator) [Original title: Glosa do orzeczenia izby pierwszej sądu najwyższego z 23 stycznia - 13 lutego 1931 r., C. 1783/30 r. (dot. charakteru zapisu na sąd polubowny oraz orzeczenia sądu państwowego w przedmiocie wyznaczenia arbitra)]
OSP 1932 (vol. 9), item 46, p. 49-51
Key issues:
arbitrator,
arbitration clause
id 30086
Kuratowski Roman
Liability of the Parties for Remuneration of the Arbitrators [Original title: Odpowiedzialność stron za wynagrodzenie sędziów polubownych.]
NPC 1933, No. 20, p. 624-630
Key issues:
arbitrator
id 30497
Łyda Zbigniew
Arbitrator’s Impartiality and the Prohibition of "Interest in the Case" [Original title: Bezstronność arbitra a zakaz "zainteresowania w sprawie"]
PiP 1996, No. 2, p. 45-54
Key issues:
arbitrator
id 31050
Morek Rafał
Selected Court Decisions Related to Arbitral Proceedings [Original title: Przegląd orzecznictwa Sądu Najwyższego i sądów apelacyjnych]
Biul. Arb. 2012, No. 17, p. 109-112
Key issues:
arbitration clause,
arbitrator
id 30955
Morek Rafał
The Iura Novit Arbiter Principle in Foreign Court Case Law [Original title: Zasad iura novit arbiter w orzecznictwie sądów zagranicznych
[in:] M. Modrzejewska (ed.), 21st Century Commercial Law. Time of Stabilisation, Evolution or Revolution. A Commemorative Volume for Prof. Józef Okolski [Original title: Prawo handlowe XXI wieku. Czas stabilizacji, ewolucji czy rewolucji. Księga jubileuszowa Profesora Józefa Okolskiego], Warszawa 2010, p. 620-632
Key issues:
arbitration court procedure,
arbitrator
id 30509
Nanowski Zbigniew
On Substitutive Appointment of Arbitrators [Original title: W sprawie zastępczej nominacji arbitrów]
PPHZ 1977, No. 1, p. 65-75
Key issues:
arbitrator
id 30615
Nanowski Zbigniew
On the Notion of Arbitrator’s "Neutrality" [Original title: W sprawie pojęcia "neutralności" arbitra]
PHZ 1969, No. 23-24, p. 40
Key issues:
arbitrator
id 30994
Neumann Marek
Public Policy and the Content of an Arbitral Award - commentary on the Supreme Court's ruling of 9 September 2010 (I CSK 535/09) [Original title: Klauzula porządku publicznego a treść wyroku sądu polubownego - glosa do wyroku Sądu Najwyższego z 9.09.2010 r. (I CSK 535/09)]
Glosa 2011, No. 2, p. 61-67
Key issues:
petition to set aside arbitration award,
arbitration award,
arbitrator
id 30863
Nowaczyk Piotr
Arbitrator in the 21st Century – Challenges and Expectations (in Search of the Ideal Arbitrator) [Original title: Arbiter XXI w. – wyzwania i oczekiwania (w poszukiwaniu arbitra idealnego)], Part of a Book in the Memory of dr. hab. Tadeusz Szurski, Honorary President of the Court of Arbitration at the Polish Chamber of Commerce
Biul. Arb. 2008, No. 5, p. 6-15
Key issues:
arbitrator
id 30142
Nowaczyk Piotr
Arbitrator in the 21st Century – Challenges and Expectations (in Search of the Ideal Arbitrator) [Original title: Arbiter XXI w. - wyzwania i oczekiwania (w poszukiwaniu arbitra idealnego)]
[in:] Piotr Nowaczyk, Sylwester Pieckowski, Jerzy Poczobut, Andrzej Szumański, Andrzej Tynel (ed.), Polish and International Commercial Arbitration at the Threshold of the 21st Century: A Commemorative Volume in Honour of Dr Tadeusz Szurski [Międzynarodowy i krajowy arbitraż handlowy u progu XXI wieku. Księga pamiątkowa dedykowana doktorowi habilitowanemu Tadeuszowi Szurskiemu], Warszawa 2008, p. 99-108
Key issues:
arbitrator
id 30960
Opaliński Łukasz
Arbitration in Domestic Trade [Original title: Arbitraż w krajowym obrocie gospodarczym]
[in:] Prace laureatów konkursu im. Prof. Jerzego Jakubowskiego, edycja druga [Works of the Winners of Prof. Jerzy Jakubowski Contest, Second Edition], Warszawa 2005, p. 195-244
Key issues:
general works
id 30961
Osiński Marcin
Proceedings Before Polish Arbitration Courts – Selected Issues [Original title: Postępowanie przed polskimi sądami polubownymi - wybrane zagadnienia]
[in:] Prace laureatów konkursu im. Prof. Jerzego Jakubowskiego, edycja druga [Works of the Winners of Prof. Jerzy Jakubowski Contest, Second Edition], Warszawa 2005, p.121-193
Key issues:
general works
id 30428
Pazdan Maksymilian
Governing Law for the Agreement Between the Parties and the Arbitrator(s) in International Commercial Arbitration [Original title: Prawo właściwe dla umowy stron z arbitrem (arbitrami) w międzynarodowym arbitrażu handlowym]
[in:] Ewa Łętowska (ed.), Procedure and Law. Book in Memory of Prof. Jerzy Jodłowski [Proces i prawo. Księga pamiątkowa ku czci profesora Jerzego Jodłowskiego], Wrocław 1989, p. 183-192
Key issues:
arbitrator
id 31021
Pazdan Maksymilian
Governing Law for the Agreement Between the Parties and the Arbitrator(s) under the 1980 Rome Convention and Rome I Regulation [Original title: Prawo właściwe dla umowy stron z arbitrem (arbitrami) według Konwencji rzymskiej z 1980 r. i rozporządzenia Rzym I]
[in:] J. Gudowski, K. Weitz (ed.), Aurea praxis, aurea theoria. Księga pamiątkowa ku czci Profesora Tadeusza Erecińskiego, tom II [Aurea praxis, aurea theoria. A Commemorative Volume in Honour of Professor Tadeusz Ereciński, Vol. II], Warszawa 2011, p. 1765-1775
Key issues:
arbitrator
id 30305
Pazdan Maksymilian
Legal Aspects of the Function of an Arbitrator [Original title: Prawne aspekty funkcji arbitra]
PUG 1994, No. 2, p. 8-14
Key issues:
arbitrator
id 30516
Pazdan Maksymilian
The Agreement Between the Parties and the Arbitrator(s) in International Commercial Arbitration [Original title: Umowa stron z arbitrem (arbitrami) w międzynarodowym arbitrażu handlowym]
PPHZ 1987, No. 11, p. 25-57
Key issues:
arbitrator
id 30152
Pietkiewicz Paweł
Challenge of an Arbitrator. Selected Procedural Issues under the Fifth Part of the Civil Procedure Code [Original title: Wyłączenie arbitra. Wybrane problemy proceduralne na tle przepisów Części piątej Kodeksu postępowania cywilnego]
[in:] Piotr Nowaczyk, Sylwester Pieckowski, Jerzy Poczobut, Andrzej Szumański, Andrzej Tynel (ed.), Polish and International Commercial Arbitration at the Threshold of the 21st Century: A Commemorative Volume in Honour of Dr Tadeusz Szurski [Międzynarodowy i krajowy arbitraż handlowy u progu XXI wieku. Księga pamiątkowa dedykowana doktorowi habilitowanemu Tadeuszowi Szurskiemu], Warszawa 2008, p. 135-149
Key issues:
arbitrator
id 30879
Pochodyła Michał
Impartiality and Independence of Arbitrators – Regulations and Case Law of English Courts [Original title: Bezstronność i niezależność arbitrów – regulacje i orzecznictwo sądów angielskich]
MoP 2009, No. 1, special issue, p. 30-32
Key issues:
arbitrator
id 30093
Presser W.
From the Studies on the Institution of Arbitration Courts. II. On Arbitrators. [Original title: Ze studjów nad instytucją sądów polubownych. II. O sędziach polubownych.]
Nowa Palestra 1933, No. 6, p. 9-13
Key issues:
arbitrator
id 30313
Radel Krzysztof
Legal Status of the Arbitrator [Original title: Status prawny arbitra]
Administracja Publiczna. Studia krajowe i międzynarodowe 2007, No. 2, p. 150-164
Key issues:
arbitrator
id 30926
Romanowski Michał
Significance of Arbitrator’s Independence and Impartiality in Arbitration Proceedings in the Light of the Constitutional Right to Be Heard by a Court [Original title: Znaczenie niezależności i bezstronności arbitra w postępowaniu arbitrażowym w świetle konstytucyjnego prawa do sądu]
[in:] Józef Okolski, Andrzej Całus, Maksymilian Pazdan, Stanisław Sołtysiński, Tomasz Wardyński, Stanisław Włodyka (ed.) Essays in Honour of 60 years of the Court of Arbitration at the Polish Chamber of Commerce in Warsaw [Księga pamiątkowa 60-lecia Sądu Arbitrażowego przy Krajowej Izbie Gospodarczej w Warszawie], Warszawa 2010, p. 376-384
Key issues:
arbitrator
id 30675
Skoczylas Józef
Arbitration in the Amendment to the Civil Procedure Code of 28 July 2005 [Original title: Sądownictwo arbitrażowe w nowelizacji kodeksu postępowania cywilnego z 28 lipca 2005 r.]
[in:] Jan Olszewski (ed.), Arbitration and Mediation. Current Theoretical and Practical Problems of Functioning of Arbitral Tribunals and Mediation Institutions. Conference Materials (Nałęczów Zdrój 8 - 10.05.2009) [Arbitraż i mediacja. Aktualne problemy teorii i praktyki funkcjonowania sądów polubownych i ośrodków mediacyjnych. Materiały konferencyjne (Nałęczów Zdrój 8 - 10.05.2009 r.)], Rzeszów 2009, p. 349-362
Key issues:
general works
id 30966
Skrzypczak Rafał
The Institution of Exclusion, Revocation and Resignation of an Arbitrator under Polish Law [Original title: Instytucja wyłączenia, odwołania i ustąpienia arbitra w prawie polskim]
[in:] Prace laureatów konkursu na najlepszą pracę magisterską dotyczącą problemów sądownictwa polubownego i mediacji im. prof. dr. hab. Jerzego Jakubowskiego, edycja czwarta [Works of the Winners of Prof. Jerzy Jakubowski Contest for the Best M.A. Thesis concerning the Issues of Arbitration and Mediation, Fourth Edition], Warszawa 2009, p. 435-539
Key issues:
arbitrator
id 30921
Slate II William K.
Arbitration Ethics in the United States
[in:] Piotr Nowaczyk, Sylwester Pieckowski, Jerzy Poczobut, Andrzej Szumański, Andrzej Tynel (ed.), Polish and International Commercial Arbitration at the Threshold of the 21st Century. Essays in Honour of Dr Tadeusz Szurski [Międzynarodowy i krajowy arbitraż handlowy u progu XXI wieku. Księga pamiątkowa dedykowana doktorowi habilitowanemu Tadeuszowi Szurskiemu], Warszawa 2008, p. 181-193
Key issues:
arbitrator
id 30997
Stefanowicz Krzysztof
Arbitration Landscape in Poland - a Subjective View
[in:] Beata Gessel-Kalinowska vel Kalisz (ed.), Arbitration in Poland, Warszawa 2011, p. 9-18, [also Polish version]
Key issues:
general works
id 30782
Szumański Andrzej
Arbitrators and the Adjudicating Panel [Original title: Arbitrzy i zespół orzekający]
[in:] Andrzej Szumański (ed.), The System of Commercial Law. Commercial Arbitration. Volume 8, Chapter 8 [System Prawa Handlowego. Arbitraż handlowy. Tom 8, Rozdział 8], Warszawa 2009, p. 357-497
Key issues:
arbitrator
id 31027
Szumański Andrzej
Possible Impact of the 2010 UNCITRAL Arbitration Rules on the Polish Arbitration Law (Selected Issues) [Original title: Możliwy wpływ regulaminu arbitrażowego UNCITRAL w wersji z roku 2010 na polskie prawo arbitrażowe (zagadnienia wybrane)]
[in:] J. Gudowski, K. Weitz (ed.), Aurea praxis, aurea theoria. Księga pamiątkowa ku czci Profesora Tadeusza Erecińskiego, tom II [Aurea praxis, aurea theoria. A Commemorative Volume in Honour of Professor Tadeusz Ereciński, Vol. II], Warszawa 2011, p. 1871-1897
Key issues:
general works
id 30683
Szumański Andrzej
The System of Commercial Law. Commercial Arbitration. Volume 8 [Original title: System Prawa Handlowego. Arbitraż handlowy. Tom 8]
Warszawa 2009, pp. 1200
Key issues:
general works
id 30437
Szurski Tadeusz
On the Status of the Arbitrator in International Commercial Arbitration [Original title: O statusie arbitra w międzynarodowym arbitrażu handlowym]
[in:] Kazimierz Lankosz (ed.), Current Problems of International Law in Contemporary World. Book in Memory of Prof. Marian Iwanejko [Aktualne problemy prawa międzynarodowego we współczesnym świecie. Księga pamiątkowa poświęcona pamięci Profesora Mariana Iwanejko], Kraków 1995, p. 177-192
Key issues:
arbitrator
id 30945
Tomaszewski Maciej
2010 UNCITRAL Arbitration Rules [Original title: Regulamin Arbitrażowy UNCITRAL 2010]
Arbitration e-Review 2010, No. 3, p. 5-15
Key issues:
general works
id 31045
Tomaszewski Maciej
Challenge of an Arbitrator and the Mode of Consideration Thereof [Original title: Wniosek o wyłączenie arbitra i tryb rozpoznania wniosku]
PS 2012, No. 2, p. 25-45
Key issues:
petition to set aside arbitration award,
arbitrator
id 30357
Tomaszewski Maciej
Effectiveness of Legal Protection before Arbitration Courts. Polish Experience [Original title: Skuteczność ochrony prawnej przed sądami polubownymi. Doświadczenia polskie]
PS 2006, No. 1, p. 34-64
Key issues:
arbitrator,
arbitration award,
arbitration court procedure,
recognition and enforcement of domestic arbitration award,
recognition and enforcement of foreign arbitration award,
state court assistance
id 30173
Tomaszewski Maciej
Reasons for Challenge of an Arbitrator under the Polish Law [Original title: Przyczyny wyłączenia arbitra w świetle prawa polskiego]
[in:] Piotr Nowaczyk, Sylwester Pieckowski, Jerzy Poczobut, Andrzej Szumański, Andrzej Tynel (ed.), Polish and International Commercial Arbitration at the Threshold of the 21st Century: A Commemorative Volume in Honour of Dr Tadeusz Szurski [Międzynarodowy i krajowy arbitraż handlowy u progu XXI wieku. Księga pamiątkowa dedykowana doktorowi habilitowanemu Tadeuszowi Szurskiemu], Warszawa 2008, p. 245-260
Key issues:
arbitrator
id 30691
Tynel Andrzej
Authority for Substitutive Arbitrator Appointment [Original title: Organ zastępczej nominacji arbitrów]
[in:] Andrzej Janik (ed.), Studies and Papers. Anniversary Book Dedicated to Professor Andrzej Całus [Studia i rozprawy. Księga jubileuszowa dedykowana profesorowi Andrzejowi Całusowi], Warszawa 2009,
Key issues:
arbitrator
id 31030
Wiśniewski Andrzej W.
Independence and Impartiality of Arbitrators in the Light of the Polish Law and International Practice [Original title: Niezależność i bezstronność arbitrów w świetle prawa polskiego i praktyki międzynarodowej]
[in:] J. Gudowski, K. Weitz (ed.), Aurea praxis, aurea theoria. Księga pamiątkowa ku czci Profesora Tadeusza Erecińskiego, tom II [Aurea praxis, aurea theoria. A Commemorative Volume in Honour of Professor Tadeusz Ereciński, Vol. II], Warszawa 2011, p. 1961-1986
Key issues:
arbitrator
id 31015
Wiśniewski Andrzej W.
International Commercial Arbitration in Poland. The Legal Status of Arbitration and Arbitrators [Original title: Międzynarodowy arbitraż handlowy w Polsce. Status prawny arbitrażu i arbitrów]
Warszawa 2011, pp. 612
Key issues:
general works
id 30989
Wolak-Danecka Anna
Arbitration in the Czech Republic [Original title: Arbitraż w Republice Czeskiej]
Biul. Arb. 2010-2011, No. 4, p. 71-81
Key issues:
general works
id 40002
Buchman Louis B.
How to select an arbitrator? »
Publication arbitraz.laszczuk.pl
Key issues: arbitrator
id 50047
Bilewska Katarzyna, Paczoska Dorota
ADR. Arbitraż i Mediacja 2009, No. 1
Key issues: arbitrator
id 50120
Flejszar Radosław
Arbitrator - Judge of Choice [Arbiter - sędzia z wyboru] »
ADR. Arbitraż i Mediacja 2010, No. 4
Key issues: arbitrator